ubiquitin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 4,951 through 5,000 (of 5,346 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Where can I find the "vidui of a shchivmera?" #1034005
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    google it. Thats what I did when asked to say it with someone. (The short version is one line “tehei mesasis kaparha al kol avanosai” if possible there is a longer paragraph that begins “modeh ani.” If possible the same vidui as yom kippur is said)

    Besuros Tovos and Gemar chasima Tova

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199764
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Mazel Tov Haifagirl, that in no way changes anything else said on this thread.

    Also thos earent the only two times you heard the word used, this thread is riddled with it.

    in reply to: Simchas Torah and women #1035659
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Lior Your concert example is silly.

    I’m fairly certain you would leave a concert in the middle if half the audience was allowed on stage to participate and join in the concert while you were told you can stand on chair and peer through at everybody else through a partition. No ammount of convincing you that you are more special than the others thats why you dont need to participate in the concert would convince you to stay.

    I’m not saying you’re worng, just that your comparison is silly

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199746
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    DY I asked for a source that poor people are insulted by the term “polite society” This has not been provided. Feel free to scroll back (I was careful to phrase it that way)

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199738
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    DY i define it that way too

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199735
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    DY offensive intent as opposed to “flame retardent” when used with offensive intent (directed at the “dolt”) it is offensive to the developmentaly delayed (becasue they don’t like it used that way as elaborated above) That is what I meant.

    Randomex, Menaes was not my best example, it was the one the mods allowed through. There is an element of arbitrariness that (any) society assigns to words.

    At any rate, “retarted” isn’t arbitraily offensive as I explained above, so my point regarding meanes is not vital

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199725
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    DY “I didnt mean intend to offend developmentally delayed people.

    What did you mean by “intend”?”

    All I meant was what Randomex said.

    That being said, it could alos be understood the way you seem to have understood that I am not accusing anypne of INTENDING to insult the developmentaly delayed. They are however (generally speaking) insulted by usage of the term even if the intent is not to offend THEM

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199719
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    rebyid, I have mentioned a couple times you are free to be offensive, if you dont care to be polite by all means use any word you feel like. I never assmued everybody wants to be polite, I am well aware that many don’t care.

    DY, we arent discussing how term originated. We are discussing thow they are percieved today in 2014. In fact “retarded” originated as a polite way to replace the term “imbecile” that in no way changes the way it is percieved today.

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199710
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    DY “I honestly don’t think they’re reading the CR. Their families might be, but if they’re normal (i.e. not hypersensitive), they shouldn’t be offended, as catch yourself said.”

    I dont think you get to decide what should and shouln’t offend a large number of people.

    When my moniker was used s a synonym for “retarded” as in any body who disagrees with that poster is “retarded (=) developmentally delayed, … (=) idiotic, (=) dolty, (=) ubiquitin-ey, (=) asinine, (=) insane,(=) bi-polar, (=)depressed, …” I was hurt . (The first time was funny, but then repeated three times in one post, hurt a little, I have sinceforgiven I am just using it to illustarte my point. Having your name used as a put down to others and as a synonym for “idiotic” doesnt feel good. It is not hard to understand why those with a condition are offended when their (or their family member’s) condition is used to insult others as a synonym for “idiotic.”

    And again it doesnt matter, if they find it offensive then just don’t use it (if you want to be percived as polite) Whether or not they are being hypersensitve.

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199709
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    DY. I didnt mean intend to offend developmentally delayed people. I doubt that is the case, they do however find it offensive when it is used as a way to offend others. They dont mind when it is used in a flame-retardent sense.

    In contrast the n-word is considred offensive in all conotations. They do take offense if you said Yankel’s Hat is “n–ger” even though technicaly it is the latin term for black. Offenive/polite terms are decided by society.

    Rape is uncouth in (most) yeshivish circles. although the hebrew term (even in ISarael) is not.

    “retarded” is considred impolite. Though not in every usage.

    The n word is offensive in every usage.

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199707
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Popa, Do poor people take offense at the term “polite society”?

    Can you provide a source (that they take offense, I have nevr heard that. (In fact when I used the term I included many polite poor poeople)

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199703
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    DY you asked:

    “Offensive to whom?”

    To developmentally delayed people. Just to be clear, they are the ones being offended (and their families, though as catch yourself points out not all families)

    “Polite society defined how, as people who don’t use the r word?”

    Defined as people who want to be sensitive to other’s (especially those with developmental delays) feelings.

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199699
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Akuperma lots of translation s are imperfect.

    And of course in hebrew they dont have these “sensitivities” they simply use the hebrew word for rape. We have decided rape is improper .there is no inherent logic, in some circles it is not yhat watway as in popas elementary school.

    Ask a developmentaly delayed person or their family if they

    Mind the word retarted. They are the ones being offended not me

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199687
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Thanks popa, I did find it humorous at first three times in your last post was a bit much.

    Reb yid, its not about you. If polite society were to deem the word tissue offensive then it would be offensive

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199683
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    DY as to your question “So why can’t popa and I use the “R” word?”

    you can but it is considered offensive.

    Polite society has deemed the word not-refined/insensitive.

    Why when learning Kesubas can I say “Me’anes” but not the English equivalant. We a a society have arbitrary decided that in polite-yeshivish society we don’t use the English equivalent.

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199680
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Oh please popa. This whole discussion is about the use of the word “retarded” with offensive intent!

    That is why DY’s comment is immaterial. In cases such as “retard growth “or flame retardent” there is no offensive intent so it is not offensive.

    You are so trying to offend that you are insulting my moniker, and by extention me personally simply because you disagree. You certainly have every right to. But please don’t claim you don’t have offensive intent.

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199667
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Veltz and when people find “developmentaly delayed” offensive it too will be offensive.

    Sensibilities change all the time the n word was once acceptable as was oriental, tbings change sensibilities change. If you dont care and want to use a word that those involved find offensive by all means do so. If you want to he sensitive avoid using words they find offensive. I dont get the debate.

    Are we discussing if they find the word offensive?

    Are we really discussing if we should avoid a word that developmentaly delayed people find offensive?

    And popa thanks for proving my point

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199664
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    DY, if a significant number of people here found ubiquitin offensive then yes I probably would stop (I’ll bet the mods would force it if people found it offensive). If just a Daas Yachid found it offensive I would say batlo daa’to

    (I’m not sure what a significant number is 51%? 75%? 90?)

    in reply to: If you think the R word is offensive you are retarded #1199654
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    It is offensive because people who are developmentally delayed (and their families) find it offensive. If deaf people found the term “deaf” offensive then it would too would be offensive.

    I don’t know why people have trouble with this. similarly If native Americans find the term “redskin” offensive then it is offensive it doesnt matter how long the term has been used. You don’t have to care you are free to use offensive terms such as retarded and redskins, but we dont get to dictate what should and shouldn’t offend people. If they are offended then by definition it is offensive, whether or not the person using the term meant nay offense.

    in reply to: Bracha for Breadcrumbs/Cro�tons in salads #1030835
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    So what is the problem? You need to wash n’tilas yadayim for bread too.

    Is there no water available?

    in reply to: Baby Boomer Shidduch Crisis #1029518
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Watch the good Doctor’s bait and switch :”Anecdotal evidence suggests that most single men in the various circles of Orthodox Jewry today have long lists of potential shidduchim and continuous dating opportunities. At the same time, many single women struggle with short lists and relatively infrequent dating.”

    He then switches to a discussion regarding matching which is 1:1. Dating however is not 1:1. a guy generally dates more than one girl before he gets married. Thus while the rest of his piece is intersting it, in no way explains the problem he introduced in the opening paragraph

    (DY I know you know this already I’m just sharing for some of the newcomers)

    in reply to: Is it wrong?…… #1029300
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Yes it is wrong that he hid it for so long.

    in reply to: Baby Boomer Shidduch Crisis #1029508
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    DY i can identify the “other factors”

    It is becasue we have a system where we expect a couple to develop a relatonship prior to mariage, yet make it exceedingly diffcult for the two to actually meet in an attempt to start a relationship.

    The above was not the case 40 years ago, nor is it the case among chasidim. THAT is the real casue of the crises.

    Anything that will get more people going out, get girls more dates, eliminate the amount of hoops people jump through to get a couple to just meet and essentially begin the process, will help resolve the process. (or conversely setting them up and just have them amrry and develop a relationship later)

    Continuing the process we have now but with a closer age will do NOTHING to resolve the real issues.

    in reply to: Baby Boomer Shidduch Crisis #1029499
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    yikimpurkan.

    As others have explained it is becasue then they had more oppurtunities to meet. More meeting = more “dates” = more marriages (when that is the goal of dating) it is that simple.

    Furthermore the amount of hoops that had to be jumped through just to get two people to go out where no-existant.

    As for chasidim it is simpler becasue while they do a lot of checking, once that is complete the shiduch is basically done, the couple meeting is a formality and rarley is a shiduch not gone through after the couple meets.

    Strict matching of singles works, lots of dating works. Somehow we have combined the bad aspects of both and created a disaster that did not exist 50 years ago.

    It has (almost) nothing to do with an “age gap” TM

    in reply to: Rechnitz – There is no Shidduch Crisis #1043181
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Squeak, im inclined to agree,

    However i’ll bet unless ALL boys are marrying girls closer to their age (Something whihc can obviously never happen) the “age gap” TM proponets will still point to those few examples as the cause of the crises.

    And DY, that is not true. That point i made then was never answered. I am hoping with some new faces here perhaps one of them can help. I wasnt asking you since you were stumped by it last year, I dont expect you to have an answer now. Thanks though

    in reply to: Rechnitz – There is no Shidduch Crisis #1043170
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Be truthful, I still don’t get it

    So the “solution” is to create a reverse gap where the boys are outnumbered and so dessparte to get married that they no longer care for looks and money?

    How long do you imagine this taking?

    Besides, as MAlim said. How on earth can a “solution” work, when the premise is that guys should give up the advantage?

    Furthermore, keep in mind new girls are turning 18 every day. IF the only change is the age of guys going out to the extent that they outnumber the girls, there will still be another girl tommrorow and the day after. The dating pool is dynamic. Unless you solve the crux of the issue (which you identified part of) you will never solve out the problem

    in reply to: New York, NY has a great frum community #1028975
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Takah mamash, now this will really blow your mind

    There is actually more than one C”Y ice cream store!!

    (unless you mean youve had them all, in which gcase, grewta news there is non-chalv yisroel ice cream too)

    in reply to: Rechnitz – There is no Shidduch Crisis #1043166
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    It has been a while since we last discussed this, but nas I have not gotten a meaningful reply I’ll try again:

    Here is my question,

    The root of the “age gap” TM theory is that there are more girls per guys in the effective dating pool, and threfore many of them are doomed to remain single.

    Now, when asking around practicaly speaking what are the effects of the “shiduch crises” The problem I hear is girlds are not getting dates. While a guy m,ay go out on severla nights with diffrenntg irls, many girls are sitting at home waiting for a date.

    Now this is where the “age gap” TM falls apart. Dating is NOT done 1:1. As mentioned above a guy goes out with severla differnt girls before he finds “the one” and marries that one. so even if 100 guys are dating 110 girls, granted 10 would rmeain single, butthe 100 guys are providing at on average 400 dates (I estimate an average of 4 girls per guy feel fre to say it is higher or lower I dont have hard data). 400 DATES is enough for all 110 girls. The girls should all be getting dates, yet some remain unmarried, but this does not seem to be the case. Girls say thye are not getting dates.

    The “age gap” TM can not be the casue of the above (granted it may exacerbate the problem).

    Or am I missing something?

    in reply to: Really "Creative" Names #1027091
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    147 how on earth did you arrive at that conclusion?

    Maybe it means we consider ourselves more indecisive than people in TeNach and can’t settle on one name so we choose two.

    Or it means we have family members who would be more insulted than poeple in Tenach if “their” name is given so people choose two

    I cna think of a few other scenarios that are more logical than the one you came up with.

    in reply to: Trivia..What are the 3 rarest Haftorahs #1024384
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    42 Ive calculated those too:

    dirshu is recited 500% of the time (i.e exactly 5 times every eyar)

    Rani vesimchi chanukah Behaloscha every year = 200%

    Rani akarah 100% during 7 d’nechemta + noach (68%)= 168%

    Hashamayim Kisi can be said, 3, 2, 1 or never during ayear averaging to 162.7 %

    Ditto for Macher chadosh though it is less than Hashamyim Kisi at 110.3% 9I have to double check this one since i had a mistake in Kedoshim as rwndk1 pointed out above.

    The seventh day Pesach (100%) is same as Haazeinu (if not shabbas shuvah (39.5%) for a total of 139.5%

    Interestingly Vayakehl is also the haftorah for second shabbos Chanukah but both of these are uncommon (10.6% during shabbos Vayakehl + 18.4% for second Shabbos chanukah = 30%)

    [I only included repeated haftorahs not pesukim, i left out those who say a posuk of Machar chodesh if entire haftorah isnt said)

    As for the Parshas you listed:

    Tetzaveh isnt that rare as it is read every leap year, and in one non leap year 41.2%

    Ki sisa read every leap eyar and TWO non-leap years 58.2%

    Mishpatim is rarer since can also be Rosh chodesh Adar 1 or machar chodesh adar 1 so while in leap eyar it isnt a daled parsha it is still only said 23.9%. Uncommon but not quite among the Most uncommon.

    in reply to: Trivia..What are the 3 rarest Haftorahs #1024380
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    rwndk1 You are right Tzav is rare however it is not one of the 3 rarest (it is fourth).

    It is read in a leap year when Pesach is shabbos or Sunday occurs about 13.9%. (In Yerushalyim it might be rarer)

    Pinchas is less common (interestingly one year heh-ches-aleph has both at 3.9% this is one of the rarest calendar possibilities.

    in reply to: Trivia..What are the 3 rarest Haftorahs #1024378
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    yachad Thanks! I made a mistake.

    Kedoshim is in fact read only in the year you identified zayin-ches-gimmel which occurs 5.8%

    Thank you

    in reply to: Trivia..What are the 3 rarest Haftorahs #1024366
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Jay, not quite.

    For example Year zayin-ches-gimmel (last occurred 5757, will next occur 5784)is a leap year during which Pesach is tuesday and yet Pinchos is the first of the three weeks (as it usually is )and those the Haftorah for Pinchas is not read.

    Pinchas is read before the three weeks when Shabbos hagadol is Metzorah (as opposed to Acherei)This occurs in leap years Years when R”H is Thursday.

    You are right about Chu”l which is where I live so that is what I focussed on. In E”Y it is more common since in years when Acharon Shel PEsach is Shabbos They read Pinchas before the Three weeks

    in reply to: Trivia..What are the 3 rarest Haftorahs #1024363
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Calculated over 600,000 years. The rarest is miketz read 10.1% (when rosh hashana is shabnos and year is chaser.)

    Pinchas is 10.6% (a leap year when rosh hashana ws Thursday)

    Kedoshim is read 11.1 % of time

    Tazria is slightly more at 16% (read in leap year when rosh hashana was shabbos or monday and year is chaser)

    in reply to: Trivia..What are the 3 rarest Haftorahs #1024361
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    The rarest are: kedoshim, pinchas, and mikeitz. The exact frequency depends how you calculate are about 10% (less if you calculate based on how often they occur on tge tur’s 247 year cycle, however as meforshim point out this cycle isnt perfect.)

    Tazria us closer to 16%. Vayakhel is rare as well, however this haftora is also for second shabbos chanuka so it is not quite as infrequent as would be.

    in reply to: Famous Mosquitoes #1023895
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Two of my favorites:

    1) FDR after Pearl harbor quoted as “Yesterday December 7th, 1941 a DAY that will live in infamy…”

    What he actually said was “…a DATE that will live in infamy…”

    his speach in both audio and his typed copy are available online to see/hear. I have even seen it mis-quoted in some books.

    (as an aside a day living onin infamy doesn’t make sense as the day is gone. However what he was saying is the DATE DECEMBER 7th 1941, will live on in infamy, and he was right as it certainly does)

    2) Neil Armstrong on the moon “That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind” This quote as heard on the recording and often repeated is nonsense as MAN and MANKIND are essentially synonyms. What he meant to say (and insists he did say, and to be fair the audio isnt clear) was “Thats one small step for A man (i.e. him) one giant leap for mankind.” (as should be obvious “A man” is not a synonym to “Mankind”)

    in reply to: the shidduch system #1202965
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Being Real, of course you are right. Several other ideas have been suggested as well over the years.

    The problem is that as a very conservative commuminty every body is afraid of doing soemthing dfiferent. This goes for the leadership as well.

    With years of talk about “shiduch crises” the big solution that has bee proposed is to have boys date girls closer in age, as if this small silly issue even addresses the real issues. (As an aside it hardly seems like a crises if the entire solution is to encourage more pople to do what many have already been doing)

    However what it does do is gives people the ability to say “See we are doing something, lets hold off any good ideas until we see if this helps”

    in reply to: Sefer Chasidim – english translation #1023659
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    out of curiosity, what do you consider a reasonable price for what sounds like an unavailble one of a kind item?

    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Nope oomis, that was all me.

    Please don’t let that distract from the crux of my point though.

    In fact perhaps it can add:

    I cant just reply well “It depends on how you perceive the fifth and sixth letters of the word” Spelling, like math, has rules. and “percieve” is simply wrong; much as any response other than 14 is simply wrong as a solution to the OP’s problem.

    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Oomis, the beauty of math is there is no such thing as “depends how you percieve it” there are strict rules as several posters have explained. following PEMDAS the answer is 14 ANY other response is simply wrong.

    in reply to: D-day and hallel #1018661
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    To b, the gemara in a few places goes through criteria for saying hallel on a nes. One of them is a bes in e”y.

    in reply to: D-day and hallel #1018654
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Did D-day occur in E”Y?

    in reply to: Halacha open table discussion on a specific Shailo #1017083
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    simcha rethink this sentence

    “The old shtender was worth $10 but there is no market for old shtenders”

    There is either no market or it is worth $10 it cant be both

    in reply to: ??????? ?? ???? ????? #1010239
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    eleh mai…..

    in reply to: Open Letter To… #1006592
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Frogggie, i dont think you know what an opne letter is

    in reply to: Mishloach Manos Themes #1005895
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    My theme is an oldie but classic

    Im sending a basket full of ginger and a cup filled with long peepers. The theme is sharp.

    in reply to: BTL Advice and Planning #1004929
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    BY maidel

    I am not saying the information is useless. All I (and health) are saying is that the reason why (some) med schools require say organic chemistry and physics is, as one admissions officer told me “To separate the men from the boys” (All were doctors though only two were physicians the other was a PHD)It is not necessary for med school and even less necessary for medicine

    in reply to: BTL Advice and Planning #1004927
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Ffg

    Do me a favorfile away this conversation in your head and please get back to me in a year I’m curious if you still feel the same way

    don’t worry while you will be busy you will have some time for yeshiva world

    in reply to: BTL Advice and Planning #1004922
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    FFG I did speak to addmisions officers All three said it was just measure iteligence.

    Bis yakov maidel

    You can pick up what you need to know in med school. You cite a few examples barely any of which are valid (Eg the average physician does not need to know how an MRI works nor does he/she)and Besides those can be taught in med school. It doesnt help the orthopedst much that he learnt young’s modulus at least 5 years prior to becoming an orthopedist. By the time it would become relevant it has long been forgotten. Ditto for your ophthalmologist example.

    Even half of what you study the first year has zero real world application and will never be revisted by the average physician once step one is behind you.(think memorizing steps in Krebs cycle)

    I happen to think those subjects are important in of themselves. But they have little to no application in the understanding or practice of real world medicine

    in reply to: BTL Advice and Planning #1004919
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    FFG that is nonsesne. Could you please provide an example of how the uderlying principle behind synthesizing a Grignard reagent (or any of your examples) is even a little (let alone “pretty”) important in medicine.

    Health’s assesmsnt is entierly correct. (alhough granted he essentially replied “No to BYM’s question)

    Good luck in the match

Viewing 50 posts - 4,951 through 5,000 (of 5,346 total)