Sam2

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 6,651 through 6,700 (of 7,493 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Everything is in the Torah #820742
    Sam2
    Participant

    Gefen: While everything is found in Torah, I don’t think it’s found in the random printing of some Siddurim. Also, I think your Remez from Koheles is a bad one from context.

    in reply to: Kiddush Hashem or Chillul Hashem? #821474
    Sam2
    Participant

    So I can’t find the Gemara I was thinking of but there are a few Gemaras at the end of Yoma that mention that doing things that make Jews or Rabbis look bad constitutes a Chilul Hashem.

    in reply to: Kiddush Hashem or Chillul Hashem? #821468
    Sam2
    Participant

    The Gemara defines a Chilul Hashem as doing something Assur in front of Jews (I think 10 but it might be 3).

    in reply to: Lack of Ashkenaz Siddurim #830876
    Sam2
    Participant

    Shein: He said they could, not should.

    in reply to: The B110 Bus #821755
    Sam2
    Participant

    Shein: What makes you think that Hashem wants men and women on separate areas of a bus?

    in reply to: Stuff Stolen from Judaism #820379
    Sam2
    Participant

    Engagement rings.

    in reply to: Drinking on Simchas Torah #820441
    Sam2
    Participant

    Shein: That doesn’t work for things like this. If you claim that there is a religious responsibility to give minors hard liquor (even on Purim) you will be laughed at and arrested.

    in reply to: Should Jews Give Candy This Coming Monday Night? #1105053
    Sam2
    Participant

    M80: I would Ta’anah that the custom of many to wear full customs on Purim nowadays as actually taken from the Goyim by Halloween.

    There is no Avodah and no celebration in kids asking for candy. It’s not a religious service at all. In fact, most kids going out and asking for candy probably aren’t religious anyway. There should be nothing Assur about giving them the candy unless you are worried about Lo Sechonem.

    in reply to: Lubavitch #820226
    Sam2
    Participant

    M80: That could be. I am not familiar with the Rosh Yeshivah. I am familiar with the site and it is a disgusting place run by those with an illogical and visceral hatred for Chabad that goes far beyond normal Kana’us.

    in reply to: Lubavitch #820223
    Sam2
    Participant

    M80: Nothing from that website should ever be called “illuminating”. That site is Mamash Sinas Chinam, regardless of the legitimate Ta’anos that exist against Chabad.

    in reply to: Lubavitch #820217
    Sam2
    Participant

    BTGuy: Unfortunately (or fortunately, probably) you apparently haven’t met any Yechiniks. They are a problem. How serious a problem is a very good Halachic question. Interestingly enough, those who deny that he is dead is probably less of a Halachic problem than those who think they will come back. Those who deny he is dead are denying reality. Those who think he will come back are altering a basic tenet of Judaism.

    in reply to: (??????? (????? ????? #852203
    Sam2
    Participant

    Jothar: I would say that unless you hold like the Chochmas Adam (who says there is no Bittul by Heter B’heter) then it should be okay. At the time you do the Bittul you are not being Mevatel any Issur.

    in reply to: Lubavitch #820215
    Sam2
    Participant

    Mdd: The Gemara does not quite say that so clearly. Also, one opinion in the Gemara is that Moshiach won’t come. Holding like that is Apikorsus, wouldn’t you agree?

    in reply to: Drinking on Simchas Torah #820432
    Sam2
    Participant

    Plenty of places make Kiddush before dancing. And if they don’t, the guys just break out the whiskey and make Kiddush on that before/during dancing.

    in reply to: (??????? (????? ????? #852199
    Sam2
    Participant

    Why is Avid Lechazusa not Nikar Ha’issur?

    in reply to: "Harei At" #820350
    Sam2
    Participant

    Plenty of out-of-town places as well as in a lot of places when people are dating it’s normal, even though you know you’re not being Mekadesh or even getting engaged yet.

    in reply to: "Harei At" #820348
    Sam2
    Participant

    OOT: It’s brought down in some Poskim that the reason boys don’t send Shalach Manos to girls is because there is a Chashash Kiddushin. That might still apply in many communities today but there are also plenty of places where it would be normal for boys to send girls gifts and therefore there is no Chashash Kiddushin.

    Her Rabbonim could have told her to explicitly state before taking any of the Shalach Manos that she is not accepting Kiddushin by taking these. That would also work.

    in reply to: (??????? (????? ????? #852197
    Sam2
    Participant

    Jothar: It’s not Derech Bishul, it’s not on the fire, and there’s no Kli Rishon. There is no Issur of Bishul Basar B’Chalav in that case.

    How is that Bittul Lechatchila? Assuming there is no taste you should say “Ein Adam Oser Es Davar She’aino Shelo”, shouldn’t you?

    It’s Halachically Treif (I assume) because you have no one being Me’id that it’s Kosher. Maybe if there was strict FDA enforcement on 100% canola oil (I have no idea if there is) and rules about the way it’s processed, etc. then you could consider the packaging saying 100% canola oil as being Mesiach Lefi Tumo and it would be Kosher?

    in reply to: Lubavitch #820203
    Sam2
    Participant

    In my experience with Chabad (and I have quite a bit), the Messianist movement is overblown by a lot of outside people. It could be that in certain communities there are high numbers of people with problematic beliefs, but I think the average Chabadnik does not believe that the Rebbe is still alive or necessarily is still Moshiach (they almost all think that he could be though).

    Also, it’s a little hard to call believing that a dead man can be Moshiach Apikorsus. We might not hold that it’s true, but it’s hard to call it Kefira just because a dead man cannot do everything the Rambam describes in the Sefer Hamitzvos. It is not a belief that we want to let permeate into basic Judaism, but I don’t think we can call it Apikorsus.

    in reply to: The B110 Bus #821730
    Sam2
    Participant

    There is a T’shuvah in both the Tzitz Eliezer (seen it inside) and Igros Moshe (never seen it but heard it from a reliable source) that it’s Muttar to sit next to a woman on a bus. I agree with Zahavasdad’s question. How is this not a Chilul Hashem?

    in reply to: (??????? (????? ????? #852192
    Sam2
    Participant

    Jothar: You would take a small bite of the dairy so as not to have a Bracha Levatala and then you do not eat more. (I believe Rav Schachter quotes that from R’ Akiva Eiger but if it’s within the first hour you can’t eat it. He quotes from the Zohar that within one hour is a real Issur D’Rabannan but after that is just a minhag and the Minhag can’t force you to make a Bracha Levatala.)

    Yes, you can throw the hot pizza out.

    No, The Issur of Bishul Basar B’chalav only applies to Basar Beheima Tehora Bechalav. There is a Machlokes Haposkim about Neveilah Utreifa. But Beheima Temei’ah everyone agrees is Muttar to cook Bechalav and Muttar Behana’ah. (There is also no Issur of Basar Bechalav if you would eat it but it’s obviously Assur because you ate pork.)

    in reply to: Drinking on Simchas Torah #820429
    Sam2
    Participant

    Toi: I clearly said “getting drunk”, not “drinking”. Enjoy your one or two shots (or three). Don’t have more.

    in reply to: Beha"b #820571
    Sam2
    Participant

    Old Man: That’s a nice idea, but cannot be true. Olei Regel wouldn’t be fasting Behab because this Minhag started well after Churban Habayis (I think).

    in reply to: "Harei At" #820343
    Sam2
    Participant

    2qwerty: Of course you need Eidim. Kiddushin isn’t Chal unless there are two Kasher Eidim.

    It’s Mefurash in the Shulchan Aruch that a child under Bar Mitzvah cannot be Mekadesh a woman.

    in reply to: The B110 Bus #821718
    Sam2
    Participant

    Dr. Seuss: It might make zero legal difference, but people would be much less likely to complain about men sitting in the back.

    How about this? You go up to an African American and ask him to sit at the back of the bus but tell him you’re not racist because you honestly don’t see the back as being inferior. See what happens.

    in reply to: (??????? (????? ????? #852183
    Sam2
    Participant

    Jothar: Fish and meat (or fish and dairy) is not in the Simanim that Yitay is asking us to ask about as far as I know.

    in reply to: The B110 Bus #821715
    Sam2
    Participant

    Dr Seuss: Because practice in the American South until the 1960s proved that being forced to sit in the back of the bus was considered derogatory and discriminatory. The easiest solution would be to put the women in front and have a curtain halfway through. Add a rear entrance for men if you want to look super-frum.

    in reply to: Drinking on Simchas Torah #820422
    Sam2
    Participant

    Toi: Maybe I believe getting drunk is wrong because Judaism is against it?

    in reply to: "Harei At" #820325
    Sam2
    Participant

    She has to have Da’as. If it’s sudden then we might be able to assume that she didn’t.

    in reply to: Inventing Your Own [False] Gematrias #820962
    Sam2
    Participant

    Iyche: Use Im Ha’osios on the one with the Alef then Im Hateivos and Im Hakollel on the one with the Hey. They’re equal.

    in reply to: Parsha Question (Only serious answers need apply) #819830
    Sam2
    Participant

    Maybe it does. Either way it’s a good Ra’ya to the Midrash. Also, it’s a good Smach that before Matan Torah being married just meant living together.

    in reply to: Drinking on Simchas Torah #820400
    Sam2
    Participant

    So you’re saying that because they don’t want to feel left out, people can do what the Moreh Nevuchim calls the worst possible thing someone can do?

    in reply to: Chumras #819865
    Sam2
    Participant

    Obaminator: The communities accepted it upon themselves or they just wanted everyone to come so they made it separate for those who wouldn’t have come otherwise/were worried about the social repercussions if they hosted a mixed event?

    in reply to: Parsha Question (Only serious answers need apply) #819826
    Sam2
    Participant

    I would say that because the rest of the species were being wiped out (and the Midrash tells us that these animals had never been involved in any form of relations) and since the vast majority of animals do not mate with their offspring, for all intents and purposes each pair was a “husband and wife”.

    in reply to: Dear Goq, How did it go? #819578
    Sam2
    Participant

    Monopoly played by the proper rules should never take longer than 90 minutes-2 hours. You guys found ways to give out extra money, didn’t you? (The Free Parking adds at least an hour to the game.)

    in reply to: Drinking on Simchas Torah #820393
    Sam2
    Participant

    When did it become okay to be uncontrollably drunk on Purim?

    in reply to: Inventing Your Own [False] Gematrias #820958
    Sam2
    Participant

    In Chumash it’s almost always Chassier, isn’t it?

    in reply to: Chumras #819860
    Sam2
    Participant

    Obaminator: You need to define “established”. There are still many, many people and places that have mixed seating at weddings.

    in reply to: #819451
    Sam2
    Participant

    It’s a famous one where he says that if you say that Basar aChayah V’Of is Assur B’bishul with dairy Min Hatorah then you’re Over on Bal Tosif. It’s famous because it’s Soseir himself somewhere else where he Paskens that Basar Chayah B’Chalav is D’Oraisa. I’m blanking on where it is at the moment. It will come to me soon hopefully.

    in reply to: #819449
    Sam2
    Participant

    Mw13: The Rambam disagrees with you. Both of those are violations of Bal Tosif.

    in reply to: Techum shabbos/yom tov and bridges #819379
    Sam2
    Participant

    Rav Schachter and his wife used to go for walks on Shabbos. They would cross part of the George Washington bridge then stop and turn around because the bridge is farther than the T’chum.

    in reply to: #819440
    Sam2
    Participant

    I have been called a “liberal reformer” for eating gebrochts. I didn’t want to give examples, but gebrochts is a great one.

    in reply to: Making Fun of Rabbis in Purim Plays/Comedies/Videos #819589
    Sam2
    Participant

    Dr Seuss: Ona’as Devarim applies to everyone.

    in reply to: #819435
    Sam2
    Participant

    I oppose any Chumra being passed off as a Chiyuv/Issur D’Oraisa. Doing so is itself an Issur D’Oraisa of Bal Tosif.

    in reply to: Beha"b #820548
    Sam2
    Participant

    Why wouldn’t it be? Any Korban is Pasul if Shechted sitting, isn’t it?

    in reply to: Making Fun of Rabbis in Purim Plays/Comedies/Videos #819582
    Sam2
    Participant

    Why is making fun of a Rabbi different than making fun of anyone else? If you have express permission from everyone possibly affected then it might be okay. Otherwise it’s absolutely Assur, regardless of whom you are making fun of.

    in reply to: R' Jonathan Sacks #832644
    Sam2
    Participant

    Dr. Seuss: There is also a possible issue that Mishum Eivah the argument of “Eis La’asos Lahashem” might apply. I don’t think he was Matir any other Jew to go.

    in reply to: Gog vs. uMagog = Modern orthodoxy vs. Charaidism #819408
    Sam2
    Participant

    I’m not sure what your story proves. Are you saying that not putting up certain pictures shows a “middle-of-the-road Jew” attitude? There is clearly something more going on there.

    in reply to: #819428
    Sam2
    Participant

    Actually Toi, I believe I am quoting the Ramban. I believe he says that from here you need to differentiate between a Chumra and an actual Halacha so as not to come to a Michshol.

    in reply to: Tanach Trivia #1217487
    Sam2
    Participant

    Plenty of words end with an “Oh” with a Hei. The issue I believe is where there should be a Mapik in the Hey and a Kamatz but instead there is a Cholam before the Hei. I believe “Veniscoh” in Rosh Chodesh Leining is one of them. Just a guess.

Viewing 50 posts - 6,651 through 6,700 (of 7,493 total)