Obaminator

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 101 through 150 (of 172 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Great Debate: Ultra-Orthodoxy vs. Modern Orthodoxy #798598
    Obaminator
    Member

    Try this experiment: Define what is meant by someone being “Very Chareidi”, and define what is meant by someone being “very modern”.

    in reply to: Where can one find out who finances a specific organization? #798082
    Obaminator
    Member

    As Bezalel said, no private non-governmental organizations — even tax-exempt organizations — are obligated to report to anyone who funds them or how much funds they raised. The *only* exception are certain organizations engaged in political fundraising to benefit a candidate for political office.

    in reply to: Dating in the Rain #799275
    Obaminator
    Member

    She must be a real dolt.

    in reply to: Mincha and Marriv on Motzei shabbos #797487
    Obaminator
    Member

    Another lack of Kavod HaTefila I’ve noticed is that some people don’t wear a jacket (or hat) to Shachris. People that generally wear a hat and jacket during the week.

    in reply to: I moved! #797756
    Obaminator
    Member

    I just realized that PBA opened this thread Motzei Shabbos! We all know the implications of what that means…

    in reply to: new gender test #806223
    Obaminator
    Member

    yacr – you admit it is assur for a yid to to kill an ubar (fetus), you just say it is assur but not chayiv misa. Therefore by your own point, a yid *cannot* do it, since it is assur. (Even if it isn’t chayiv misa, it’s still assur for the yid.)

    in reply to: Saying "Nu!" in Middle of Davening #797456
    Obaminator
    Member

    Michael, What difference does it make if it is a Hebrew word or a word in another language? (Or even if it were a made-up word, for that matter.)

    in reply to: Saying "Nu!" in Middle of Davening #797452
    Obaminator
    Member

    Interesting, M80. I’ve always been making a kinfe-cutting hand-motion to my wife when I couldn’t find the knife. (Sometimes adding in a “nu” when the length of the pause seemed like a big hefsek.)

    in reply to: I moved! #797741
    Obaminator
    Member

    New Square

    in reply to: Saying "Nu!" in Middle of Davening #797448
    Obaminator
    Member

    After making al netilas yodayim but before making hamotzi you can say to someone “Where is the knife”?

    in reply to: I moved! #797728
    Obaminator
    Member

    You’ve addressed everyone’s location guess (which you solicited) — except MiddlePath’s guess.

    in reply to: Dating in the Rain #799264
    Obaminator
    Member

    A – Yeshivish guys are complimenting their entire lives, from childhood on. Just not inappropriate cross-gender compliments as noted above.

    B – People “like” a lot of things; that doesn’t necessarily make it appropriate.

    in reply to: I moved! #797722
    Obaminator
    Member

    Guess

    NY.

    Why’d you ignore my question??

    in reply to: The Great Debate: Ultra-Orthodoxy vs. Modern Orthodoxy #798581
    Obaminator
    Member

    They could start a new thread, if that is easier.

    in reply to: I moved! #797719
    Obaminator
    Member

    but we’re getting there.

    Who is the other party in “we’re”?

    in reply to: Dating in the Rain #799260
    Obaminator
    Member

    You’re married to her wolf, so any Yeshivish guy would do the same.

    in reply to: need to go to college #1043401
    Obaminator
    Member

    “it” is a typo that should have read “is”. “eat” was a typo that I intended to delete before submitting. “excersize” is a misspelling that you surely understood the meaning of. Replace the commas with semicolons if that makes it easier to read. And note that it is a reply to the comment immediately preceding it, namely the posters point about “because everyone else is”.

    in reply to: Dating in the Rain #799258
    Obaminator
    Member

    Another: Yehsivish guys are not above compliments, they give many compliments. But not about a girls dress or bodily features. Especially if they are not engaged or married to her.

    in reply to: The Great Debate: Ultra-Orthodoxy vs. Modern Orthodoxy #798578
    Obaminator
    Member

    Why don’t Itche and LMA start fresh, agree to the rules among themselves, and debate.

    in reply to: Dating in the Rain #799246
    Obaminator
    Member

    adorable: Once they are engaged, agreed. (But even then they shouldn’t get carried away too much.) But if they aren’t engaged, entirely off-limits.

    in reply to: I need to get this rant off my chest! #799098
    Obaminator
    Member

    Or to Five Towns, Atlanta, Milwaukee, etc. I’ve seen it all.

    in reply to: Dating in the Rain #799242
    Obaminator
    Member

    Not until you’re engaged. And even then, until you are married you shouldn’t be going too far verbally. But if you’re not engaged to her, never tell or discuss with her about her clothes, features, or prettiness.

    in reply to: Is this really "Yeshiva" world coffee room? #797026
    Obaminator
    Member

    +1

    in reply to: Dating in the Rain #799239
    Obaminator
    Member

    I think it’s inappropriate to talk to a girl you’re not married or engaged to about her clothing or her features.

    in reply to: Food Stamps #798977
    Obaminator
    Member

    If he qualifies he shouldn’t have any busha from his poverty. If he doesn’t qualify and lied to get it, he won’t have any busha anyways.

    in reply to: Dating in the Rain #799236
    Obaminator
    Member

    I don’t think it’s appropriate to tell a girl you’re not married or engaged to that she’s pretty.

    in reply to: I need to get this rant off my chest! #799082
    Obaminator
    Member

    gavra:

    The species of Chassidah is well known for helping all Jewish kind. It is very Kosher.

    in reply to: need to go to college #1043398
    Obaminator
    Member

    There’s nothing wrong to sit and learn because everyone else is, there’s nothing wrong to work because everyone else it, and there’s nothing wrong to eat excersize because everyone else is.

    All of those are the right thing to do — especially sitting and learning. So whatever the reason he is learning, it is good.

    in reply to: What makes Chaim Zieg's Chulent that desirable? #796943
    Obaminator
    Member

    An additional benefit is that it also includes free perfume for his wife. (It becomes ready by time he gets home from the station.)

    in reply to: What makes Chaim Zieg's Chulent that desirable? #796942
    Obaminator
    Member

    Ofcourse: I’m not sure how you could have missed the biggest clue of all. You did mention he sells it at his gas station. He secret ingredient is the free gas he puts in the chultent.

    in reply to: Dating in the Rain #799223
    Obaminator
    Member

    Just call him and tell him you’re cancelling.

    in reply to: WIC #798052
    Obaminator
    Member

    The government pays the retail price the store charges for the WIC items. So if you the WIC recipient customer take a larger package then technically allowed, the store will fill in the higher price on the WIC check you give him, and the government therefore pays a higher price.

    in reply to: Commiting to two dates?? #797649
    Obaminator
    Member

    Its really nice if she wants to be mentchlich about it, and she should be, but that doesn’t take away his responsibility to act like a mentch.

    She has just as much responsibility to be mentchlich as he does to be a mentch.

    in reply to: Food Stamps #798974
    Obaminator
    Member

    You should have the same busha to use a food stamp card that you have using a credit card. No more, no less.

    Should an oni be made to have busha if he pays for his milk and bread with tzedakah provided him? That’s not the Jewish way. There is a reason tzedakah is specifically given btznius.

    in reply to: The Great Debate: Ultra-Orthodoxy vs. Modern Orthodoxy #798572
    Obaminator
    Member

    How about Lomed Mkol Adam and ItcheSrulik start fresh, agree to the ground rules, and make a debate thread only they post in?

    in reply to: Sefardic Rabbonim's Hats #1101422
    Obaminator
    Member

    The dress may have been Mid East when the lived there, but since they lived in Spain before the Mid East, their traditions derive from Spain. There wasn’t any more of an unbroken chain from Yerushlayim to Spain to Iraq then there was from Yerushlayim to Ashkenaz.

    in reply to: Ir Miklat and Murder #1075988
    Obaminator
    Member

    Perhaps my wording wasn’t clear. If the din had been he goes free, even though he committed an intentional murder, I would accept that entirely. I am *only* questioning if the din is in fact like that. I believe it is not.

    in reply to: Ir Miklat and Murder #1075984
    Obaminator
    Member

    I’m questioning the claim that an intentional murderer without hasra goes scott free under beis din. I learnt the din the same way “ajewfrommonsey” explained it above.

    in reply to: Ir Miklat and Murder #1075982
    Obaminator
    Member

    And why should an intentional murderer without hasra have a better outcome than an accidental killer?

    in reply to: "Attempted Abduction" #797338
    Obaminator
    Member

    Talking to a child is not a crime. Even if they find this guy, there is nothing they can arrest or charge him with. And he doesn’t have to answer any questions under the law.

    in reply to: Sefardic Rabbonim's Hats #1101420
    Obaminator
    Member

    Sefardim came from Spain (hence “Sefardim”) before they moved to the Middle East.

    in reply to: Ir Miklat and Murder #1075979
    Obaminator
    Member

    apushatayid-

    Your understandinf of that doesn’t compute. You mentioned 3 cases:

    1. Intentional killer with warning from witnesses is brought from Ir Miklat to court, convicted, executed.

    2. Accidental killer is brought from Ir Miklat to court, determined to be accidental, sentenced to Ir Miklat.

    3. Intentional killer without warning from witnesses is brought from Ir Miklat to court, and then sent free?

    Why should Case 3 have it off when Case 2 doesn’t?

    in reply to: The Great Debate: Ultra-Orthodoxy vs. Modern Orthodoxy #798551
    Obaminator
    Member

    Mod80-

    The debate can only happen if the mods only approve posts from the two debaters in the debate thread.

    in reply to: Dear CR member, #798008
    Obaminator
    Member

    haifagirl: Were those that recognized you lurkers or regular posters here?

    in reply to: First and second generation of holocaust survivours #797411
    Obaminator
    Member

    HaLeiVi: What do you mean that some didn’t rebuild their lives? You’re referring to those that abandoned Yiddishkeit? (Like Eli Weisel.)

    Does anyone know if most of the frum survivors remained frum?

    in reply to: Commiting to two dates?? #797629
    Obaminator
    Member

    I’m not arguing over the propriety of agreeing to a second date before a first, but on the issue of travel my points are quite clear above and I maintain them. Additionally, I should add it is typical and fairly standard that the girl will travel to the guy’s city. So you may wish to fight city hall, but you wont get too far.

    On the side point, I think it is pretty clear in the shidduch world that the girls need to be more appreciative when they have a date than vice versa, considering the guys are getting a lot more requests for dates than the girls. Which is another reason it works out better for her to travel to him. She has less dates thus has less times she would need to travel. If he would need to travel for many of his dates (and he has many more than her), it would be a lot more expensive. And it would also mean out-of-town girls would get a lot less dates if they tried to force the guy to travel to her. He could date many others locally without the need for travelling time, expense, and loss of study.

    And I do believe the girls appreciate the great accomplishments her potential Choson has made in becoming a Torah scholar, and wishes to allow him uninterrupted.

    Either way this will not change as much as you disagree with it. And I think I’ve been clear enough on this issue to need not further comment.

    in reply to: wisonsin strike #796464
    Obaminator
    Member

    The Republicans won 4 of the 6 recall races today, and will be keeping control of the Wisconsin Senate. Furthermore, the Republicans might pick up another 2 seats from two Democrat Senators facing a recall election next week. But either way, the Republicans are guaranteed to keep control of the Wisconsin Senate and therefore all levels of power in Wisconsin.

    in reply to: Commiting to two dates?? #797627
    Obaminator
    Member

    I make the decisions in the house. She agrees with me.

    in reply to: #796166
    Obaminator
    Member

    Good points HaLeiVi.

    in reply to: Commiting to two dates?? #797624
    Obaminator
    Member

    Tell that to my wife.

    Anyways, I was talking about her coming in, which you seem to agree with. Not about the 2 dates agreement.

Viewing 50 posts - 101 through 150 (of 172 total)