akuperma

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 2,251 through 2,300 (of 3,414 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Why isn't the world in an uproar over #1030640
    akuperma
    Participant

    The world is in an uproar over Islamic State (not just killing a few American reporters, but large scale massacres of various Muslim minorities, non-Muslims, and massive sexual crimes against non-Muslim women). Do you expect the US to launch an invasion of the Middle East, from which the US was driven out just a few years ago?

    in reply to: Patent Lawyers #1041088
    akuperma
    Participant

    If you are good at the STEM (science, engineering, technology, and mathematics) subjects but don’t want to do them for a living, a patent lawyer is an option. Most patent lawyers work for the government, large corporations or big firms (rather than hanging out a shingle in Boro Park). Because most people going into law lack a background in STEM subjects, it is probably a good career prospect if you want to be a lawyer. The usual caveats about lawyers having trouble finding work are less applicable if you have an unusual undergraduate background and skills that are in demand.

    If you “undergraduate” is a BTL based on yeshiva credits, you are totally not in the ballpark.

    Undergraduate you should get a degree heavy in STEM (exposed to all sciences, major in one, perhaps in general engineering). Take course in technical writing since writing skills are necessary. Learn enough of government/history of the United States so you don’t make a fool of yourself.

    An elite school is probably the best for law school, though undergraduate is less critical as long as you have a strong STEM background.

    in reply to: Isis vs. klal yisrael #1030384
    akuperma
    Participant

    The war in Eretz Yisrael is a sideshow. Islamic State is not about conquering Eretz Yisrael, though if they conquer the Middle East the liklihood is that they will conquer Israel as well. In fact, many Palestinians do not favor the Islamic State/al Queda/Hamas/Muslim Bortherhood movement, and it would be rational for the zionists to reach out to those who oppose the “radical” (as the west wishes to see them) Muslims.

    in reply to: Isis vs. klal yisrael #1030375
    akuperma
    Participant

    ISIS (a.k.a. Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or increasingly Islamic State) is no less a threat to Klal Yisrael than were the Communists or Nazis. Again, from a “this world” perspective, our survival will largely depend on the Americans (without whom the Third Reich would rule the world today, or the Communists would have achieved the global dictatorship). While we would undoubtedly survive an Islamic conquest, just as we would have survived a thousand year global Reich, or a global “dictatorship of the proletariat” – suffice to say we’ll have more to worry about than which hecksher to buy and where to go on vacation.

    edited

    While the above deals with “this world” (the world of ???), frum Jews deal more with the world of ??? and have no option other than to concentrate on Torah and Mitsvos and allow Ha-Shem to take care of matters.

    in reply to: gaza #1030415
    akuperma
    Participant

    It would be almost impossible for the Gazan’s military to operate without endanger civilians. Urban warfare is like that. It’s hypocritical of them to complain that civilians are being killed, but remember from their perspective that if they don’t keep fighting the Israelis their claims will grow stale. Remember that from their perspective, Israel is increasingly weak, with tremendous internal dissent, most of the major western countries looking for a way to push them under the bus, and with the militant and revived Islam growing, the Gazans figure it is just a matter of time until they are able to retake control of Eretz Yisrael.

    in reply to: WhY iS CAPiTALIZaTIoN NEcEsSArY? #1030038
    akuperma
    Participant

    Most Roman script langauges use capitalization to make it easier to read. By capitalizing the first word of a sentence it makes it easier to locate the start of the sentence. By capitalizing proper nouns, it makes it clearer what (or who) you are talking about. People raised as Anglophones fine the semitic languages lack of capitals to be annoying.

    in reply to: Is it ever proper to withhold a get? #1032080
    akuperma
    Participant

    If the man has a valid argument against the divorce (e.g. he is madly in love with his wife and hopes she’ll change her mind), he should make the arugment to the Beis Din. However if the Beis Din told him to give the “get”, it’s a bit late.

    in reply to: Baby Boomer Shidduch Crisis #1029498
    akuperma
    Participant

    There was a disasterous shidduch crisis among the “baby boomers” – but it was among the seculars, and in particular the secular Jews. Many of the non-frum Jews of the baby boomer generation failed miserably at reproducing. As a result, subsequent generations are radically reduced. Combined with our birth rate, that “crisis” is a major reason why the percentage of Shomer Shabbos among Jews has climbed radically over the last 50 years.

    The primary “proof” of a shidduch crisis is a falling birth rate and what that results in (schools closing for lack of students, pediatricians retraining to specialize in geiatrics, etc.).

    in reply to: Is Midrash Rabbah translated by Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman kosher? #1195176
    akuperma
    Participant

    golfer:

    The binyanim are not tenses. They are actually a very easy to use device to manipulate roots. It also allows one to “invent” a word as needed, which happens all the time.

    The tenses in Hebrew are Avar and Atid, roughly equivalent to the “Past” and “future” (some would say “definite” and “indefinite”), and to simplify matters we manage to do a “present” by using a gerund. However the complex tenses in English (there are over a dozen, which are true of most Indo-European languages) have no equivalents. Whereas Indo-European langauges have very definite verb constructions, Semitic languages are “laid back” about time. The fact that Semitic languages make limited use of a very “to be” is also a serious complication.

    Hebrew closely resembles Arabic and Aramaic. Using a translation of the Rambam from Arabic to Hebrew won’t lose much, and neither will a translation from Aramaic to Hebrew. German (of R. Hirsch) is very close to English – at the time of the Gaonim, the people in England could still carry on a conversation with the people in what is now Germany since the languages weren’t that different yet – while English got a lot easier after the Norman conquest, underneath they are still very similar.

    So if someone wants to study our Sefrei Kodesh, best to learn enough of the original langauges so at least you can work with a bilingual linear translation, even if you can’t read them outright.

    in reply to: Is Midrash Rabbah translated by Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman kosher? #1195171
    akuperma
    Participant

    Is any translation “kosher” (which means fit, not necessarily as food). Is it possible to translate from Hebrew into English without losing most of the context? Hebrew is as similar to English as either language is to Chinese or Cherokee. Just consider the problem of translating between Hebrew with at most three tenses (really only two, the “present” is a gerund kludged into use as a present), and English with over a dozen very exact tenses.

    in reply to: Rechnitz – There is no Shidduch Crisis #1043128
    akuperma
    Participant

    Everyone has a shidduch crisis until they get married – always has been that way, always will be that way.

    in reply to: Jew becoming a lawyer or judge -halachic problems ✡️⚖️ #1028113
    akuperma
    Participant

    One can always be a lawyer and also avoid halachic issues, but as is often the case in many professions, respecting halacha will come with a price. Some types of legal work are clearly against halacha (e.g. assisting someone in a divorce in extorting money from the ex-spouse by refusing to give a “get” as ordered by Beis Din). Others are murky (convicting the innocent and acquitting the guilty in criminal cases). — The same is true in other professions. Just because you are a doctor doesn’t mean you have to perform (“elective”) abortions. Just because you work in the corporate world doesn’t mean you have to be an insider trader. Just because you are a professional athlete doesn’t mean you have to take prohibitted drugs. Just because you run a kosher restaurant doesn’t mean you have to compromise on kashruth. However in general, it is more profitable to be cheat than be honest – in any profession.

    If you are entering law since the subject is interesting, you can find honest work and a respectable living. If you are entering law since you think it is an easy way to get rich, you will be miserable and be sorely tempted to cheat.

    in reply to: Jew becoming a lawyer or judge -halachic problems ✡️⚖️ #1028092
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. There is always a problem if a Jew is involved in case due to a halacha that one needs to use a Beis Din. That’s the last thing most Jews want to do. One can avoid the matter by specializing an area where that isn’t an issue (administrative law including tax law, since the non-Jewish “king” is a party so Beis Din isn’t involved).

    2. Convicting the innocent and aquitting the guilty is a moral issue, but as long as you follow the rules of legal ethics, probably okay.

    3. There are halachos about oppressing the poor, but as long as you don’t want get rich, that won’t be a problem.

    in reply to: Telling about pregnancy and gender #1027578
    akuperma
    Participant

    The customs about not telling (among Jews, and others) dates back to the time when most babies didn’t make it, and you were almost as likely to be planning on attending a funeral (for the mother) rather than a bris. That is now history, ???? ???.

    akuperma
    Participant

    Actually the Brits were very close to surrendering,and surprise surprise, the same people who complain about the Israelis were the surrender-monkeys turn out to be the same groups that wanted to end the war in 1940. In 1940 the Germans offered very reasonable terms (considering that at the time the alternatives being consdiered included moving the capital of the British Empire to Canada).

    in reply to: Are you a Ka'eylah Jew? #1203244
    akuperma
    Participant

    I just noticed this topic.

    If you don’t have money for food on Hol ha-Moed, of course you can sell your hat!

    in reply to: Sakanas Nefashos #1024773
    akuperma
    Participant

    especially while flying a kite attached to a metal key

    in reply to: Yavam inheriting father who was a ger #1039555
    akuperma
    Participant

    In the real world, the father would have arranged (through a will or gifts and/or through private contractual agreements with the creditors) to protect the interests of the son who converted together with the family (regardless of how halacha characterized the relationship). This of course is irrelevant to the legal principles being discussed in the gemarra.

    As is common in any legal system in which the full details of actual cases are not reported (i.e. like almost every other legal system in the world other than the Anglo-American system), the discussion of the case in the gemarra focuses on details related to the legal issue being discussed. The real world is always messier with “facts not on point”.

    in reply to: Girl Refusing a Shidduch Because Boy is Shorter #1026930
    akuperma
    Participant

    So does the boy have a special bracha to make for having narrowly avoided a shiduch with a fool?

    in reply to: They Are Not Civilians! #1024600
    akuperma
    Participant

    frumnotyeshivish: In a democracy you are stuck with the idiots you elected, even if you don’t vote for them. Plenty of Germans never voted for Hitler or Tojo (both of whom were democratically elected). The majority of the Palestinians want a government that will resist Israel and will not give up the Palestinian claim on Eretz Yisrael – and their government does what the people want. It was their decision to build tunnels instead of bomb shelters, and rockets instead of industrial goods. — And its unfair to talk about “children” since we normally let parents decide on behalf of their children, and until recently even in the United States, a high percentage of soldiers were too young to have ever voted, so that’s no hiddush. Wars aren’t supposed to be nice or pleasant, and they almost never are.

    in reply to: Halachos of 3D Printing #1024397
    akuperma
    Participant

    It’s just a tool for manufacturing solid objects in small numbers. For large numbers, a regular factory set-up is more efficient. But, for example, to make “one” plastic fork, it doesn’t pay to do a factory run.

    All halachos of intellectual and industrial property apply.

    in reply to: They Are Not Civilians! #1024594
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. Mommies and little kids are civilians.

    2. “Human shields” implies hostage, not spectators. The videos I have seen suggest that Palestinian civilians are standing near their troops to watch. This suggests that are not “human shields” (which is a war crime), but are “fans” of the Hamas soldiers (which is very unwise)

    3. One should remember that Hamas is the democratically elected government, not a criminal organization that grabbed power. And the “terrorists” are actually the legitimate soldiers of that government. It should not be shocking that the Gazans want to wish their army well and root for “their team” .

    4. No one claims that the Gazans are especially bright or clever.

    in reply to: Discriminated against how????? #1022679
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. Most Israeli Arabs face the same sorts of job discriminantion as hareidim (being from a traditional non-western culture and not serving in the army).

    2. They are forced to speak a foreign language in dealing with the government, and are forced to deal with a government consisting almost exclusive of other groups.

    3. Many if not most Israelis wish to get them to leave the country.

    4. As with hareidim, if they give up their religion, culture and lifestyle they will no longer be discrimianted against.

    P.S. The US also disapproved of Hamas kidnapping and murdering the three Jewish boys – butg whereas Hamas is regarded as an enemy force, the Israelis are a client state (a little more independent than Puerto Rico or Guam, but less than being an independent sovereign country that could exist without American support).

    in reply to: Hunting and Judaism #1022646
    akuperma
    Participant

    Hunting for sport is clearly prohibited. Hunting for food is permitted – however you would have to capture the animals to slaughter them halachically. I’ve heard of people hunting with goyim and giving the goy the animal to eat. However I don’t think anyone would allow killing animals for fun.

    in reply to: becoming dentist coming out of full time learning #1021933
    akuperma
    Participant

    The academic requirements are similar to medical school, though with a different test. You need an undergraduate degree. A dubious yeshiva degree will work provided you take the required science courses at a reputable school – though a bechelors with premeds from a reputable school certainly help with admission.

    And do you really want to spend your life cutting up other people’s mouths.

    in reply to: NYC housing costs #1021920
    akuperma
    Participant

    Why do you have a car in a city with a well developed system of public transportation? Part of the reason you pay high prices in New York is that you don’t need the expense of a car (including car payment, insurance and operating costs).

    in reply to: Generation Gap #1021918
    akuperma
    Participant

    Adam and Chava had a real gap with their kids.

    Same for all subsequent parents.

    Maybe Ha-Shem designed it that way.

    And our world has been rapidly changing (pre and post internet; pre and post outlawing of job discrimination, etc.) so that parents often grew up in a very different world than their kids.

    in reply to: special ed degree #1022810
    akuperma
    Participant

    Do you want to be a special education teacher? If so, the answer is “yes” (but be a bit wary of a masters that doesn’t get you certifified by the government as a teacher – it might not be worth the time and money involved). Frum schools generally don’t care “bubkes” about certification, but many special education programs are structured such that you can have a publicly funded program for frum kids using (and requiring) state certified teachers. But then again, do you want to specializing in dealing with kids with serious mental and physical problems?

    in reply to: #1021714
    akuperma
    Participant

    Sam2 and Splenda: Unless the courts of a place are enforcing the requirement that a man support his wife, there is no reason for a women to refuse a “get” since the “get” is written after the man has stopped paying for her bills. If the laws requiring men to pay their wives’ bills were enforced, few men would refuse to write a “get” except in situation where they didn’t want a divorce (and if one of the partners to a marriage wants to stay married, it probably is still the time for counseling, not litigating).

    in reply to: #1021713
    akuperma
    Participant

    The original definition (“de jure”) refers to a woman whose husband is missing. In the past it was more common (men often went on long trips for business reasons, or were caught up in wars). The modern use of the term refers to a woman whose husband is refusing a court order to give a “get” (and would be easily solved, as it was in the past, by courts enforcing their orders).

    in reply to: New Yeshivas and Seminaries #1022152
    akuperma
    Participant

    It would be a sad day for someone to be capable of knowing about all the new yeshivos and seminaries. Especially since, unlike the goyim, we prefer small institutions in which the teachers know all the students, there should always so many new ones starting that no can know about all of them.

    in reply to: Why don't we reverse our sleeping habits in summer? #1021449
    akuperma
    Participant

    Sam2: We have changed the ability to work at night through improved lights. Our bodies’ design is not under our control, and being noctural (sleeping days, working nights) is problematic for one’s health.

    in reply to: Why don't we reverse our sleeping habits in summer? #1021444
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. Until recently, people often got up at sunrise, worked until mid-day, and took a nap for few hours. That custom is dying out.

    2. It’s hard to reverse one’s schedule since our bodies were designed to be diurnal.

    in reply to: Is stealing food to survive pikuach nefesh? #1021454
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. Probably not if by stealing the food someone else’s would starve to death.

    2. “Survive” does not include ice cream, nice fleisigs, wine, etc. It means enough to stay alive. Not enough to feel like you are a normal middle class consumer.

    in reply to: Best jobs with fewest hours? #1021512
    akuperma
    Participant

    Define “best”. Highest income, least stress, most enjoyable work, fewest hours, most flexible hours, most secure income. If you are paid to do anything you would do anyways even if unpaid (sit and learn all day, stay at home with children, etc.), that’s probably the best deal since the job requires no time (you would be doing it anyways) and the income is pure profit.

    in reply to: Law School- Is it a bad idea? #1020864
    akuperma
    Participant

    rebyidd23: 1) Lawyers can be very useful; 2) Unless a lawyer works for the government, a big non-profit or “Big law”, lawyers don’t have jobs – they are self-employed business people whose success largely depends on their own energies and wits.

    in reply to: Law School- Is it a bad idea? #1020862
    akuperma
    Participant

    rebyidd23 who said: “Why would anyone want to be a lawyer when they can be a marine biologist or a tailor?”

    Because they lack manual dexterity and like needles (but are good with words and logic) and don’t like fish (but do like helping people with their problems).

    in reply to: Law School- Is it a bad idea? #1020857
    akuperma
    Participant

    Veltz Meshugener: If you want to be a lawyer, go for it. There are plenty of people in need of legal services. In New York one would say “in the outer boroughs” – but really it is a function of class more than geography. The bar exam isn’t that hard – most people pass it and those who go to “bad” law schools usually do better than the “good” (probably since “bad” law schools prepare you for practice in one jurisdiction, “good” law schools are bigger on theory). If you idea of a “living wage” involves six or seven figures (US dollars, no decimal point), most lawyers don’t earn a living wage – indeed the only fields in which you get that sort of incomes are professional athletes in major league sports, seucessful businesses, and many people who follow the Madoff career tract — but if you like the idea of being a lawyer, and are content to be middle class, go for it.

    in reply to: Law School- Is it a bad idea? #1020855
    akuperma
    Participant

    If you want to be a lawyer, law school is an excellent idea (the alternative of “reading law” is only bedievad – few people do it any more). You might end up working for a big firm and get rich, you might end up with a respectable government job, and you might end up going into private practice dealing with real people (great if you feel a bit entreprenurial, and like the idea of doing what lawyers do).

    Would you want to be a lawyer if lawyers weren’t well compensated – if the answer is yes, then go to law school. If you are asking if law school is worth the time and cost in terms of getting a job which you won’t enjoy but will make you rich – the answer should be obvious. Becoming a lawyer since you think it is a meal ticket shows you are quite dumb. Pick something you enjoy and figure out how to make a profit at it.

    Especially if you prefer to be a neighborhood lawyer (rather than a Wall Street “Big law” firm type), going to a fancy law school isn’t that important. Indeed, the graduates of non-elite law schools are usually better qualified to “hang out a shingle” than those in the elite schools. The non-elite law schools are often more liberal with financial aid, and of cource, in many states there are low cost public law schools (e.g. CUNY and SUNY in New York, UB and UM in Baltimore, Rutgers in New Jersey).

    in reply to: Choosing College Major #1020746
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. Pick a career first, major based on career.

    2. If you don’t like science, and are looking for an easy major, don’t expect it to have a high income. The easier the major, the more likely it is to attract many people, and therefore the lower the pay (cf. law of supply and demand)

    in reply to: Online Learning #1020360
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. Distance Education (e.g. online courses) require a serious student, and may not be suitable for children unless the parent is closely supervising.

    2. Cost isn’t necessarily cheap for a frum family, so distance education providers generally do not give discounts based on family size or poverty – unlike frum schools

    3. Some subjects really require a teacher, such as ones involved in acquiring language skills, The more interactive the course is, the more expensive it is.

    4. Unless someone is hooking your house up with their own dedicated wires, you are accessing the same internet that everyone is. A “kosher” internet is just a program to keep you from looking at sites – and can easily be evaded.

    in reply to: Why should school be mandatory? #1020618
    akuperma
    Participant

    But you don’t need to learn math in school. Some might argue that one learns better out of school. Education is about learning and acquiring knowledge needed for life. School is about keeping kids off the street and out of their parents hair, but under the right conditions one can learn in a school.

    in reply to: Why should school be mandatory? #1020615
    akuperma
    Participant

    splenda: American truancy laws require that you be educated up to a certain age — there is no requirement that you be in school.

    In places where truancy laws are enforced (and usually such laws are only enforced against lowerw class minorities), home school students should bring a letter from their parents. In general, kids who are out when most kids are in school are left alone if they look and act respectably (and that includes frum kids on days our schools have off and the goyim have class), in part since police have better things to do, and in part since they don’t want to be sued for false arrest.

    in reply to: Why should school be mandatory? #1020613
    akuperma
    Participant

    School is NOT mandatory.

    Under both Jewish and American law, school is not mandatory. All American states, public international law, and Halacha all recognize a right of parents to educate their children at home.

    Schools however are more efficient, which is why most parents prefer them to various alternatives (e.g. home schooling, hiring tutors, etc.)

    in reply to: Would U let U'r daughter marry some/1 with that yarmulka? #1020592
    akuperma
    Participant

    “let” means to grant permission. By halacha, no permission is needed or required. An adult woman is free to marry any man that she is halachically allowed to marry, without parent consent.

    Perhaps you should ask the question differently, i.e. “Would you approve … ” or “Would you try to talk her out of it”

    in reply to: Would U let U'r daughter marry some/1 with that yarmulka? #1020590
    akuperma
    Participant

    If she is over the age of 12, by halacha the parents have no say in whom she marries.

    in reply to: Schools need to shape up NOW! #1031046
    akuperma
    Participant

    In response to “What if you’re a kid and want a good education for yourself?”

    Study on your own. It’s easier now than ever before. Build on what the school offers rather that feel you are limited to what the school offers.

    in reply to: Schools need to shape up NOW! #1031030
    akuperma
    Participant

    One is always free to home school one’s children. It works fine if both parents are 200% committed, and have sufficient Torah and secular educations to handle all subjects. When one includes opportunity costs, it’s cheaper to use the frum schools. In all fairness, even for kids who are never home schooled, their academic success is largely a function of their parents not the schools – so if a parent is unhappy with their kid’s education, they should compalin to a mirror.

    Consider that the goyim gave up their classic curriculum and replaced it with a modern one (about 150 years ago), but we are trying to keep our classic curriculum intacts (i.e. Torah) while adding a modern one, we are doing fine. Of course we are going broke and the kids are driven crazy, but that’s by design.

    in reply to: Jealous of Birds #1019325
    akuperma
    Participant

    They can be fried, boiled, grilled, turned into salad. Their kinderloch can be scambled, deviled, and hard or soft boiled. And these are the ones with a good life. Other get eating alive by predators who tear them wing from wing.

    in reply to: your indian name #1019164
    akuperma
    Participant

    American Indian names reflect how the individual relates to their “spirits”. It is at the least, the “dust” of Avodah Zarah. An equivalent concept in western though is “saint’s names” or “patron saints”. Even in jest, frum Yidden wouldn’t even joke about who your patron saint is, or which avodah zarah is protecting you!

Viewing 50 posts - 2,251 through 2,300 (of 3,414 total)