A journalist for Qatar’s Al Jazeera media outlet was responsible for the production of the two Hamas ceremonies in Gaza held for the release of the female IDF hostages, during which the soldiers were paraded on stages in front of hundreds of terrorists and “innocent” Gazan civilians, an investigative report by 124News in Hebrew revealed.
Tamer Almisshal, one of Al Jazeera’s top journalists, was hired by Hamas to remotely arrange the ceremonies. He came up with all the ideas, including forcing the hostages to dress in mock IDF uniforms, the stage, the narrative, the banners, the propaganda “goodbye” bags and the “captivity certificates.”
He also came up with the idea of forcing the hostages to deliver speeches in Arabic on the stage, a plan thwarted by the IDF soldiers themselves who instead waved and smiled.
When Almisshal narrated the (completely objective) Al Jazeera report on the first hostage release, he claimed that Hamas purposely chose to parade the hostages through Gaza’s Saraya Square to project strength.
“This area, heavily targeted by Zionist operations, sends a message: ‘You didn’t break us—Hamas is still here,’” he said, “reporting” his own narrative.
Almisshal also produced a recent documentary called What is Hidden is Greater, in which Al Jazeera aired “exclusive” footage of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar skulking around Gaza.
Almisshal reportedly has ties with Ezzedine Haddad, a commander in Hamas’s armed wing responsible for overseeing the terrorist exchanges with Israel.
Amisshal is not the first Al Jazeera journalist found to be involved with Hamas or even served as terrorists themselves in the Strip.
Multiple Al Jazeera journalists celebrated Hamas’s Oct. 7 assault and were even embedded with the terrorists as they broke though the security fence.
(YWN Israel Desk – Jerusalem)
Join the official YWN WhatsApp status
One Response
This is not the first article aiming to point Al Jazeera and/or its journalists as Hamasians. I’m sort of totally clueless as to how wokeness works. There’s apparently a line of “reasoning” that a newspaper/journalist must be noble, and these articles have to disprove them? I just can’t figure it out.