9 Responses

1. Tzaddikim, yemach shemam

2. Loop up: Stockholm syndrome

3. Aside from releasing them, it’s encouraging to know that they
   are capable of feeding and providing basic care, Gd willing. I hope
   the hostages are being treated decently.
   These poor people were just living their everyday lives and now the entire planet
   knows who they are and will continue to interview them and follow them around.

4. Using cute terminology like “bubbies and barbarians” about an extremely painful and serious event is wrong, insensitive, and frankly not at all within the spirit of Torah or plain decency.

5. Hey! its feeding time in the “hamas zoo (safari)” just that here “animals” feed people!!!

6. Hamas propaganda.

7. Forget Stockholm syndrome. I’ve heard an earlier report that one of the elderly women being held hostage has Alzheimer’s. Perhaps this is the one.
   Besides, she might be acting so civilly (for PR purposes) for the benefit of those remaining (including her own husband).

8. The radical Arab-Palestine animalistic cult poses as “humanitarian” by releasing 1 percent of 222 hostages and not a single child, out of 30, was freed, so far.

   ___

   Ugly Haaretzism:

   Haaretz justifies the massacre and mocks the kidnapped victims

   Hanan Amior, Presspectiva, 23.10.23 |

   And again, as always, the issue is not who wrote the article, but the decision of the newspaper’s editors that it is worthy of publication
   On Monday, October 9, two days after the massacre in the Gaza Strip, Amira Hass published an article in Ha’aretz entitled…

   But the article did not describe any circle, but was entirely a song of praise and praise for the barbaric Nazi massacre carried out by Hamas throughout the enclave, and a song of mockery and joy for the IDF’s defeat on that blackest of black Sabbaths.

   Already at the beginning of the story, Haaretz’s story about the IDF is a vile and despicable lie…

   I noticed that since the beginning of the war, all daily Israeli newspapers incorporate the Israeli flag in the newspaper logo. Thus Yedioth Ahronoth, Israel Hayom, Ma’ariv, Jerusalem Post.

   They do this because they feel Israeli. A part of Israeli society that stands on its own.

   The only newspaper that does not do this is Haaretz, for the exact same reason.

   He does not feel part of Israeli society. once felt Then he moved to look at us from the side. Then he adopted a critical look from the side. Then a hostile look.

   The wagon goes unstoppable and now he, quite simply, sympathizes with the enemy and supports him, even when he commits the most barbaric crimes, which human history will forever remember.

   But there is another thing that history, especially Jewish history, will forever remember: and that is the negative, debilitating, inciting, divisive and enemy-justifying content that the newspaper published systematically and consistently from the beginning of the war.

9. Sickening…I almost couldn’t bear to see this. A moment ago they were murdering their own families and neighbors in ruthless, cold blood, slaughtering babies, and here we see those same demons pretending to act nice. Look at the look of contempt in the Jewish lady’s face. Look at the way she observes the food as though it is something she had not seen yet until that moment…and notice how they block out all audio except to hear a couple of words from the red cross worker (themselves most probably anti semitic)….horrifying.