House Democratic leadership issued a stern rebuke on Sunday dismissing the anti-Israel remarks made by Representative Pramila Jayapal, who serves as the chair of the congressional progressive caucus.
The controversial comments were made by Jayapal during her appearance at the Netroots Nation conference on Saturday. Claiming to speak from her experience as a participant in numerous demonstrations, Jayapal asserted, “I want you to know that we have been fighting to make it clear that Israel is a racist state, that the Palestinian people deserve self-determination and autonomy, that the dream of a two-state solution is slipping away from us, that it does not even feel possible.”
Following objections raised against her initial statements, Jayapal later clarified her position in a lengthy statement, indicating that she did not view Israel as a racist nation but rather disagreed with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s “extreme right-wing government.”
However, a leaked draft statement from prominent supporters of Israel within the Democratic Party was circulated to the press on Sunday. The authors of the document openly promoted its contents, expressing deep concern over Representative Pramila Jayapal’s “unacceptable comments” about Israel, a historic and democratic ally. They acknowledged her retraction but emphasized their commitment to preventing anti-Zionist sentiments that foster anti-Semitism from influencing the Democratic Party.
Before the leaked statement could be officially released, House Democratic leaders preempted it with a statement of their own. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Whip Katherine Clark, Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar, and Vice Chair Ted Lieu jointly stated, “Israel is not a racist state,” firmly rejecting the assertions made by Representative Jayapal.
They continued: “As a Jewish and Democratic nation, Israel was founded 75 years ago on the principle of complete equality of social and political rights for all of its citizens irrespective of religion, race or sex, as codified in its Declaration of Independence.
“America and Israel have a uniquely special relationship anchored in our shared democratic values and strategic interests. As House Democratic leaders, we strongly support Israel’s right to exist as a homeland for the Jewish people. We are also firmly committed to a robust two-state solution where Israel and the Palestinian people can live side by side in peace and prosperity.
“Certainly, there are individual members of the current Israeli governing coalition with whom we strongly disagree. That is also the case with respect to some on the other side of the aisle who we serve with in the United States Congress.
“Government officials come and go. The special relationship between the United States and Israel will endure. We are determined to make sure support for Israel in the Congress remains strongly bipartisan.
“Our commitment to a safe and secure Israel as an invaluable partner, ally and beacon of democracy in the Middle East is ironclad. We look forward to welcoming Israeli President Isaac Herzog to the United States House of Representatives this week.”
Let me set the record straight about Israel as a multiracial democracy based on nearly a decade to traveling to the region.
Jewish and Arab citizens enjoy equal protection under the laws, including an equal right to vote in Israeli elections.
There is Arab representation in…
— Ritchie Torres (@RitchieTorres) July 17, 2023
(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)
8 Responses
What an ugly wicked female.
“indicating that she did not view Israel as a racist nation but rather disagreed with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s “extreme right-wing government.””
Mam,
Backing anti-reform dogma, is another form of racism.
You have any better defense?
Her ugly comments were clear and not some “misunderstanding” and she was not “misunderstood”. Yet, at the same time the Republicans are salivating at an opportunity for a floor vote to condemn her words, Jim Jordan and Kevin McCarthy today insisted they will go forward with their invitation for RFK Jr. to testify as an expert on censorship by big tech companies. But why is such hypocrisy not surprising.
Following is from an email:
July/2023: Meeting at the squad (satire):
– Tlaib/Omar to Pramila Jayapal:
– Hello “sister”.
– Hello.
– How can I help in our “cause?”
– ‘IsrAIL- bashing always work. (By us it’s a goal, not just a tool, anyhow).
– You two do that better.
– Well, we are known as Muslims, whereas you…
– So what’s the strategy?
– Tlaib: “apartheid” calling! As you know, by now, our other Arab (anti-Jewish) activist, brother Omar Shakir, had already used the HRW for his campaign he began since 2010 at BDS, so it’s by a “human rights org.” (Not just Hitler’s helper A. Shukeiri’s 1961 invention). And please, do repeat it several times.
– Omar: I have got a far better idea. In the US, if you utter the R word, that’s a bombshell, just say “racist.”
– Tlaib: Shukran!
– What is racist?
– You know…
– What?
– I see, you want me to say that the “occupation” is “racist?” But Israel is mufti ethnic?
– You’re almost there…
– I see… I should just come out and offend all of them. Israel is racist ? No problem.
– Omar/Tlaib. Clapping.
– Omar/Tlaib: Allah Akbar! Curse da juuz. Shhh.. , out loud say: “zionists”.
Anti semitic.
Im Israel, there was, and still is, debate over a 2 state solution.
The Palestinians, on the other hand, never wanted and do not want a 2 state solution.
They have always been opposed to any solution that would give Israel anything.
“From the river to the sea” is unanimous!
No conservatives, no liberals, no debate.
Someone should tell her that the palestinians self determined 5 times that they don’t want a state they only want the destruction of Israel.
@Mordechai Hatzadik how is “anti-reform dogma” another form of racism?