President Barack Obama will not be protected by a vast armada of 34 US warships when he visits Mumbai this weekend, officials said, calling reports from India on security preparations “comical.”
The claim that many of the 288-ship US naval fleet would be deployed to waters off Mumbai was “absolutely absurd,” Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell told reporters on Thursday.
US officials usually decline to discuss details about security precautions for the president, but the media accounts circulating out of India were so off the mark that press officers at the Pentagon and the White House said they felt compelled to speak up.
“I will take the liberty this time of dismissing as absolutely absurd this notion that somehow we were deploying 10 percent of the Navy — some 34 ships and an aircraft carrier — in support of the president’s trip to Asia,” Morrell said.
“That’s just comical. Nothing close to that is being done,” he said.
Although the United States is known for taking elaborate precautions when it comes to presidential trips, the accounts out of India described a massive naval fleet steaming towards Mumbai and an astounding price-tag of 200 million dollars a day for security.
The White House bluntly dismissed the cost estimate, and said that the price tag for security was similar to trips for previous presidents, without offering a specific figure.
“I think there’s been a lot of creative writing that’s been done on this trip over the last few days. I’ve seen other reports with some astronomical figures in terms of what it costs to take these trips,” Morrell said.
India’s NDTV website ran a report claiming a 34-ship security detail, citing the Press Trust of India, which was in turn picked up by the popular US website, Drudge Report.
5 Responses
In case one doesn’t have a map handy,note that “off Mumbai” probably includes the Indian Ocean, where we have a substantial number of ships deployed due to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Also, it doesn’t say how big the ships are, but the number could include support vessels as well. So it is possible that both the original report and the denial are correct.
“I think there’s been a lot of creative writing that’s been done on this trip over the last few days.” And much of it appeared on this blog.
YonasonW-
YWN didn’t make it up. Don’t blame the messenger!
#3 – I know it’s not YWN, and I didn’t mean to say it was – however, it is true about individuals who blog here . . . and that was my point.
it’s a shame that YWN feels the ever constant need to print the most trite and unsubstantiated stories about Obama since he doesnt fit into their Republican worldview …as opposed to using the space they use to print secular stories to to print secular substantive stories about the most distinguished professional opinion regarding US economics and foreign policy.