President-elect Donald Trump said Wednesday he will continue to profit from his global business empire after he enters the White House this month — a precedent-breaking decision that the director of the Office of Government Ethics swiftly condemned as unpatriotic.
At a news conference announcing a much-anticipated plan for dealing with his sprawling company, Trump and his lawyer said the Trump Organization would be run by the president-elect’s adult sons and a longtime company executive, although the president-elect will retain an ownership stake in a trust that holds his business assets.
Sheri Dillon, an attorney with the firm Morgan Lewis & Bockius, said the company will pursue new deals in the U.S. but will not enter new foreign arrangements while Trump is in office.
The steps are to assure Americans that he is “not exploiting the office of the presidency for his personal benefit,” she said.
The decision to stop new ventures abroad was one of Trump’s few concessions to ethics experts who have warned that the real estate development and licensing company’s international footprint could expose him to conflicts of interest. They have warned that foreign governments might try to curry favor with him or influence U.S. policy by cutting deals with his company and speeding approval for his projects.
The concerns have thrust a typically obscure office into the limelight. The Office of Government Ethics, which advises incoming presidents and their administration officials but is not an enforcement agency, on Wednesday urged Trump to go much further to distance himself. OGE Director Walter Shaub said Trump should sell off his businesses and put the proceeds in a blind trust overseen by an independent manager.
“I don’t think divestiture is too high a price to pay to be the president of the United States of America,” said Shaub, during a blistering 15-minute critique.
Explaining why presidential appointees, nominees and presidents themselves typically sever all business ties, Shaub said:
“Their basic patriotism usually prevails as they agree to set aside their personal interest to serve their country’s interests.”
Shaub praised some of Trump’s Cabinet nominees for making a “clean break” from business entanglements, singling out Rex Tillerson, whose Senate confirmation hearing to become secretary of state was held Wednesday as Trump was speaking in New York.
The president-elect and his lawyer vigorously defended his plan, saying it would be impractical for Trump to sell off his company.
Doing so, Dillon said, would create its own ethical questions about whether he was receiving a fair price. And moving too quickly could create a “fire sale” environment that devalued the company to which he has dedicated his adult life.
“President-elect Trump should not be expected to destroy the company he built,” Dillon said.
The business arrangements, announced at Trump Tower in New York during Trump’s first news conference since July, appeared to walk back a broader promise he made last month in a Fox News interview and a tweet that the company would do “no new deals” while he is in office.
Along with Shaub — who was appointed to a five-year term by President Barack Obama in 2013 — Republican and Democratic government ethics counselors have urged Trump to take bigger steps.
“Firewalls work in businesses, not in families,” said Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project on Government Oversight. “Trump’s plan doesn’t prevent his business interests from benefiting him or his family while he’s in office or interfering with his presidential duties.”
Trump stressed that a president is not subject to the same conflict-of-interest provisions as Cabinet members and other government employees.
“I could actually run my business and run government at the same time,” he said. “I don’t like the way that looks, but I would be able to do that if I wanted to.”
Yet presidents have typically followed the same rules as their Cabinet members as a best practice.
President Jimmy Carter sold his Georgia peanut farm when he took office. Soon after he was inaugurated, Ronald Reagan cashed out his personal holdings — worth about $740,000 — and put the money in a blind trust.
Trump’s dealings are far more complex; he has struck deals involving hotels, office buildings, golf resorts and residential towers in about 20 countries.
Dillon said the company will add an ethics adviser to its management team who must approve deals that could raise concerns about conflicts. Trump’s transition team has not said whether he will appoint a White House ethics adviser as two previous presidents have done.
Trump’s sons Eric and Donald Jr. will run the company along with Allen Weisselberg, the current chief financial officer. Weisselberg began work with the Trump family decades ago under the president-elect’s father, Fred.
Dillon also addressed the “emoluments clause” of the U.S. Constitution. Some lawyers have claimed that foreign leaders who pay for rooms and services at his hotels across the globe would put the president-elect in violation.
She argued that “fair-value exchange,” such as paying for a hotel room, does not run afoul of the ban on foreign gifts or payments to the president.
Nonetheless, she said, the company plans to donate money spent by foreign governments at his hotels to the U.S. Treasury.
The president-elect’s new hotel in the nation’s capital, has already hosted diplomats from Bahrain and Azerbaijan.
(AP)
6 Responses
It should be noted that this office is NON-partisan and its lawyers are not political appointees. It gave the Obama administration a lot of flak too for some of their appointees’ ethical and conflict issues. Most of the prior administration ethics lawyers interviewed today were almost unanimous in their view that the proposals outlined in the press conference today did not resolve the conflict issues. For example, it would not cover the increased value of the domestic assets resulting from decisions Trump makes while in office. Short of divestiture, his actions will be continue to be questionable
#1 If the ruler intends to benefit himself he will benefit the people he rules or serves. If he rules for mutual benefit there is nothing wrong with that.
The is no necessity for him to be seen to be deliberately diminishing his own assets if that action would also harm the people he serves.
There is nothing Trump can do or say that will not upset this fools. The entire issue is a non issue there is no law requiring him to diversify anything as president he can own what ever he wants. They keep bringing up that the last hand full of presidents sold everything one of his buildings are worth more then all the combined value of the last 10 presidents holdings before becoming president.
This sounds like a bunch of jealous people
Just imagine that Hillary had won and had kept her association with the Clinton foundation (which is a charity and non-profit) the trumpites would be screaming bloody murder! But we’re just somehow supposed to swallow anything trump does or says like it’s just fine.
#5 What a DUMB comparison!! The Clinton Foundation was a farce set up to perform Pay-to-Play games with multiple entities, including foreign nations and Arab States.
The “charity” YOU pride with was to ISIS, Al Qaeida and other terrorist organizations, as well as for Hillary’s Election campaign.
Your hatred toward this great man President Trump who will, with Hashem’s help, make America great again for the next 8 years, is causing you to become completely loony. Were you fired as his housemaid and trying to get even? Or is it his getting jobs for people and making them work for a living instead of receiving handouts that’s making you edgy?