Feeling maligned by the media, Donald Trump is threatening to weaken First Amendment protections for reporters if he were president and make it easier for him to sue them.
“I love free press. I think it’s great,” he said Saturday on Fox News Channel, before quickly adding, “We ought to open up the libel laws, and I’m going to do that.”
The changes envisioned by the celebrity businessman turned Republican front-runner would mean that “when they write purposely negative and horrible and false articles, we can sue them and win lots of money,” he said at a rally Friday in Fort Worth, Texas.
Trump added that, should he win the election, news organizations that have criticized him will “have problems.” He specifically cited The New York Times and The Washington Post.
Trump last month threatened to sue the Post after the newspaper wrote an article about the bankruptcy of his Atlantic City casino. On Twitter, Trump has routinely criticized reporters who cover him and their news organizations, including The Associated Press.
“The press has to be fair,” he said in the broadcast interview.
First Amendment advocates condemned Trump’s suggestions.
“His statement shows why we need libel protections,” said Gregg Leslie, legal defense director for the Washington-based Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. “Trump gets offended, he gets upset and he wants to sue to retaliate. That’s not a good reason to sue someone.”
Libel law in the United States generally makes it difficult for public figures to sue reporters or other people who criticize them. To win such a case, the plaintiff must demonstrate that factually incorrect statements were made with actual malice or a reckless disregard for the truth.
Trump said he would like to lower that standard. “We’re going to have people sue you like you never got sued before,” he said.
Because the Supreme Court has repeatedly endorsed the existing legal standard, Trump could not change libel laws as they affect public figures by executive order or even with an act of Congress, Leslie said.
“I’ve never heard of politicians say they would repeal case law established under the First Amendment,” he said. “You’d really need a constitutional amendment to do that.”
Trump’s comments on libel law are not the first time he has disagreed with widely held conceptions of constitutional law. Last year, he said he saw no obstacle to deporting children born to undocumented immigrants in the United States. Courts have regularly found that such children are natural born citizens entitled to the same rights as any other American. Trump has said he does not believe a constitutional amendment would be necessary to get his way.
“You don’t have to do a constitutional amendment. You need an act of Congress. I’m telling you — you need an act of Congress,” he said in an interview with Bill O’Reilly of Fox News last year.
(AP)
6 Responses
We should all agree, that the so called news establishment write things that are not so accurate to smear someone they don’t like!!!
Than comes t 5 line retraction in page 78 only readable with reading glasses.
This should be stopped, and the only way to stop them is by law suit.
Why are they allowed to kill people’s lives by writing negative things about them??? Especially when it’s not true?
It would be very hard if not impossible to open up libel laws to allow a politician to sue over statements pertaining to his political positions, though it already is possible to sue for maliciously false (i.e. made with knowledge that they are false) statements about “facts” pertaining to private life. Nothing would allow a suit for claiming that Trump is an idiot, and Trump can sue if he can prove that someone falsely claims he goes around killing babies and robbing church poorboxes.
If somehow Mr Trump could get a massage, please before telling People not to bad mouth You or pick on You please in the most sincere way please stop bad mouthing other People it hurts Them like it does You
* please try not to bad mouth other People
Trump your right. Let them give a true report .
when he will be president he will be bussy with the people that attacked hem and not with the more important things that a president need ??? seems like achashveirosh and a real dictator what is about the lias he said about cruz rubio bush and others will they sue hem the way win with opening law suits and this other things smells dictator