Hillary Rodham Clinton countered criticism that her personal wealth undermines a populist campaign message focused on the economic problems of everyday Americans, saying on Monday that her family fortune is “secondary” to most voters.
“I don’t think Americans are against success,” she told reporters in Concord, New Hampshire. “Those of us who do have opportunities ought to be doing more to help other people do the same.”
Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, have made hundreds of millions of dollars since leaving the White House from paid speeches— a fortune that even she has struggled to explain.
Last year, she stumbled into a storm of political criticism after saying her family was “dead broke” at the end of her husband’s second term. Though in deep debt due to legal fees from various controversies, Bill Clinton quickly moved the couple into the top 1 percent with book sales and speaking fees.
Last month, the couple reported that they earned more than $30 million in speaking fees and book royalties since January 2014.
In New Hampshire on Monday, Clinton seemed more comfortable acknowledging her wealth, describing her family as “blessed.” But she also highlighted her middle class roots, pointing out that both she and her husband had federal college loans to pay off.
“What (voters) are interested in is who’s going to fight for them,” she said. “I want everybody to have the same opportunities that I had and my husband had.”
While the opening days of her campaign have stressed Clinton’s family and career history, her personal fortune has gone largely unmentioned.
Her remarks on Monday came in the midst of a campaign launch focused on her personal biography, particularly her mother’s impoverished upbringing, as a way of reintroducing one of the country’s best known political figures as a fighter for struggling families left behind by the economic recovery.
On Monday, she focused the first major policy proposal of her campaign on universal pre-K education — an issue championed both by liberal voices in her party, as well as by more conservative governors in Republican-led states, including Texas.
Speaking to parents and children at a YMCA, she promised that as president she would make “high quality preschool” available for all 4-year-old children in the next decade, double federal money for early Head Start programs, and implement a tax cut to help parents with the costs of raising children under age 3.
That proposal is one item on a wish-list of progressive policies Clinton has backed over the past three days, as part of her vision of a more “inclusive economy.”
“Prosperity cannot be just for CEOs and hedge fund managers,” she told hundreds of supporters Monday in a Concord barn.
Those Wall Street financiers include members of her immediate family.
Her son-in-law Marc Mezvinsky has leveraged family ties to raise money from investors for his hedge fund. Her daughter, Chelsea, also worked at a hedge fund founded by a major Clinton campaign donor.
Clinton was paid to speak to financial firms such as Deutsche Bank and Ameriprise Financial. One of her final paid speeches was delivered in March to eBay, which paid her $315,000, records show.
Republicans have spent months questioning how the Clinton family has leveraged political connections into personal cash— criticism that may be having some impact on early perceptions of her candidacy.
About 47 percent of Americans said Clinton cares about people like them in a CNN/ORC poll released earlier this month, down from 53 percent in the same poll last summer. An ABC News/Washington Post poll released the same day found a slight decline in the past year on a similar question, with 49 percent saying Clinton “understands the problems of people like you” and 46 percent saying she doesn’t.
Republicans are flipping charges successfully leveled against their party in the last presidential race. In 2012, Republican nominee Mitt Romney, the wealthy co-founder of private equity firm Bain Capital LLC, found his presidential bid undermined by Democratic attack ads painting him as a heartless plutocrat.
“Hillary Clinton has to expect the same kind of treatment,” Romney said Monday, in an interview on MSNBC. “How could she get out there and sell a populist message when she makes in one hour a multiple of what the average American will make in a year?”
(AP)
5 Responses
Well, it is amazing that the Clintons have accumulated so much, considering their careers have been public service rather than the well paid private sector. Of course, all the presents given them out of love and admiration do add up. And maybe they lived frugal lives and put their lunch money in a little tin box.
Walker and Rubio are still middle class, barely. Bush is inherited “old money.” Carson earned his as a working as a physician. The Clintons got to be super-rich without ever having an honest job?
Exactly. With Hillary, there is always a double standard. With Romney, the Democrat controlled media made his wealth THEE number one issue. With Bubbe Clinton, ahh, its nothing. The brainwashed voter doesn’t care. Its just a “war on women”, you evil white racist Republicans are waging.
Yup. Secondary concern. First concerns, where are the emails and when will she answer to Benghazi? According to her, what’s the point? Just ask Vince Foster.
Just can’t be trusted when she opens her trap all her life is a lie
She is right her money doesnot matter to most people but it does to me for 2 reason; she has an evil eye on everybody’s elses money just like obama, and her money has not been ligit since day one. Plus she lies on how rich she is. Can’t trust a word of hers