The White House is threatening to veto a Republican bill to fix the widely criticized No Child Left Behind law that is set for debate in the House on Wednesday, calling it “a significant step backwards.”
Republicans say the bill would restore local control in schools and stop top-down education mandates. Democrats say it would allow billions in federal dollars to flow out without ensuring they will improve student learning.
The White House said the measure “abdicates the historic federal role in elementary and secondary education of ensuring the educational progress of all of America’s students, including students from low-income families, students with disabilities, English learners, and students of color.”
The White House’s statement Wednesday is the latest in a series of veto threats issued since both chambers of Congress went under Republican control last month for the first time in Barack Obama’s presidency.
A vote is expected on Friday, and it’s possible that members will vote strictly along party lines. That’s what happened with a similar bill in 2013.
The bill maintains annual federal testing requirements. It consolidates or eliminates many federal programs, creates a single local grant program and allows public money to follow low-income children to different public schools. It would also prohibit the federal education secretary from demanding changes to state standards or imposing conditions on states in exchange for a waiver around federal law.
The bipartisan law President George W. Bush signed in 2002 sought to close significant gaps in the achievement of historically underserved group of students and their more affluent peers. It mandated annual testing in reading and math for students in grades three to eight and again in high school. Schools had to show student growth or face consequences.
No Child Left Behind required that all students be able to read and do math at grade level by 2014. The Obama administration in 2012 began allowing waivers around some of the law’s more stringent requirements if schools agreed to certain conditions, like using college- and career-ready standards such as Common Core.
House Republican leaders view the bill as a way to show their opposition to the Obama administration’s encouragement of the Common Core state standards. The standards have been adopted in more than 40 states and spell out what English and math skills students should master at each level. They have become a political issue in many states because they are viewed by critics as a federal effort even though they were developed by U.S. governors.
In the Senate, there appears to be more of a bipartisan effort to fix the law. Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., the chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, and the committee’s senior Democrat, Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., have said they were working together on a proposal. Alexander said this week he wants to get a bill to the full Senate in March.
(AP)
Join the official YWN WhatsApp status
4 Responses
I don’t know enough about the details of this law. However, one thing is obvious to anyone with an IQ on the positive side of zero. Common Core is a totally imbecilic, corrupt, and damaging concept. No wonder that the greatest teachers refuse to implement it, and some notable teachers have already chosen to leave the field of teaching rather than to be subjected to this ridiculous curriculum. Anything that promotes Common Core should be vetoed, and anything that removes it should be supported.
#1 you actually know alot ! “historical federal role…in education” HAHAHA!!! look at other school systems that actually work! we’re the educational laughing stock of the world. Common core + english as second langauge+ Michelle O’s lunch menu = the 3 three ring circus we are!
It would appear that each of commenters 1 and 2 is half right. That was a failing score when I was in school.
The federal role in education is relatively new, and, yes, our schools overall perform substantially below the rest of the developed world. As for the Common Core, the educators I know think the idea is good, but it is too early to test kids on the Common Core, because the curriculae of most schools do not presently match the Common Core. There are problems with it, but rolling it back is not the solution.
Countries with standardized curricula tend to outperform those with chaotic systems like the United States.