Texas Gov. Rick Perry is lashing out at the “outrageous” criminal charges filed against him and defending the veto that led a grand jury to indict him on two felony counts of abuse of power.
Perry, a potential candidate for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016, appeared defiant Saturday when he met with reporters outside his Capitol office in Austin, Texas.
Already the longest-serving governor in state history — in office since December 2000 — he made it clear that he plans to complete his final term in January as planned.
“We don’t settle political differences with indictments in this country,” Perry said. “It is outrageous that someone would use political theatrics to rip away at the very fabric of our state’s constitution.”
His scheduled appearance on Sunday morning news show was expected to provide him with a national audience to press his case.
A Travis County grand jury on Friday indicted Perry for carrying out a threat to veto state funds to the local district attorney, an elected Democrat who refused to resign following a drunken-driving arrest. That 2013 veto prompted a criminal investigation.
“The details of my decision-making were very clear. I said early on that I was going to clearly veto those dollars as long as they had someone in that office who I had lost confidence in,” Perry said. “And I had lost confidence.”
Perry is the first Texas governor since 1917 to be indicted. The charges came as he has sought to reintroduce himself to Republican leaders and rank-and-file party members eager to win back the White House. Several stumbles during his presidential bid in 2012 led to his early departure from the race.
Perry’s veto cut $7.5 million in funding to the state’s ethics watchdog housed in the county district attorney’s office. A state judge assigned a special prosecutor to investigate the veto following a complaint filed by a left-leaning watchdog group, which accused Perry of trying to leverage his power to force the resignation of District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg.
That unit of public corruption investigators is based in Austin, a liberal haven in the mostly conservative state. Voters in the county reliably elect a Democrat to serve as district attorney.
Perry said he was confident that he would prevail and said those responsible for this “farce of a prosecution” would be held accountable.
Many Democrats criticized Perry’s aggressive reaction to the indictment and accused him of trying to shift the blame.
Yet state Sen. Wendy Davis, the face of the party in Texas who’s running a high-profile campaign for governor, took a more cautious tone Saturday.
“The charges that were brought down by the grand jury are very, very serious,” Davis said, adding that she trusted the justice system to do its job.
Tensions between Republicans and the public integrity unit have simmered for years. Conservatives have long grumbled that the unit operates through a partisan lens and targets Republicans.
(AP)
Join the official YWN WhatsApp status
7 Responses
I guess we are seeing the socialist liberal democreep playbook in use on Gov Perry.
Remember, the libs will ALWAYS show whom they are deathly afraid of.
They’ve done it before and they will do it again.
Mark Levin,
You are full of it.
The man is accused of abusing hid office. Apparently, a grand hury believes there is enough evidence for a trial.
This is called the American judicial system, something you new-facists ar deathly afraid of,
Wow #2… Do you even know what a grand jury is? It’s just a bunch of Joe Shmoes off the street that do what the court tells them to. It’s not much more than a formality. The media makes it sound like being “indicted by the grand jury” is so official and scary, but it’s really not any indication of guilt or innocence.
The fact that Democrats feel it is appropriate to be represented by an irresponsible and selfish drunk driver is more telling than anything Perry is being accused of. That’s the real story here.
Moose613,
I tend to agree with Perry and his veto. Who is to say that this AG would do right with the money? Afterall how can you trust an individual who enforces the law breaks the laws she is suppose to enforce by getting arrested for drunk driving no less. Would you Moose613 trust an AG with $7.5 million? I certainaly would not.
A Grand Jury indictment reflects the local prosecutor, and the local prosecutor was a Democrat and a well know political enemy. Grand juries are notoriously easy to manipulate. That’s why indictments are mere accusations, with the real decision made by a much less partisan “petit jury” after a public trial (remember that grand juries are secret proceedings with evidence largely limited to what the prosecutor selects).
If the charges stick, he won’t be running in 2016.
If they don’t get a conviction, he’s a hero, and perhaps the front runner.
His potential appeal as a candidate is highlighted (he’s a strong religious social conservative, and has a strong record of being pro-immigration while also having a strong pro-business record).
Moosey,
Believe what you want. I only report facts. For fiction, please consult the DNC, MSdnc, or CNN.
Any idiot, in this case a socialist liberal democreep, can do this, and they did.
District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg was DRUNK! She refused a breathalyzer test. That means automatic arrest. THAT is why he vetoed the money. The district attorney doesn’t obey the law and he lost faith in her ability to do her job. Big crime, huh?