The House Ways and Means Committee voted Wednesday to refer a former Internal Revenue Service official to the Justice Department for possible criminal prosecution in the agency’s tea party controversy.
Committee investigators say they have uncovered evidence that Lois Lerner may have violated the constitutional rights of conservative groups, misled investigators and risked exposing confidential taxpayer information.
Lerner, who retired last year, headed the IRS division that processes applications for tax-exempt status. The agency has acknowledged that agents improperly singled out tea party and other conservative groups for extra scrutiny when they applied for tax-exempt status from 2010 to 2012.
“We think there’s reason to believe that laws were broken, that constitutional rights were violated,” said committee chairman Dave Camp, R-Mich. “We have to make sure that the signal goes out that this can’t happen again.”
The Ways and Means Committee has been investigating the IRS for nearly a year, since shortly after the mishandling of tea party applications became public. Wednesday’s vote to refer the matter to the Justice Department was 23-14, with all Republicans voting in favor and all Democrats voting against.
Democratic leaders said the vote was a political stunt designed to fire up the Republican base in an election year. They noted that the Justice Department is already investigating whether any crimes have been committed.
“It now seems clear that Republican members of the Ways and Means Committee have decided that they do not want to be left behind in the Republican campaign to declare this a scandal and keep it going until November,” said Rep. Sander Levin of Michigan, the committee’s ranking Democrat.
Lerner’s lawyer issued a statement Wednesday declaring her innocence.
“This is just another attempt by Republicans to vilify Ms. Lerner for political gain,” said the lawyer, William W. Taylor III. “Ms. Lerner has done nothing wrong. She did not violate any law or regulation. She did not ?mislead Congress. She did not interfere with the rights of any organization to a tax exemption. ?Those are the facts.”
Levin said Camp could have simply transmitted the information to the appropriate authorities at the Justice Department, without making it public.
Camp defended making it public.
“Look, the potential violation of constitutional rights occurred in secret, inside the bowels of the IRS,” Camp said. “I think it’s important that the public has an understanding of what went on, and I think if I sent a secret letter to the Department of Justice, I think that would be doing a disservice to the Americans whose constitutional rights are on the line.”
Lerner first publicly disclosed the issue at a lawyers’ conference in May 2013. At the time, she apologized on behalf of the IRS.
Soon afterward, President Barack Obama forced the acting IRS commissioner to resign, and much of the agency’s top leadership has been replaced.
Lerner has emerged as a central figure in investigations by congressional committees. The House Oversight Committee has scheduled a vote for Thursday on whether to hold Lerner in contempt of Congress for refusing to answer questions at two congressional hearings.
At both hearings, Lerner invoked her constitutional right against self-incrimination. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said Lerner had effectively waived her Fifth Amendment right not to answer questions by providing an opening statement at a hearing last year.
Taylor and Democrats on the oversight committee disagree.
Lerner is an attorney who joined the IRS in 2001. She retired last fall, ending a 34-year career in federal government, which included work at the Justice Department and the Federal Election Commission.
(AP)
Join the official YWN WhatsApp status
One Response
The Justice Department is already investigating whether any crimes have been committed? Isn’t that AG Eric Withholder, cited for contempt of Congress for refusing to provide emails about the Fast and Furious government gun-running disaster that led to the death of a Border Patrol agent and untold Mexican innocents? My optimism that our contemptible AG will honestly investigate this matter runneth over–not.