By Rabbi Yair Hoffman
This Shabbos we will be saying. “Chazak Chazak veNischazaik at the end of the last Aliyah.
The fact is, however, that no one really knows how the minhag of reciting “Chazak, Chazak v’Nischazaik” upon completing the last parsha in each of Chamisha Chumshei Torah really started. Nor do people really known where and when it started (but there are some indications). Toward the end of this article, the author would like to present a theory.
There are many things that we do know about this minhag.
THE REASONS FOR IT
It seems that the Gedolei HaAcharonim provide us with a few reasons for the minhag to say Chazak:
The Maharam Mintz (responsa #85) says that it is similar to the Hadran that we recite after completing a Mesechta. In other words, we are saying, “Review it and learn it again so that you will not forget it.”
He gives second reason as well. Just as we tell the Chazan, “Yasher Kochacha” – we, in essence are saying, “Wow! You finished this Mitzvah! May it be Hashem’s will that you complete other Mitzvos as well!”
The Pri Chadash (Siman 139) explains that since Torah weakens the strengths of an individual we tell him, “May you strengthen yourself from the wekening that just happened.”
THE OTHER MINHAG
We know that the Aruch haShulchan (OC 139:15) and the Chasam Sofer both held to say instead, “Chazak, Chazak, Chazak.” We know that there was a minhag to say, “Chazak, Chazak, Chazak” because Chazak in gematria is 115 and saying that three times is 345 – which is the Gematria of “Moshe.”
The Chsam Sofer’s minhag is mentioned in the writings of his student (5638) Rabbi Chizkiya Feivel Plaut in his Likutei Chaver ben Chaim). So we know that in 1806-ish – the minhag of reciting “Chazak, Chazak v’Nischazaik” – already existed – at least in Hungary.
This idea of chazak 3 times is actually first mentioned by Rav Chaim Vital in his Shaar hapsukim on Yehoshua 1:6 – where he notes that Hashem told Yehoshua “Chazak” three times.
We know that the custom in Worms was to recite Chazak twice at the conclusion of every Sefer – once by the Chazan and once by the congregation (5747 edition page 278). This was also the custom in Frankfurt (cited in “Noheg k’Tzon Yosef by Rav Yoseph Kashman on parshas Vayechi).
We also know that some Poskim hold that the person who got the last Aliyah should not say “Chazak, Chazak, veNischazaik” when the rest of the Tzibbur is saying it because they hold it is a hefsek. We also know that the Lubavitcher Rebbe disagreed with this psak and held that is part of the bracha – no different than saying “pass the salt” after reciting hamotzi – according to the Gemorah.
THIS AUTHOR’S SUGGESTION
I would like to suggest the following idea. Somewhere, in some shul in Hungary in the late 1700’s, there may have been too much talking in shul and or krias haTorah. The Rav felt that it was a lack of derech eretz and spoke about the Gemorah in Brachos (32b). There the Gemorah states that four things require Chizuk – strengthening. The last of the four is DERECH ERETZ. The Gemorah quotes the pasuk in Shmuel Bais (10:12), “Chazak veNischazaik ba’ad ameinu – let us be strong and we will be strengthened for our nation.”
That particular shul already had the minhag of reciting Chazak three times at the completion of each sefer. But after the Rav may have quoted that Gemorah in Brachos (32b), the kehillah then combined their minhag and changed it to Chazak chazak venischazaik because of the Rav’s citation of the Gemorah in Brachos to strengthen derech eretz. This minhag spread rapidly.
When it first began, the Chasam Sofer felt it was wrong. The Aruch haShulchan felt the same way. But Hashem runs the world and the minhag developed in order to strengthen Derech Eretz.
The author can be reached at [email protected]
9 Responses
R Soloveichik zt”l is known to have said that the minhag resulted from the chumashim having the abbreviation Ch”Uk (Chazan U’kahal) where the tzibor repeated the last pasuk, similar to our minhag by Eichah. This abbreviation eventually (mistakenly) morphed in ChZ”k.
“Chazak, Chazak, Chazak” because Chazak in gematria is 115 and saying that three times is 345…
“Chazak, Chazak v’Nischazaik”, gematria 686, has some strengthening ideas like these:
אחדות נגד ההר
אוהביי ורעי מנגד נגעי יעמודו
Maybe ונתחזק is a nifal, passive, by strengthening the future before one learns. Maybe chazak twice is 230 with the words (2) is 232 the ר’ת of רחמנא לבא בעי reminds us to apply our mind.
In any event, it would seem that we should say venitchazak not venitchazeik as it is written in Shemuel B 10:12.
I once asked my Morah in Bais Yaakov about “chazak chazak v’nis’chazek” and she told me that she was told that:
We say the first chazak to the one who got the aliyah that he should be chazak (in fact Sefardim bless each person who got an aliyah with “chazak u’baruch); the second chazak we say for the baal koreh that he be chazak; and then we conclude with v’nis’chazek, that WE too should be included in this blessing of chazak.
Regarding how to pronounce v’nis’chazek – with a tzeirei under the zayin or patach like the possuk
(שמואל ב י יב) חזק ונתחזק בעד עמנו וכו’ –
This is disussed:
See באוצר תדפיס של הרי”ש שפיגל על אמירת חזק.
בספר אם למקרא כתב הגר”ש דבליצקי שיש לומר בזיין קמוצה, ע”פ הכתוב. וכך נוהגים בבית מדרשו.
As a Yekka, I recall hearing it said with a patach. Also sometimes the congregation said it with patach while the baal koreh said with a tzeirei.
I was told that this is parallel to kaddish when saying yisgadel with a tzeirei or yisgadal with a patach. My husband heard this when he learned in Brisk.
The sefer cited is here:
https://tablet.otzar.org/#/book/158874/p/-1/t/1/fs/0/start/0/end/0/c
Mahram Mintz explains chazak fir past, vinischazek for future.
R Aharon from Chenobeler says if a person is chazak and chazak, then min hashomayim he is guven chizuo, hence v’nischazek from Above.
See pg 357 in sefer cited and linked.
Saying it is a nice thing, and pretty innocuous. Perhaps a more important issue is whether saying it is before the bracha a hefsek for the person getting the aliyah. From there, we could ask whether the tzibbur is being yotzei with his bracha and so there might be a hefsek issue for everyone listening.
Talmidim of Rav Aharon Soloveichik tell me that he would first say the bracha and then say Chazak. I have heard this of other gedolim as well.
It is never innocuous to practice a “minhag” that comes from nowhere, that has no reason, and has very smart and powerful people who have strong opinions against it. We either follow tradition or we don’t. Which is it?