Search
Close this search box.

Israeli Supreme Court Judge Quotes The Ramchal In Anti-Vax Ruling

Supreme Court Justice Noam Sohlberg (Photo: By The judiciary of Israel, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons)/ Illustrative. A man protests coronavirus restrictions with a yellow star and a photo of Anne Frank outside the Holocaust memorial in Berlin. (@ZSKberlin/Twitter)

Supreme Court Justice Noam Sohlberg quoted Gemara and the Ramchal in a ruling on an appeal to the court against the legality of the “Green Pass,” which bans unvaccinated Israelis from certain venues unless they present a current negative coronavirus test.

“Prior to signing, I want to express my opinion on another important issue,” Sohlberg stated. “In the course of the hearing, a man in the audience caught my attention. He was wearing a yellow star on his lapel, apparently as a sign of protest against the Green Pass, which in his view, renders him as a ‘prisoner to vaccination.'”

“I don’t know if he is one of those who filed the appeal or perhaps a protestor who came to support them. I considered expressing my protest immediately against the cynical use of a Holocaust symbol. But after pondering it, I decided against doing so in ‘real time.’ In the heat of the protest, rebuke isn’t received well and we’re even commanded to avoid it, ‘as Rebbi Eloi taught us in the name of Rebbe Shimon: ‘Just like it’s a mitzva for a person to say something that will be heeded, it’s also a mitzva for a person to refrain from saying something that won’t be heeded (Bavli, Yevamos, 65, 72).”

“Now, at a distance of time and place, I feel it is my duty to comment on the usage of Holocaust symbols at protests and demonstrations. It’s true that even problematic use [of the symbols] is covered under the right to free expression since as of yet it has not been legally banned, but even without an explicit prohibition, Chazal already said: ‘Sanctify yourselves with what is permissible to you (Bavli, Yevamos, 20:71).”

“On these words, the Ramchal adds in his sefer Mesilas Yesharim, in Chapter 13, in Biur Midas HaPrishus: “And the klal of perishus is what Chazal said: ‘Sanctify yourselves with what is permitted to you.’ And this is the teaching of the word itself. Prishus -distance oneself from something, to forbid something for oneself that is permissible. And the intent of this is not to violate the prohibition itself.”

“These words are kal v’chomer appropriate for our issue. Many people think that the use of Holocaust symbols should be completely off bounds, even without an explicit prohibition. The Holocaust is an extremely painful and sensitive topic, a bleeding wound in the Jewish nation, and there is nothing that can be compared to it.”

“The use of Holocaust symbols can severely hurt the feelings of many. Even if someone doesn’t necessarily ‘connect’ to these feelings, and he reasons that it is a legitimate act of protest, it is preferable that he distance himself from it in order not to cause pain to others. Even in the heat of dispute and storm of protest, there are matters that one shouldn’t touch.”

(YWN Israel Desk – Jerusalem)



9 Responses

  1. Unfortunately, the coerced vaccination issue has become on par with the tyrannical assault on human freedoms experienced during the Shoah. The rounding-up of Jews (and others) in Germany was similarly claimed to be to maintain ‘cleanliness’, and delousing and gassing of our brothers, sisters and fair-minded citizens of the world under these pseudo-medical-scientific and imaginary-eugenic-science reasons were put to rest at the Nuremberg Trials after, by a jury of the world, where ‘our body, our choice’ was affirmed for all people. There will no longer be permission by any other to inflict a medical procedure on the body of a person without informed consent.

  2. גרויסע תלמיד חכם.
    דער אבפאסקיישענע רעבע שליטא.
    We just want to know which way he signed, thank you.

  3. The Israeli Supreme Court is the apitimy of anti Torah, why should we be impressed when they quote a Gemora to show off or to twist it to make it appear that they have backing from the torah? Why?

    Tzaddikim yeilchu Bum V’reshoim….

  4. This is like someone applying halachik reasoning to sports commentary.. The statements he’s quoting are to do with mitzvos, “keshem she mitzvah etc” was said regarding tochacha, not regarding what’s proper debate behavior or what is considered freedom of speech…

    Kadesh atsmecha and its application in mesilas yeshorim is regarding taavas achila or other permitted things that if taken in excess, cause one to fall spiritually… It has zero bearing on a discussion of freedom of speech… This is the result of Yeshiva learning that was mixed with nationalism

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts