Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew warned Congress Thursday of “irrevocable damage” that an unprecedented federal default could cause, even as House GOP leaders considered a short-term debt limit increase to provide more time to resolve their budget battle with President Barack Obama.
Lew testified to the Senate Finance Committee on the 10th day of a partial federal shutdown and one week before Lew has said the government will deplete its ability to borrow money. Most economists say the default that could result would deal a staggering blow to the world economy. Some Republicans have downplayed the harm a default would cause.
Lew warned that failure to renew the government’s ability to borrow money “could be deeply damaging to the financial markets, the ongoing economic recovery and the jobs and savings of millions of Americans.” It would also leave the government unsure of when it could make payments ranging from food aid to Medicare reimbursements to doctors, he said.
“The United States should not be put in a position of making such perilous choices for our economy and our citizens,” the secretary said. “There is no way of knowing the irrevocable damage such an approach would have on our economy and financial markets.”
Lew also rejected GOP suggestions that, in the event federal borrowing authority expires, the government could use the dwindling cash it has to make payments to debt holders and other high priority needs. He said federal payment systems are not designed to prioritize and said he didn’t believe such an approach was technically possible.
“I think prioritization is just a default by another name,” Lew said.
The top Republican on the Finance panel, Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, accused the Obama administration of “an apparent effort to whip up uncertainty in the markets.” He and other Republicans also pressed Lew on how long a debt limit extension the president would like to see, and complained when he failed to provide specifics.
“Our view is this economy would benefit from more certainty and less brinksmanship. So the longer the period of time is, the better for the economy,” said Lew, who also repeated Obama’s willingness to accept a short-term extension for now.
Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., said GOP demands to curb Obama’s 2010 health care law as the price for ending the shutdown “is not up for debate” and would not happen.
“We need to reopen the government and pay the nation’s bills, no strings attached,” said Baucus.
As Lew testified, Obama prepared to host top House Republicans at the White House in hopes of finding an opening in an impasse that has shuttered much of the government and threatens federal default.
A short-term debt limit measure was expected to be a topic at a closed-door House GOP meeting Thursday morning. It wasn’t clear what conditions GOP leaders might seek to attach to the bill, if any, but conservatives consistently have been pushing top Republicans like Speaker John Boehner to add conditions beyond what Obama says he’ll accept.
The game of Washington chicken over increasing the debt limit — required so Treasury can borrow more money to pay the government’s bills in full and on time — already has sent the stock market south, spiked the interest rate for one-month Treasury bills and prompted Fidelity Investments, the nation’s largest manager of money market mutual funds, to sell federal debt that comes due around the time the nation could hit its borrowing limit.
Wednesday featured lots of activity but no progress toward ending the budget and debt limit impasses.
Obama had House Democrats over to the White House, while Republican conservatives heard a pitch from the House Budget Committee chairman, Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., on his plan to extend the U.S. borrowing cap for four to six weeks while jump-starting talks on a broader budget deal that could replace cuts to defense and domestic agency budgets with cuts to benefit programs like Medicare and reforms to the loophole-cluttered tax code. Curbs to “Obamacare” were not mentioned.
At the White House, Obama told House Democratic loyalists that he still would prefer a long-term increase in the nation’s $16.7 trillion borrowing cap but said he’s willing to sign a short-term increase to “give Boehner some time to deal with the tea party wing of his party,” said Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt.
A midday meeting Wednesday between the two top House Republicans and Democrats, meanwhile, yielded no progress. Rival aides to Boehner and Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California even disagreed over who asked for the meeting. Aides said Pelosi had a long-ignored request for a meeting with Boehner that Boehner unexpectedly granted on short notice.
Obama invited the entire House GOP to the White House on Thursday but Boehner opted to send a smaller squadron of about 20 mostly senior members, which prompted White House Press Secretary Jay Carney to issue an unusual statement criticizing the move to exclude tea party Republicans from the session.
“The president thought it was important to talk directly with the members who forced this economic crisis on the country about how the shutdown and a failure to pay the country’s bills could devastate the economy,” Carney said.
The frustrating standoff in Washington is weighing on each side’s poll numbers, but Republicans are taking the worst drubbing. A Gallup poll put the approval rating for the Republican Party at a record-low 28 percent. Polls have consistently said the Republicans deserve the greater share of blame for the shutdown.
(AP)
7 Responses
Hardly. Everyone knows the US is affluent and powerful and rich. If someone known to you as being super-rich tells you to hold off depositing a check for a few days so he can shift funds around, the check is still good and you are unlikely to try to have it discounted. That’s a “perq” of being rich – your credit is good even when your checking account is empty.
If the markets seriously believed the US would default, the price of gold would be soaring and the value of the dollar would be collapsing. Gold isn’t soaring, the dollars shift downwards against some currencies has been slight and well within the range of its previous movements.
However long term printing of massive amounts of money can do serious harm to a country. Ending the deficits, and telling the Federal Reserve to stop printing money (which is how they finance most of the deficit) is a matter of long term survival.
Dear Mr. Lew:
As a fellow Jew, I really sympathize with you. You’ve got a really tough job, trying to defend a your boss Obama, who has proven himself to be a habitual liar.
We just don’t believe him anymore.
Remember the story of the “Little Boy Who Cried Wolf!”
He’s a fraud just like his boss (and unfortunately “fin unzerer”).The Treasury has way more than enough money to pay the interest on the debt with their current receipts without raising the debt limit and subsequent debt. Spending is out of control and this administration (read “regime”) doesn’t care to enslave future generations. It reckless and false to suggest a default. Read Moody’s article on the issue.
Mr. Lew how can you put yourself as an orthodox Jew is a position to defend the liar in chief. Same on you and you will reap tzoruis for doing he lying
No. 1: You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. You are so wrong in so many ways, I do not know where to start explaining your errors to you. Your last paragraph is an absolute mystery. Please explain the “printing” of money finance the federal government’s deficit
Allow me to correct my prior post:
Commenter No. 1. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. You are so wrong in so many ways, I do not know where to start explaining your errors to you. Your last paragraph is an absolute mystery: please explain how the “printing” of money finances the federal government’s deficit.
Commenter No. 2 writes in his 2nd paragraph: “We just don’t believe him anymore.” Actually, I do not think you ever believed Mr. Obama.