Search
Close this search box.

US Judge: Russia Acting Like ‘Scofflaw,’ In Dispute Over Chabad Library


rebbeA federal judge Thursday accused Russia of acting like a “scofflaw” and an “outlaw” by refusing his order to hand over a Jewish group’s historical books and documents.

Royce Lamberth, chief judge of the U.S. District Court in Washington, made the comments at a court hearing in a longstanding lawsuit against Russia. In January, Lamberth slapped Russia with a $50,000-a-day civil contempt sanction for refusing his earlier order to give the documents, known as the Schneerson library, to Chabad Lubavitch, a Hasidic movement within Orthodox Judaism headquartered in Brooklyn, N.Y.

Russia has refused to recognize the authority of the U.S. court and claims the documents are state property. The country has transferred some of the documents to the new Jewish Museum in Moscow. Last week, Russian President Vladimir Putin visited the museum and declared, “From this moment, I consider the question of the Schneerson library to be closed.”

At Thursday’s hearing, Nathan Lewin, a lawyer for Chabad, said that the partial transfer of materials to the museum doesn’t satisfy Chabad’s religious needs or the court’s order that the materials be returned. But Lewin also noted that there have been negotiations between the U.S. and Russia over the impasse, and he asked for a hearing to be set for Aug. 20 to give those talks a chance to bear fruit. Several rabbis from Chabad were in the courtroom from New York, California and Israel.

Lamberth, who granted the request, said that Russia “is not willing to obey the laws of the United States, or any other country.”

The Russian embassy declined to comment Thursday. Putin had earlier criticized Lamberth’s ruling imposing the sanctions, saying “discussion of this problem has taken on elements of confrontation,” Russian news agencies reported. The Russian Foreign Ministry called the ruling “an absolutely unlawful and provocative decision” and threatened a tough response if U.S authorities try to seize Russian property in an attempt to pay for the sanctions. The Obama administration had urged Lamberth not to issue the sanctions, arguing they wouldn’t help resolve the dispute and would hurt U.S. foreign-policy interests.

Russia had earlier halted all art exhibit loans to the U.S., fearing they would be seized and held hostage in the court battle. That’s despite Chabad’s assurance in court filings that it will not go after any art deemed culturally significant by the State Department, which is the case for major exhibitions. Such art is already protected from legal claims under the Immunity from Seizure Act.

There are two collections at issue: 12,000 religious books and manuscripts seized during the Bolshevik revolution and the Russian Civil War nearly a century ago; and 25,000 pages of handwritten teachings and other writings of religious leaders stolen by Nazi Germany during World War II and then transferred by the Soviet Red Army as war booty to the Russian State Military Archive. The books and manuscripts, some hundreds of years old, record Chabad’s core teachings and traditions.

The case has been dragging on for about eight years, and efforts to get the materials returned date back decades, involving presidential administrations and members of Congress of both parties.

In an interview after the hearing, Lewin credited Lamberth’s January ruling for prodding Russia to engage in talks with the U.S. to resolve the dispute.

(AP)



4 Responses

  1. Not really. The issue was ownership of property that was in Russia and has never left Russia. If a foreign country attempted to rule over who owned something in the United States, no American court would take them seriously. It was “chutzpah” for an American court to rule on the matter.

  2. If the materials are from Chabad, they originated in the Soviet Union. Even if the Germans (illegally, under international law) seized them, the Soviets were required to return them to the country of origin, If they were validly seized under the Russian or Soviet law, the end result will be that the US will recognize the seizure (meaning that if this ever gets to higher American court, the Russians will win). As the Russians have agreed to use them to enrich a Judaica library in Russia, something that is in our interests, and as there have been a growth of Jewish studies in Russia recently, we should drop the matter (and offer to pay for digitization).

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts