Search
Close this search box.

Jerusalem to Name a Street After Professor Yeshayahu Leibowitz


lSince his petira in 1994, there has been a battle for and against naming a Jerusalem street after Professor Yeshayahu Leibowitz. Barring any last minute surprises, the battle has finally come to an end and on Sunday, 28 Adar 5773, a street will be named in his memory. A final approval is still pending, but it appears this is more of a formality than a stumbling block. The street has not yet been selected, but it appears it will be one of the streets in the Hebrew University Givat Ram Campus.

The late professor was an outspoken individual, one who was the subject of much controversy and criticism due to his views on many issues, hence the 20-year battle over naming a street in his memory.

The following excerpts from Wikipedia tell a bit of his life and the controversy that surrounded the individual.

Leibowitz was an Orthodox Jew who held controversial views on the subject of Halacha. He wrote that the sole purpose of religious commandments was to obey G-d, and not to receive any kind of reward in this world or the world to come. He maintained that the reasons for religious commandments were beyond man’s understanding, as well as irrelevant, and any attempt to attribute emotional significance to the performance of mitzvot was misguided and akin to idolatry.

The essence of Leibowitz’s religious outlook is that a person’s faith is his commitment to obey G-d, meaning G-d’s commandments, and this has nothing to do with a person’s image of G-d. This must be so because Leibowitz thought that G-d cannot be described, that G-d’s understanding is not man’s understanding, and thus all the questions asked of G-d are out of place. Leibowitz claimed that a person’s decision to believe in G-d (in other words: to obey him) defines or describes that person, not G-d.

One result of this approach is that faith, which is a personal commitment to obey G-d, cannot be challenged by the usual philosophical problem of evil or by historical events that seemingly contradict a divine presence. When someone told Leibowitz that he stopped believing in G-d after the Holocaust, Leibowitz answered, “Then you never believed in G-d.” If a person stops believing after an awful event, it shows that he only obeyed G-d because he thought he understood G-d’s plan, or because he expected to see a reward. But “for Leibowitz, religious belief is not an explanation of life, nature or history, or a promise of a future in this world or another, but a demand.”

Leibowitz was a staunch believer in the separation of state and religion. He believed that mixing the two corrupted faith. He condemned the veneration of Jewish shrines, cynically referring to the Western Wall as the Discotel (a play on the words “discothèque” and “Kotel”).

In contrast to his strict views on some religious matters, he was surprisingly liberal in others. On the subject of homosexuality, for example, Leibowitz believed that despite the ban on homosexual relations in Judaism, homosexuals should do their best to remain observant Jews.

Leibowitz served as the editor of the Encyclopedia Hebraica in its early stages. Apart from his innumerable articles and essays, Leibowitz authored a wide range of books on philosophy, human values, Jewish thought, the teachings of Maimonides, and politics. Many of his lectures and discourses, including those given as part of the “Broadcast University” project run by Israeli Army Radio, were subsequently compiled and printed in book form. Leibowitz was a prolific letter-writer and his advice or comment was sought out widely. A first collection of his letters (in Hebrew) was published posthumously.

(YWN – Israel Desk, Jerusalem)



8 Responses

  1. If he had a beard and peios and a streimel he would fit nicely into the hareidi world. In some ways he was like Dr. De Haan, well educated by western standards but with political views that were too frum and too radical. Given the current conscription crisis, it is interesting to ask if there is a significant minority of religious zionists who are not so blinded by nationalism that they have made learning Torah and doing mitsvos secondary to preserving control of the land.

  2. He used provocative language to make his points. Even though we can be offended by how he said things, it might not hurt us to read what he had to say.

  3. He was orhodox ? He was a kofer in שכר ועונש which a fundemetal point in yidishkiet, I know some who went of the derech after reading his philosphy

  4. barlev- Because someone went off the derech after he read something that he wrote that make the author a kofer? I know someone that went off the derech because he read a chumash. Does that make Moshe rabbeinu a kofer?

  5. He didn’t say there wasn’t שכר ועונש but rather that isn’t the reason for being frum. He said you can’t go around all day saying how much reward do I get for this mitzvah, or how much punishment will I get for that aveirah. He said you should do mitsvos since Ha-Shem told you to. Sounds to me like he got his ideas from Pirke Avos.

  6. Someone told R’ Shlomo Wolbe that he’s “coming out of the closet” but otherwise he tries to be religious. R’ Wolbe pointed to a nearby tall building, told him to climb to the top, and jump off.

    Naa, Leibowitz was not a kofer, but nobody ever is..

  7. #6 – I seriously question your story. I heard other versions, and they most definitely do NOT have him holding that a gay male should commit suicide, or holding that refraining from that one averiah is equal to the rest of Torah.

    Unlike the Christians with their doctrine (with strong pagan origins) of being “saved” or “dammed”, we have always held that the fact you are rewarded for the good, and punished for the bad, and who are we to know the relative importance of any given averiah or mitsvah. The fact that some is a thief, doesn’t mean he is exempted from putting on tefillin, and more than the fact that he puts on tefillin allows him to be a thief.

  8. I heard it personally from R’ Wolbe’s son-in-law, the Mirrer Mashgiach.
    Literally ‘Harog v’al ya’avor’

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts