Barack Obama will cement the new co-operative relationship between the US and the United Nations this month when he becomes the first American president to chair its 15-member Security Council.
The topic for the summit-level session of the council on September 24 is nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament – one of several global challenges that the US now wants to see addressed at a multinational level.
“The council has a very important role to play in preventing the spread and use of nuclear weapons, and it’s the world’s principal body for dealing with global security cooperation,” Susan Rice, US envoy to the UN, said last week.
Her remarks were the latest by the Obama administration to emphasise a shift from the strategy of the previous Bush administration, sometimes criticised by its UN partners for seeking to use the world body principally to endorse its own unilateral policies. The US currently holds the month-long rotating presidency of the Security Council.
Mr Obama will join other heads of government in New York during the week of the nuclear summit for the opening of the 64th session of the UN General Assembly. The annual meeting of world leaders is this year raising expectations on a number of fronts.
UN officials hope a climate change debate on September 22 will give fresh impetus to the search for a global climate deal at Copenhagen in December. There are also hopes a possible meeting between Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli prime minister, and Mahmoud Abbas, Palestinian Authority president, that Mr Obama would host, could lead to a breakthrough about a timetable for Middle East peace.
Heads of state are also likely to consider how to deal with Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Mr Obama gave Tehran a September deadline to reply to his offer of negotiations. Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadi-nejad will attend the General Assembly “to encourage Iranian views in managing the world,” an aide said.
US officials are concerned Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi might try to steal the limelight during his first visit to New York. A public outcry at the Libyan leader’s visit after he last month welcomed home Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, the freed Lockerbie bomber, has already stymied his plans to pitch his tent in Central Park.
“How President Gaddafi chooses to comport himself, when he attends the General Assembly and the Security Council in New York, has the potential either to further aggravate those feelings and emotions or not,” Ms Rice said.
The State Department has not ruled out the possibility that Mr Obama and Colonel Gaddafi would cross paths. They are both due to address the General Assembly on the same day, and the Libyan leader, whose country is a temporary member of the Security Council, is entitled to attend the nuclear summit session that Mr Obama will chair.
(Source: Financial Times)
7 Responses
Obama should’ve sent resigned Green Jobs czar Van Jones to chair the Security Council. Jones’ communist sicknesses would dovetail nicely with those of the UN.
Just in time for the Palestinians resuming their rocket attacks on Israel. Hey Mr. President, want the Jews to restraint because as the “Very” Rev. Wright said “….Israelis terrorizing Palestinians!!!!” Do you believe that lie?
Just great now the president will slaughter the US at the alter of the un I was wondering how corrupt can get more corrupt just leave it to obama to figure out a way I just didn’t think he would put us completely in the hands of the commi un
This shows who this fifth column is – a traitor plain and simple who wants the US to be subordinate to the UN, EU, Putin, Chavez and everyone else.
If he is not gone in 2012, the US will become a footnote like France, and one of the Asian powers, probably China, will rise to become the next superpower.
The position of “chair” is rotated on a monthly basis. Whomeever is the highest ranking member of the delegation during “our” month, chairs the Security Council. For all purposes, it is a photo op, and no more. The two important positions are President of the General Assembly and Secretary General.
How perfectly appropriate!
It would have been a complete waste of the UN’s time and resources to have someone like John Bolton represent thu U.S.A. at the U.N. Now, everyone can get along with Obama in the chair 🙂
Good thing Obama cant get anything accomplished.