Search
Close this search box.

Jan. 6 Committee Makes Multiple Criminal Referrals to DOJ Against Donald Trump

A video of former President Donald Trump is shown on a screen, as the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol holds its final meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Dec. 19, 2022. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

The House Jan. 6 committee is wrapping up its investigation of the violent 2021 U.S. Capitol insurrection, with lawmakers on Monday declaring that they have assembled a “roadmap to justice” to bring criminal charges against former President Donald Trump and his allies.

As they cap one of the most exhaustive and aggressive congressional probes in memory, the panel’s seven Democrats and two Republicans are recommending criminal charges against Trump and associates who helped him launch a multifaceted pressure campaign to try to overturn his 2020 election loss.

The committee alleged violations of four criminal statutes by Trump, in both the run-up to the riot and during the insurrection itself, as it recommended the former president for prosecution to the Justice Department. The charges recommended by the committee are conspiracy to defraud the United States, obstruction of an official proceeding of Congress, conspiracy to make a false statement and insurrection.

While a criminal referral is mostly symbolic, with the Justice Department ultimately deciding whether to prosecute Trump or others, it is a decisive end to a probe that had an almost singular focus from the start.

Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said the criminal justice system can provide accountability, adding, “We have every confidence that the work of this committee will help provide a roadmap to justice.”

Thompson said Trump “broke the faith” that people have when they cast ballots in a democracy. “He lost the 2020 election and knew it,” Thompson said. “But he chose to try to stay in office through a multi-part scheme to overturn the results and block the transfer of power.”

Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, the panel’s Republican vice chairwoman, said in opening remarks that every president in American history has defended the orderly transfer of power, “except one.”

The committee also voted 9-0 to approve its final report, which will include findings, interview transcripts and legislative recommendations. The report is expected to be released in full Wednesday.

The panel, which will dissolve on Jan. 3 with the new Republican-led House, has conducted more than 1,000 interviews, held 10 well-watched public hearings and collected more than a million documents since it launched in July 2021. As it has gathered the massive trove of evidence, the members have become emboldened in declaring that Trump, a Republican, is to blame for the violent attack on the Capitol by his supporters almost two years ago.

After beating their way past police, injuring many of them, the Jan. 6 rioters stormed the Capitol and interrupted the certification of Democrat Joe Biden’s presidential election win, echoing Trump’s lies about widespread election fraud and sending lawmakers and others running for their lives.

The attack came after weeks of Trump’s efforts to overturn his defeat — a campaign that was extensively detailed by the committee in its multiple public hearings, and laid out again by lawmakers on the panel on Monday. Many of Trump’s former aides testified about his unprecedented pressure on states, on federal officials and on Vice President Mike Pence to find a way to thwart the popular will. The committee has also described in great detail how Trump riled up the crowd at a rally that morning and then did little to stop his supporters for several hours as he watched the violence unfold on television.

California Rep. Adam Schiff, a Democratic member of the panel, said ahead of the hearing that Trump is someone who “in multiple ways tried to pressure state officials to find votes that didn’t exist, this is someone who tried to interfere with a joint session, even inciting a mob to attack the Capitol.”

“If that’s not criminal, then I don’t know what it is,” Schiff said.

The panel aired some new evidence at the meeting, including a recent interview with longtime Trump aide Hope Hicks. Describing a conversation she had with Trump around that time, she said he told her that no one would care about his legacy if he lost the election.

Hicks told the committee that Trump told her, “The only thing that matters is winning.”

While a so-called criminal referral has no real legal standing, it is a forceful statement by the committee and adds to political pressure already on Attorney General Merrick Garland and special counsel Jack Smith, who is conducting an investigation into Jan. 6 and Trump’s actions.

“We obviously want to complete the story for the American people,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., another member of the committee. “Everybody has come on a journey with us and we want a satisfactory conclusion, such that people feel that Congress has done its job.”

The panel was formed in the summer of 2021 after Senate Republicans blocked the formation of what would have been a bipartisan, independent commission to investigate the insurrection. When that effort failed, the Democratic-controlled House formed an investigative committee of its own.

As the committee was getting started, House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy of California, a Trump ally, decided not to participate after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rejected some of his appointments. That left an opening for two anti-Trump Republicans in the House — Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois — to join seven Democrats, launching an unusually unified panel in the divided Congress.

While the committee’s mission was to take a comprehensive accounting of the insurrection and educate the public about what happened, they’ve also aimed their work at an audience of one: the attorney general. Lawmakers on the panel have openly pressured Garland to investigate Trump’s actions, and last month he appointed a special counsel, Smith, to oversee two probes related to Trump, including those related to the insurrection and the presence of classified documents at Trump’s Florida estate.

In court documents earlier this year, the committee suggested criminal charges against Trump could include conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of an official proceeding of Congress.

In a “conspiracy to defraud the United States,” the committee argues that evidence supports an inference that Trump and his allies “entered into an agreement to defraud the United States” when they disseminated misinformation about election fraud and pressured state and federal officials to assist in that effort. Trump still says he won the election to this day.

The panel also asserts that Trump obstructed an official proceeding, the joint session of Congress in which the Electoral College votes are certified. The committee said Trump either attempted or succeeded at obstructing, influencing or impeding the ceremonial process on Jan. 6 and “did so corruptly” by pressuring Pence to try to overturn the results as he presided over the session. Pence declined to do so.

A criminal referral on the charge of insurrection is a clear effort to hold Trump directly accountable for the rioters who stormed the building. The rarely used insurrection statute criminalizes any effort to incite, engage in or assist a rebellion or insurrection “against the authority of the United States.”

The committee may make ethics referrals for five House Republicans — including McCarthy — who ignored congressional subpoenas from the panel.

The panel subpoenaed McCarthy, R-Calif., and Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, Andy Biggs of Arizona and Mo Brooks of Alabama. The panel has investigated McCarthy’s conversations with Trump the day of the attack and meetings the four other lawmakers had with the White House beforehand as Trump and some of his allies worked to overturn his election defeat.

(AP)



15 Responses

  1. The evidence presented in the hearings is quite convincing, certainly would be enough for grand jury indictments. What happens next will be interesting and historic.

  2. Coffee addict, this wasn’t a trial but rather an investigative committee somewhat similar to an investigative grand jury. Trump was asked to testify and didn’t comply. Almost all who testified, other than the police officers, were Trump White House and campaign staff members. What happens next will be interesting.
    The 154 page summery of the findings is available on line for you to review.

  3. CA says “When the other side has no voice (because it wasn’t given one)” but….. they were given a chance to be on the committee and chose NOT to participate. #AddictedToFakeNewsMuch?

  4. yaakov doe
    you did not answer coffee addicts question. just changed the subject like all dems do. How about answering for a change? THE QUESTIONS! With honesty

  5. The facts speak for themselves. Those who hate the “libs” or the “dems” – ok, you have a right to your political views.
    What is not ok is using the office of the Presidency to pressure or influence the election process. Say what you want about the Jan 6th insurrection, or the Jan 6th commission, two things are undisputable: Trump pressured Pence not to certify the election and Trump personally called the Georgia Sec of State to “find” 11 thousand plus votes.
    If we want to preserve our conservative values, and the values of the Torah, we cannot support a man whose only measure of morality is “what is in it for me?”

  6. Morris Hertz, you are being very dishonest. Every president does his best to influence the election — that’s what campaigning is! And that’s what lobbying is.

    Trump tried to persuade Pence to take an action that he had good reason to believe was within Pence’s power. Pence took legal advice on the matter, and his lawyer disagreed with Trump’s lawyer and advised him that he did not have that power. Pence properly followed his own lawyer’s advice, but that doesn’t make Trump wrong. He was equally properly following his lawyer’s advice, which was objectively no less valid that that of Pence’s lawyer. Eastman’s argument is not obviously wrong, and it’s certainly no worse than the contrary argument; both cases suffer from the same flaws. So Trump was right to follow it and Pence was right to decline.

    But what’s really dishonest is your portrayal of the call to Raffensperger, putting the word “find” in scare quotes, as if Trump had asked him to do something wrong. Yes, Trump asked him, in fact demanded to know why he refused to even try to find just 11,000 invalid votes, among all the tens or hundreds of thousands that were surely there. How is that any kind of crime? It was a good question. Why didn’t Raffensperger look for them? As Trump said, he didn’t have to find all of them, just 11,000. How hard could that have been?

    Raffensperger was of the opinion that there were fewer obviously invalid votes, and therefore finding 11,000 would be harder, so he wasn’t going to look. OK, that was his opinion. But how does that justify implying that Trump’s request was somehow improper, and how does it justify the scare quotes around “find”? Putting those quotes makes you a deeply dishonest person, an outright liar and slanderer, and a disgrace to the Torah.

  7. BaltimoreMaven, the Republicans were NOT given a chance to be on the committee. Pelosi insisted on choosing all the members, which means they would be representing HER, not the Republicans. The Republicans obviously refused to go along with such a sham. The two Republicans Pelosi appointed represent the Democrat Party, not the Republicans, since it was the Democrats who chose them.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts