A federal lawsuit has been filed against eight entities and three individuals for the May shooting that killed 19 students and two teachers at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas.
The lawsuit, first reported by the San Antonio Express-News, was filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Del Rio by one parent whose child was wounded in the shooting and two parents whose children were on campus at the time. Attorneys for the parents say it is the first federal lawsuit related to the attack.
“The horrors of May 24, 2022 were only possible because so many in positions of power were negligent, careless, and reckless,” according to a statement from Stephanie B. Sherman, one of two attorneys representing the parents.
“We are already hearing that many (students) are scared for their lives,” said Monique Alarcon, the other attorney for the parents. “This case is about ensuring that they have access to the care and resources they need.”
The lawsuit alleges a violation of due process rights, negligence, emotional distress and other violations by the Uvalde school district, the city, firearms maker Daniel Defense, gun dealer Oasis Outback and firearms accessory maker Firequest International.
Also named are radio communication device maker Motorola Solutions, door locking maker Schneider Electric USA, fired school Police Chief Pete Arredondo, suspended police Lt. Mariano Pargas, who was acting city police chief at the time.
The police response to the shooting was sharply criticized as nearly 400 officers responded, but waited more than an hour before confronting and killing the gunman.
School Principal Mandy Gutierrez, who was reinstated three days after being suspended when she rebutted a sharply critical legislative committee report alleging a “culture of complacency” at the school, is also named in the lawsuit.
The lawsuit alleges Motorola’s products failed to operate inside the school, “leaving first responders without information communicated from dispatch and/or other first responders,” and that “Schneider Electric’s doors failed to lock as designed after being shut.”
The defendants declined comment or did not return messages to The Associated Press on Thursday.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified punitive damages from each defendant but the school district and the city, which are exempted by state law from such awards.
(AP)
Join the official YWN WhatsApp status
One Response
I understand suing the school district, the city, and the then-commissioner. But the gun manufacturer and dealer?! They did nothing wrong and are not at all responsible, so by suing them the plaintiffs show themselves to be dishonest, greedy, blood-suckers, and this makes even their otherwise-legitimate suits illegitimate. Likewise I don’t believe their claim that the door lock or the radios didn’t work properly; radios are certainly not guaranteed to work everywhere and that doesn’t make them defective.