Enter this article and discover with us what are the current plans of Europe to solve an energy crisis without equality.

How Europe can solve the problem of the energy crisis

The situation that Europe has been experiencing for some months now, from the energy point of view, is rather critical due to the breaking of ties, for various reasons, with the major importing countries of various resources, including wheat and especially gas.

Europe has in fact a heavy dependence on gas, as it is not able to produce enough for its needs, and therefore must import it, and having to do with countries generally distant has two options available: the first is to transport liquid gas by cargo ships, as happens with the gas from the Americas, the second, which is also the best, is to use huge pipelines that cross the continent and also sections of sea, but must be small because the costs for the creation would otherwise be exaggerated.

The current situation on the energy front

Having said that, up to now the European Union (and in particular countries like Germany and Italy, which import up to a third of it in this way) has been importing gas mainly from the East through pipelines: with this situation, however, it is not possible to rely on them, and it is mandatory to switch to another energy source, especially considering the European plan on energy transition that risks suffering a heavy blow.
Anyway, on this page, you can find the best Betting Offers Finder currently on the market to think less about the gas crisis and more about fun.

The first steps, i.e., finding alternative suppliers, especially on the African continent, have already been taken, but they are not enough to cushion the exponential costs that are reaching electricity and gas; the next step would be to switch to “cleaner” energy, but unfortunately, this is difficult for a number of reasons.
This is explained to us by Tony Sloterman, the Product Owner of Casino Bonuses Finder.: “One of these reasons is that energy sources such as solar and wind need a lot of space for their installations, and consequently this space is taken away from agriculture, livestock or (to a lesser extent) industries; moreover, these energies are heavily dependent on climatic conditions, and can be catastrophically affected.”

Other solutions to address the current crisis

Other solutions are geothermal and hydroelectric energy, which however depend on the morphology of the land and are therefore not feasible everywhere (and in the case of hydroelectric energy, special dams must be created, which can cause water problems, especially for crops near rivers or that take water from them). However, there is another viable solution, which is heavily demonized by several parties, including those active at the European level: nuclear power.

Nuclear power is in fact a very valid source of energy, on which, however, for about 35 years there has been a fairly heavy spectre: that of being a source of high-risk energy, as symbolized by the explosions of Chornobyl (1986) and Fukushima (2011): especially the first one is very impactful for Europeans, as it occurred at a relatively short distance from them. Several referendums regarding nuclear power have been made in a short time, and in countries like Italy, this energy source has been completely abandoned.

In any case, nuclear power constitutes a choice that is not affected by morphological characteristics, it requires the same space as a traditional power plant and, furthermore, it uses much more efficient fuel than any type of coal or gas power plant. Consequently, this is the preferable solution for the whole of Europe, despite public opinion having a lukewarm, if not negative, reputation for it.