Republicans fighting President Joe Biden’s coronavirus vaccine mandates are wielding a new weapon against the White House rules: natural immunity.
They contend that people who have recovered from the virus have enough immunity and antibodies to not need COVID-19 vaccines, and the concept has been invoked by Republicans as a sort of stand-in for vaccines.
Florida wrote natural immunity into state law this week as GOP lawmakers elsewhere are pushing similar measures to sidestep vaccine mandates. Lawsuits over the mandates have also begun leaning on the idea. Conservative federal lawmakers have implored regulators to consider it when formulating mandates.
Scientists acknowledge that people previously infected with COVID-19 have some level of immunity but that vaccines offer a more consistent level of protection. Natural immunity is also far from a one-size-fits-all scenario, making it complicated to enact sweeping exemptions to vaccines.
That’s because how much immunity COVID-19 survivors have depends on how long ago they were infected, how sick they were, and if the virus variant they had is different from mutants circulating now. For example, a person who had a minor case one year ago is much different than a person who had a severe case over the summer when the delta variant was raging through the country. It’s also difficult to reliably test whether someone is protected from future infections.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in August that COVID-19 survivors who ignored advice to get vaccinated were more than twice as likely to get infected again. A more recent study from the CDC, looking at data from nearly 190 hospitals in nine states, determined that unvaccinated people who had been infected months earlier were five times more likely to get COVID-19 than fully vaccinated people who didn’t have a prior infection.
“Infection with this virus, if you survive, you do have some level of protection against getting infected in the future and particularly against getting serious infection in the future,” said Dr. David Dowdy of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “It’s important to note though that even those who have been infected in the past get additional protection from being vaccinated.”
Studies also show that COVID-19 survivors who get vaccinated develop extra-strong protection, what’s called “hybrid immunity.” When previously infected person gets a coronavirus vaccine, the shot acts like a booster and revs virus-fighting antibodies to high levels. The combination also strengthens another defensive layer of the immune system, helping create new antibodies that are more likely to withstand future variants.
The immunity debate comes as the country is experiencing another surge in infections and hospitalizations and 60 million people remain unvaccinated in a pandemic that has killed more than 770,000 Americans. Biden is hoping more people will get vaccinated because of workplace mandates set to take effect early next year but which face many challenges in the courts.
And many Republicans eager to buck Biden have embraced the argument that immunity from earlier infections should be enough to earn an exemption from the mandates.
“We recognize, unlike what you see going on with the federal proposed mandates and other states, we’re actually doing a science-based approach. For example, we recognize people that have natural immunity,” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican who has been a chief critic of virus rules, said at a signing ceremony for sweeping legislation to hobble vaccine mandates this week.
The new Florida law forces private businesses to let workers opt out of COVID-19 mandates if they can prove immunity through a prior infection, as well as exemptions based on medical reasons, religious beliefs, regular testing or an agreement to wear protective gear. The state health department, which is led by Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, who opposes mandates and has drawn national attention over a refusal to wear a face mask during a meeting, will have authority to define exemption standards.
The Republican-led New Hampshire Legislature plans to take up a similar measure when it meets in January. Lawmakers in Idaho and Wyoming, both statehouses under GOP-control, recently debated similar measures but did not pass them. In Utah, a newly signed law creating exemptions from Biden’s vaccine mandates for private employers allows people to duck the requirement if they have already had COVID.
And the debate is not unique to the U.S. Russia has seen huge numbers of people seeking out antibody tests to prove they had an earlier infection and therefore don’t need vaccines.
Some politicians use the science behind natural immunity to advance narratives suggesting vaccines aren’t the best way to end the pandemic.
“The shot is not by any means the only or proven way out of the pandemic. I’m not willing to give blind faith to the pharmaceutical narrative,” said Idaho Republican Rep. Greg Ferch.
U.S. Sen. Roger Marshall, a Kansas Republican and physician, along with 14 other GOP doctors, dentists and pharmacists in Congress, sent a letter in late September to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, urging the agency, when setting vaccination policies, to consider natural immunity.
The White House has recently unveiled a host of vaccine mandates, sparking a flurry of lawsuits from GOP states, setting the stage for pitched legal battles. Among the rules are vaccine requirements for federal contractors, businesses with more than 100 employees and health care workers.
In separate lawsuits, others are challenging local vaccine rules using an immunity defense.
A 19-year-old student who refuses to be tested but claims he contracted and quickly recovered from COVID-19 is suing the University of Nevada, Reno, the governor and others over the state’s requirement that everyone, with few exceptions, show proof of vaccination in order to register for classes in the upcoming spring semester. The case alleges that “COVID-19 vaccination mandates are an unconstitutional intrusion on normal immunity and bodily integrity.”
Another case, filed by workers of Los Alamos National Laboratory, challenges their workplace vaccine mandate for civil rights and constitutional violations, arguing the lab has refused requests for medical accommodations for those workers who have fully recovered from COVID-19.
A similar lawsuit from Chicago firefighters and other city employees hit a bump last month when a judge said their case lacked scientific evidence to support the contention that the natural immunity for people who have had the virus is superior to the protection from the vaccine.
(AP)
11 Responses
There is so much misimformation in this article I don’t know where to start
1. There are many studies that suggest that natural immunity is significantly more reliable than vaccine immunity,
2. There are studies that suggest natural immunity is effective regardless of the severity of the infection
3. The CDC study cited has been contradicted by many other studies. Many Scientists have a big issue with the methodology of that study.
It is appalling the author made such generalizations as “Scientists say”….is he suggesting that those who disagree with these conclusions are excluded from the “scientist” designation?! This is the sort of article I would expect to read on CNN not YWN.
Finally! The sensible are being heard. It’s a much lower voice than the shouting coercing idiots, but TRUTH doesn’t need to be shouted to be heard.
“Natural immunity” has the risk of death or long-term problems. Not worth the risk.
Who wrote this trash? Arguing that natural immunity is not as “constant” as getting a vaccine? How moronic is this person? Thanks he government is already pushing a third shot, with how many more to come. Does this sound like “consistent” immunity to you? Of course not. Has it occurred to you that the reason we keep seeing “variants” is because healthy people are getting jab after jab. This is exactly what is causing the variants. Old people and people with underlying health issues should get vaccinated if they choose, otherwise healthy and younger adults have close to 100% chance of full recovery (with having experienced only moderate to sever like flu symptoms) and going on with their life. The natural immunity gained from this is at least as good if not much much better that having gotten the vaccine (which we now know wears out after 8 months).
Any genius care to look at the facts – Israel was the most highly vaccinated country – and is now going through its’ THIRD wave of COVID….Vermont is the most highly vaccinated state, and is now also going through another wave of COVID…Helen Keller could have seen the nonsense of this vaccine. The states with the tightest COVID restrictions are the states with the highest outbreaks of COVID………You’re welcome.
BS”D
1. Even if a person is in the minority who are not immune to covid 19 from having the disease, or don’t have cross over T cell immunity from another corona virus, it is not the business of the government to decide which vaccines, if any, a person will have.
2. This article is loaded with false statements.
3. The covid “vaccines” are not necessary, not safe, and don’t prevent the spread of, or death from, covid.
4. The websites of Drs. Zev Zelenko M.D., Robert McCullough M.D., Joseph Mercola D.O., and Pierre Kory M.D., are excellent places to become informed.
In many states, the Democrats reject (as ineffective) both vaccines and natural immunity (from having the disease in the past), which is why they support continued use of masks and social distancing. If you say masks are needed in any situation (such as on a train), you are saying the the vaccines doesn’t work and previous exposure to the disease doesn’t confer immunity.
If anyone living in NY wants to see how the Democrat$ themselves don’t believe the effectiveness of the so-called covid-19 vaccine$, they should go to Manhattan where businesses have signs that even if someone got the so-called covid-19 vaccine$ they must wear masks, regardless! These so-called vaccine$ have zero effectiveness in any capacity to the point that the Democrat$ have redefined for themselves the purpose of vaccine$.
> Israel was the most highly vaccinated country – and is now going through its’ THIRD wave of COVID…
and indeed there is effect – Israel currently has 0.2 daily deaths per million, Austria 5, USA 3.5, UK Germany 2, Canada 0.7, France 0.5. This is effectof Israeli policy. Looks like you did not know this, so hopefully this new info will change your opinion.
The hypocrites are using the masks as pacifiers and the vaccines as blankies.
But does it help them grow up?
Idiots do as idiocy does.
Doing stupid things again and again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity.
@Always_Ask
You’re not asking; you’re stating. Actually you are twisting malka6101’s words. malka mentioned people getting ill. You responded with mortality stats. Was that deliberate?
This ‘vaccine’ – unlike all previous vaccines in history – was never claimed to prevent contaigion or transmission. It merely claims to be able to reduce mortality – which it appears to do. However, its real success rates are not known as most official sources are concealing vital data required to calculate risk benefit stats, and are obfuscating trial results.
However, world leaders are using contaigion numbers as their bar, rather than mortality. Eg Germany is presently seeing a huge rise in numbers, but also a significant drop in deaths.
Why are world leaders sticking to this clearly un-winnable tactic? Well, any suggestion will be labelled a conspiracy theory, so we’ll leave that alone.
Japan has just ditched the WHO’s advice to fight the virus with injections, and have started promoting rescheduled off-the shelf existing medicines that have already proven successful in a few states of India that used them. The matter is definitely nowhere near finished, but just like after WWII, a time of reckoning will come for those who have basically destroyed society on multiple levels for the next few generations.