America’s baby bust isn’t over. The nation’s birth rates last year reached record lows for women in their teens and 20s, a government report shows, leading to the fewest babies in 32 years.
The provisional report, released Wednesday and based on more than 99% of U.S. birth records, found 3.788 million births last year. It was the fourth year the number of births has fallen, the lowest since 1986 and a surprise to some experts given the improving economy.
The fertility rate of 1.7 births per U.S. woman also fell 2%, meaning the current generation isn’t making enough babies to replace itself. The fertility rate is a hypothetical estimate based on lifetime projections of age-specific birth rates.
Whether more U.S. women are postponing motherhood or forgoing it entirely isn’t yet clear.
If trends continue, experts said, the U.S. can expect labor shortages including in elder care when aging baby boomers need the most support.
“I keep expecting to see the birth rates go up and then they don’t,” said demographer Kenneth M. Johnson of University of New Hampshire’s Carsey School of Public Policy.
He estimates 5.7 million babies would have been born in the past decade if fertility rates hadn’t fallen from pre-recession levels.
“That’s a lot of empty kindergarten rooms,” said Johnson, who wasn’t involved in the report.
Other experts are not concerned, predicting today’s young women will catch up with childbearing later in their lives. The only two groups with slightly higher birth rates in 2018 were women in their late 30s and those in their early 40s.
“Our fertility rates are still quite high for a wealthy nation,” said Caroline Sten Hartnett, a demographer at the University of South Carolina.
American women are starting families sooner than most other developed nations, according to other research . Other countries are seeing similar declines in birth rates.
Young Americans still want to have children, but they don’t feel stable enough to have them yet, said Karen Benjamin Guzzo, who studies families at Bowling Green State University in Ohio.
The U.S. could do more to encourage childbearing with parental leave, preschool expansion and child care subsidies and other policies aimed at helping young adults struggling with student loan debt and housing costs, Guzzo said.
Brandy Loshaw, 39, of Webster, New York, said despite a stable career as a dental hygienist “I would never be able to afford the added expense of a child and live comfortably.” She said she is grateful she “can never remember a time in my life that I wanted children.”
Pollution and climate change worry her. “I would hate to bring a child into a world that could fall apart around them,” Loshaw said.
Births were down across racial groups, with small declines for Hispanics, whites, blacks and Asians. The number of babies born to native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders was stable.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report also found:
—Overall, the U.S. birth rate for women ages 15 to 44 was 59 births per 1,000 women, an all-time low.
—Last year, there were 2% fewer births than in 2017.
—Births to teenagers again reached a record low. The number of births to mothers ages 15 through 19 was 179,607, down 8%.
—The rate for premature births — delivery at less than 37 weeks — rose for the fourth straight year to just over 10%, from 9.9%.
(AP)
10 Responses
—Last year, there were 2% fewer births than in 2017. This is going to ease the Shidduch crisis, and unpend the necessity for boys to marry girls their age and older.
Just keep in mind that libs want depopulation!
I suggest the focus on economics is in error. I hypothesize that the primary factor determining birth rate if belief in the future, and that “persons of faith” (regardless of religion) have more confidence that the future is worth living for and therefore see the future as a good place for children, and produce more children, whereas secular persons, tend to see the future more critically, and combined with a belief that all that matters is what you benefit from immediately and in your own lifetime, tend to have fewer children. The result is that the birth rate correlates with religion, and therefore the “birth bust” in the US and elsewhere is tied to growing secularism.
not amongst anchor babies.
It’s all due to the lefts love of abortion
Not at all surprising, considering
A. The dominance of citizenship demanding abortion be legalized everywhere
B. Women are all trying to become men in the U.S.
C. Vice versa from B…
birth rate has little to do to economy; it has to do with the desire to have a family. Many non Jewish Americans have opted not to marry and the few who do marry many opt not to have a family or if to have a family to make it small.
This is the American (non Jewish) generation of ‘getting my personal pleasure”……
Only immigration is going to prevent the US from having a long slow economic and demographic decline.
147: The study covered all of America, of which Jews are about 2%. The study tells us nothing about Jewish birthrates, frum or otherwise.
Abortion rates in the US have plummeted in recent years.
Eastern Europe is more religious than Western Europe but has much lower fertility rates.