The House Judiciary Committee voted Wednesday to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress, escalating the Democrats’ extraordinary legal battle with the Trump administration over access to special counsel Robert Mueller’s Trump-Russia report.
The vote capped a day of ever-deepening dispute between congressional Democrats and President Donald Trump, who for the first time invoked the principle of executive privilege, claiming the right to block lawmakers from the full report on Mueller’s probe of Russian interference to help Trump in the 2016 election.
Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler of New York declared the action by Trump’s Justice Department a clear new sign of the president’s “blanket defiance” of Congress’ constitutional rights to conduct oversight.
“We did not relish doing this, but we have no choice,” Nadler said after the vote.
The White House’s blockade, he said, “is an attack on the ability of the American people to know what the executive branch is doing.” He said, “This cannot be.”
But Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said it was disappointing that members of Congress “have chosen to engage in such inappropriate political theatrics.”
Barr made “extraordinary efforts” to provide Congress and the public with information about Mueller’s work, she said.
White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said neither the White House nor Barr “will comply with Chairman Nadler’s unlawful and reckless demands.”
Late Wednesday the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee issued his own subpoena to the Justice Department for the full Mueller report, as the confrontation intensifies.
Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff of California, whose committee had previously requested the documents, said he has “no choice” but to compel the department’s compliance. He warned that if it continues to “ignore or rejects our requests,” the panel could take legal action.
Kupec declined to comment.
Though the White House initially hesitated on invoking privilege, Trump told his staff and political advisers in recent weeks to refuse to cooperate with Democrats, believing the party’s goal was simply to damage him politically going into his re-election campaign. The coming legal battle could stretch to 2020, and the White House is aiming to tie up congressional probes until Election Day.
Executive privilege is the president’s power to keep information from the courts, Congress and the public to protect the confidentiality of the Oval Office decision-making process.
The president’s decision was weeks in the making, the next inevitable escalation between the White House and Congress over a number of probes. The White House has rejected all efforts to probe Trump’s business dealings or tax returns as well as the West Wing’s security clearance procedure.
[WATCH: Pelosi Says Jails Will Be “Overcrowded” If We Start Arresting Trump Officials]
The committee voted along party lines, 24-16, to recommend the full House hold Barr in contempt, but only after some five hours of heated and, at times, emotional testimony.
Democrats made their case that Congress was at a historic juncture as it confronts what they consider Trump’s stonewalling of lawmakers’ ability to conduct oversight of the administration. Republicans portrayed the majority as angry and lashing out at Barr after the special counsel did not find that Trump colluded with Russia to swing the 2016 election.
Said Democrat Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas: “The president now seeks to take a wrecking ball to the Constitution of the United States.”
And Rep. Cedric Richmond of Louisiana said the road ahead may be “messy” but Democrats must fight to “protect our democracy.” Other Democrats called the standoff a “serious” and “grave” moment.
However, the panel’s top Republican, Doug Collins of Georgia, said Democrats were manufacturing a crisis and rushing the process to “sully Bill Barr’s good name.”
Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, a Trump ally, said the Democrats were trying to “delegitimize” the president and biding time before they try to impeach him.
“Get over it,” Gaetz said.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said the next step will be consideration by the full House. Nadler said that will happen soon.
If approved by the House, where the Democrats hold a solid majority, the contempt resolution would almost certainly move to an unusual, and potentially protracted, multi-pronged court battle with the Trump administration.
The contempt finding could be referred to the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, a Justice Department official who would be likely to defend rather than oppose Barr. Democratic House leaders could also file a lawsuit, though the case could take months or even years to resolve. Some committee members have suggested they also could fine Barr as he withholds information.
Nadler said Wednesday the Trump administration’s refusal to provide the special counsel’s full Russia report to Congress presents a “constitutional crisis.”
In a letter Wednesday to Trump , Barr explained that the special counsel’s files contain millions of pages of classified and unclassified information. He said it was the committee’s “abrupt resort to a contempt vote” that “has not allowed sufficient time for you to consider fully whether to make a conclusive assertion of executive privilege.”
Barr told Trump he should assert privilege now, “pending a full decision on the matter.”
Talks with the Justice Department broke down over the committee’s subpoena for an unredacted version of the report.
Barr released a redacted version of Mueller’s 400-plus-page report to the public last month, but Democrats subpoenaed the full document , along with underlying evidence.
The department has rejected that demand, while allowing a few top lawmakers from the House and Senate to view a version with fewer redactions. That version blacks out grand jury information, which needs a judge’s approval for release, and it doesn’t include the report’s underlying evidence. Democrats have said they won’t view that version until they get broader access.
Almost half the report’s pages contain some type of redaction including those around the Russian influence campaign, presidential pardons and other topics.
Barr has refused to testify in public to the committee after a disagreement over the Democrats’ demand that he answer questions from a staff attorney in addition to lawmakers. The committee is in talks for Mueller himself to appear May 15, but there is no agreement yet, and Trump has said Mueller should not testify.
Nadler also has threatened to hold former White House Counsel Don McGahn in contempt of Congress if he doesn’t testify before the committee later this month. Nadler rejected a White House claim that documents McGahn refused to provide despite a subpoena are controlled by the White House and thus McGahn has no legal right to them.
Pelosi, who has tamped down calls from her liberal flank to launch impeachment proceedings against Trump, said in a Washington Post interview Wednesday that the president, by obstructing Congress was becoming “self-impeachable.”
Mueller, in his report, said he could not establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, but he did not reach a conclusion on whether Trump obstructed justice. Barr said he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein decided there were not grounds to charge Trump with obstruction.
(AP)
15 Responses
To hell with Nadler and his criminal party.
1. The President should issue an executive order declaring the Democrat Chairmen in the House as being in Contempt of the Presidency. As one of the three coequal branches of government, the President has the same right to issue a Contempt citation as do the courts and Congress.
2. The President should invoke his constitutional right to “Executive Privilege” on all requests from the House. If they go to court, which can take years going through the judicial system (Obama’s A.G. Eric Holder’s official Contempt is still unresolved in the courts over six years later), the President can run out of the clock.
3. The United States Senate should preemptively vote that it will and does “dismiss with prejudice” any and all impeachment proceedings from the House on the basis that the House acted purely out of political malice and not on any sound legal basis. And that the Senate will throw out any impeachment without even trying it.
Hardly a crisis. Most Democrats announced a policy of total non-cooperation with Trump prior to his inaguration, regardless of what policies Trump follows as President, so there isn’t a real change. The Democrats aren’t likely to have enough votes to do any serious mischief unless they win in 2020, in which the matter will be moot The question whether Congress needs a purpose (other than harssment of the president) for its legislative investigations has never been litigated. The only “crime”the Democrats have evidence of is “political incorrectness” at that isn’t an impeachable offense.
Ndler is one of the of the biggest Hillul HaShem, he is an embarrassment to all Jews in America.
So the corrupt president gets to hide the evidence of his possible crimes! Totally insane! He certainly is acting like an innocent person isn’t he?
What a betrayal of government powers! Do these guys ever do what they’ve been elected to do? Between finding faults with Trump and vacationing do they ever do something productive?
rt, stop repeating latest DNC talking points you received this morning from Nancy Pelosi. If Nadler was really interested in unredacted Mueller report, he would go to Justice Department building where it was available for the members of Congress since last week.. You Democrats can fool only yourself.
Jerry Nadler and that Pelosi are being held in CONTEMPT of the Citizens of the USA for being stupid, arrogant, deceptive, low-lifes, and defiant to the President of the USA and his Attorney General.
That’s in addition to wasting the citizens tax dollars and not doing any work that they were hired to do.
If I acted like that on my job, I would get fired.
What Chutzpah they have.
One day they will have to face the fury of the people of the USA – they will be the greatest cause to having President Trump win the 2020 election by a major landslide
Stupid Democraps
So the corrupt president gets to hide the evidence of his possible crimes! Totally insane! He certainly is acting like an innocent person isn’t he?
his actions are those of any person, to a party that cant fargin his win and will do anything to take him down.
that is you stonewall them at every turn! exactly as they are trying to do to your administration
Let’s be very clear about what’s happening here: Nadler is demanding that Barr COMMIT A CRIME by providing him with grand jury testimony. Not only can Barr not provide it on request, not even a court can authorize its release. It is simply illegal for Nadler to see it. And now he purports to hold Barr in contempt for obeying the law. The citation is of course completely invalid, and the DOJ will of course throw any criminal referral into the garbage where it belongs.
Meanwhile Eric Holder, who withheld information Congress was absolutely entiled to, for no other purpose than to cover up his own criminal conspiracy to run weapons to Mexican cartels in order to undermine the second amendment, was never prosecuted and to this day walks around a free man despite being held in contempt of Congress. Disgusting.
Democrat (AP) headline:
House Democrats Hold AG Barr IN CONTEMPT; Trump Invokes “Executive Privilege” Over Full Mueller Report
Correct headline:
House Democrats Hold AG Barr “in contempt”; Trump Invokes EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE Over Full Mueller Report
Mosheingolus,
In defense of rt (idk why im defending a baby) Nadler can’t get the unredacted report
But Barr can’t give it to him legally
I guess all you guys believe that a president should rule like a king! Just like in turkey or Russia. Learn some history what happens if there is no balance of power.
coffee addict, Nadler may not get the report, but he can read it inside DOJ building if he wants without taking copies of it.
Nadler is a miserable kvetch. Who’d vote for him.