Pushing back against explosive reports his own administration is conspiring against him, President Donald Trump lashed out against the anonymous senior official who wrote a New York Times opinion piece claiming to be part of a “resistance” working “from within” to thwart his most dangerous impulses.
Perhaps as striking as the essay was the recognition of the long list of administration officials who plausibly could have been its author. Many have privately shared some of the same concerns expressed about the president with colleagues, friends and reporters.
Washington was consumed by a wild guessing game as to the identity of the writer, and swift denials of involvement in the op-ed came Thursday from top administration officials, including from Vice President Mike Pence’s office, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Dan Coats, director of national intelligence, and other Cabinet members.
Trump was furious, tweeting Thursday morning that “The Deep State and the Left, and their vehicle, the Fake News Media, are going Crazy – & they don’t know what to do.”
On Wednesday night, Trump tweeted a demand that if “the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders called on the “coward” who wrote the piece to “do the right thing and resign.”
TREASON?
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2018
White House officials did not immediately respond to a request to elaborate on Trump’s call for the writer to be turned over to the government or the unsupported national security ground of his demand.
To some observers, the ultimatum appeared to play into the very concerns about the president’s impulses raised by the essay’s author. Trump has demanded that aides identify the leaker, according to two people familiar with the matter, though it was unclear how they might go about doing so. The two were not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Does the so-called “Senior Administration Official” really exist, or is it just the Failing New York Times with another phony source? If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2018
In a “House of Cards”-style plot twist in an already over-the-top administration, Trump allies and political insiders scrambled to unmask the writer. But the op-ed also brought to light questions that have been whispered in Washington for more than a year: Is Trump truly in charge? And could a divided executive branch pose a danger to the country?
Former CIA Director John Brennan, a fierce Trump critic, called the op-ed “active insubordination … born out of loyalty to the country.”
“This is not sustainable to have an executive branch where individuals are not following the orders of the chief executive,” Brennan told NBC’s “Today” show. “I do think things will get worse before they get better. I don’t know how Donald Trump is going to react to this. A wounded lion is a very dangerous animal, and I think Donald Trump is wounded.”
The anonymous author, claiming to be part of the “resistance” to Trump “working diligently from within” his administration, said, “Many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.”
“It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room,” the author continued. “We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.”
The Deep State and the Left, and their vehicle, the Fake News Media, are going Crazy – & they don’t know what to do. The Economy is booming like never before, Jobs are at Historic Highs, soon TWO Supreme Court Justices & maybe Declassification to find Additional Corruption. Wow!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 6, 2018
I’m draining the Swamp, and the Swamp is trying to fight back. Don’t worry, we will win!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 6, 2018
Trump raged about the piece in the White House, calling around to confidants to vent about the disloyalty of the author and fuming that the so-called Deep State within the federal government had conspired against him, according to a person familiar with the president’s views but not authorized to discuss them publicly.
Hotly debated on Twitter was the author’s use of the word “lodestar,” which pops up frequently in speeches by Pence. Could the anonymous figure be someone in Pence’s orbit? Others argued that the word “lodestar” could have been included to throw people off.
In a rare step, Pence’s communications director Jarrod Agen tweeted early Thursday that “The Vice President puts his name on his Op-Eds. The @nytimes should be ashamed and so should the person who wrote the false, illogical, and gutless op-ed. Our office is above such amateur acts.”
Pompeo, who was in India, denied writing the anonymous opinion piece, saying, “It’s not mine.” He accused the media of trying to undermine the Trump administration and said he found that “incredibly disturbing.”
Coats later issued his own denial, followed by Housing Secretary Ben Carson, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, budget director Mick Mulvaney and others; and with several prominent administration members delivering on-the-record denials, the focus could now fall on other senior aides to do the same, with questions raised about those who stay silent.
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders tried to head off reporters’ inquiries of Trump officials, tweeting that the questions should be aimed at The New York Times, which she said was “complicit in this deceitful act.” Trump, appearing at an unrelated event Wednesday at the White House, lashed out at the Times for publishing the op-ed.
“They don’t like Donald Trump and I don’t like them,” he said of the newspaper. The op-ed pages of the newspaper are managed separately from its news department.
Early Thursday, Trump followed up with a tweet that touted his administration’s accomplishments. His other morning tweets — one on North Korea, the other on the economy — seemed to be an effort to change the subject.
The anonymous author wrote in the Times that where Trump has had successes, they have come “despite — not because of — the president’s leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective.”
The assertions in the column were largely in line with complaints about Trump’s behavior that have repeatedly been raised by various administration officials, often speaking on the condition of anonymity. And they were published a day after the release of details from an explosive new book by longtime journalist Bob Woodward that laid bare concerns among the highest echelon of Trump aides about the president’s judgment.
The writer of the Times op-ed said Trump aides are aware of the president’s faults and “many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations. I would know. I am one of them.”
The writer also alleged “there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment” because of the “instability” witnessed in the president.
The 25th Amendment allows the vice president to take over if the commander in chief is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.” It requires that the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet back relieving the president.
(AP)
10 Responses
TRUMP
IF YOU CAN’T TAKE THE HEAT, GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN.
Just keep doin’ what yer doin’ , prez..
So much accomplished in less than 2 years, and all they wanna bark about is your style… your personality…
Your as crazy as a fox, Mr. Prez… They wanna howl about your ex-girlfriends, your Sloppy Joe’s dinner at midnight … You jump from subject to subject… Aw… Ye kaynt spell…
Books, books,… dysfunction at the WH … oops..!! Another book, another anonymous source..
You’re a political newbie whose throwing the garbage out… Sure, ye made mistakes, who doesn’t?
They’re shaking in their pantaloons.. Their oxen have been gored…
Just keep on truckin’… Say , uh …. for another 6 years…
Oh yeah, before I forget…. Peekaboo..!!! Russian coloooozion…. Whew…. Almost forgot..
If the author of this letter swore an oath to protect the constitution, perhaps he and others he’s mentioned would actually do that by revealing their names so that the republic can be preserved.
OTH I’m old enough to remember DeepThroat.
mayerfreund, relax, Trump is doing just fine. He drives Democrats crazy, I feel your pain.
Dear Mr Trump
The fact that you are fuming and don’t use your normaal fraze “fake news” is proof that it is true and that hurts.
… Besides, who can blame you ? A weaker man would’ve given up after this kind of harassment, abuse, vilifications, slander and nit-picking by angry ferocious mobs of pols, Rinos, Dems and media..
By an attempted coup d’état of the hallowed intelligence services who hate you and plotted for your blood… The same IS who, by the way, who lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq..
Plapalapopas said you” nodded” about something Russian…. Impeach… !!! He nodded…
It would drive anybody to drink, this progressive, America hating horde…
There is NOTHING substantive that the sewer rats have ever presented to the American people against you….. So they attack you personally, 24/7 , each day with some new” bombshell… ”
MAGA
So who is David Dennison? John Miller? Or “many people are saying”? This is the most incompetent and dumbest person ever in the office.
Could it be a former, disgruntled high level member of the Administration? I’m sure we could think of a couple of people that President Trump has received fired or received resignations from. We should understand that with mid-term elections coming, the desperation of Democrats is immense, in the aftermath of their recent defeats. It should be no surprise that “anonymous” is a cover for these efforts by Democrats. You’ll also note that the Mueller investigation is saturated with Clinton and Democratic loyalists, who want to leverage it for political gain in the mid-terms and beyond. Washington politics needs an overhaul, though they’ll fight it to the bitter end.
No NuYork, it is specifically mentioned that this person is a current member of the administration. Wasn’t denied by the White House either. Who’s desperate?
So what does the president mean when he says he wants the Times to ‘turn over’ the author to the govt? The author broke no laws. How can this be justified under our BOR and Constitution?