A former U.S. intelligence official said Wednesday the Watergate scandal that brought down a president “pales” in comparison with allegations that President Donald Trump’s election campaign colluded with Russians.
James Clapper, director of national intelligence until Trump took office in January, told Australia’s National Press Club the cover-up of a 1972 burglary at the Democratic Party national headquarters in the Watergate complex in Washington that ended Richard Nixon’s presidency “was a scary time.”
But the allegations under multiple investigations of Russian meddling in last year’s presidential election were more concerning, he said.
“I think (if) you compare the two that Watergate pales really in my view compared to what we’re confronting now,” Clapper said.
Clapper said Trump firing FBI Director Jim Comey, whom Clapper described as a “personal friend and a personal hero of mine,” reflected “complete disregard for the independence and autonomy” of the bureau.
Trump’s sharing of classified intelligence with Russian diplomats of the Islamic State group’s plotting reflected “either ignorance or disrespect and either is very problematic,” Clapper said.
He said the sharing compromised the Israeli source of the intelligence.
President-elect Trump branding the intelligence agencies as Nazis over their assessment of Russian political interference was prompted by “his team’s extreme paranoia about and resentment of any doubt cast on the legitimacy of his election,” Clapper said.
“I am very concerned about the assault on our institutions coming from both an external source — read Russia — and an internal source — the president himself,” Clapper said.
(AP)
4 Responses
Really? This comes from the mouth of the same slime-bug who lied to Congress about illegal NSA spying on US citizens and who publicly stated during recent Senate Intelligence hearing that there is no evidence in Trump Russian “collusion”.
Mr. Clapper, stop with your political nonsense! Btw, how did a person become US president when he wasn’t legally eligible, according to some, during your tenure?!?
Hey what about Hillary and her hacked illegal server how does that rank with watergate. Oh I forgot that was done by a lying liberal so that’s not a problem
Re takingabreak: As a non-lying liberal, I can tell you that I think Hillary’s server – clearly not secure – was a disgrace and a serious problem. Why did the Republican-controlled Congress fail to investigate it?
Re health: I do not know who you think was a president who was not “legally eligible, according to some ….” But the US is not governed by “some,” it is governed by the constitution, and all presidents in the last 50 years have been legally eligible according to the constitution. One US president – Trump – is clearly not fit to be president, and I shudder to think how that happened.