After weeks on the defensive, President Donald Trump has stepped up his efforts to dispute and downplay revelations stemming from the investigations into the Kremlin’s interference in last year’s election and possible Russian ties to his campaign associates.
The White House has said the real story is not about Russia — it’s about how Obama administration officials allegedly leaked and mishandled classified material about Americans. Trump and his aides have accused former officials of inappropriately disclosing — or “unmasking” — the names of Trump associates whose conversations were picked up by U.S. intelligences agencies.
“Such amazing reporting on unmasking and the crooked scheme against us by @foxandfriends,” Trump tweeted Monday morning. ‘Spied on before nomination.’ The real story.”
The White House has not pointed to any hard evidence to support such allegations, and instead has relied on media reports from some of the same publications Trump derides as “fake news.”
The truth is buried somewhere in classified material that is illegal to disclose. Here’s a look at what the White House believes is real story.
——
THE FLYNN AFFAIR
Trump fired national security adviser Michael Flynn following news reports that Flynn misled the White House about his contacts with Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. But the White House says the problem is that Flynn’s conversations were in the news at all.
“The real story here is why are there so many illegal leaks coming out of Washington?” Trump tweeted after firing Flynn in February.
The White House has called for investigations into the disclosure of multiple intercepted conversations that Flynn had with Ambassador Sergey Kislyak before the inauguration. The government routinely monitors the communications of foreign officials in the U.S. It’s illegal to publicly disclose such classified information.
Officially, the White House said Flynn was forced to resign because he had given inaccurate descriptions of the discussions to Vice President Mike Pence and others in the White House. But Trump has continued to defend Flynn, suggesting he was only fired because information about his contacts came out in the media.
“Michael Flynn, Gen. Flynn is a wonderful man,” Trump said. “I think he’s been treated very, very unfairly by the media.”
———
THE DEEP STATE?
White House officials say some Obama holdovers are part of a so-called deep state out to tear Trump down.
This week, the White House latched onto a month-old television interview from an Obama administration official who said she encouraged congressional aides to gather as much information on Russia as possible before the inauguration.
Evelyn Farkas, the former deputy assistant secretary of defense, said she feared that information “would disappear” after President Barack Obama left office.
Spicer called Farkas’ comments “devastating” and said they “raised serious concerns on whether or not there was an organized and widespread effort by the Obama administration to use and leak highly sensitive intelligence information for political purposes.”
Farkas was no longer in government when she urged officials to collect intelligence on “the staff, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians.” She left the Pentagon in 2015, just over a year before the election. She says she was offering advice to associates and did not pass on actual information.
Obama administration officials have acknowledged that there were efforts to preserve information that could be related to the Russian investigations, as was first reported in The New York Times. Former Obama officials contend that intelligence was not publicly leaked, but disseminated to pockets of the government where officials had clearance to see classified reports.
Still, Farkas herself connected the concerns among government officials about the Trump campaign’s possible ties to Russia to the information winding up in the press.
“That’s why you have the leaking,” Farkas said in the March 2 interview on MSNBC. “People are worried.”
———
THE HILL WEIGHS IN
The White House has embraced a top Republican’s assertion that information about Trump associates were improperly spread around the government in the final days of the Obama administration. It appears the White House played a role in helping House intelligence committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., acquire some of that information.
Nunes announced last week that he had seen intelligence reports showing that Trump aides’ communications were picked up through routine surveillance. But he said their identities may have been improperly revealed. The California congressman later said he viewed the reports at the White House.
The White House contends that Nunes’ information — which has not been made public — validates Trump’s explosive claim that his predecessor wiretapped his New York skyscraper. Nunes has disputed that but still says he found the reports “troubling.”
The White House’s apparent involvement in helping Nunes access the information has overshadowed what Trump officials contend are real concerns about how much information about Americans is disseminated in intelligence reports. Trump has asked the House and Senate intelligence committees to include the matter in their Russia investigations.
———
CAMPAIGN MODE
Trump won the election, but thinks it’s his vanquished opponent whose ties to Russia should be investigated.
Some of the White House’s allegations against Clinton stem from her four years as secretary of state, a role that gave her ample reasons to have frequent contacts with Russia.
To deflect questions about Trump’s friendly rhetoric toward Russia, the White House points to the fact that Clinton was a central figure in the Obama administration’s attempt to “reset” relations with Moscow — an effort that crumbled after Vladimir Putin took back the presidency.
“When you compare the two sides in terms of who’s actually engaging with Russia, trying to strengthen them, trying to act with them, trying to interact with them, it is night and day between our actions and her actions,” Spicer said.
Rex Tillerson, Trump’s secretary of state, has deep ties to Russia from his time running ExxonMobil and cutting oil deals with Moscow.
The White House has also tried to link Clinton to Russia’s purchase of a controlling stake in a mining company with operations in the U.S., arguing that she was responsible for “selling off one-fifth of our country’s uranium.”
The Clinton-led State Department was among nine U.S. government agencies that had to approve the purchase of Uranium One. According to Politifact, some investors in the company had relationships with former President Bill Clinton and donated to the Clinton Foundation. However, the fact checking site says most of those donations occurred well before Clinton became secretary of state and was in position to have a say in the agreement.
(AP)
5 Responses
Let Russia worry about their “Metro Security” in St. Petersburg, and let President Trump assist New Jersey Transit authority to improve their safety & have these numerous derailments become a thing of the past.
What a liberal headline. YWN, you should be ashamed of yourselves. If the liberal media had any proof whatsoever that Trump, Flynn, Sessions, and my bunny rabbit are “Russian Agents” they would have released it gleefully. Now we do have proof that Susan Rice under Hussein Obama targeted the Trump campaign with illegal spying (No FISA warrant). However that took weeks after Trumps wiretap tweet and weeks of the mainstream media blasting Trump about the “allegations”.
Given that the Democrats were extremely “soft” on Russian expansionism (e.g. in spite of an agreement by which the USA guaranteed Ukraine’s territorial integrity, Obama and Clinton didn’t do anything when Russia seized big chunks of Ukraine), and that the Democrats were stripping military funding to pay for domestic programs such as climate change and support the “LGFT” community — IT IS ABSURD TO THINK THE RUSSIANS WANTED TRUMP TO WIN. Trump is bad news for Putin, since he is pushing a large American military buildup, and coercing our NATO allies to do elsewhere.
On the other hand, Obama always espoused the principle of “demonizing” one’s enemies, and it is quite believable that the Democrats made political use of classified information gained from spying on the Republicans.
Schiff: Still no ‘definitive’ link between Russia, Trump campaign
see http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/02/schiff-still-no-definitive-link-between-russia-trump-campaign.html
Russia Russia Russia.
Enough already about Russia. The ONLY connection between the Russians and any candidate was with the Democrats.