Search
Close this search box.

Bloomberg’s NYC Budget Plan Bittersweet – Blames Albany


Mayor Michael Bloomberg says the city will be forced to cut nearly 11,000 jobs, including 6,400 teaching positions, in its 2011 fiscal year budget, due to what he calls “Albany’s irresponsibility.”

Among the teacher cuts, 4,419 will be through layoffs and 1,995 through attrition.

Three-hundred non-teaching positions will be cut, as well.

Additionally, Bloomberg said the New York City Fire Department will cut 400 firefighters and reduce its fifth firefighter in 60 Engine companies. The mayor said 50 senior centers will be forced to close, as will four city pools.

The city has not seen cuts like this since the 1970s.

Under union rules, teachers are laid off according to seniority, which means the newest hires will go first.

However, one agency that will not be affected is the New York City Police Department. The mayor’s preliminary budget in January had called for 892 officer cutbacks in the department through attrition.

This reversal comes after a recent spike in crime and, of course, the attempted bombing in Times Square.

The four-year executive spending plan outlined by Bloomberg from City Hall today totals $62.9 billion, without any tax increases. However, it is contingent on the assumption that state aid will be cut by some $1.3 billion.

The mayor blamed the state’s inactivity with its own budget as the cause for such drastic measures.

“Our ability to put together a balanced budget is very seriously hampered by State government’s continued inaction in addressing its own budget problems,” said Bloomberg said. “The governor’s proposed a budget that in effect balances the State’s books by starving New York City, and we are still facing that very grim outlook. We’ve kept our own fiscal house in order, preparing responsibly for the downturn with eight different belt tightenings over the last three years, while spending in Albany has continued to spiral out of control. Now we are paying the price for Albany’s irresponsibility.”

State Budget Director Robert L. Megna fired back at the mayor’s accusations.

“The mayor’s budget uses the state as a scapegoat to shirk responsibility for their own budget choices,” he said in a statement released during Bloomberg’s budget address.

Megna said that this doomsday budget “uses selective accounting to vastly overstate the local financial impact of the State’s Executive Budget. Moreover, the City also appears to vastly understate the positive benefit of the additional federal Medicaid funding it expects to receive in fiscal year 2011. Taken together, these factors bring into serious question whether many of New York City’s proposed cuts will ultimately be necessary – especially given the fact that the City expects to end the current fiscal year with a $3 billion surplus.”

The state is five weeks past its budget deadline.

(Source: NY1)



2 Responses

  1. Hey, Mr. Maya, it is not only Albany’s irresponsibility for the city’s budget woes. It is also because of YOUR TAXING that the city’s budget where it is at. You could cut your budget but you don’t want to, right?

  2. One should live within one’s means, whether you are an idividual or a government. The city can repeal the collective bargaining statute (it isn’t a real “contract” since governments don’t need to bargain with employees), and then can cut wages to a sustainable level. Or New Yorkers can imitate Greece by threatening to hold their breath until they turn blue.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts