Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Zugger613Participant
Bereishis: What A Waste
The second passuk in the Torah tells us that at the beginning of creation, the world was “תהו ובהו”. Rashi explains that the בהו means empty, while the תהו means that a person is astonished by the emptiness.
R’ Moshe Feinstein asks, why is this second description necessary? Nobody was alive to be astonished by the emptiness – why does the Torah point it out?
R’ Moshe answers that since there is such an important message here, the Torah felt a need to teach this right at the beginning. If we see a vacuum, we see emptiness where we know something positive could exist, it should bother us. It should astound us. We should ask ourselves, how can this be? How can I fill the void?
The Ramchal writes in the Derech Hashem that Hashem “didn’t finish” creating the world. He could have made a perfect world, but He made an imperfect world instead.
The Ramchal explains why Hashem did this. If the world would be perfect, we’d have nothing to add. But the fact that some of the world’s potential has not yet been realized gives us an opportunity to be the ones to fill the void and fix the emptiness.
לע”נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע”נ ר’ חיים דוב בן ר’ בן ציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantVzos Habracha: Doing It Yourself
The Sfas Emes has a fascinating explanation on the pasuk of תורה צורה לנו משה מורשה קהלת יעקב.
We know that Klal Yisroel chose to hear the Torah from Moshe, not to hear it directly from Hashem. The Sfas Emes explains that there was a reason for this. They knew that anything that is given to a person miraculously will not last. The only things that stay with us are the things we worked for, the things dedicated our heart and soul towards. Those things become a part of our very essence, and we can never forget them.
Since we chose to hear the Torah from Moshe (תורה צוה לנו משה), we had to work to understand it – it wasn’t miraculously given to us. And since we had to work on it, it became a part of who we are, and we were able to transmit it from one generation to another for the thousands of years since (מורשה קהלת יעקב).
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantHaazinu: Torah is like 🌧️
As he gets ready to take his final leave of his people, Moshe compares the Torah he is about to teach Bnei Yisroel to rain watering plants. Aside from the obvious metaphor of Torah bringing life, perhaps there is a deeper message here as well.
Every patch of earth has its own unique qualities, and each area has plants that it is uniquely suited to providing for. And yet, the same rain nourishes each and every spot in the world, and allows it to produce its own crop.
Similarly, each and every one of has our unique characteristics and circumstances, abilities, and challenges. Each of is capable of producing a unique crop of achievements, things that nobody else can do instead of us.
Yet in order to make our unique contributions, we all need the same thing. Only through the Torah can we see how to use our unique talents in pursuit of the greater good, in the context of Hahsem’s grand plan. The Torah nurtures our uniques talents, and shows how to use them correctly.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantLink to the full shiur: https://shiurim. eshelpublications. com/vayeilech-5780/
Zugger613ParticipantVayeilech: Finding the New in the Old
One of the final Mitzvos on the Torah is the mitzva of Hakhel – on the Sukkos of the year following Shemittah, the king read all of Sefer Devarim in the Beis HaMikdosh.
R’ Aaron Lopiansky sees a beautiful message in this mitzva. Devarim is the Sefer that was written by Moshe – but its content is not truly new. It is Moshe’s understanding of the things that Hashem had previously said, and his application of those Divine principles to the upcoming life of the nation in Ererz Yisroel.
Explains R’ Lopiansky, this is symbolic of the job of a Jewish king. He is not to make up new ideals, but he can’t just repeat old ideals either. Rather, his job is to see the new within the old, to find the application of the old ideals that his generation needs to hear.
R’ Lopiansky further explains that this is one of the messages that Chazal intended when they said that the reason that the children are brought to Hakhel is “to give reward to those who brought them”. This doesn’t just mean that shleping kids is a pain, so you get reward for it. It means that the truest success a parent can have is to impart to their children the ability to find the new messages within old wisdom.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantNitzavim: Returning to our Ideals
This parsha contains some famously stirring words about a particular mitzva: לא נפלאת היא ממך… לא בשמים היא… כי קרוב עליך הדבר מאוד. However, there is a disagreement between Rashi and the Ramban which precise mitzva this is referring to. Rashi is of the opinion that the mitzva being discussed is the study of Torah, while the Ramban thinks the we are talking about the mitzva of teshuva.
However, we can suggest that two opinions are not necessarily in conflict. Translated literally, “teshuva” means “to return”. During the course of a full year, it is all but guaranteed that there are times that we will have fallen short, times when we will not have moved up to the ideals that we cherish. Teshuva is the process of returning back to the ideals that we may have abandoned.
This is where studying Torah comes in. The Torah is the ultimate, divine guide to Jewish ideals. By studying the Torah, we can ensure that our ideals are not watered down by the times that we’ve fallen short, and that we have pristine ideals to return to.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantKi Savo: Being Uplifted<strong/>
When a person brings their Bikkurim to the Beis HaMildosh, there is an intriguing process to be followed. The owner first places his hand on his basket of fruits, then the Kohen puts the Kohen’s hand under the owners hand, and they lift the basket together. Only then does the owner begin reciting the inspiring passages of Bikkurim.
R’ Aaron Lopiansky points out a message that we can take from this. When a person is in the presence of the Kohen in the Beis HaMikdosh, they mustn’t view themselves as just a visitor. They must come with the intention of both accepting the inspiration and teachings of the Kohen, and of being uplifted and changed by their experience. Only someone looking change for the better will succeed in doing so.
In the next few weeks, we will all go through experiences that have the ability to change us. But these Yomim Tovim can only change us if we want to be changed, if we want to be better.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantKi Seitzi: Forever Grateful
There is a somewhat surprising mitzva in this weeks parasha: לא תתעב מצרי, do not hate an Egyptian. Despite the fact that they enslaved and made us miserable for hundreds of years, culminating in their throwing our children into the Nile, we can’t hate them.
Why? The passuk continues: כי גר היית בארצו. Because when Yaakov and his sons needed a place to live during times of famine, Mitzrayim took us in. Despite all the terrible things they did to us afterwards, we can never forget the one favor that they did for us when we needed them.
R’ Yerucham Levovitz points out how applicable this is in our own lives. We tend to dwell on the bad we feel people have done to us. And if we even think about the good that they’ve done for us at all, we tend to think it’s been “canceled out”.
But in the Torah view, we should never forget a favor that somebody has done for us, regardless of what happens after that.
There is a incidental benefit to living our lives like this. By focusing on the good people have done, we may find ourselves feeling far more happy and grateful and far less grumpy and resentful.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantShoftim – Who Needs a King?
One of the Mitzvos recorded in this week’s Parsha is to appoint a Jewish king. And yet, when the nation requested a king from Shmuel HaNavi, they were punished. How can this be?
R’ Shamshon Raphael Hirsh explains that they asked for a king at the wrong time and for the wrong reasons. The goal of the ideal Jewish king is to guide the people by example, and to show them what true Avodas Hashem looks like. If that is why we seek a king, we’re doing the right thing.
But in the times of Shmuel HaNavi, the people wanted a king to help them win their wars and conquer the rest of Eretz Yisroel. But the Torah says that we should appoint a king only after we have conquered the land and divided it between the Shevatim, לאחר ירושה וישיבה. Explains R’ Hirsh, this is to drive home this point – a king’s job is not to fight wars and not to conquer territory. A king’s job is to guide the people to be the best that they can be, and to do so primarily by example.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantRe’ah: Everyone Can See It
The Parsha starts off: ראה אנכי נותן לפניכם היום ברכה… אשר תשמעו אל מצות ה׳. But how can we be told that we can see, today in front of us, the ברכה of listening to Hashem? Don’t we know that שכר מצוה בהאי עלמא ליכא, the reward for the Mitzvos can never be paid back in this world?
R’ Moshe answers that although the reward for the Mitzvos is not given in this world, the difference between somebody who lives a life dedicated to ruchniyus and somebody who only lives for gashmiyus is apparent to all. Somebody who lives life focused only on physical pleasure and selfishness will never be happy, and everyone will know it. But somebody who truly dedicates their life to ruchniyus and doing what is right will be happy and content.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantDevarim: Channeling Tragedy
Rashi explains why it is that Moshe chose this moment to rebuke Bnei Yisroel for all the mistakes they had made over the past 40 years. Moshe knew that he was about to die, and that this was the most opportune time to correct all the mistakes of the past.
The Ksav Sofer further explains that when we are happily going about our regular lives, without any major challenges or issues, it can be very difficult for us to change ourselves. We feel comfortable, and we can feel complacent.
But when tragedy strikes, it tends to jolt us out of our regular routine. We suddenly realize how little in life is certain, and we can be far more open to changing our ways.
When Moshe was about to pass away, he knew that Bnei Yisroel would be uniquely attentive to what he had to say, and would be far more open to changing their ways.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantPinchos: Admit It
There were 24,000 people who died in a plague, all of whom had allowed themselves to be enticed by the daughters of Midyan. Why is Zimri specifically singled out for condemnation?
R’ Yosef Chaim Zonnenfeld explains that Zimri did not just make a mistake. Zimri publicly sought to justify his actions, and to convince others to do as he had done.
Zimri ridiculously compared his actions to that of Moshe, who married a giyores. Zimri proudly paraded his sinful actions in the heart of the camp, trying to sway others his way.
We all make mistakes. But we need to make sure that our failings do not dilute our ideals. We always need to recognize what is right and what is wrong, but never more so than after we’ve crossed that line. Don’t let your failings redefine you.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantBalak: Blame Game
Why did Hashem prevent Bilum from cursing Bnei Yisroel? Hashem controls the world, and nothing Bilum or anybody else says can force Hashem to do anything. Why didn’t Hashem let Bilum curse us, and just ignore him?
The Chida quotes R’ Shlomo Astruk as explaining what the problem would have been. If Bilum had cursed Bnei Yisroel, Bnei Yisroel would have blamed any suffering or misfortune that occurred to them as being the result of Bilum’s curse, without considering whether their suffering was actually caused by their own actions.
Pain is often Hashem’s way of sending us messages about what it is that we need to do better. If we blame others for the situation we find ourselves in instead of considering that what is happening to us is primarily the result of our own actions, we will never be able to fix the true root of the problem.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantChukas: Speak Softly & Drop the Stick
We know that when Moshe hit the rock, instead of talking to it as Hashem had instructed, he was no longer allowed to enter Eretz Yisroel. But the reason given seems somewhat puzzling: “יען לא האמנתם בי”, because you did not cause Bnei Yisroel to believe in Me. What exactly was the lesson that the Jewish people was supposed to have learnt from witnessing Moshe talk to the rock that they didn’t see from him hitting the rock?
The Mahral explains that if the rock would have given water simply by request, Klal Yisroel would have seen a model image of Avodas Hashem: you should do what Hashem wants, because you want to do what Hashem wants you to do.
Instead, by seeing Moshe angrily hitting the rock, they were shown a very different image: of doing what Hashem said because you feel you have no choice, due to either threats or rewards that you just can’t ignore.
This difference in attitudes is so critical, writes the Mahral, that it is part of the very definition of Emunah. כי אין אמונה רק שיהיה” דרך רצון ושמחה” – the only way of serving Hashem with Emunah, is do so voluntarily and joyfully.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantKorach: The Right Man for the Job
What reasons did Korach give for why he should be Kohen Gadol instead of Ahron? He complained that all the honor and glory was going to Moshe and his family, and that Korach’s family should have been in line for the next open position.
However, there is one point Korach did not address. He made no argument that Ahron wasn’t fit for the job, or why he would make a better Kohen Gadol. Korach was apparently not concerned with who the best man for the job was. He just wanted it for himself.
Contrast this with the attitude of Moshe. In last weeks Parsha, Moshe receives a Nevuah that he will die in the desert, having failed to bring Bnei Yisroel to their destination. But Moshe was not perturbed-מי יתן כל עם ה׳ נביאים. Moshe wanted the best man to get the job, regardless of that was him or not.
This is a pretty easy way to gauge whether we are looking out for the greater good, or just in it for ourselves. If we find ourselves asking “who would do the best job”, we’re asking the right question. But when that becomes “why not me?”, we should check our motives.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantShelach: We See What We Want to See
What exactly did the Meraglim do wrong? Moshe sent them to report on how difficult Eretz Yisroel would be to conquer, and that’s exactly what they did. ❓
The answer is that מקיש הליכתם לביאתן, מה ביאתן בעצה רעה אף הליכתם בעצה רעה. The Mergalim saw what they set out to see. Since they already believed that the land was bad and unconquerable, they had not looked for the hinge that would reinforce those preconceived notions. 👁 👁
We can learn from the mistake of the Meraglim how to attack לשון הרע at its root. Once we see the bad in somebody, it is very difficult to refrain from ever mentioning it. 🗣 But if we do not seek to find fault in others, we can more easily avoid לשון הרע. 🚫🗣
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantBahaloscha: Finding the Light
There is a cryptic medrash that compares the lighting of the Menorah in the Mishkan to the passuk of יגדיל תורה ויאדיר, making the Torah great and glorified. But what does one have to do with the other?
Perhaps we can explain this based on the Chida, who writes that the Menorah symbolizes תורה שבעל פה.
When it comes to תורה שבכתב, one may never add to to the Torah. To do so would be in violation of בל תוסיף. Yet when it comes to תורה שבעל פה, new insights are always welcome.
This is hinted to in the lighting of the Menorah. The Menorah will never give any light unless somebody takes action and lights it. Similarly, תורה שבעל פה is left to us. It is our job to constantly plumb the depths and search for new insights. It is our chance to make continue to grow, to make even more great and glorified.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantBahaloscha: Part of the Journey
There are two pesukim in this Parsha that aren’t where they belong. The pesukim of ויהי בנסוע הארון, which deal with the travels of the Mishkan and the Shechina, are surrounded by two backwards letter nun. This is to let us know that these pesukim really belong fifty pesukim earlier, together with similar pesukim detailing Bnei Yisroel’s travels.
Rashi quotes the medrashim that the reason these pesukim were moved here was to break up some of the פורענות, the trouble that Bnei Yisroel started getting into. But why were these specific pesukim chosen to interrupt the troubling stories?
The pesukim of ויהי בנסוע and ובנוחה יאמר give us a sense of a complete picture. True, we often see the Mishkan being packed up, and the Shechina on its way out. But we know they will not be gone long. Soon, Hashem’s presence will be felt in a new place. The end of one part of the story should never be mistaken for the end of the story.
The journey, both of the Jews in general and each one of us in particular, is a long one. It has many starts, stops, and pitfalls. But it won’t be over until we get to where it is that we need to go.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantNaso: Listen Here
Rashi on the very last passuk of this weeks Parsha goes through great lengths to explain how Hashem spoke to Moshe. Moshe would only hear the voice of Hashem while he was standing in the Mishkan. But the reason for that was not because the voice of Hashem was feeble and hard to hear. The voice of Hashem was booming and powerful. Even so, it could only be heard within the Mishkan.
Perhaps we can take a message from here in our own lives. We may often feel like we don’t know what it is that Hashem wants from us, like the word of Hashem is muddled and unclear.
But we need to know that the voice of Hashem is powerful and always offering guidance. We just need to enter into the spaces that Hashem has set aside for communicating with us. When we put all of heart and soul into Davening and even more so, learning Hashem’s Torah, we too can hear the voice of Hashem speaking to us so powerfully. But if we do not get ourselves in to that place, we will not hear Hashem at all.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantNaso: Never Say Never
Rashi famously explains that the reason the Mitzva of Nazir follows that of the Sotah is because anyone who sees the disgrace of the Sotah should learn to stay away from wine, which can lead to immorality.
R’ Yosef Elephant pointed out a defense mechanism that we often use instead. Imagine if today, we would hear about a woman dying as a Sotah. Our initial reaction would probably be to ask: “What neighborhood did she live in, what family did she grow up in, what schools did she attend in her youth? Oh, well with that background, it’s no wonder this is how she ended up. This would never happen to me or people in my circles.”
But this is precisely what the Torah is telling us to avoid. If we see somebody fall in a particular area, we need to realize that the same thing can happen to us if we’re not careful. When it comes to aveiros in general and immorality in particular, we cannot allow ourselves to be lulled into a false sense of security and complacency. אל תאמן בעצמך עד יום מותך – make sure the next scandal doesn’t happen to you.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantNaso: Admit It
The first step of Teshuva is taught to us in this weeks Parsha. When a person steals or does any other aveira, the first step is והתודו את חטאתם, Viduy on what they’ve done wrong. The Rambam in particular stresses how Viduy is the very essence of teshuva. But why is so much emphasis put on verbalizing our mistakes? Why can’t we just focus on fixing them?
Based on the Chinuch, R’ Aaron Lopiansky explains that often we like to brush our problems under the proverbial rug. Even if we acknowledge our shortcomings, it is often only in an abstract way. In order to motivaste ourselves to grow, we need to concretize exactly where the problems are that we need to fix.
Rav Huna famously tells us in יומא פו that once somebody is עבר ושנה, repeats their misdeeds, they tend to quickly forget that what they’re doing is wrong at all. The act of verbalizing our mistakes can help fix this. By admitting where we’ve fallen short, we keep our ideals from being watered down by our actions. Only when we acknowledge that there are higher ideals to live up to do we stand a chance of eventually living up to them.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantApologies for the typo, the first shevet should be Yehuda not Reuven.
Zugger613ParticipantBamidbar: דגל התורה
The של״ה writes that the first three shevatim that traveled together, Reuven Yissachar and Zevulun, represented the Torah.
Perhaps we can suggest that the names of the נשיאם of each Shevet give us a clue as to their unique contribution to the study and the spread of Torah.
The נשיא of Reuven was נחשון בן עמינדב. Perhaps this shows that Nachshon and his shevet excelled in being שונה בנחת, teaching gently, the עם of Hashem (see שה״ש ז,ב where בנ״י are called בת נדיב). This can be seen in how Nachshon led by example, jumping into the ים סוף first.
The נשיא of Yissachar was נתנאל בן צוער. Perhaps this shows that the shevet of Yissachar would always toil in the Torah that Hashem gave (נתן קל) even when doing so entailed great sacrifice (צער).
The נשיא of Zevulun was אליאב בן חילון. Perhaps this shows that the shevet of Zevulun would always be focused on doing the will their Father in Heaven (אלי אב), even when they were doing things that were חול, seemingly mundane. Zevulun used their financial expertise to both support the Torah of Yissachar, and to show the nations of the world the beauty of Yiddishkeit.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantBechukosai: Seeing the Big Picture 🖼
Our Parsha begins with 11 pesukim detailing the berachos that will come to us if we do what Hashem wants, followed by 29 pesukim that detail the curses that will come upon us if we disobey Hashem. Why does there seem to be more curses than blessings?
The Ibn Ezra forcefully writes that in fact, the brachos are more numerous. He points out that each of the brachos is a general statement, which applies to many different scenarios. However, each of the curses is only one specific difficulty.
Perhaps we can glean an insight into human nature from this. We tend to focus on every individual thing that goes wrong, without paying any attention to the many things that Hashem is making sure are going right in our lives.
We should not ignore what is going wrong on our lives. As the Parsha makes clear, these are messages from Hashem about what we need to improve in. But it’s important to put our difficulties in the proper context. There is more good in this world than evil.
לע״נ דוד חיים הן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantTazria: An Honest Eye
One of the cryptic rules of tzaras is that although even a small white spot can be considered tzaras, a person who turns entirety white without a single spot of healthy skin must be declared Tahor by the Kohen. It is also interesting to note that the Torah conveys this idea not by referring to a person who has become entirely white, but by saying that כל מראה עיני הכהן, “every [part of the person] that meets the Kohen’s eye” seems to be a problematic shade.
There is a fascinating rule that binds a Beis Din when deciding cases of capital punishment; if the accused is unanimously found to be guilty, he may not be put to death. If an opinion is unanimous, we are concerned that not enough effort has gone towards looking at the other side of things; we cannot kill the man.
Perhaps there is a similar lesson to learnt from the Kohen: if every single thing that somebody does seems problematic to our eyes, we cannot convict them. It is almost inconceivable that there can be nothing good about any individual or group. If the only thing we see are the problems, there’s a very good chance that the problem lies not with them, but with the way that we view them.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613Participant*Parshas Shemini: K.I.S.S.
Nadav and Avihu were the crown princes of Klal Yisroel, slated to take over after Moshe and Ahron. And yet they they were killed by a supernatural fire on the day of the inauguration of the Mishkan. And although Chazal give us many things that Nadav and Avihu did wrong, they all revolve around what the Torah explicitly says: ויקריבו לפני ה׳ אש זרה אשר לא צוה אותם, they brought to Hashem a foreign fire/service, which they had not been commanded to bring.
When McDonald’s trains their workers, they teach them a very important principle: K.I.S.S. That stands for Keep It Simple, Stupid. We have invested lots of time and money figuring out exactly how to make a burger, and we want you to just do what you’re told. Don’t go decide you think the burgers should be a bit more well done or spiced a bit differently. We know what we’re doing here: just follow the rules.
Hashem knows quite well what the best thing for us to be doing is. Don’t make up your own rules.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantVayikra: Control
Why does Hashem want us to bring Korbanos? There’s nothing we can give to God – what does killing a few animals do?
The Sefer HaChinuch explains that by “sacrificing” some of our livestock, we are acknowledging that nothing we have is truly ours to begin with. When we bring a Korban, we remind ourselves that everything is only from Hashem.
With this, R’ Aaron Lopiansky explains why Korbanos are compared to Tefilah. Why do we need to ask Hashem for anything?
Doesn’t He already know what we need?The answer is that when we Daven to Hashem, we are acknowledging that only He has the power to help us. Everything belongs to Hashem, and only He can control His world.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantPekudei: Accounting
The Parsha contains an accounting of all of the resources that went into the building of the Mishkan – how much of each material went to each specific cause.
R’ Moshe Feinstein writes that this should inspire us to do our own accounting. Hashem has given us a limited amount of time on this world – what are we doing with it? Are we putting our resources and abilities to good use? Each of has unique, God-given talents – are we using them in the right way?
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantVayakhel: Foundations
The Torah repeatedly emphasizes that the foundations of the Mishkan itself were made out of silver, while the foundations of the חצר around the Mishkan were made out of copper. Why were they different?
R’ Aron Lopiansky explains that the word כסף is synonymous with desire through Tanach – for example, נכספה וגם כלתה נפשי. The foundation of all of the Avodah of the Mishkan was the desire to build a relationship with Hashem. And in our lives, the foundation of our Avodah must be that desire to come close to Hashem.
But the foundations of the חצר around the Mishkan were copper. Copper is a tough and impenetrable metal, and therefore used in Tanach as a metaphor for brazenness and stubbornness.
Around the Mishkan that we are to build in our hearts, there needs to be a protective חצר. The foundation of this protection must be being impenetrable to outside influences. We cannot allow the values of the society around us to seep in to our hearts and water down our ideals. We should not care what the outside world cares about, or we will quickly stop caring about what we should really care about – ס֥וֹף דָּבָ֖ר הַכֹּ֣ל נִשְׁמָ֑ע אֶת־הָאֱלֹקים יְרָא֙ וְאֶת־מִצְוֺתָ֣יו שְׁמ֔וֹר כִּי־זֶ֖ה כׇּל־הָאָדָֽם:
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantKi Sisa: How דוד המלך Stopped a Deadly Plague
The Parsha opens with an eerily timely warning: if you count Bnei Yisroel, there will be a plague. And indeed the Gemora tells us that in the times of דוד המלך Bnei Yisroel were counted, and a deadly plague began to spread. Interestingly, the plague killed exactly 100 people a day. So to stop the plague, דוד decreed that everybody should make 100 brachos every day. But how does counting brachos counteract counting people?
Why would a king want to count his people? Simple: he wants to assess the might of his kingdom. But that is based on a false worldview. The security and prosperity of a nation is not determined by its population, but rather by Hashem. Counting the people shows a false sense of security, as if we determine our destiny and not the Almighty.
Brachos are the exact opposite. A bracha is an affirmation that this is Hashem’s world, and He controls everything. We acknowledge that all that we have comes only from Hashem.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantTezaveh: Public Servant
The בגדי כהונה were fashioned out of a surprising material: Shatnez. That’s right, they had threads of wool and linen woven together. Why do the Kohanim wear Shatnez while doing the Avodah?
R’ Shamshon Raphael Hirsch explains that Shatnez is only forbidden when it is worn for personal pleasure. For instance, one is really allowed to wear Shatnez if they are only checking the size of merchandise. Similarly, the Kohanim are not doing the Avodah for themselves; they are representatives of the entire nation.
But the temptation certainly exists for the Kohanim to let their special status get to their heads, and to let their own Kavod motivate their actions. So the very clothes that the Kohanim wear warn them: if you are only in this for yourself, not only is what you’re doing not a mitzva, but instead it actually becomes an aveirah.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantTerumah: Satisfied?
The Kli Yakar has interesting observation about the measurements of the כלים of the משכן listed in the Parsha: the dimensions of the ארון (2.5 Amos long, 1.5 wide, 1.5 tall) end exclusively in half-measurements, while the most of the measurements of the שולחן (2 Amos long, 1 wide, 1.5 tall) end in whole numbers. Why the difference in measurements?
The Kli Yakar suggests that the message here is that by ruchniyos, we should never be satisfied with what we have. We should view our current accomplishments as being incomplete, and always be looking for opportunities for further growth.
But when it comes to our material belongings, the opposite is true. We should focus on being satisfied with what we have, on being מתפק במעוט and שמח בחלקו. (As for the half measurement of the height of the שולחן, the Kli Yakar interprets it to be a warning not to be haughty due to one’s material success.)
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantYisro – Your Turn
Hashem tells us in this week’s Parsha: וָאֶשָּׂ֤א אֶתְכֶם֙ עַל־כַּנְפֵ֣י נְשָׁרִ֔ים וָאָבִ֥א אֶתְכֶ֖ם אֵלָֽי,
I brought you on eagle’s wings to Me. What is this referring to?R’ Dovid Soloveitchik explains that Bnei Yisroel were on the 49th level of impurity in Mitzrayim, and yet 49 days later they were hearing Hashem at Har Sinai. How could they have changed so quickly?
This Passuk is the answer. Hashem lifted them up miraculously, not just physically, but spiritually as well. By showing us so many miracles in Mitzrayim and Yam Sof, Hashem left us with no choice but to believe in Him.
But as the next Passuk makes clear, after Kabbalas HaTorah the opposite is true. Now it’s all up to you: וְעַתָּ֗ה אִם־שָׁמ֤וֹעַ תִּשְׁמְעוּ֙ בְּקֹלִ֔י וּשְׁמַרְתֶּ֖ם אֶת־בְּרִיתִ֑י וִהְיִ֨יתֶם לִ֤י סְגֻלָּה֙
Hashem lifted us to the heights of ruchniyus, so that we could see what it’s like. But now our job is to climb to those elevated heights ourselves.
From now on, only our choices and our actions will determine how close we are to Hashem.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantBo: Emunah Always
The Ramban at the end of this weeks parsha asks, why are so many of the mitzvos זכר ליציאת מצרים?
He explains that some believe that Hashem created the world, but think that He no longer controlled it. Through the ten makkos, Hashem proved not only that He exists, but that He controls everything that happens, and nobody else does.
But the makkos were a long time ago. With time, people might forget that everything that happens is from Hashem. That is why we need so many mitzvos, to remind us that Hashem runs the world.
The Ramban then takes this a step further. He writes that the purpose of the נסים המופרסמים, the obvious miracles, is that we should recognize that what we think of as “nature” is in fact נסים נסתרים, no less miraculous just because it happens more often.
Water to turning blood is obviously the hand of Hashem; but that ought to remind us that Hashem gives us water every day. Why should we consider one to be more miraculous than the other?
The Ramban goes so far as to write:
אין לאדם חלק בתורת משה רבינו עד שנאמין בכל דברינו ומקרינו שכולם נסים אין בהם טבע ומנהגו של עולם.לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantVaeira: The Forest and the Trees
A passuk appears for the first time in this weeks Parsha that we often just tune out: וידבר ה׳ אל לאמור. But let’s think about this a bit. Why does this frequent phrase switch from דיבור to אמירה?
R’ Aaron Lopiansky explains that וידבר comes from the root of דבר, a concrete thing. דיבור is used when conveying the halachos, the defined details of the mitzvos.
On the other hand, the softer phrase ויאמר is about conveying general ideas, not specific details.
Hashem speaks to Moshe in the form of דיבור, defined and detailed instructions. But we are not supposed to stop there. We are then supposed to search for the אמירה, the ideas that the mitzvos convey. Then we will be able to fulfill the רצון ה׳ even when there is no particular Halacha about what we should do.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantVayishlach: Legs of Eternity
The Torah tells us that when the Malach of Eisav struggled with Yaakov, וירא כי לא יכול לו, ויגע בכף ירכו. But how can we say that he saw he could not win if the very next words inform us that he did inflict damage on Yaakov’s hip?
R’ Aaron Lopiansky explains that the influence of Eisav can never succeed in changing the essence of Yaakov and his children. We are simply too committed to our cause and to our God to be swayed. Therefore all that the nations can do is to physically stop us from carrying out our plans.
The Malach saw that he could not win; he could not change the essence of who Yaakov and his children are. He saw he could only try to affect Yaakov’s “legs”, which symbolize our ability to bring our ideals to fruition. He tries to make the world into a goal of its own, instead of being a means to a greater end. And conversely, it is our job to try to fix this world, to turn it into a place where we can all connect to Hashem through Torah and mitzvos.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantToldos: Forge Your Path
The Gemora tells us that Hashem listened to Yitzchak’s teffilos over Rivka’s since Yitzchak was a צדיק בן צדיק, while Rivka’s parents were not too righteous.
But why should that be? Shouldn’t a צדיק בן רשע be the more worthy of the two, since it was more difficult for him or her to break out of the negative mold they were born in?
Rav Dessler quotes a beautiful explanation from his Rebbi, the Alter of Kelm. He explains that since a צדיק בן רשע realizes that what his parents are doing is wrong, he has an easier time not following his parents lead.
But a צדיק בן צדיק what is in a way a deeper test. He may have good role models, but he must make sure not just to become a copycat. Every person is unique, and Hashem put each of us here to do something different. The צדיק who realizes that he is more than a copy of his parents, specifically when his parents are great people, is the most impressive.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantVayeira: Never Say Never
When Sarah overheard what seemed to be three simple Arabs bless her to have a child, she laughed. After all, she was almost 90, and having a child seemed physically impossible.
However, Hashem rebukes Sarah for this laughter. R’ Moshe Feinstein explains that we must believe that Hashem can do anything, and to dismiss anything as being impossible is at odds with that belief.
R’ Moshe goes on to explain Sarah’s response, ותכחש שרה לאמר לא צחקתי כי יראה not as a false denial motivated by fear, but rather as Sarah’s explanation of her actions. Sarah told Avraham that she laughed כי יראה, “because I saw” that this wish simply isn’t possible. To which Avraham answers: “No”, nothing is impossible.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantNoach: The Beauty of the Rainbow 🌈
We know that seeing a rainbow is considered a bad sign: it means that Hashem is so angry that he would destroy the world, if not for the fact that He promised not to.
And yet, this can be hard to internalize. Rainbows are just beautiful and so nice to look at. Why is it that this sign of wrath is so pleasant?
Perhaps the beauty of the rainbow is supposed to remind us of the second half of Hashem’s statement. True, He is angry enough that He would destroy the world. But why doesn’t He? Because He loves us so much that He simply can’t do it, no matter how much we may deserve it.
The rainbow is the sign of Hashem’s promise never to turn His back on us. No matter how low we may sink, Hashem’s love for us is always there. And that’s beautiful indeed.
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלום
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהןZugger613ParticipantBereishis: An Unfinished Work
Almost all of creation came into existence by the word of Hashem – He declared each thing should be, and it was. But man was created differently: by the hand, not the word, of Hashem.
Once spoken, a word can not be changed. However a hand can always continue to create. All of creation is set and fixed in its role, with one exception. The role and nature of a person is not predestined; each person decides, by their own choice, exactly what they will accomplish.
We know that man is created בצלם אלוקים. Obviously this can’t be referring to a physical similarity, because Hashem has no physical form. Rather it means that just like Hashem is a creator, man too can create. No other part of creation can act of its own free volition, deciding its own destiny.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantSukkos: What’s the Shake all About?
Although m’ikkar ha’din one can fulfill the mitzva of lulav and esrog by merely picking them up, the משנה tells us to shake them during הלל when saying הודו לה׳ כי טוב and אנא ה׳ הושיעה נא.
Based on medrashim, the תפארת ישראל explains that shaking the four species symbolizes shaking of every part of our body and soul in fervent prayer to Hashem, to both thank Him for all He’s given us and to request that His kindness continue to surround us.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע”נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantVayelech: Reconnecting
Hashem tells Moshe some bad news in this weeks Parsha: after Moshe dies, the people will stray from the path, no longer doing what they are supposed to do and being who they are supposed to be. The consequences will be dire, mostly along the theme of: והסתרתי פני מהם, I will hide my face from them. If they turn their backs on me, I will turn my back them. There is no greater punishment than this. If you don’t want to develop a relationship with your Father in heaven, then you just won’t have one.
The מבי״ט writes in בית אלוקים that although חרטה and עזיבת החטא are necessary components of Teshuva, they are not the actual essence of Teshuva. Teshuva literally means to return. If someone gets into a fight with a loved one, it is not enough to merely say sorry; they have to rebuild the relationship in order for it to go back to being what it used to be. Teshuva is that process of making it up to Hashem, of fixing what we broke, of coming back to once again be with Him.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantNitzavim: One For All and All For One
Rashi famously writes that after Klal Yisroel heard all of the curses that would befall those who disregard the Torah, their faces turned green out of apprehension. Moshe then told them אתם נצבים היום כולכם, you’re all still here today; despite all the mistakes you’ve made, Hashem has not destroyed you.
The obvious question is asked, wasn’t the whole point of the curses to impress upon the nation how crucial keeping the Torah is? Didn’t Moshe just undo what he’d set out to accomplish?
R’ Betzalel Rudinsky points out that אתם נצבים היום כולכם is plural, referring to the whole nation. The Jewish people as a whole will never be destroyed, even if they may deserve it.
So how do we as individuals tap into this group guarantee? The answer is to be כולכם, all together. If we are together as one, connected to every Jew, we are a part of the klal, and the klal will always make it.
Heading into Rosh Hashanah, one way to merit a favorable judgement is to say בתוך עמי אנוכי ישוב, to be at peace with every Jew.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantKi Savo: Work Hard
The Meforshim are bothered by several questions on the Pasuk of אֲרַמִּי֙ אֹבֵ֣ד אָבִ֔י וַיֵּ֣רֶד מִצְרַ֔יְמָה: First of all, what does Lavan bothering Yaakov have to do with going down to Mitrayim? Secondly, why does the Pasuk seem to imply that Lavan did destroy Yaakov if he was ultimately unsuccessful in doing so?
The Kli Yakar has a fascinating explanation. He writes that on some level, Lavan did destroy Yaakov. From the time they spent together, Yaakov was affected by Lavan’s attitude towards this world. This why Yaakov was ביקש לישב בשלוה, slightly too concerned with his comfort in this world. And that is why Klal Yisroel had to go down to Mitzrayim; by experiencing being forced into backbreaking labor, they were able to internalize that אדם לעמל יולד.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613Participant<strong>Ki Seitzi: In Gods Hands
Rashi at the end of this weeks Parsha explains that the mitzva of remembering what Amalek did to us is placed right after the the issur of cheating in business, to teach us that this type of dishonesty will be punished by enemies attacking us.
However, Rashi parshas Beshalach writes that Amalek attacked Bnei Yisroel because they said היש ה׳ בקרבנו, questioning if Hashem was really with them. Which one was it?
R’ Moshe explains that in truth, these are not two different issues. One who thinks that they can get ahead in this world by dishonesty is actually denying that Hashem controls the world. One who believes that Hashem is with us and controls everything knows that only Hashem decides how much money he will end up with – he has no incentive to lie.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantShoftim: Monkey See, Monkey Do
There is a mitzva in this weeks parsha to appoint a Jewish King. And yet, when Bnei Yisroel approached Shmuel HaNavi about doing just that, they were rebuked for it. How can that be?
The Ohr HaChaim explains that although the Jews of that generation were trying to do the right thing, they were doing it for the wrong reason. They didn’t want a king to fulfill the mitzva of Hashem: they just wanted to be like the nations around them, which all had kings. (This is supported by the observation of the Tur that Bnei Yisroel only asked for king in days of Shmuel, since that is when the Pilishtim began to have kings.)
Don’t live your life as a copy of somebody else, even if that person is doing everything right. You have to figure out what’s right for you, and do it for the right reasons.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantThanks abukspan
Zugger613ParticipantEikev: Do It Right
Rashi famously writes that the Brachos in this week’s parsha are destined for those who keep מצוות קלות אשר דש בעקביו, the mitzvos that a person step on with his heel. This is generally understood to be referring to “small” mitzvos that some people ignore.
However, R’ Moshe Feinstein writes that this is referring to the big mitzvos as well. He points out that Klal Yisroel were praised for accepting the Torah and mitzvos unconditionally when they said נעשה ונשמע, since they were willing to put aside their own opinions about right and wrong and completely obey Hashem’s Torah and mitzvos.
And yet, says R’ Moshe, when it comes to the biggest mitzvos, such as learning Torah and giving Tzedaka, many people just do whatever they feel is right, without ever asking a shayla about what they should be doing or how they should be doing it.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantRe’ah: Key to Contentment
Chazal famously darshan עַשֵּׂר תְּעַשֵּׂר – עשר בשביל שתתעשר, tithe so that you will become wealthy. R’ Shimon Schwab finds this puzzling – since when is wealth the reason we do mitzvos, or even something we should be aspiring towards at all?
R’ Schwab therefore interprets this based on another saying of Chazal: איזה הוא עשיר, השמח בחלקו. Chazal are not telling us to get rich, they are telling how to be happy with what we have.
One who is only focused on amassing wealth for himself will never be satisfied: מי שיש לו מנה, רצה מאתיים. Only when we focus on what we can give to others can material possessions bring us satisfaction.
R’ Schwab beautifully explains that this why the reward for giving tzeddaka is expressed as וַהֲרִיקֹתִ֥י לָכֶ֛ם בְּרָכָ֖ה עַד־בְּלִי־דָֽי, I will give you until you say “enough”. One who gives to others will be blessed with appreciation for what they have, and not want anything else.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלוםZugger613ParticipantV’eschanan: See Who You Can Be
Before his death, Moshe sought to recap all that had happened to Klal Yisroel in his lifetime, putting special emphasis on the things that needed improvement. Moshe did not hold back, letting the nation know exactly what their mistakes were.
Yet constantly interspersed with this rebuke is a tremendous amount of praise. Moshe constantly emphasizes how special Klal Yisroel is, the chosen nation of Hashem. כי מי גוי גדול אשר לו אלוקים קרובים אליו
The Ran explains that these two elements are both necessary and complimentary. As long as a person has not acknowledged his mistakes and shortcomings, he has no chance of fixing them. But it is not enough to just point these things out. A person also has to believe that he is capable of being better than he is now, that he can rise above his shortcomings, that he has the potential within him to be great. Only when a person sees both where they are and where they can reach can they excel.
לע״נ דוד חיים בן ישראל דוב הכהן
לע״נ ר׳ חיים דוב בן ר׳ בןציון שלום -
AuthorPosts