Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
i dont understand this whole thread
some kind of undertone of something
if anyone thinks some of these posts or the whole thread should be deleted, post that
i really dont understand what is going on here.
And no jokes about taking it
im not joking. im quite serious. you know my email address. send it through paypal
http://www.consumersearch.com/carbon-monoxide-detectors
in my opinion consumersearch is THE best online place for reliable, useful reviews,
they incorporate consumer reports as well as a number of other sources of reviews and summarize and analyze the results
maybe the incr before the edible was inadvertently left out
no there is no danger of CO2 toxicity from too many plants
n dini momoinois minhag hamedina takes precedence over halacha
im sure you phrased that incorrectly, but of course nothing takes precedence over Halachah.
if dinai mamonis follows the minhag medina then that is becuse that is the Halacha
and to correct you blueprints sound does not have to have a specific frequency, as opposed to specific subsets of sound such as a pure note
thank you blueprints for the correction.
writing quickly causes many interesting phenomena 😉
agent
if thats how you define sound then of course if no person is there (or other sentient being) then there is no sound, and there is no riddle!
so, agent, you are defining sound as the aural perception by a sentient creature of vibrating physical media, or something like that, correct?
define it any way you want, (although physics would define it as a vibration in a physical media, air in this case).
if you define it such then yes it makes a sound.
if you define it as perception then no it doesnt make a sound.
it is a riddle that is neither profound nor meaningful.
it merely depends on definition
dont want to sound gayvadik but i am well aquainted with that “riddle” and it does not have a solution. the answer simply depends on how you define “sound”
either as a physical vibrational movement of air
or as a perception by a sentient being.
the dimes becaause they are smaller thus more of them
whats the other riddle?
not the tree in the forest?
that has no answer, it depends on how you define “sound”
i think gavra was pulling some satire there
yes dr salk of course
saved by the Chasdei Hashem, so many times
well said nurse
still i would strongly recommend against home birth.
what is ideal is to have an enlightened OB backing up a good midwife in an enlightened birthing center/hospital
the only reason for not deleting the above post is because it is such a classical example of a twisted response to another poster.
note how he puts words into sjs mouth that she never said, implied, or even hinted at (such as that medical personnel are always negligent)
note how his angry response is far out of proportion to sjs calm friendly post.
disclaimer: it should be noted that in general i am in disagreement with sj on almost every issue, as she well knows.
but please lets try to argue with reason and mentchlikeit here
But then again, you could hypothesize lots of things
exactly my point
cave
OK, but perhaps, maybe you’re right. Perhaps I need to work on myself
i didnt say that!
i HYPOTHESIZED that POSSIBLY that is what Rabbi Miller, tz’l MIGHT say to someone who was bothered by the actions of people around him.
i was personally involved with home births for about 6 months, and hospital births for a year. i knew all the lines about the infection rate and c-sec rate in hospitals, the unfounded aggressive nature and surgical orientation of obs. all true. but i would never recommend someone to have a home birth, (almost)never.
on the other hand there are some terrible unnecessary things that go on with hospital births. for now the best answer is a compromise. a birthing center that is truly understanding of the process, a midwife directed birth, or an ob who has some sense, or a combination of all three
but never a home birth unless absolutely necessary for some reason
besides i made it clear i was completely hypothesizing.
probably you are right
im sure Rabbi Miller, tz’l would agree with you.
i dont know why i answer your questions. you surely will pick the answer apart. i quite expected something along those lines.
i was responding to this post of yours which asked me the question with the key phrase: disturbs his neighbor and prevents him from davening properly?
i didnt know you were talking about a person davening like a freight train
a person needs zchus for the Rabbano Shel Olam to allow him to support Torah learning
i dont know how Rabbi miller, tzl would answer your question wolf.
he might say no, under such circumstances a person should not daven loudly.
i could also hear him saying to the person who is bothered, it is proper to daven loudly and if someone is bothered he needs to work on himself.
i would guess that if someone asked a loud davener to please keep it down because it was bothering his davening Rabbi Miller, tz’l would agree that he should daven more quietly
people here are understanding “davening” in different ways.
for example, youchie, Rabbi Miller, tzl was not referring to the silent Shemoneh Esrei, but to other areas of “davening”, particularly Pseulei D’Zimrah
give the op a break
minhagim has a specific Halachic usage
but it is also loosed more loosely for “custom” or “typical behavior”
popa i see your point
that rule actually is ambiguous, even self-contradictory:
“resembling english”
“normal english”
i prefer to interpret it more towards the first definition
“rules” have a connotation of the implication of “required”
you should have said “guidelines”
im very glad to see you back
“remind me if i forget” wonderful.
you can put an axis anywhere you want
but when you compare your position to the “position” of the virtual person im the mirror there has been a virtual rotation along the up down axis. of course there was no rotation at all just we pretend there is another person in the mirror and according to his perspective, his right is our left.
forget the mirror, stand facing another person. you have the same perspective as far as up-down. also east west. north south, but right left are called depending on whos perspective. this is just a convention of nomenclature but does not represent any reality
nothing is inverted
its a matter of nomenclature
up and down is the same however you rotate yourself through an axis going from your head to toes
right to left only “changes” because we imagine the perspective of the person in the image, and change the nomenclature accordingly.
thats a good question and deserves a good answer.
so what do the Meforshim TELL us that it means?
please…..read the title and the first few responses.
no one is arguing that “being” in love is only a non-Jewish idea.
read: “falling”
wolf i think that quote and the whole thread have to do with “falling” in love, not “being” in love.
in other words the question at hand is the concept of meeting someone for a few minutes, or just looking at them once, or going on a date or two and deciding you are in love with them.
no-one told you what to do.
if you want to have a dog, wonderful
yes people have expressed their opinions here
if you dont think those opinions matter you are perfectly free to disregard them
this is a forum
there are people who dont have your opinion
thanks
i thought it was 600,000 sheep?
exactly popa
but i did address this here
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/global-warming-1?view=all#post-183853
and a little differently in other threads
the temperature of the earth varies over times and there are variences within the variences and smaller variances within those, trends within trends
to take an infinitesimal period of time and chart the trend during that time tells you close to NOTHING about the larger trend, and where that larger trend fits in the even larger trends.
besides how do you measure the earth temperature?
on the surface?
a mile high?
an average of all heights?
the ground temperature, how many locations, which locations?, the ground temperature varies quite widely all over the surface of the earth. right now where i live the temperature near the lake and a mere 2 miles away is 10 degrees different.
anything less that millions and millions of measurements many times during the day will be innacurate.
the sea temperature, how deep in the sea, an average of all depths?
what horizontal locations?
do you average all locations or give more weight to some?
average the ground temperatures with the sea temperatures?
how about the ice temperatures below the surface?
and the locations of measurement must be consistent throughout time
do we have even ONE DAY with temperature measurements all over the globe horizontally, all over the globe vertically from the depths of the ocean to the heights of the atmosphere.
to claim there is global warming is the epitome of stupidity, short-sightedness, and arrogance
which the scientism of deep theory has always been guilty of