Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
not everyone who disagrees with you is anti frum, you know
and that wasnt very nice. how about being dan l kaf zchus yourself. just maybe i have good reason for what i do. just maybe you dont have the whole picture.
and since quark has been here he has used one and only one ipaddress. no one else has ever used it. within an hour of quark being blocked mr whatever began posting from his ipaddress
maybe i *am* overeacting somewhat
but i dont think so
almost every post of this poster, in both of his incarnations, is anti-frum
80% are deleted. YOU dont see those posts. thats my job, to make sure you dont.
i dont see a reason to dan l kaf zchus in this case just because he ended this particular post with an innocent question
this also supports my feeling, shared by gavra, that this was nothing but an anti-frum troll post.
now i get it
after quark2 was blocked he came back as mr.guberfield
quark2 was unblocked after about an hour
i think its time to reconsider
i dont wish to carry on this conversation further
thank you for your responses
i am a talmid chocham
we apparently disagree as to the meaning of that phrase. it does not mean a “talmudic scholar, or professor”
and, in the gemara an argument was accepted from anyone, if it made logical sense.
when you become a Tanna or Amorah, let me know
And if you don’t use logic, what then do you use? you just decide a halacha without even thinking about it? im sure that that would be much better, then trying to understand it.
the Poskim use the logic of Daas Torah to decide the Halachah. not relative Am HaAretzim like you and me. what do i use? i ask the Poskim
Logic just means clear thinking
everyone thinks they think clearly, when in fact they do not. thats why we rely on those with aas Torah
he didnt write them so that everyone could poskin Halachah for himself
Does anyone know of a clear halachic reason for women not to wear pants?
yes, all the Poskim poskin that this is the Halachah.
as to their reasoning, you would have to read their Psakim and Tshuvos, or discuss this with a Talmid Chochum.
As to the logic you presented, this is not the way we determine the Will of our Creator.
the cause of all forms of alopecia are unknown
autoimmune causality is a theory
it doesnt respond to steroids or other immunosuppresives
its called alopecia
no one really knows what the cause is
it is proper to be Shabbosdik on Shabbos, therefore IF this is not Shabbosdik then it is ACTUALLY wrong.
but you mean is it a specific issur, or malachah?
i dont think so
reminds me of the goyim that are aghast at frum Yidden who wont look at a womans arm
those that understand, understand
those that dont, wont
youre right
sorry I don’t see how this is an issue
of course you dont
there arent any.
that was my point.
a few yrs ago there was a bachur who began wearing one
it was a big problem
most people here wont understand this, but this little bobby pin was a sign of discontent and rebellion
it threatened to poison the Holy atmosphere
it was dealt with
first kindly and gently, then more firmly
i dont know the eventual outcome
see both of my posts
in my first one i said Telshe was makpid on not wearing bps.
Usually he means, “I hope this keeps it on
unfortunately thats not what he means, not the bachrim at Telshe.
maybe the buchrim at yu mean that, i dont know.
its not a matter of Halachah.
its a matter of following the manners of the Tzibur
they are makpid on this at Telshe Yeshiva
its just a sign, thats all, a statement.
like the couple who finally divorced because the husband kept asking his wife to close the toothpaste tube and she kept leaving it uncovered. he felt she didnt care what he had to say about things, that she didnt respect him, of course it was silly but every time he saw the open tube his anger and hatred of his wife welled up.
its not the bobby pin, its what the bochur means by wearing it
please these horrible comments that keep appearing about this poster are disturbing indeed
like a pack of wolfs that go after prey after it is rendered harmless
enough!
especiaally since icot did
I apologize to popa.
i have good reason to believe he was telling the truth all along.
in my pomposity and certainty of the “facts” i did not take that possibility into consideration
popa is an erliche Yid and i should have believed him.
she wasnt *allowed* to leave
she left using magic
besides we have to answer the following question:
must an inadvertant murderer stay in an A’M? or is it just that if they leave they are subject to misa by the goel?
besides as soon as the wiz was carried away in a balloon, never to be seen again, the sgan K’G became the NEW K’G until a permanent one could be appointed
youre right
assuming a woman can be a goel hadam
besides she is certainly puter from being an intentional murderer because she was aiming for the scarecrow, and water normally cant kill anyways.
she was also putar re murdering the green witch, because she was a rodeif
it was an oneis
dorothy was putar from golus
that wasnt a mod
that was popa pretending to be a mod
hes done that a few times before
icot
i also like popa very much but his very sharp humor sometimes goes beyond derech eretz. its not fair to the other posters
Its him
You haven’t seen his numerous deleted posts
People don’t get blocked(twice so far)for no reason
The style is unmistakeable
You mean the time you were blocked and changed screen names every five minutes?
It’s funny how all these people only post when they are visiting you
And your father abba bar popa was staying at your house when he posted for one day?
Right
And abba bar Aristotle is staying at you house also
What’s a comp?
Bar shattya is popa bar abba
And
Me thinks you got an additude
a story of a Gadol who came to Eretz Yisroel
he was known to not leave his house on Shabbos
when finally asked to explain he said that the first Shabbos in E’Y he saw someone smoking and he fainted.
the questioner stopped him and said, oh so thats why you dont leave the house on Shabbos?
he said no
its because the next Shabbos he again saw someone smoking…..and he didnt faint
Bpt, thank you for the first reply that was on topic
why in the world should this stay on topic since you didnt say what the topic was until 4 posts ago!
hopefully someone will enter and clarify matters
i know
i was supporting your contention with an actual example
some do
i know a Rav who makes kiddush before Shachris for a medical reason
not sinners, a rasha.
what is a rasha halachically?
dont know
im out of this conversation
i dont know enough.
carry on men
do you know if they have diabetes or other medical conditions that might require this?
from Rav Moshe Leib Halberstadt:
“There is a difference of opinions among the Rishonim regarding a Rasha whom it is permitted and a Mitzvah to hate, whether he should be hated totally. It was decided Lehalachah like the opinion that it is a Mitzvah to hate him totally.”
but its well known and pushut.
and its a Mitzvah not a “Mitzvah”
its a very well known one to those who learn.
im not talking about amalek. its a Mitzvah to hate a rasha. there are other categories as well. im not a Talmid Chochum, i cant give you sources. perhaps some of our resident lombdim can help.
Its Assur to hate anyone. Hatred of people is evil, period.
it is sometimes a Mitzvah to hate someone, period.
the battery provides an energy source for whatever “fire” there is. it itself is not fire.
maybe its your portabellas?
aries the battery has nothing to do with it
Halachah is not determined by ones personal analysis and theories.
most electronic watches have a button to turn on their light. that does not make them Muktzah.
WIY
you can call me 80
thanks wiy
excellent insight
its an inyan
i hold by it
not everyone does
i once saw a very chushiv Rosh Kollel, who is also a Posek, blow out the candle he used to light the Menorah.
i was quite surprised and asked one of the Kollel men who said he alwaus does that, rather than create a tircha d tzibbur for the extra few seconds to struggle with waving it out. he said the R’K does hold by not blowing out a candle but it is a minor consideration when something else outweighs it.
adorable
it was a mistke