YW Moderator-42

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 601 through 650 (of 2,485 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chofetz Chaim Dance #930245
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Who knows this song?

    “Step on over to your right – m’yimini michoel. Step on over to your left – m’smoli gavriel. Just one step forward – m’lifanai oriel. Jump and turn – uma’achorai refoel…”

    in reply to: Come with popa #937524
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    JK Rowling Googled the word “horcrux” before she invented it. It didn’t exist back then.

    in reply to: Sholom Zechorah #1118631
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Mazel tov! May she grow up to be as strange and brilliant as her uncle.

    in reply to: Was munching on tortilla chips and got an idea… #930607
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    I do that with Snacker Crackers – the salty ones of course. Yum.

    in reply to: Perek Shira Segulah #930641
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Would having popa_bar_abba as a bro-in-law make you happy? He’s probably not as crazy as he sounds in real life. For all we know, pba is a 70 year old lady, purple is too, which would make Purple’s 75 year-old sister a perfect shidduch for popa…

    in reply to: Wherein Golders Greener Came Late For School�Serial Story #993826
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    “Scourgify!” She shouted, pointing her wand at the signature on the shoes. The loopy signature blurred a bit but was not washed away. “Oh, well. I was never good with those kinds of spells. You will have to put them on and walk around the lake 40 times while carrying a ram in order to get those signatures off”.

    in reply to: Wherein Golders Greener Came Late For School�Serial Story #993825
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    “What are you doing to our shoes?” They asked.

    “I have to sign purple shoes every day for 40 days to get my memory back” he responded.

    Suddenly, from out of nowhere appeared a woman with spikey purple hair…

    in reply to: Wherein Golders Greener Came Late For School�Serial Story #993824
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    That night, the boys used their invisibility tallis to sneak into the dungeons to find their shoes. When they got there, they found a senile old man in turquoise robes signing his loopy signature on their shoes.

    in reply to: Perek Shira Segulah #930634
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    I have a perfect solution to this perek shira not working crisis. Let’s have WIY get engaged to Purple’s sister. If WIY isn’t interested, then we’ll give the zchus to yossi_z, we’ve been waiting for him to get engaged for awhile now. And if that fails, there’s always popa ^_^

    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    I heard a story like once that this handicapped guy was about to pull into the only handicapped spot at a Rite Aid. A non-handicapped guy entered the parking lot from the wrong side and got the spot first. The guy said to the angry handicapped driver that he was in a rush and would be “just a minute”. So the handicapped driver blocked him in, called 311, and got out to do his shopping. The guy who stole the spot ended up being parked there for more than “just a minute” while the police came to ticket him. I don’t know if that was the right thing to do (or if either character in the story was Jewish) but it is a fun story to tell. ^_^

    in reply to: If You Were a Sandwich… #930023
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Ice cream. Chalav stam mint chocolate chip of course with those big crunchy chocolate cookies around it. Yum.

    in reply to: Anyone a Doctor? #930489
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    As long as you don’t suffer from doublepostitis we’ll let you stay.

    in reply to: Anyone a Doctor? #930488
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    As long as you don’t suffer from doublepostitis we’ll let you stay.

    in reply to: Perek Shira Segulah #930611
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    U hav 2 say it at the kosel for 40 days 4 it 2 rllly work

    in reply to: Mice in mein hoiz #994271
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    In my hs we wunce had a dolfin in the clas rum

    in reply to: Free Advice! #930006
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down in the most delightful way.

    in reply to: Free Advice! #930005
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Go out and buy yourself a leather couch.

    in reply to: MAZEL TOV: YWN CR Reaches 400,000 Comments #1137005
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Hakol b’sefer nichtavim…

    in reply to: Driving With Popa #929000
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Yehudayona and pba, you seem to have missed my question. Wanderingchana got it though 🙂

    in reply to: For the Mods #929080
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Tgere is an “edit” link in your profile page. Click your name

    in reply to: Lost Cabinet Screw; Need Help Replacing #928939
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Aren’t most people in Brooklyn missing screws? Why else would they live there? ^_^

    in reply to: Should Proper Grammar Be Required in the CR? #929464
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    I vote No.

    I also give a +1 to torah613613torah.

    in reply to: Guilty Pleasures #929879
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Is posting in the CR as bad as being a Zionist?

    in reply to: What's red, hangs on the wall, and whistles? #928599
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator
    in reply to: Painful Shoes/Bruised Heel? (Shidduchim) #931638
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    I never understood why girls wear heels. Are you so insecure that you are not happy with the height Hashem made you? I personally couldn’t care less how tall my date is and would rather she be comfortable.

    in reply to: Driving With Popa #928996
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Is it possible to drive from Boston to NY without paying any trolls?

    in reply to: For the Mods #929057
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Superme, if you want to start over with a new name that nobody knows is you, just make a new account. (Making multiple accounts for the purpose of trolling is against the rules but we don’t mind if someone wants to just start over). But, considering the way you’ve been posting until now, I doubt it would take long before people figure out that it’s you 🙂

    in reply to: In Witch He Snorted #1115514
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    True, that is what it says explicitly in the books but it is also mashma that nobody really knows what happend to the charm after the secretikeeper dies. Hermione was acting out of caution, she wasn’t sure what the effect of her bringing Yaxley into the house was. For that matter, what would happen before Dumbledore had died if one of them would have apparated into the house with somebody else who did not know the secret holding on? What if the secret-keeper does that? We know that he can divulge the secret through writing (the note Harry read) but does apparating have the smae effect? Nobody seems to know for sure so therefore they acted with caution assuming the worst.

    in reply to: For the Mods #929042
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    You can set your browser to remember your username and password so you don’t have to type it every time. Also, set it to keep you logged in.

    in reply to: Studying Chumash/Navi On Shabbos #944555
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    My father told me that there is no issue of hachono when it comes to learning on Shabbos.

    in reply to: In Witch He Snorted #1115512
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    In answer to yekke2’s question about the secret-keeper, until Book 7 we were never told what happens when a secret keeper dies. It seems that as long as the secret keeper is alive, he can tell the secret to many people but they cannot in turn tell it to someone else. But, once he dies, they now have the power to tell someone else and not only that, but the “someone else” has the power to tell. In other words, the charm is significantly weakened.

    in reply to: The "whats the best word to use express what I want to say thread" #928771
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    When you are the one doing the sneezing, don’t forget to answer “Amen! Baruch tihyeh” to the person who says… whatever they say

    in reply to: What's red, hangs on the wall, and whistles? #928597
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    An 800 ton, moss-covered leaf

    in reply to: Chemistry Is Important #928356
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    I don’t feel like commenting on either discussion here but I would like to point out the meforshim say that although the initial kidnapping was obviously out of lust, Shechem actually did love Dinah for the “right reasons” at the end when they approached Yaakov (I can’t remember who says this but I definitely saw it a few weeks ago when it came up in the parsha)

    in reply to: Some Snow #940747
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Bahstan is the same time zone as NY.

    in reply to: Some Snow #940740
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Speaking of which, it is getting late in Bahston. Time for PJs…

    in reply to: Some Snow #940739
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Are you allowed to crush short snails under your mukluks on Shabbos? They do make a delicious crunching noise after all. ^_^

    in reply to: How wuz the Snew by Yew? #1133250
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    We had kugel, cholent, kishka, cookies, cakes, herring, shnitzel, deli, peas, carrots, ketchup, and for some strange reason – peppermint humbugs.

    in reply to: How wuz the Snew by Yew? #1133249
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    We had a big kiddush so munching is more apropos

    in reply to: How wuz the Snew by Yew? #1133246
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    I went munching in my mukluks.

    2 feet, 3 feet, 4 feet, can’t tell the difference after the wind pushed it all around. Some of the drifts were over 4 feet!

    Either way, I only have 2 feet, but my mukluks kept them dry and the cholent kept me warm.

    in reply to: THE PURIM (urim) STORY (ory) Fan Club #1219274
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    And who do you think is the most filthy, despicable man in the world?

    Daddy! Haman!

    in reply to: THE PURIM (urim) STORY (ory) Fan Club #1219271
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    squeak can be Shaul

    I’ll be Charvona.

    in reply to: Bored All Night With Internet #928117
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    http://www.torahanytime.com

    http://www.theshmuz.com

    If you are a man, you can also listen to daf yomi shiurim online (or if you are a woman related to popa_bar_abba)

    in reply to: Some Snow #940733
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Either that or a college…

    in reply to: Some Snow #940732
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    I thought it was a snort of power shovel used to put snow into bird’s nests.

    in reply to: Why You Shouldn't "Unsubscribe" From Spam #927922
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Haleivi, hitting the “mark as spam” button in most email clients will probably do that for you. It will submit the email to them for analysis.

    in reply to: In Witch He Snorted #1115505
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    in answer to yserbius, I actually only read Hitchhikers Guide once a long time ago and have never really chazered it as it is not such an appropriate book for B’nei Torah. But I still like using some of the concepts from there such as 42. HP on the other hand I am a baki in. Though if I have time some day perhaps I will read Discworld. Is it appropriate for Bnai Torah?

    in reply to: In Witch He Snorted #1115504
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Just my happence wrote:

    42 – Ha gufah ra’aya, the conversation you quoted takes place before the school year started and Hagrid is quoted as saying that Quirrell is “scared of his own subject”, implying that he already teaches DADA, the subject he then teaches the following school year (i.e. for a second consecutive year)

    I agree it is dochek. JKR seems to have overlooked this and then only explained it away after the fact. But lemaysah you can say that when Hagrid said “scared of his own subject” he was referring to the subject he was planning to teach the coming September and not the Muggle Studies subject he had taught before his year off.

    and after the Sorting Ceremony Percy tells Harry that Snape has “been after Quirrell’s job for years”, again implying that Quirrell taught the subject previously.

    Again, bidochek you can say he was referring to the job that Quirrel was starting that day and that the “for years” was referring to the job itself and not that Quirrel actually taught the job for years.

    Quirrell is not welcomed back, implying that the year out was not the previous one nor is it mentioned that (unlike when Snape changes subject in Book 6) he will now be teaching a different subject than before.

    This is an interesting point. Perhaps there was an announcement of the job change but it wasn’t recorded because it wouldn’t mean anything to Harry as he doesn’t take Muggle Studies in his first year.

    His turban (which he got on the year out) is something that the pupils are used to already, as Fred and George show when they tell Harry (on the second day of term) that some think he keeps garlic underneath to ward of vampires (in other words he wore the turban the previous year and therefore the year out was at least two previous).

    This I have to disagree with. Harry actually notices the turban at the opening feast and it is mashma that he did not wear it previously. Any reasons that fred and George give do not imply that they were used to it. Adaraba, it shows that he had davka been gone the previous year and met a vampire.

    For all the above reasons, and others besides, (whatever JKR may try and retroactively claim) I find the Quirrell conundrum implacable.

    Of course the obvious answer is that JKR is not Hashem and Harry potter is not the Torah so not everything in the first book will shtim with the story later on. (Ahhh, kfira!!!). But it is still fun to try to come up with terutzim to make it fit. ^_^

    in reply to: purplicious=ThePurpleOne #928148
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Wow!! How did u do that? I thot ppls can’t edit ther own sn???

    in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927731
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    From jaymatt19:


    @hakatan

    Until the last part of your piece it sounded like we were in agreement

    Let me summarize. Kivan She’nitan is a concept in chazal. It exists, one can’t deny it.

    But what do those words mean?

    You say that Kivan She’nitan means that innocent people can be punished because of guilty people. So, for example, people not with korach would get punished solely due to korach. You say this based upon a lekach tov in parshas korach.

    I say that it means that once the rishoim bring forth a tragedy, anyone can suffer, but each person suffers due to their own transgressions. So, in this example. Korach brought forth the din, and moshe warned others something to the effect of: “make sure you don’t have stolen property. If you do, you might get killed since din is coming. Normally this isn’t a reason to be killed, but Kievan shenitan so beware!” (property only used as an example, all aveiros are equal here). This is based upon the iyun yaakov and the emek davar.

    So, both of us hold Kievan shenitan, the question is what it means and how it works.

    For argument sake, let’s try to apply this to the hurricane.

    IF the hurricane happened due the actions of the goyim and that might be a stretch

    1. Does kivan shenitan apply when the goyim are the cause?

    2. Let’s say that it does apply when the goyim are the cause, does that mean that yidden suffered because of the goyim or does it mean that the goyim created an eis of din, and yidden who had averios, whether big or small, suffered because of their own aveiros?

    So now, post facto, let’s try to take the mussar from the storm

    We can choose to see that yidden suffered because of the aveiros of yidden. And do a cheshbon hanefesh as to what hashem is trying to tell us to do better.

    Or

    We can decide to only see Kievan shenitan through the way that you quote the lekach tov, expand it to include cases where the goyim bring down the din, blame others and not see anyway to improve ourselves.

    Can one legitimately see things this second way? Possibly

    But it also sounds like it may be a ??? ????? to think that way

    Also, should one choose to view things in a way which shifts the blame away from themselves when one can just as easily try to take a message and improve?

    It has been a pleasure discussing this with you over the past week or 2. Thanks for introducing me to Kievan she’neitan.

    Hatzlacha in all that you do

Viewing 50 posts - 601 through 650 (of 2,485 total)