Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Yserbius123Participant
@common-saychel @Avram-in-MD
I see now that I referenced the wrong user. It wasn’t @goldilocks, it was @always-ask-questions
The difference is noticeable. In one shul I daven, there are people who were mostly careless. I feel sometimes that I am at a smoker’s club as every couple of minutes you hear a chronic cough, mostly young men. In another shul, where people preferred vaccines to natural immunity and this happens way less.
@syag-lchochma claimed that was a lie. Lying about what? That there were shuls who were careless and rife with Corona? We all knew these cases, even if some of us chose to block it from our memories. There were definitely shuls I saw where no one wore masks, and people were walking around coughing, while the mispallelim of the more careful shuls stayed home if they had any sort of illness. I’m not sure what part of the line I quoted can possibly be untruthful.And for those who chose not to be moichel me, I do not believe I require mechila. There are people who demanded that everyone return to normal mere weeks after the virus started raging and long before anyone knew anything about the virus. These individuals insisted that wearing masks is more dangerous than walking around with asymptomatic COVID and that the vaccine is a lie and should not be given to anyone. I can only assume that these people saw Pesach of 2020, where multiple frum papers had to add extra pages for shivas and levayas, was some sort of peak that klal Yisroel needs to aspire to. So yeah, pro-death. I guess in hindsight it’s a little harsh, but I fail to see how it’s inaccurate.
Yserbius123Participant@Avram-in-MD I define careless in way that @Goldilocks described his/her shul.
Yserbius123Participant@coffee-addict I’m not going to watch a whole movie and pick apart every claim to see if it’s true or false. Can you pick a specific piece of evidence the movie mentions and we can talk about that? I wanted to talk about the faulty numbers Trump’s team used as evidence in Georgia. Does the documentary mention it? Can you talk on it?
@philosopher I am extremely skeptical of the claims of election fraud in 2020. You took that to mean that I am a liberal. That’s ridiculous and bordering on childish name calling. If people were a little more open minded and willing to investigate outlandish things they hear and read about, we would be in a much better state.Yserbius123ParticipantFrom a Torah perspective, it’s the challenge of modern “civilization”. Three hundred years ago, and all the 5400 years preceding that, war was the glorious conquest of the barbaric enemy by our heroes who may heroically die in battle. People with different looks were inferior to us and they would probably serve best as eternal slaves. In that sort of atmosphere, Torah thrived. We were forced to fight for our survival day to day and every ounce of mitzvos was precious to us.
In modern times, civilization has long reached the point were we don’t have to worry about our children reaching adulthood, nor about droughts making food scarce, nor roving gangs grabbing our possessions and leaving us penniless. In that type of world, art and philosophy thrived since people were able to afford to sit and do something that’s not immediately productive to society. Philosophers realized that in modern times, wars are stupid an unnecessary and we’ve spent too much time and energy on murder and ignoring science. This is the Enlightenment and is the basis for our current secular society. This of course led to the Haskalah Yidden, nebbuch.
So now we are faced with a different challenge. Baruch Hashem there are very few countries were people are forced to celebrate a bris in a candlelit basement, or play dreidle to confuse the soldiers. But with all this food and luxury, time to listen to Hashem is no longer precious. It’s easy! And so we no longer value it like we once did.
Yserbius123Participant
@syag-lchochma I don’t understand. Are you saying that you don’t believe that a shul exists where the klal was careless about Corona during the height of the pandemic?Yserbius123ParticipantWhy does the Democrat insistence of allowing mail-in-ballots as an option cause “distrust” more so than the Republican insistence that there’s widespread voter fraud before a single ballot was counted?
Yserbius123Participant@lakewhut In 2020 it took a week to fully declare all the results. Now, with many results being much closer to 50/50 and you’re complaining after two days?
Yserbius123Participant@coffee-addict Sorry I’m unfamiliar with that term. What is 2000 mules?
@1 I really really dislike the modern political climate, especially in frum communities. If you’re not 100% on board with every bit of zevel that comes out of Donald Trump’s mouth, you’re a liberal anti-Semite.Maybe I’m just a conservative voter disillusioned by the insanity of US politics?
Yserbius123Participant@coffee-addict Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I really don’t get why you’re so certain that voter fraud happened considering there isn’t a shred of evidence. And no, “they didn’t see if there was fraud” doesn’t constitute evidence. Lemme give you a farinstance. “I didn’t see Ploni on July 7th 2016 so it’s possible he burglarized Moishes house that day. Moishe is pretty sure he isn’t missing any money, but we can’t prove that Ploni didn’t steal the money that may or may not be missing. Therefore Ploni must be a ganif.”. Veiter noch, the evidence that Trumps team tried to push had more invented numbers than Madoff’s accountant.
@lakewhut This happens by every election. The electronic ballots are counted immediately and then verified. That takes hours. If the race isn’t close, they declare a winner and they count the mail in ballots and unclear ballots being counted later. If the race is close, then they don’t declare a winner until all the other ballots are counted and verified.
@akuperma I hate that ever since the Bush-Gore election of 2000, every political loser claims election fraud or voter suppression.Yserbius123Participant@philosopher I think the argument over voter ID laws and mail-in-ballots is a smoke screen. Republicans wanted voter ID laws to convince people that voter fraud was happening. In response the Democrats pulled that old chestnut of saying that voter ID is racist. Truth is, there’s never been any significant fraud around voter IDs. Illegal immigrants aren’t voting en masse, and making people prove they are who they say they are hasn’t made an ounce of a difference in black voter turnout. Same with mail in ballots. There was no significant fraud. Democrats were just pushing for mail ins because of the COVID lockdowns. In response, the GOP claimed that mail in ballots were fraudulent.
It’s just the same stupid sports rivalry where one guy says black and the other will say white just to spite him.
Yserbius123Participant@coffee-addict But that wasn’t what Trump was claiming in Georgia! He claimed that the statistics proved fraud. Statistics that were wrong! And they did watch most of the counting, as evidenced by the testimony of the Trump poll watchers. They were there for 95% of the time. And that 5% they missed did not have any significant changes in the numbers. So Georgian poll watchers were there the entire time the mail-in “bump” happened!
@Always_Ask_Questions The problem is that it’s never enough for some people. And there’s a fine line between “transparency” and “letting idiots run roughshod over a delicate process”.
@syag-lchochma You’ve been posting angry and bitter comments directed at me this entire thread most of which I just ignored. Not sure what I said in the past to make you feel that way about me, but the word sinah certainly comes to mind.Yserbius123Participant@AirOfTheLand I was just saying it in context of a way to end the argument. You can discuss sugyos all tug unt nacht, but no one alive will be able to discuss them the way the pre-WWII Acharonim did. So we are arguing a moot point since the issue is settled. Either you’re an Edahnik, Brisker, or Satmar-adjacent chusid. Or you hold it’s important to vote in the Israeli elections. That’s all.
Yserbius123Participant
@coffee-addict I don’t really have a “side” in politics, unless there’s a local politician who happens to be pro-Jewish, conservative, and sane (very short supply these days) so I can’t honestly tell you how I’ll react if someone I really wanted to win, lost. Look, I’ve heard the argument that poll watchers weren’t able to see everything everything and it just doesn’t hold water, to be honest. “We weren’t able to see any fraud, therefore there must have been fraud” isn’t evidence, it’s just whining. Especially since that wasn’t the argument Trump’s team was going for in Georgia, they went after the statistics. Mail in ballots “pop-up” in literally every election since they’re the last to be counted. And, like I’ve shown, the statistics were amateurish and wrong on a very fundamental level (confusing total population ratio with partial population ratio).Oh, and there was one individual who is recorded as having asked the governor of Georgia to “find more votes with my name” after the results were in. Can you guess who that is?
@syag-lchochma To be honest, I don’t keep track of usernames on this forum. I think I recall a conversation we had from a while ago, but I’m not sure. I may be thinking of someone else. You seem to hate me though and are unwilling to engage honestly (although you are perfectly willing to engage in childish taunts and insults). So whatever.Yserbius123Participant@syag-lchochma @coffee-addict Then let me ask you two fine folk something. Given the fact that the Trump team tried to discredit the Georgian results in the way in which I’ve stated. And given the issues with that, that multiple statisticians and mathematicians have agreed with. Why are you still so certain that there was evidence of Democrats pretending to “find” votes to flip the election?
(Oh, and I have learned statistics and currently work in a job that uses a ton of statistics and analytics)
Yserbius123Participant@coffee-addict Statistics aren’t “made up”, they are facts on the ground. There’s no “belief” involved, there’s what happened, and lies. If you choose to believe the lies, then that’s on you. I was simply pointing out one of the more blatant lies, how it was a lie, and my bafflement at people (like you) who prefer to stick their fingers in their ears and go “LA LA LA LA LA TRUMP REALLY WON!”.
Yserbius123ParticipantI can’t speak for the Torah since I’m not a Talmid Chacham, but I do know that Rav Shach ZT”L, the Steipler ZT”L, and many many other gedolei Yisroel told people to vote in the elections. So clearly Dayan Fischer ZT”L and the Rebbe ZT”L were not the be all and end all opinions on the matter.
Yserbius123Participant@coffee-addict I’m sorry, but can you please address my comment? Namely, that Trumps team used tricks and bad math to try and prove something they had no proof over?
Yserbius123Participant@Always_Ask_Questions I haven’t done an in depth analysis of how often they go from “Dems will win” to “Republicans will win”. But I do know that when I check their predictions a week or two before elections, they are almost always spot on.
@emes-nisht-sheker If I won the national lottery four weeks in a row, it doesn’t mean that the statistics are wrong, it means I somehow cheated.
@coffee-addict Trumps legal time tried to use statistics to prove that Biden’s team “found” votes at the last minute. Their statistics were wrong which is what I’ve been trying to explain.Yserbius123ParticipantThere’s a story about a Rebbe who was moiser nefesg to break the ice of a lake to go to the Mikvah one Channukah when he was a slave in the work camps. The story goes that a Nazi Y”Sh saw him and was so nispoel he gave him an extra ration of food.
A friend of mine asked the Rebbe directly and the real story was that a beam fell on the lake and cracked the ice. The Nazis offered food to the man who would jump in and lift it out, so the Rebbe did so with the kavona that going to the Mikvah would save him from hypothermia.
The first version is still what I hear all the time when people talk about that Rebbe.
Yserbius123Participant@Always_Ask_Questions I don’t disagree. Nate Silve of FiveThirtyEight is still very much a progressive intellectual which means he leans heavily liberal Dem. Still, they’ve been consistently very accurate. And yes, they change their numbers as it gets closer to the polls. I wouldn’t trust a pollster who doesn’t. I mean, three months ago John Fetterman was a shoe-in against Mohammed Oz. But once he was forced to have non-scripted public appearances, people realized the truth about his health.
@coffee addict Actually I was quoting those numbers from a lawsuit filed by Charles Chiccetti, a GOP donor involved in the 2020 GOP election fiasco, which was cited by Giuliani and Trumps legal team. So I’m not sure what you mean by “quantity over quality”, but they were very much disputing that Biden won Georgia using bad statistics to make their case.Yserbius123Participant@philosopher If you don’t like what I’m saying, you can do the research and see for yourself. Let me give you one example and we can hopefully put this whole narischkeit to rest.
One of the three or four states that the Trump campaign was claiming it was statistically impossible for Biden to have won was Georgia. Let’s break it down. Towards the end of the day, 4.5 million votes were counted and Trump was winning by a slim margin of 2%. What that means is that if you dump all of those 4.5 million ballots in a pile and pick them at random, 51 out of every 100 will be for Trump. Then they counted the late votes, which included mail-in ballots, and on those Biden was winning by 40%. So if you take all of those and pick at random, only 30 out of every 100 will be for Trump. The GOP team claimed that the likelihood of this happening is extremely small so there must be fraud!
Now here’s the problem with that. Statistics only works like this when the populations are random. Meaning, that if you would take ALL of the ballots, mix them in a pile, count out 4.5 million, tally the results, then take the rest and tally those results, if there was a difference of 38% it would be shocking and clear evidence of something fishy. But that isn’t what happened! The votes are not random, they are split up by district and method. The vast majority of those last 250,000 votes were mail in ballots and Trump (and the GA GOP) spent a good part of 2020 telling their constitutes not to use mail in ballots. Furthermore, So it makes perfect sense that an overwhelming majority of the late votes are for Biden!
Yserbius123Participant@ujm FiveThirtyEight predicted a 30% chance of a Trump win in 2016 which was far higher than any other media outlet. It was based on predictions of which counties will vote for him. Every single county fell well within the margin of error. They were the only major polling analyst that got it right. They never clopped chotosi, they had to write multiple articles explaining to people that there’s a difference between 70% and 100%.
@philosopher That is factually incorrect. What actually happened was that in several states, Trump had a narrow lead, but when the votes for Blue counties and mail in ballots came in overwhelmingly in Bidens favor, Trumps lead dropped.November 8, 2022 2:15 pm at 2:15 pm in reply to: condemning a candidate due to sickness or old age. #2136465Yserbius123ParticipantWhy should this only apply to political candidates? I believe all leaders should step down when they reach old age or are too infirm to be the person they once were.
Yserbius123ParticipantI go busur the shittois of FiveThirtyEight which always gives extremely accurate predictions of election results. They are predicting that it’s very likely that Republicans win the House and somewhat likely they will win the Senate. Not a huge upset, but still most probably a big win for Republicans.
People that are still claiming that Trump lost in 2020 because of election fraud are either getting their news from unreliable sources, have ulterior motives for fooling people, or have a tenuous grasp on reality.
Yserbius123Participant@DaMoshe Unfortunately, you are wrong. There absolutely are people who parade around their financial crimes and are praised for it. I can think of numerous examples (all of which are Lashon Hora) and I’m sure you know of plenty too.
Yserbius123ParticipantI would like to say this story b’sheim omro but I can’t recall the Rosh Yeshiva’s name. It was either in 1950s America, or 1930s Europe a Yeshiva put a new building up. Some of the boys found pieces of rebar sticking out of one of the walls and would have fun climbing up and down. A couple bachurim came complaining to the Rosh Yeshiva, derech Yivonim, etc. etc. The RY smiled and thanked the boys for telling him and said it was a good thing they are thinking this way. He then said that he is not going to cover it up because he intentionally asked the builders to leave it like that so that the boys can get some exercise and fun.
October 27, 2022 12:54 pm at 12:54 pm in reply to: The State of Israel Formed on the Basis of Keeping the Torah #2132987Yserbius123ParticipantBen Gurion allowed Rabbonim to decide matters of religion for the same reason the World Zionist Organization chose Palestine over Argentine and Uganda to create their Zionist state. It’s the only way they were able to get frum people aboard and they needed more Jews to support them.
October 25, 2022 11:14 am at 11:14 am in reply to: Is YU officially a modern-Orthodox institution? #2132334Yserbius123ParticipantYU is literally Modern Orthodox since Modern Orthodox, unlike Yeshivish, has an actual organization with YU taking up a massive percentage of its head. Whether or not they are frum is a different discussion.
The Yeshivish community has written them off decades ago, I’m not sure what sort of association you expect from them.
As for their “Chaveirim Kol Yisroel” club, I don’t see this as any different than the club that existed in Cordoza for the last several decades.
The language they used in setting it up basically states that it’s a support group for men that don’t have tayvas nashim, or women that don’t have tayvas anashim, and how to live a frum lifestyle with that. Which is fine, I guess, assuming they stick to the charter. Obviously, I’m not stupid and I know that they will be hosting talks, publishing media, and holding events that go against halacha. But until that point, and until RIETS officially endorses such activities, we have to be dan l’kaf zechus.
October 22, 2022 10:30 pm at 10:30 pm in reply to: Bnei Brak Kollel guy gives up multiple million Euro inheritance b/c of SHABBOS #2131659Yserbius123ParticipantI’m questioning literally everything about this.
Yserbius123ParticipantAs has been mentioned a million times on this subject, Rav JB Soleveitchik ZT”L himself criticized YU for putting themselves into a position where the government can decide what their morals and ethics should be.
Yserbius123ParticipantI would tell you all to just read Rav Hirsch (specifically “Horeb” and volume 7 of “Collected Writings”) but everyone will just roll their eyes and call be a stupid Yekke. So I’ll pick another gadol.
Did the Vilna Gaon study every aspect of limudei chol (except pharmacy) only when he was in the bathroom? Did he write, edit, and publish “Ayal Meshulash” to take away from others learning chas v’shalom? Did he instruct Rav Baruch of Shklov to translate Euclid’s “Elements” to trick Yidden away from learning?
September 13, 2022 11:49 pm at 11:49 pm in reply to: Can we have an adult conversation about education? #2124365Yserbius123Participant@AviraDeArah Having lived in a very Chassidishe place for a long time, (and being intimately familiar with some of the current narisch trend amongst Litvaks to ignore secular studies) I’m going to strongly disagree with you on that one. From personal experience, only the most successful of Yidden who had no secular education make it in the business world. It takes a huge amount of Hatzlacha to even get to the point that your average desk sitting businessman gets to in a year or two. And the vast majority never reach it and are literally fighting over scraps as to who gets the Meishiv Second Seder job, or answering phones at a frum mortgage broker for $15 an hour.
Mind you, these are not the people I referred to that put the money into the communities. A בִּיג קאָנטרְבְּיוּטַר is generally someone who grew up outside the community and becomes infatuated with their lifestyle. Walk around any overtly massive shul and tell me how many of the names on the plaques did not go to high school.
September 13, 2022 6:49 pm at 6:49 pm in reply to: Can we have an adult conversation about education? #2124269Yserbius123ParticipantAs an addendum to my previous comment, a lot of the money and success people perceive in communities that don’t have a secular education come from outside Big Contributors. The big shuls, the fancy sifre Torah, and the large weddings are usually the result of some one who went to college and did well in business that gives his money to the moised. Occasionally you have some local k’nocker in real estate, but it’s very rare.
September 13, 2022 6:47 pm at 6:47 pm in reply to: Can we have an adult conversation about education? #2124268Yserbius123ParticipantI’m going to start with four strong opinions and base the rest of what I’m saying on those.
- A proper frum education is necessary
- A secular education is necessary in this American golus
- A school can be very successful at both of these
- The secular education given by very many frum schools is very inadequate or non-existent
The main sensible argument I’ve heard against this is “Parents have a right to teach their kids how they want and it seems to work”. I would say no! As frum Yidden we absolutely do not believe in “rights” and “personal choice”. Parents have a responsibility to educate their children properly and that includes also in secular studies. And no, it doesn’t seem to work either. Many people who graduate from theses Yeshivos are forced to fight for a small number of jobs in the frum community and rely on their wives and government aid to just barely survive poverty. It’s not even a choice for people anymore. Many feel pressured by friends, family, neighbors, and the looming prospect of shidduchim leaving only the “just Limudei Kodesh” schools as the only available options.
Now it doesn’t matter what the NY Slimes or the moisers said. There is a huge problem with Yeshivos in New York and New Jersey that are under the mistaken impression that the only way to have a proper frum education is to forgoe a proper secular one. The fact that this has been going on for so long means that they were hanging by a thread and just waiting for something to trigger repercussions. And here those repercussions are.
In my opinion, the frum oilom should have worked with the government better on this. They could have taken say, Chaim Berlin, for example, which is probably scores near the top on most standardized secular metrics and said that this is the baseline secular education that Yeshivos would follow. What this would have resulted in would be perceived as the Litvish and Yeshiva working crowd using the government to put pressure on certain institutions which would be potentially bad. But the alternative is (with all due respect to the Agudah, Rabbi Hoffman, and legions of other talmidei chachamim who have weighed in on this topic) a united front towards suicide. Right now, Rabbonim and askanim are in vain trying to convince the world that since Chaim Berlin does well on the Regents, therefore the government should back off from the Yeshivos that don’t even teach the kids to speak English. Which no one accepts, so now we have to deal with a government that wants to force all Yeshivos to not only study reading, riting, and rithmatic, but also gender studies, heretical philosophy, and comparative religion.
Yserbius123ParticipantCan someone find the famous speech by Rav JB Soleveitchik ZT”L where he criticized the YU administrators for taking government money saying that now the government will have a say on what YU can or cannot do?
Also, I seem to recall an very similar story around the mid 90s where one of the YU schools (I think it was Cardozo) was forced to allow a toeva club to continue.
Yserbius123ParticipantBaruch Hashem for the Zionist State which calls itself Israel! They are the largest marbitz Torah in the entire history of galus! How many Yungerleit are sitting and learning for years, YEARS!, just because Hashem commanded the State of Israel to provide them with money and food? How many Kollelim, Yeshivos, Seminaries, Bais Yaakovs, Chedarim, and shuls exist just because Israel also exists? Imagine what a world we would live in if Chas v’Shalom Eretz Yisroel was still under the Turks, or the Palestinians, or the British!
No Jewish state, no torah.
Yserbius123Participant@rightwriter I’m confused. Do you mean viruses that can read DNA and only attack people with certain DNA, or do you mean that the bad guy will read someone’s DNA and find an allergy or weakness which will be used to kill them?
The former is pure fantasy, the latter is just ridiculous.
August 4, 2022 11:18 am at 11:18 am in reply to: The fake-ocupation cover / mask (fakeupation) #2112057Yserbius123ParticipantThen according to all of this logic, the Israeli government should offer citizenship to Arabs living in all of the areas captured from Jordan in 1967, not just Yerushalayim. They should further cease to recognize the PA as any sort of authority, since the West Bank is part of Israel. Why aren’t they?
August 3, 2022 12:15 pm at 12:15 pm in reply to: The fake-ocupation cover / mask (fakeupation) #2111749Yserbius123Participant@Shalom-al-Israel Well, yeah, I’m not denying that. Doesn’t change the fact that it’s an actual military and civilian occupation. The Tziyonim did what they always do and messed up and are still trying to figure out how to cover that up.
Yserbius123ParticipantWouldn’t JIYO be more accurate? “Jewish In Yichus Only”?
Yserbius123ParticipantFrom behind the scenes I’ve heard that in many tzedaka campaigns, there are generally several big anonymous donors and one or two big named contributors. The anonymous askanim only gave because they see someone they trust putting a lot of money into it.
August 2, 2022 11:45 pm at 11:45 pm in reply to: The fake-ocupation cover / mask (fakeupation) #2111487Yserbius123ParticipantNot to sound like a smolani, but there is very much an occupation. Israel does not recognize Sheba Farms, Gaza, Areas A, B, nor C as part of Israel. People who live there do not get Israeli citizenship, but Israel has troops and buildings on some of these places. The official term for it is “Israeli occupied territory” since it is nisht a hin, nisht a herr.
Yserbius123Participant@rightwriter If the only thing the assassin is looking for in the DNA is a vulnerability, then looking at their genetic code is way overkill. You can probably just google it, or call their house pretending to be their doctor and ask about any allergies. This is a huge change from your original statement that claims that it may be possible to develop a virus that can be spread amongst many people but only kill one person based on their DNA.
And a previous 007/attache-case-in-Hebrew movie was about a machine that can change the race of a person. Another one involved a secret space station. Not sure how any of that science fiction is at all relevant.
What vaccines targeted birthrates in what African countries? How did the birth rates change?
Yserbius123Participant@rightwriter I don’t know if a virus that targets people and animals with specific DNA is even possible. I tried looking around on many academic sites and found nothing. I then resorted to Google, and then Yandex (Russian Google, which finds a lot of the more bizarre stuff that’s censored by Google). The only thing that had any credibility was a single Congressman claiming that such weapons were “possibly in development”, which is kind of a meaningless statement.
Anyhoo, what you’re saying about vaccines and birthrates is really scary! Israel has something like a 95% COVID vaccination rate, even in the frum and Chareidi communities! Have you been there lately? Are Bikur Cholim maternity wards really empty?
Yserbius123ParticipantA Tesla Model S is around 2.5 times the price of a hybrid sedan. You’re paying a good $300 a month more. Which is about 65 gallons of gas at current prices. Which is about 1800 miles in a hybrid sedan. Where are you driving for 1800 miles a month?
Yserbius123ParticipantHe should be referred to in third person by all members of his household. “Would The Father like a glass of water to drink?” “Can The Father learn with me later?” “I apologize to The Father for making him so angry before.” “Hello Father and welcome home.”
Yserbius123ParticipantSo I would like to vote for President. (Which is great, because right now we’ve been invaded by lizards who rule over humanity, but we get to choose which lizard is in charge so yay democracy!) The problem I am having is this. Anyone who wants to be president, is de-facto the worst possible person to be president. Anyone who is capable and eligible to be president, doesn’t want to run. So how do we get around this Catch 22?
Yserbius123Participant@Always_Ask_Questions I am far more scared of a bunch of yokels running around with murderous weapons than I am of our government turning on the people. And so should you.
Yserbius123ParticipantI still don’t get why Biden is somehow at fault for worldwide OPEC and Russian controlled oil prices.
Yserbius123ParticipantOne thing to add to all of this: gun ownership is very goyish. It’s about toughness, and hunting. The idea that you can protect yourself and don’t need the police. It’s not a Yiddishe mehalech.
As for all those people who are unwittingly repeating the NRA motto, “If you criminalize guns, only criminals will have guns” that’s wrong too. Guns are widely legally available in most states in the US. It’s extremely easy for a criminal to get one, even if they have a record. And if someone already owns a gun and decides to commit a crime, that crime just got a lot worse. Contrast that to a country such as Australia where gun ownership is extremely rare. Criminals simply have a very hard time finding guns so there aren’t a lot of gun crimes.
What the Constitutions talks about is irrelevant. It’s a document written with the express purpose of changing for every generation. In this generation, I think it’s clear that the 2nd amendment is causing far more harm than any good.
-
AuthorPosts