Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 29, 2018 5:37 pm at 5:37 pm in reply to: The world is in a state of Geula- and don’t misunderstand us! #1633369Yserbius123Participant
Whatever it is that Chabad does, however they daven, you should know that the place Rav Schneerson ZT”L has amongst them is unprecedented in all of Yiddish history. No one has ever proclaimed that a dead leader is an exclusive emissary from H”KBH, nor has anyone ever made it a minhag to insert said leaders name into teffilos. I don’t care how many Chassidishe seforim talk about “Nasi HaDor” or how many mekoros there are for a meilitz yosher, it’s a new, mudnehdikeh, thing that was invented by Chabad in 1996.
Is it avodah zora? Not for me to decide, others have already weighed in. Is it a new and strange custom with no basis in halacha or minhag that very strongly resembles certain issurim d’orayso? Absolutely.
Yserbius123ParticipantIf you want a visual, animated, interactive demonstration, search for “Research on Complex Systems: D3 Herd Immunity Simulator”.
It creates a population of 300 simulated people, and you can set how fast they have children and how many are immunized. When you run it, it clearly demonstrates why a high vaccination rate is crucial to the overall health of a group of people.
November 29, 2018 3:07 pm at 3:07 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1633257Yserbius123Participant@doomsday Myself and several other people have posted numerous refutations to the allegation that there are research papers “proving” the link between vaccination and autism. Futhermore, I did address your claim of fraudulent CDC studies.
November 29, 2018 2:38 pm at 2:38 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1633212Yserbius123Participant@doomsday I’ll answer the question again. There is no verified study other than Wakefield’s that shows a link between disease immunization and autism. You think otherwise and told me to look up that webpage with “24 studies”. I refuted that with another webpage I found showing how those studies are not evidence for a link.
We are talking about the study: “A Population-Based Study of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccination and Autism” yes? Because I’m having a difficult time seeing your points in the study. In fact, I couldn’t even find your points on the anti-immunization sites I pulled this from. Where did you get your information?
- Patients before 1992 were counted from hospitals, after 1992 they counted the total population: I don’t see anything in the study that differentiates between the datasets per year.
- after 1992The Danish Government Changed the Definition of Autism: Shouldn’t this be a pretty big red flag that your initial assumptions are incorrect? This kind of proves that you cannot correlate the increase in autism rates with any increase in immunization.
- the Fake Researchers [deleted] the entire year of data 2001 for seven year old children from its final published report.: Again, I think we are reading different studies. The CDC “Danish Study” only looks at data from 1991 to 1999.
Yserbius123Participant@apushatayid Can’t speak for the others, but it’s a bit of a guilty pleasure of mine to argue a position I know I’m right about.
Yserbius123Participant@Takes2-2tango It’s a well known fact that Rav Moshe Heineman SHLITA enjoys fixing things and handiwork. He used to fix his own cars until he was told it’s pas nisht for a rov. I know people who have asked him shaylos on issues they had with their car.
Yserbius123ParticipantNot to disparage Yidden. Modern Orthodox Yidden are even more diverse than the Yeshivishe chevra.
That being said, there are definitely people who consider themselves Modox who believe in “Maddah U’Torah”, “Da’at Ba’al HaBus”, and “Da’at Yachid L’Heter”.
November 29, 2018 12:31 pm at 12:31 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1633124Yserbius123ParticipantAs for the “Danish Study”, two seconds on Google found an article on the website “Science Based Medicine”, search for the title “The curious case of Poul Thorsen, fraud and embezzlement, and the Danish vaccine-autism studies”.
Basically, Thorsen is a fraud. But he only worked on two studies and wasn’t even the primary researcher on either. The data from the studies is still valid and so is the data on dozens of other studies that show no link between immunization and autism.
November 29, 2018 12:21 pm at 12:21 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1633120Yserbius123ParticipantI did not lie. I did not say that there’s no way to analyze all the studies, nor did I refuse to answer your question.You told me to look for a site that claims 24 studies that link autism to immunization. As I am not a scientist, I cannot honestly tell you if those studies show what you claim. But I do know a little about science and can say that at least some of them do not come to the conclusions you claim they do. Good thing I also found a website of a real scientist that goes through each study individually and points out why the study was either invalid, or does not conclude what you claim.
Furthermore, you are consistently refusing to acknowledge that thimerisol, a major aspect of many of your studies, is an methylethyl mercury compound and not the dangerous kind of ethylmercury. Can you address that?
November 29, 2018 11:20 am at 11:20 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1633044Yserbius123Participant@kavod Habriot
You are arguing from emotion, not logic. Take a step back and think for yourself. What science? What history? Have vaccines been an overall benefit or danger to society? What happened to polio? Smallpox? How many people over the age of 60 have permanent illnesses because of measles? How does measles, mumps, and rubella affect newborns? Chemo patients?
November 29, 2018 11:19 am at 11:19 am in reply to: In a general sense, rate broad categories of devices based on performance. #1633045Yserbius123ParticipantIf you have a business or something that involves regularly printing on something other than paper, i.e. plastic or fabric, get a specialized printer for that because inkjets aren’t great at plastics either. If it’s not a regular thing, then just do your printing down at Kinkos/FedEx. The sub-$100 inkjet printers are a complete ripoff and there’s no reason to buy one over an more expensive laser.
November 29, 2018 9:31 am at 9:31 am in reply to: In a general sense, rate broad categories of devices based on performance. #1632870Yserbius123Participant@RebYidd23 As opposed to printing on celery which inkjets excel at?
@ZionGate It’s comparable in quality. But if you’re doing professional photos, you want a specialized photo printer, not a $50 HP so this comparison isn’t nogeya.November 29, 2018 9:31 am at 9:31 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1632869Yserbius123ParticipantI already responded to your post about “24 studies” with one of my own. None of those 24 studies do show a link between immunization and autism as you can see from searching for the phrase I posted or this one “About Those Research Papers Supporting the Vaccine/Autism Link”.
The idea that there is research showing a link besides the Wakefield study is a sheker that comes from people unfamiliar with scientific studies attempting to comprehend a scientific study. One major example of this am ha’aratzus is the one I keep bringing up: claiming that thimerisol (methylethyl mercury) is damaging to the human body just because it shares words in common with ethylmercury.
Other bits that showcase this lack of education are things like calling a cell-line “aborted baby fetus”, referring to preliminary studies showing possible correlation as evidence, and ignoring a lack of control groups.
November 28, 2018 10:29 pm at 10:29 pm in reply to: In a general sense, rate broad categories of devices based on performance. #1632717Yserbius123ParticipantYou’re buying printers wrong. Ink jet printers are awful. The companies actually lose money selling the printers and make all the profit on ink. Therefore the printers are incredibly flimsy, waste ink like it’s water, and replacement ink costs more than a good esrog.
Get a Brother or Canon laser printer. I did and never looked back. They are expensive (several hundred dollars) but they rarely run out of toner, print really fast, and work like a charm.
November 28, 2018 10:28 pm at 10:28 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1632715Yserbius123ParticipantYou are doing what’s called a “Gish Gallop”. Posting dozens of pieces of evidence in order to overwhelm the person you are trying to debate because they will have to go through each one individually. I can respond in kind if you would just Google “124 (now 144) papers that DO NOT prove vaccines cause autism”.
Just reading the titles of the articles I know that the conclusion you are attempting to draw is a false and misleading one. Several articles specifically talk about heavy metal ethylmercury which has never been present in vaccines, unlike methylethyl mercury which is harmless. It’s a lack of scientific knowledge that causes people to confuse and conflate the two.
On another note, several articles are old and only show preliminary conclusions that essentially state “more data required”. More data has been gathered and newer studies were launched that showed the initial preliminary conclusions were incorrect due to a variety of factors.
November 28, 2018 11:37 am at 11:37 am in reply to: The Anti-Vaxxers are Causing a Chillul Hashem #1632350Yserbius123ParticipantI think at some point we will have to rethink how we approach the anti-medicine community. Obviously logic doesn’t work. Announcements and psak halacha from chachomim doesn’t work. Debate doesn’t work. Ridicule doesn’t work. Attacks don’t work. Having their children literally get sick and (C”V) potentially die doesn’t work.
I’m all out of ideas, thoughts?
Yserbius123ParticipantMy question is why the frum oilom, which relies so heavily on welfare and other federal MOIFSIM (ΧΧΧΧΧ§ΧΧ¨, ΧΧΧΧ€ΧΧ¨, Χ€ΧΧΧ‘ΧΧΧ€, Χ‘Χ§Χ©ΧΧ ΧΧΧ) programs are so overwhelmingly anti-Democrat which is the party that’s constantly pushing to increase these programs.
Yserbius123ParticipantTo add to my previous comment. The debate over vaccinations is no more a debate than the debate over flat Earth, whether the President is an alien, and government mind-control satellites. Not surprisingly, they are all discussed in the same forums.
So if you want people to discuss “both sides” and continue to pretend that this is a debate, just know that you sound no different than the people that claimed the world will end in 2012.
Yserbius123ParticipantAnti-vaxxers are under the mistaken impression that there is a vaccine “debate”. That there are two sides to the issue, “pro-vax” and “anti-vax”. That’s a fantasy concocted by the anti-vax crowd and is completely false. There’s no debate. There’s merely facts (which the majority of intelligent seicheldikeh people understand and abide by) and there’s scare tactics and lies pulled from weird looking websites with only some token out of context scientific data to back it up.
Yserbius123ParticipantKingdomino and its sequel/expansion Queendomino are excellent games.
November 26, 2018 3:02 pm at 3:02 pm in reply to: Why Are Torah Observant Jews Overwhelmingly Republican/Conservative? #1630795Yserbius123Participant@It is Time for Truth
Can you stop with the big words and hidden meanings and just come out and say it? You vote Republican because they are opposed to gay marriage.
Fine. But you know what? It’s happening whether we like it or not and there’s nothing we can do to stop it. So maybe we can stop pretending that Republicans have some sort of imaginary moral high-ground and look at actual issues that actually affect us as opposed to an inevitable change that has literally nothing to do with frum society.
Do they realign the whole world to fit with their indiscretions,promote, and flaunt it ?!
We are talking about Trump, yes? Because that describes Trump to a “T”. How many wives has he had so far? How did he pick them? What has he been accused of spending a lot of time, effort, and money covering up?
November 26, 2018 12:53 pm at 12:53 pm in reply to: Why Are Torah Observant Jews Overwhelmingly Republican/Conservative? #1630667Yserbius123ParticipantBecause on the surface it seems as if Republican and conservative values align more with Torah values than Democratic and liberal ones.
In reality, they are all apikorsim whose only values lie in tayva. Look at the Great and Might Trump, for example. Is this menuval really supposed to be the pinnacle of what a Jew should vote for just because he made some token gestures about Israel? Also I find it extremely ironic that those who benefit the most from liberal social programs like Medicare, FAFSA, Section 8, and WIC are the ones that vote overwhelmingly Republican.
Democrats are bad. Republicans are bad. As a klal we need to start looking more objectively at politics and decide to support those that are slightly less damaging in their policies.
November 26, 2018 12:51 pm at 12:51 pm in reply to: “Lehovin” has the highest respect for Rav Chaim Kanievski #1630659Yserbius123ParticipantI do not believe Rav Chaim knows 100% what’s going on outside of his walls of Torah. All the information from the outside world is filtered and filtered again before it gets to him. He relies entirely on trusted advisors to explain to him situations. At times, those advisors have agendas that they push by selected what Rav Chaim hears. I don’t even believe he cares about political nuances other than those situations that may attack Torah lifestyles.
November 23, 2018 1:58 am at 1:58 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1629395Yserbius123Participant@LogicalMom As you agree that you were wrong about thimerisol due to a misunderstanding of how chemistry works, perhaps you can take a second look at everything else you believe about vaccinations?
And I’ve read Dr. Humphries’s essay. I don’t need to be smarter than her or more qualified than her to say it’s nonsense. I just need to find people that are. And it’s not very difficult. I’ve found almost no one as smart and as qualified as her that actually agrees with her and literally thousands who consider her a dangerous quack. Why do you insist on following the insignificant minority of experts who hold of her and ignore the overwhelming vast majority of unbiased opinions that consider her a liar?
Yserbius123ParticipantPlaying Carcassone seriously means reading the instructions for how farms work.
What I find hilarious is how every expansion has some kneitch that seems to totally contradict how the rules work. L’moshol, in one expansion it comes with special meeples in every color plus gray, which isn’t one of the playable colors. There are at least two expansions that have changes to the farm rules, but the original rules mentioned are different than what’s in the original box.
November 22, 2018 8:44 pm at 8:44 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1629299Yserbius123ParticipantIf thimerisol contains mercury making it dangerous to ingest, then salt contains chloride making it dangerous to eat, water contains hydrogen making it dangerous to drink, etc.
The chemical compound is made up of mercury which is a completely different ballgame than the dangerous form of liquid metal mercury.
November 22, 2018 10:49 am at 10:49 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1629011Yserbius123Participant@LogicalMom So you’re admitting you were wrong about Wakefield and thimerisol. Just to clarify.
You are under the mistaken impression that there’s some sort of debate. There isn’t. There are maybe a few dozen medical doctors in the US who believe that there’s a debate and probably less than 5 who are anti-vaccine (Dr. Humphries is the most well known, and she honestly believes that polio and smallpox vaccines were meaningless). There’s simply no question that the benefits of immunization far outweigh the potential damages.
Look at what people like you have done in Eretz Yisroel and Monsey! Children are literally dying from measles! Don’t tell me things would have been worse and more people would be sick if they all vaccinated.
November 22, 2018 6:50 am at 6:50 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1628821Yserbius123Participant@LogicalMom
You are wrong about Wakefield. He did some serious ethical breaches to produce the data that was used in his infamous study. It was enough of an issue that he lost his license. Not because “they” didn’t want the truth to come out. Initially he had the support of many members of the medical community, but when it became clear that he was untrustworthy, a fear-monger, and an attention addict, everyone backed down including his 11 collaborators. Doctors later expressed surprise that the study even passed peer review since the data shown in the paper didn’t even support the conclusions and there were some serious doubts if the data itself was correct.
Not to mention that it spurned numerous other studies that showed absolutely no link between GI diseases and the MMR vaccine. Why fixate on a retracted study when there are many more that show no correlation between vaccines and autism?
- “Unintended events following immunization with MMR: a systematic review” (2003) Vaccine. Jefferson, Price, et all.
- “MMR vaccine and autism: an update of the scientific evidence” (2014) Expert Review of Vaccines. DeStephano, Thompson
- “Immunizations and Autism: A Review of the Literature” (2006) Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. Doja and Roberts
. Yes its in the form of thimerisol which is 50% mercury but difference does that make as to the exact chemistry name of it?
What difference does it make? All the difference in the world! Salt is a molecule made up of one sodium atom and one chloride atom. Sodium is an incredibly destructive chemical that can cause fires just by touching water. Chloride is literally poison. But table salt is perfectly safe. Same with thimerisol. It’s not “50% mercury”, it’s organic molecule has a mercury atom in it.
November 21, 2018 10:42 pm at 10:42 pm in reply to: Is it Mutar to celebrate Thanksgiving?!?!?!?!?!?! #1628737Yserbius123ParticipantOnce, our high school class made a joke and put our belts on our hats and sang and danced for Thanksgiving. The mashgiach came in to tell us we were going straight to gehennom for avodah zorah. He shook his head sadly at me, “Your grandparents and great-grandparents (whom he knew personally) are rolling in their grave”.
My grandparents came to the USA from Europe. They were from Rabbonus and pretty much everyone who wasn’t a rov in that side of the family was also a massive talmid chacham and lamdim. They celebrated Thanksgiving and so did most of their siblings that lived in America.
If someone wants to tell me that it’s assur, I would really like to see the source.
November 21, 2018 10:40 pm at 10:40 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1628730Yserbius123Participant@LogicalMom
I’m not going to refute all of your points, but I’m certain they aren’t any more logical than the fake fear mongering Wakefield invented to start the modern scare. So let me pick on the most obvious one:
At no point in any time in history did any vaccine contain mercury.
It’s a misconception based on misunderstanding of chemistry. Vaccines used to contain thimerison which is an organomercury compound. It’s related to the mercury you find in old thermometers in the same way in which highly flammable hydrogen gas is related to water (H2O). The reason it was removed was because of fear mongering by people like Andrew Wakefield and Jenny McCarthy.
November 21, 2018 3:30 pm at 3:30 pm in reply to: Did Dell Bigtree change your perspective about anti vaxxers? #1628491Yserbius123ParticipantRav Moshe Heineman’s Vaad Harabonim of Baltimore just issued a statement
We consider it a Halachic obligation for every member of the community β adults and children – to be properly vaccinated according to the standards and schedules established by the medical community as outlined by the CDC (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/index.html). These standards have been responsible for the eradication of many terrible diseases and have significantly improved public health in our country. As we are seeing in the current measles epidemic, ignoring or undermining the policy of universal vaccination endangers the community and is Halachically wrong.
November 21, 2018 11:52 am at 11:52 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1628281Yserbius123ParticipantUnfortunately Iβve come to believe (and e/o is welcome to their own opinion of who they would like to believe) that the CDC has falsified information in their favor.
Then your beliefs are wrong. That claim was publicized by a fellow named Andrew Wakefield, the same Andrew Wakefield who invented the claim that vaccines cause autism and lost his medical license after he falsified data trying to prove it. The CDC has done other studies and re-examined the data of the study in question and came to the same conclusion.
We can keep playing Wack-A-Mole with data, claims, anecdotes, all day long, but you can be rest assured that for everything you bring up that seems to imply that vaccinations are dangerous there is a rock-solid scientific reason why that is not so.
Do you know how I know that you are biased and that vaccination is the right way to go, no questions asked? Because of how you argue. It’s always the same. First there’s a claim from one shady place about the dangers of immunization. That’s proven to not only be false, but completely bogus. Then there’s another claim from another place with a similar rebuttal. Then a third, then a fourth. At a certain point an unbiased debater will say “Well if so much of what I believe is based on narischkeit, maybe I should re-examine it” But not anti-vaxxers. You will keep pulling more and more absurd and out-of-context “evidence” to push your agenda no matter how many times it’s proven false.
And then there’s the tiny amounts of “evidence” required to cement your beliefs versus the mountains of evidence you require to contradict them. A falsified study, a claim by a website, a letter by a Rov, an anecdote by a random person, good enough to say vaccines are bad! But to say they are good, you require notarized letters from every doctor, researcher, and Gadol in history!
November 21, 2018 11:34 am at 11:34 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1628285Yserbius123Participant@Meno Yes it’s a coincidence. Children unfortunately suffer neurological and mental disorders all the time. The fact that once or twice it happened soon after vaccination is meaningless. You have to show that out of a random population of children affected by a disorder, it happens most often immediately after vaccination. Then you need a control group of unvaccinated kids and show that they are healthier. Similar studies have been done and the conclusions show no difference.
November 21, 2018 11:25 am at 11:25 am in reply to: Lev Tahor and other frum cults- and don’t misunderstand me #1628243Yserbius123ParticipantAs much as I would like to agree in terms of Lubavitch (entire sedorim dedicated to memorizing random letters a man wrote to someone 50 years ago is not Yiddishkeit), they do learn rishonim and acharonim and they do not have a single living “guru” who demands that they do nothing without his or her say so.
November 21, 2018 8:56 am at 8:56 am in reply to: Lev Tahor and other frum cults- and don’t misunderstand me #1627984Yserbius123ParticipantYou aren’t wrong, but you are a little misleading. I don’t know of any other frum system that learns their guru’s writings to the exclusion of others. OK, maybe Satmar and Vizhnitz won’t read Rav Kook, but there are Ponevezhers who learn Rav Hirsch, Briskers who learn B’nei Yisaschor, and Chassidim who learn P’nei Yehoshua.
Yserbius123Participant@Mariana Santos: Not just the hardcore anti-Semites. Even the cowardly “I only criticize Zionism” types have difficulty explaining why they level the same “criticism” at Jews of every stripe and color.
Yserbius123ParticipantDid I really just say 38 melochos?
(facepalm)
November 20, 2018 2:22 pm at 2:22 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1626974Yserbius123Participant@RebbYidd23
That’s another issue. People keep trying to frame this as a “debate” or “science machlokes”. It’s nothing of the sort! There’s literally no debate, there are just normal people and people who reject hard facts and logic.
L’Havdil, if I would say that in Halacha there’s a debate whether the Chachomim are correct and their psak stands forever, or to go like Reform and the Torah (C”V) needs to be “reexamined” I would be reamed over hot coals, banned from this site, and called a kofer. It’s the same thing with this fantasy of there being a “vaccine safety debate”.
November 20, 2018 12:11 pm at 12:11 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1626895Yserbius123ParticipantI spent time writing that comment, but it got borked because capital and lowercase show up the same. Here it is again:
Do you know what? Even if every one of your studies leads to the conclusions you are claiming they lead to it would still mean that itβs imperative to vaccinate. Because all those studies show is that there may be some side effects of immunizing. But on the other hand, it is a fact that not immunizing can not only lead to horrible permanent damage or death due to measles or whooping cough. And not only in the people who refuse to vaccinate but also in the 5% of people who vaccinated whose bodies didnβt respond to the vaccine, to the infants who are too young to get the shot, to the elderly with compromised immune systems, to people who nebech are undergoing chemo therapy.
Letβs do this in some visual, yeah? Imagine the studies are all fine and good, this would be the world today. βOβ
is someone who is vaccinated, “uβ is someone without the vaccine either by choice or medical necessity (infants, immune compromised, egg allergies, etc). Letβs say thatβs %5 of people.OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOuOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOuOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOuOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOuOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOu
So you say there are adverse side affects to vaccination, ok, letβs limit that to side affects that cause lasting damage and/or death. Weβll mark them as βDβ and say it happens to 0.5% of people which is way higher than what the people opposed to vaccination claim it is.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOuOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOuOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOuOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOuOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOu
Really a tragedy. OK, now letβs say that instead of 95% of people vaccinating, itβs more like 70%. Then our population would look something like this:
OOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuu
That βXβ disappeared! Yay! Less vaccinations means less likelihood of someone getting hurt from one!
Now letβs take measles as a factor. According to the CDC, measles can cause death 0.15% of the time and other lasting damage about 1% of the time. Letβs go with our original vaccination rates and assume that only unimmunized people will get the disease. They will be denoted as βMβ in this chart. Again, a large βDβ is someone damaged from a vaccine, but weβll add a small βxβ for someone damaged from measles.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOuOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOuOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOu
One person got measles, recovered, and only able to pass it on to one person who also recovered. Letβs see how that plays out in a less vaccinated population:
OOOOuOOOMxOOOOuOOOMMOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOMMOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOMMOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOMMOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOMMOOOOuOOOMMOOOOuOOOMMOOOOuOOOuuOOOOuOOOMxOOOOuOOOuu
Far more people received the virus because it is more likely to spread. So no one was damaged by the vaccines, but we have two people with severe issues emanated from the measles virus.
According to these numbers, an unvaccinated population is more than twice as likely to see permanent injury or other lasting damage than an immunized one.
Any kashes?
November 20, 2018 11:24 am at 11:24 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #1626852Yserbius123ParticipantDo you know what? Even if every one of your studies leads to the conclusions you are claiming they lead to it would still mean that it’s imperative to vaccinate. Because all those studies show is that there may be some side effects of immunizing. But on the other hand, it is a fact that not immunizing can not only lead to horrible permanent damage or death due to measles or whooping cough. And not only in the people who refuse to vaccinate but also in the 5% of people who vaccinated whose bodies didn’t respond to the vaccine, to the infants who are too young to get the shot, to the elderly with compromised immune systems, to people who nebech are undergoing chemo therapy.
Let’s do this in some visual, yeah? Imagine the studies are all fine and good, this would be the world today. “O”
is someone who is vaccinated, “o” is someone without the vaccine either by choice or medical necessity (infants, immune compromised, egg allergies, etc). Let’s say that’s %5 of people.OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo
So you say there are adverse side affects to vaccination, ok, let’s limit that to side affects that cause lasting damage and/or death. We’ll mark them as “X” and say it happens to 0.5% of people which is way higher than what the people opposed to vaccination claim it is.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOXOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo
Really a tragedy. OK, now let’s say that instead of 95% of people vaccinating, it’s more like 70%. Then our population would look something like this:
OOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOoo
That “X” disappeared! Yay! Less vaccinations means less likelihood of someone getting hurt from one!
Now let’s take measles as a factor. According to the CDC, measles can cause death 0.15% of the time and other lasting damage about 1% of the time. Let’s go with our original vaccination rates and assume that only unimmunized people will get the disease. They will be denoted as “M” in this chart. Again, a large “X” is someone damaged from a vaccine, but we’ll add a small “x” for someone damaged from measles.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMOOOOOOOOOOOOOXOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo
One person got measles, recovered, and only able to pass it on to one person. Let’s see how that plays out in a less vaccinated population:
OOOOoOOOMxOOOOoOOOMMOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOMMOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOMMOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOMMOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOMMOOOOoOOOMMOOOOoOOOMMOOOOoOOOooOOOOoOOOMxOOOOoOOOoo
Far more people received the virus because it is more likely to spread. So no one was damaged by the vaccines, but we have two people with severe issues emanated from the measles virus.
According to these numbers, an unvaccinated population is more than twice as likely to see permanent injury or other lasting damage than an immunized one.
Any kashes?
Yserbius123ParticipantAs for Shabbos issues, Rav Ribiat in his 38 Melochos series goes into detail for several toys and games. He is OK with most puzzles as long as they’re not built in a frame. For something a little more specific, a talmid of Rav Yosef Berger from Baltimore published a kuntrus on his psak halachos of toys on Shabbos and he goes into detail on games and puzzles.
Don’t quote me on this, but I recall one or both paskening that there’s no halachic problem with a game that has play money, it’s just something people don’t do.
Yserbius123Participant@Rand0m3x: You’re suggesting Eclipse and telling me that Agricola isn’t gateway enough?
I just found out that there’s a third game in the “Forbidden” series called Forbidden Space. Looks like fun, but a little more complicated than its predecessors.
Hanabi is an amazing family game that’s also small and cheap.
November 20, 2018 10:51 am at 10:51 am in reply to: Did Dell Bigtree change your perspective about anti vaxxers? #1626789Yserbius123Participant@takahmamash I had to google the name. He’s a guy with a website. I think the only thing that makes him famous is that he hates the government and he’s very against doctors and medical science. That makes him a big name for conspiracy theorists and “alternative medicine” types. A few years ago he made a movie (falsely) claiming that the CDC suppressed data on the dangers of vaccination.
November 19, 2018 12:28 pm at 12:28 pm in reply to: Did Dell Bigtree change your perspective about anti vaxxers? #1626102Yserbius123ParticipantI don’t need rabbinic support to tell me what any first year medical student knows.
The sad fact is that in the case of vaccines, there are several prominent rabbonim that have been misguided by fools and liars. Since there is no Torah nor halachic cheshbon to use to figure out if vaccination is the right thing to do, Rabbonim have to rely on secular knowledge. And some rabbonim, R”L, mistook the fools for the educated ones.
Yserbius123ParticipantTo clarify some things: The “greasy” guy isn’t the biggest masmid. The greasy Yeshivish guys are just those that have given up interacting with the world in general. They speak in mumbled sentences, wear the same clothes all week, and rarely shower. They may be smart and talmidei chachomim, but not necessarily. Most Yeshivish masmidim I know are well respected and dress normally.
November 19, 2018 12:09 pm at 12:09 pm in reply to: Lev Tahor’s donors – Which rock could they be living under? #1626091Yserbius123ParticipantIf anyone has any questions about Lev Tahor or doubt the reports from the frum news sources, just read the Ami article from a few years ago. Ami tried really hard to paint them in the best light possible, and were severely criticized for it. But even in this whitewashed picture that Ami tried to paint, the rough edges are still pretty glaring. In an interview, one guru admits to taking kids away from uncooperative parents and waves his hand saying “We don’t do that so much anymore”. When asked about the teen and child marriages the only answer given was “A 12 year old girl is old enough to marry k’halacha”.
Yserbius123ParticipantTo answer your first question: No.
As for the second: Goyim who live near large frum communities.
November 12, 2018 2:37 pm at 2:37 pm in reply to: How can the Lakewood township fix the local traffic problem? #1621558Yserbius123ParticipantLakewood and Monsey are lost causes in terms of traffic. There never should have been that many people living in such close proximity with only one or two roads that can get you where you want to go.
But everyone who insists on zoning enforcement is an antisemite amirite?
Yserbius123ParticipantAre you real or are you a Russian bot?
Yserbius123ParticipantI’ve always found Brian Greene to have the best explanations on physics. Gerald Schroeder gives a good one too, if you want something from a frum perspective.
-
AuthorPosts