Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 8, 2021 12:00 pm at 12:00 pm in reply to: Universal Health care, Obamacare, Managed Care #1989633Yserbius123Participant
“The structure of our healthcare industry is confusing and expensive at every level, and there’s no simple solution… I’m a conservative on most issues, but liberal on this one… The goal should be clear: We must have universal healthcare… We should have a Canadian-style single-payer system were all expenses are paid to a single agency.”
Donald J. Trump, 2000
Yserbius123Participant@Health I am repeating myself over here. I don’t believe Mr. Ramsland because when he was talking in the video, in about three sentences he made a bunch of statements that can easily be disproven. Such as calling Clarity Election Night a company, or saying that they had taken Scytl servers from Germany. So I don’t believe Ramsland and neither should you.
Yserbius123Participant@Health “Who cares?” You do, obviously. Else you wouldn’t be getting so worked up over it. There is zero evidence that your provided that indicates voting fraud in the 2020 elections. Zero. Zip. Nada. Nothing. Calling me a liar and getting all worked up over it isn’t going to change the facts on the ground that you are clearly reluctant to admit to yourself. It looks as if you’ve made Donald Trump so much a part of your identity that you take it extremely personally when his narrative is challenged even in the slightest way (such as “Is there any evidence to those claims other than his word?”). Please focus your emunah and mental energies into something that would actually be beneficial, like Torah and Avodah.
Yserbius123Participant@Health Ramsland’s claims in 2018 didn’t involve Scytl. I think you need to do some chazarah on what you’re saying.
Yserbius123Participant@philosopher You called it (or at least 100% agreed with someone who said) “modifies DNA”. That’s misleading, as it does not modify the actual strands of DNA nor a person’s genes.
Dr. Malone (whoever he is) is not being silenced. You said yourself he was on Tucker Carlson, one of the most watched talk shows on TV in the English speaking world. According to a few things from reliable sources I literally just Googled, Dr. Malone has a habit of using inflammatory, misleading, and wrong information, so I wouldn’t necessarily trust him over my own doctor.
I agree that waiting until people are 18 makes sense, but 99% of people simply cannot make an informed decision on vaccinating themselves. That’s what caused the measles outbreak in Monsey two years ago which could have Chas V’Shalom been much worse than it was.
Yserbius123Participant@Health You’re the one that kept jumping around and mentioned dozens of claims of voter fraud and getting all angry if I didn’t prove each and every one wrong. So we agreed to focus on two.
Your argument about Ramsland would make sense if two things were true: (A) The 2018 claims were proven and (B) they were similar enough to the 2020 claims.
Neither is true. The claims were not proven, as evidenced by the report I and @JacobLev mentioned. And they were completely different claims, focused on different companies, different machines, and different states! In 2018 he claimed that the Dominion machines were connected to the Internet and hacked to change individual people’s ballots. In 2020 he claimed that the Scytl servers had malware on them that allowed people to change the total vote count. Very different beasts, other than the one similarity of “computer” and “vote”.
Yserbius123Participant@Health Well, the fact that there were two claims that I asked you to prove, and you ignored one to focus on the second kind of indicates that shitaka k’hoda’ah, you admit I’m right.
And since Ramsland’s claims three years ago were different than what he claimed last year, you can’t really use one to prove the other.
QED
Yserbius123ParticipantThe line “affects your DNA” is incredibly misleading. It implies that it changed the genes of a person, like give them a different hair color or make them taller, kind of like what CRISPR does, which can then be passed on to their children. To backtrack and say this whole complex explanation isn’t really doing the argument any favors.
Yserbius123ParticipantSo to get our stories straight: We had two points. One point the only thing you had to go on was Ramsland’s word. And the only thing that backed that up was something that happened two years ago. On the second point you 100% admit that I am right.
Yserbius123Participant@philosopher I think you need to read up what “100%” means. I have not heard any Rabbonim discussing giving it to children, but when it comes to adults taking the shot every Rav and doctor I heard who voiced an opinion encouraged people to get vaccinated. Multiple cities (not New York, Lakewood, and Monsey for some reason) had petchkvilim signed by virtually every shul and Yeshiva in town telling people to get vaccinated. So that’s who I’m listening to.
Yserbius123Participant@Health You’re talking about the Dept. of Homeland Security involvement in ASOG back in 2018. You are wrong. They absolutely did not confirm his findings back then which were completely different than his findings in 2020 (which were also not confirmed by DoHS).
As we are focused on the 2020 findings (which again, are a very different than the ones in 2018 other than the tzad hashoveh of “election computers”), once again I have to restate that Ramsland has no proof.
So we are back to square one. You are claiming that fraud happened because someone on the Internet said so. I am claiming that there’s no proof because there’s no proof. I hate to toot my own proudly Conservative, Republican voting, horn, but my logic works an awful lot better than yours. If you wanted Heaven fearing people in the government, maybe you shouldn’t literally worship Trump, the guy who claims to be Xtian, but blatantly and publicly commits aveiros according his own religion (and probably Sheva Mitzvos too, at least according to some Rishonim) and has been seen praying less times in public during his whole reign than Biden has in the last few months.
Yserbius123Participant@gadolhadorah I second Lakewood. People there are up at all hours working hard and learning hard. Definitely a very woke town.
Yserbius123Participant@philosopher A fella posted this in response to me saying that we have to listen to Rabbonim, askonim, doctors, and other experts instead of drawing our own conclusions:
Rabbonim, Askonim and many others have been acting out of actual panic and without proper evaluation of the situation required of a Beis Din.
To which you responded “you are 100% correct”.
So please stop gaslighting me and pretending I didn’t read what you absolutely 100% did say.
Yserbius123Participant@philosopher Saying “don’t take doctors and Rabbis at their word, do your own research” strongly implies that doctors were gulled into believing something not true and they didn’t do the research. I resent that implication.
You said over and over again “99% survival rate” (and only about a 90% rate of people without serious health concerns). So is it or is it not? Because your last post seemed to imply a much greater survival rate. Also, your logic of “never exposed to this virus” requires mass exposure to the virus which means one out of every 100 people literally dying. Which, and I shouldn’t have to say this, is horrific. Right now the only reason it’s about as deadly as the flu is because so many people are already vaccinated. Remember, the viral spread went in waves. Every few months over 2020 there would be a two week or so period where the papers would be swamped with shiva announcements.
Yserbius123ParticipantHe clearly said he saw the numbers that the guy voted at the beginning
Yes. Ramsland claimed he saw a lot of stuff. Stuff that was not backed up by any other independent witnesses. So in order to believe what he said, you have to take him at his word. Which is something that I find difficult, as there are several claims he makes which can be independently checked and are blatantly false.
So let’s reiterate:
I said to pick two pieces of evidence to discuss. Here is your evidence:
- “The Illegal Votes are 10 times more than the amount Biden won by!” Your evidence for this was a list that Mike Lindell supplied showing 350,000 Arizona votes that should not have gone to Biden.
- there is some sort of Malware in Germany that takes all the Info from every place. For the Highest Bidder they get to change each County.” Your evidence for this was Ramsland’s claims
OK, let’s look at them one at a time:
- 350,000 votes. Even according the the list itself, 250,000 of those votes were not fraudulently attributed to Biden, they simply went into adjudication. Several other numbers were also highly suspect as there’s literally no other source for them, like tens of thousands of illegal alien voters
- Ramsland investigated the computers and found that servers in Germany changed the votes. Well, Ramsland is a liar. There’s literally no other way to say this. On the Arizona ballot (unlike the ballots in 2019 where he had DoHS working with him) specifically, he made a bunch of false claims (like Clarity is a company, or that Scytl tallies went to the official vote count) which means there’s no reason to believe him when he says he found something that’s too dangerous to show anyone.
So I guess that settles it then, right? There’s nothing more to talk about. The two biggest pieces of evidence that the “Trump or Die” crowd could come up with are literally nothing. There’s simply no reason to believe any fraud happened.
Yserbius123ParticipantDoes anyone realize that 99% survival rate is actually super scary for a virus as infectious as COVID? There are communities where literally everyone got COVID and yes, they had a 99% survival rate. Which means that every few classes in Yeshiva had a kid sitting shiva, every shul lost one or two members, and every neighborhood had aveilim. Is that supposed to be reassuring?
I don’t know if giving the vaccine to children is the right thing to do, but I do know that I have far more trust in my Rabbonim and doctors to tell me what is. And I resent the implication you are stating that my doctors and Rabbonim are so gullible they can be tricked into supporting something dangerous.
Yserbius123ParticipantShort of mesira, what would it take to get the moisdois responsible for this to face consequences?
Yserbius123Participant@Health Ramsland proved nothing as the document I named previously goes into great detail to show. All he does is claim that he saw evidence, but conveniently cannot show you what that evidence is. His actions in Texas two years ago are not my concern, we are discussing the here and now. I picked several things he said that are easily disproven as errors or lies (servers in Germany, Clarity as the name of a company, etc.) which should be enough for an honest person to not believe everything Ramsland has to say.
If you choose instead to believe Ramsland, then, well, I don’t know what to tell you other than you are choosing to believe someone on a topic he is openly and provably dishonest about.
What’s Ubiq’s full username? I’m trying to remember if I even agreed with them on anything.
Yserbius123ParticipantRav Aharon Feldman SHLITA once told over a story. He was talking to a non-frum student from an Israeli college and asked about his Gemara class. “Well, the professor tells us Bais Hillel’s pshat, Bais Shamai’s pshat, and then his own pshat.”
That’s sort of what’s happening here.
Yserbius123Participant@Always_Ask_Questions Yes, that was what I was getting at. That’s why it’s important to trust Rabbonim, doctors, and community organizers over doing the research yourself. Sure the data is out there, but you if you don’t know how to interpret it (or worse, think you know how to interpret it) you’re going to make a horrible mistake and potentially put people’s lives in danger.
Yserbius123Participant@kollelman mRNA vaccines do not modify the body’s DNA. They are messenger RNA molecules, not DNA modifications.
Yserbius123Participant@Health Most of my info comes from a document that Michigan had commissioned called “Analysis of the Antrim County, MichiganNovember 2020 Election Incident”. It details the mistakes and intentional errors that Ramsland and his ASOG team made. I guarantee that if you read the whole document with an open mind, you will doubt everything you heard Pillow Man say.
Yserbius123Participant@Health One more thing: Clarity Election Night Reporting is only used to report election results to the media. The actual election results are tallied separately and not connected to Scytl systems. So even if the Clarity platform was hacked, it still wouldn’t change the results.
Yserbius123Participant@Health Ramsland not Ramsfeld. This whole conversation started because I was wondering what smashing strong evidence is out there that proves Trump really won the election. So yeah, you kind of do need to convince me that you’re not just believing every schmo on the street who claims to know something. As of this moment, I’m not convinced. In your attempts to show that there’s reasonable concern to say that the election was fraudulent, you failed on multiple occasions to answer simple questions and instead insulted me again and again calling me a liar and liberal and democrat.
OK, on to Ramsland. I must say, than you for that timestamp. It contains one of the singular most hilarious pieces of dialog ever filmed:
Ramsland: The election was hacked and there’s proof in the machines that the numbers were changed!
Lindell: WOW! And you saw this code that proves it was hacked?!
Ramsland:…. no.Now, Ramsland first errs in stating that Clarity Election Night Reporting is a subsidiary of Scytl. That’s false. Clarity Election Night Reporting is the name of the service that Scytl offers/sells, not a company. Ramsland then goes on to say that they had a server in Frankfurt where they stored the votes. That’s also false, and based on a lie on Twitter by a Congressman that I mentioned earlier. Scytl does not have German servers, alleged German servers were not raided by the FBI, those same non-existent servers were not analyzed with “white hat techniques”, nor did Mr. Ramsland find QSnatch malware on them (since he never actually had access to these non-existent servers)!
Yserbius123Participant@Health Until you can find me either the name of the alleged Scytl subsidiary, the time in the video in which it’s mentioned, or at least the name of the guy who mentioned it, this conversation can go no where. Again, I have no interest in watching the whole video beyond those few minutes I already saw.
I’m not going to discuss this new claim about adjudication on the Dominion machines. Lindell’s claim of 250,000 adjudicated votes was about mail in ballots in Arizona.
Yserbius123Participant@torahvaluesoverparty My argument against HCQ wasn’t that it didn’t work, it was that there’s no evidence that it worked as well as you claim it did. There’s a lot of confusing writings about HCQ in general, whether it helps or not. And I do believe that it got bad press namely because Trump touted it as a miracle drug. But I still stand by my original statement that there’s very little evidence that it can be used to cure 90% of COVID cases. I am willing to be proven wrong on that one, since there really wasn’t a lot of investigation or research. But the Trump fraud claims are different since were investigated and diddly squat was found.
@Health Please please please can we keep this a civilized argument. I enjoy debating on the Internet, but your constant screams of LIAR and LIBERAL are tiresome, pointless, and counterproductive. Now on to your points:Lindell starts his video with the claim of 350,000 ballots that should not have been counted towards Biden. The claim is blatantly false as
- 250,000 of those he said should not be counted were simply adjudicated. Which means that they were investigated. The investigation turned found them to be fine, so they were counted
- You claim that there were at least 10,000 votes on that list that should not be counted. I’m calling you out on that claim, as the few numbers I did look into turned out to be fake and lies. So I highly doubt there’s any more truthiness to the other numbers
I don’t know who Lamsfeld is and I don’t think anyone of that name shows up on Lindell’s video. Searching for the name turns up this thread as the top result. If you watched the video, you should know at what point the name was said. So then watch that part again and tell me the name.
What we have here is simply a case of misplaced emunah. You see, emunah is something you believe even if everything tells you otherwise. No amount of science or archaeology is going to make me doubt the reality of Hashem and His Torah. That’s emunah. But for everything else, you should be skeptical. You shouldn’t believe things just because someone said so. It looks like you took your emunah away from Hashem and are using it on Trump instead, believing everything he ever said no matter what.
Yserbius123Participant@torahvaluesoverparty and @syag-lchochma The Democrats certainly are going overboard in stifling any talk of election fraud which is stupid and just biting them in the back. But their reasoning is still sound, the more investigations they allow, the more power the “Give Me Trump or Give Me Death” crowd gains. That doesn’t mean there’s veracity to the claims just because they don’t want them investigated. Personally I think everyone should just ignore these silly endless audits and recounts. But then no one ever asks my opinion.
I googled “Ruby Freeman” for giggles. Ok, I did know about that story, but I forgot her name. Thing is, she wasn’t “the center of accusations”. She was the center of accusation for that week. Because during the end of the elections, there was a different accusation, a different claim, and a different uber-evil that was causing all the fuss! And the claim about Freeman not only didn’t have a leg to stand on, but I don’t think even made it as far as any official claim given in to courts. She’s actually a pretty good microcosm of the whole mess. She was the subject of an hour long phone conversation with a group of Georgia Republicans who had to repeatedly tell Trump that what he’s looking for simply doesn’t exist. “Well then you’re not looking hard enough”. Do you see what happened? Trump and his supporters were so convinced by themselves (and no evidence) that there was fraud, that when they were faced with the facts that there’s nothing to what they’re looking into, they refused to step down and insisted that it’s their!
This isn’t even comparable the HCQ or the vaccines. I am willing to admit that I may be wrong about those. There is a bit of contradictory research and a lot of very confusing trails that may or may not mean something. Like there’s actual evidence that HCQ helps with COVID and there were people who kept on trying to downplay it. But here, there’s literally nothing. Just a lot of people shouting about something that didn’t happen.
Yserbius123ParticipantI’m not saying you, specifically. But there’s a double standard when it comes to bitul zman. People like to call out video games, television, goyishe novels, and movies as bitul zman, but things like following sports or cell phone plans (which is an honest to Hashem hobby for many) are seen as “acceptable” time wasters.
Yserbius123Participant@torahvaluesoverparty I’m not going to start chasing down every new scenario that’s brought up. I don’t know who Ruby Freeman is, nor do I care. I do know that every single accusation I looked at where Trumps team was claiming to be iron-clad proof turned out to be wet paper-clad. And then I came to this thread and I asked (repeatedly!) for any evidence that could convince a person that there was widespread fraud. The best examples given were a lady who didn’t know what she was talking about and a two hour video of a guy who did (but lied the whole way through).
Yserbius123Participant@syag-lchochma Nobody has an unbiased personal view of any situation. Look, Trump has been hyping this election up for months beforehand, insisting over and over again that there will be fraud. So it should come to no surprise that people saw exactly what they wanted to see when it came time for polling.
I wasn’t even “collecting opinions”, all I did was read the claims that were submitted in court and read how they were interpreted by different news sources. If a claim was rejected (which they all were) I would dig a little deeper to find out why. That’s all.
Furthermore, the claims that there’s this concentrated effort to hinder investigations are just as baloney as the original claims of fraud! The real roadblock is that people are sick of this stupid and baseless investigation. The Democrats didn’t try to stop the Maricopa audit because they had something to hide, they tried to stop it because not only is it a waste of time and money, but even if it turns up nothing, it will only benefit the hard core ma’aminim in the getchkeh of Trump.
Yserbius123ParticipantBetter yet
VP Harris lies and says “I care”
Yserbius123Participant@syag-lchochma I’m not a researcher, but I work in a place that does a ton of scientific research, so I know a thing or two. Also, one of my hobbies is arguing on the Internet, so I’ve gotten pretty good at tracking down claims and separating fact from fiction.
To address your points specifically, you didn’t really give anything specific enough for me to comment on. You say you know people whose votes were manipulated. How? Where? How do they know?
You say you’ve heard the dispositions and are ignoring the news around them. Well so have I. @Health focused on one by a poll worker named Jessy Jacob, so let’s reiterate my comments on that. On the surface it sounds pretty damning, she claims she witnessed voter intimidation and changing dates on the ballots. So I read the news reports and followed those to the judges ruling. She was unable to provide anything specific enough to warrant a trial, no names, no places, no times, not even a date, she just kept repeating vague claims about intimidation. When questioned about the ballot date changes, the judge realized that she was simply ignorant of the procedures and what she thought she saw was actually something else entirely!
Look, if there’s some solid piece of evidence that that a significant number of votes were changed, I’m all ears. But the most I’ve seen from primary sources (not silly videos by pillow salesmen, nor rumors heard in shul) were people saying “Well, it’s not clear what happened, so if if if may may may possibly possibly possibly”.
@Health Thanks for pointing out a specific time in the video. I watched the first five minutes and found the numbers you’re talking about. He lists about eight or ten counts of votes that he claims should have gone to Trump, the largest of which was the 250,000 adjudicated Arizona ballots.I’m glad we’re finally coming to a consensus. You admit that I am right and the three numbers from Lindell’s chart that I picked at complete random are false. I am not going to bother discussing the others, because they already are in chazaka to be as false as the ones mentioned.
Oh, and Scytl does not have a subsidiary in Germany. If I am wrong about that, then you can prove it by stating its name and telling me a place where I can find their connection to the Spanish company Scytl.
I think that covers both claims I agreed to discuss, shall we call it quits?
Yserbius123Participant@torahvaluesoverparty and @SyagLchochma The problem with doing your own research is that you’re not a researcher (unless you are? I don’t know you guys). You are unfamiliar with polling processes, how things usually work, and the vocabulary.
Nobody, and I do mean this literally, who is honest with themselves and did a deep dive into the voting fraud claims can say that Trump may have won.
As I illustrated in my previous comment, even a cursory examination of some of the strongest claims shows a lot of glaring holes and inconsistencies. Like for example the claim that 250,000 Arizona (not Michigan as you erroneously said) votes were switched from Trump to Biden, when that really means 250,000 adjudicated ballots and the number 250,000 appears no where outside of Mike Lindell’s videos.
I mean, I’m sorry guys, but I’m not going to chase down every single source for every single fraud claim being made. Because I’ve chased enough of them to pure fantasy land, and if that’s any indication, the rest are unlikely to be any stronger.
So far, the worst thing to come out of the Maricopa audit is the name of the audit team, “Cyber Ninjas”. Ugh. Did they hire a 10 year old boy to do their naming?
Yserbius123ParticipantPeople who are sniffing down their noses at those plebians playing silly video games probably wouldn’t think twice about spending half an hour writing comments on CR, or reading ESPN dotcom.
Yserbius123Participant@Health Mr. Lindell’s claims at the beginning of his video don’t hold any water. Here are a few of them on Maricopa County:
36,400 illegal aliens voted. That’s a very specific number. I can’t find anything on that number. The closest thing is a Republican claim that they received an anonymous tip that 35,000 votes were added for Biden for every vote. Which should be pretty easy to prove with some simple forensic statistics, but they didn’t. They just accepted it at face value. Also it has nothing to do with illegal aliens. OK, so that’s a lie on Lindell’s part, next.
150,000 voters registered after the deadline. I’ve discussed this in a previous comment. It’s pure nonsense. Lindell lied again. Next.
250,000 mail in ballots requiring adjudication. Even if this were true, it’s meaningless. Adjudication is a normal part of counting votes. It just means that they need to examine the ballots to check for fraud. Counting all adjudicated ballots as fraudulent votes that went to Biden is pure dishonesty.
I shouldn’t have to add anything to these. Lindell is clearly more dishonest than my local used car salesmen and is willing to literally invent numbers and state them as fact.
Yserbius123ParticipantI feel like a lot of people on this thread would call the investigation into the murder of Laibey Kletzky HY”D mesirah.
Yserbius123ParticipantIt boggles my mind that people ignore the advice of countless Rabbonim, askanim, doctors, epidemiologists, politicians, and other experts because of random things they found on some shady corner of the Internet. Why does Joe Hutzenputz’s crummy video of random news clips and poor audio have more ne’emanus than literally anyone with any authority on the subject?
Yserbius123Participant@Health You have yet to post a single shred of evidence, despite my repeated attempts to get you to. You haven’t even posted a timestamp on your movie that can state something to back up a single claim you made. As far as I can tell, you are believing something “because he said so”. If that’s all you have to go on, then I can counter with “well I say no”.
You claimed Biden had ten times more votes than he should have because of fraudulent voting. Then give me numbers. Where did you get that 300 thousand number from? What district showed 300 thousand votes out of which 290,000 were shown to be fraudulent?
I don’t know why I bother asking. You’re either going to ignore my questions and call me a liar, or tell me to watch a two hour internet video.
Yserbius123ParticipantLindell’s claims that 10 times more votes went to Biden than should have are baseless. For the states that could have gone either way (AKA swing states) Biden won by a narrow margin, not ten times more. In no vote count in a swing county did Biden receive ten times more votes than expected.
Scytl is a public company. You can check their website, their tax filings, and their shareholder disclosures. They do not have offices nor subsidiaries in Germany. Lindell took Ghomert at his word. But since Ghomert lied, then Lindells claim doesn’t have any more truth to it. I did not see anything in the video that states a name of a subsidiary, so if you have a link to the exact time it was mentioned I am all ears.
I think I understand the issue over here. You weren’t convinced by Lindell, you simply have emunah on Donald Trump. Emunah is not something that requires “evidence”. It’s something you believe in because it’s a mitzvah. There’s no mitzvah to believe Trump, so you need evidence. Right now, as we’ve established over and over again, there’s simply no evidence. Just lie after lie parroted by Trump and people like Mike Lindell. Why do you believe? Why do you have such a low criteria for believing Trump, yet have these massive mental barriers erected before you can even begin to doubt him?
Yserbius123Participant@Health The only other name I’ve used on this forum is @Yserbius, but changed it when I forgot the password.
OK, now we’re cooking with gas. Two claims, let me see:
- The Illegal Votes are 10 times more than the amount Biden won by!: I honestly don’t know what this means. Can you elaborate? What illegal votes? What was 10 time more? Last I checked, there were multiple recounts and audits and none of them found 10 times more fake votes for Biden than Trump.
- There is some sort of Malware in Germany that takes all the Info from every place. For the Highest Bidder they get to change each County. I’m assuming you’re talking about Texas Congressman Louie Ghomert’s claim that Scytl, a company involved in voting counts, had servers in Germany that changed the counts. He lied. Scytl doesn’t even have a German office
Please can you be a little more specific in your claims. It’s very hard to have a discussion over vague sentences that can refer to any or all of a hundred different things.
Yserbius123ParticipantWho is “the government”?
June 7, 2021 5:49 pm at 5:49 pm in reply to: why “early to bed, early to rise” and not “late to bed, late to rise”? #1980915Yserbius123Participantzman krishma
Yserbius123ParticipantDear @Health,
What you are commenting on is called “goalpost movement”. It’s a debating fallacy where you change the subject. I gave three counterpoints to claims stated in Lindell’s video. You ignored two, and attempted to disprove one. Your disproving was flawed, as you eventually admitted, leaving me with three questions as of yet unanswered. Instead of responding, you change the subject to talk about whether a foreign country had the ability to change the vote count.
I’m not discussing nor watching the entire video because the little I saw was horribly flawed and outright untrue. Saying that you’re not going to continue this discussion until every little claim is debunked is another debating fallacy called a “gish gallop”: stating hundreds of points and declaring yourself the winner until the other side can disprove each and every one of them.
Let’s make this easy on each other. You pick two pieces of evidence that you think are the strongest indicators that Trump won the election. They can be clips from Lindell’s video, articles, or other things. We discuss those. The conversation ends when we are either both satisfied that the evidence shows one thing or another, or neither of us are satisfied with the other’s evidence. OK?
Yserbius123ParticipantDear @MadeAliyah Clearly mask mandates have made you very angry. It’s a position I understand, but only to a point. You refuse to acknowledge that the government can mandate something that’s a little extreme when the situation warrants it. You have extreme quasi-libertarian opinions about the limits of government.
I vehemently disagree with your opinions. The government is not unlimited, but mandating masking during a horrific pandemic is hardly overstepping any bounds. It’s no different than speed limits to protect pedestrians, or laws about firing guns in public.
That’s all. That’s literally all this thread is about.
@n0mesorah Glad to see we’re finally on the same page.Yserbius123Participant@Health. I repeatedly said that I didn’t watch the documentary. I only browsed a few minutes here and there. And no, it wasn’t on Vice.
I have a link to the full unedited video which I have no interest in watching all the way through. So please tell me at which point is proof brought that the pipeline was hacked. Was it at five minutes in? Seventeen? One hour and thirty two?
And I am sticking to my original statement: Flynn said that the Dominion voting machines were connected to the internet. Not the pipeline, not the counting system, but the machines themselves. Clearly that was a lie as you yourself admitted. So why should I believe anything else Lindell has to say?
Yserbius123Participant@n0mesorah I dunno, I think you’re making things a little too complicated. If we limit the discussion to masks, the public health officials could not possibly have been any clearer (after a rocky start for about a month in 2020). I don’t know why you think they aren’t communicating properly. “Wear a mask”. It’s a pretty simple message. All this narischkeit about government rights and “personal autonomy” just sound like dog-whistles for the pro-death crowd that seem to want to do everything in their power to spread COVID-19 as much as possible.
How much hand washing have I been doing? More. Much more. I keep hand sanitizer in my car and I usually use it when going in to a public place and coming home from one.
Yserbius123Participant@Health The portions of the Lindell documentary I saw say that the votes may have been switched, and the machines could have been hacked. But I didn’t see anything where someone said it actually happened. Can you point the timestamp out to me so I can watch that section of the movie?
Yserbius123ParticipantDear @n0mesorah
- You have voiced support of users on this thread that have opinions I just described. Hence your crowd.
- The government has a right to make laws that are not unjust. A mask mandate during a pandemic is not unjust. I don’t see why that’s such a complicated topic that we need four pages of comments explaining it
- I am not, nor do I claim to be, a public health expert. I defer those opinions to the actual public health experts. And public health experts have near unanimously said that people need to wear masks during a pandemic otherwise it puts others at risk. So it upsets me when people don’t wear masks, and it upsets me even more when people deride and belittle the concept of wearing masks, because it puts me and others at risk of catching their COVID. Again I don’t see why you’re making it so complicated.
Yserbius123Participant- Why yes. I did use the governments reasoning to say that mandating masks is correct. Because it makes sense and has evidence and data to back it up. Unlike the anti-mask crowd whose evidence and data consists entirely of throwing a tantrum and shouting “You can’t tell me what to do you’re not my mom!!!!”.
- I never said it’s not ethical to mask for the flu. I said it’s not necessary if basic precautions are being taken.
OK, now on to the next part.
- If everyone followed all the rules of the road, lowering speed limits to 10 miles per hour will not save any lives.
- Children can spread COVID to adults. That’s why they have to mask. Again, for what seems like the millionth time, masking is not to prevent the masked individual from catching COVID but to prevent those around the masked individual from catching COVID
June 3, 2021 4:13 pm at 4:13 pm in reply to: Why do used car salesmen have a bad reputation? #1980103Yserbius123ParticipantEvery time I’ve been to used car salesmen, frum or not, I felt like I was being cheated. Salesmen in general have a reputation for being able to talk people in to overpaying for something they don’t need. Used car salesmen have it even worse, since it’s not difficult to hide major issues and get someone to overpay for a piece of junk.
-
AuthorPosts