Joseph

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 4,851 through 4,900 (of 5,517 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Natural-Hair Sheitels Are Assur #1405899
    Joseph
    Participant

    He is explaining why their wives wore tichels, but their daughters, with their blessings, wore shaitels.

    Neither the quote I cited nor other parts of his comment(s) seem to demonstrate that such blessings were given. They seem to assume that such blessings were given merely based on the claim (even if we assume accurately) that the daughters wore wigs-only.

    Their daughter-in-laws would be a better example than their daughters, since the daughters likely would’ve switched to their new husband’s minhag. (Even regarding DILs, we should really see something more than an assumption it was done with the father’s blessing.)

    in reply to: Rebishe Kids #1405870
    Joseph
    Participant

    The Chofetz Chaim dressed very simply, like an average Yid. Even his hat was a common one.

    That said, there are different derechs in this regard. You wouldn’t expect, or likely accept, if the King dressed like an average Dave.

    in reply to: Seeking advice of tooth removal #1405842
    Joseph
    Participant

    Wolf: Everyone knows the real experts are in the CR.

    in reply to: Proper etiquette for bochor speaking to girl’s parents #1405841
    Joseph
    Participant

    iac: Thanks for clarifying. Your thought is that the bochor should make the brochos loud enough for the parents to respond Amein, but not very loud. Correct?

    in reply to: Shidduchim in the CR! #1405840
    Joseph
    Participant

    You guys won’t be the first transatlantic couple.

    in reply to: Natural-Hair Sheitels Are Assur #1405814
    Joseph
    Participant

    “How is he dismissing the way they conducted themselves?”

    My understanding of his comment (correct me if I’m mistaken) is that since Rav SZ and Rav Elyashiv were from the long ago Yishuv haYashan Perushim of Yerushlayim where all women went covered as per the no longer relevant minhag and tekanahs from those long ago times. And way back then that was still the overall custom that we have long since discarded.

    My objection is the assumption that the minhagim Yisroel from the Yishuv haYashan Perushim of Yerushlayim, who were not that long ago and whom everyone reading this lived in the times of people from the Yishuv (like Rav Elyashiv), are irrelevant and no longer binding practice on those from those communities and communities with similar minhagim.

    in reply to: The Queen of England is Married? #1405816
    Joseph
    Participant

    LB: If you didn’t know that Elizabeth was married, who’d you think is Charles’ father?

    in reply to: The Queen of England is Married? #1405810
    Joseph
    Participant

    Diana will never become the Queen that Camilla will become. This is poetic justice given Diana’s sin. The vain Diana wanted nothing more than to become a Queen. Even after Charles divorced her she was still kvetching to the media that she still wanted to become Queen.

    Now Camilla is, of course, no better than Diana and deserves the queenhood no more than Diana. She committed the same sin and they are two peas in a pod. But the reason to take pleasure in the fact that Camilla will become Queen where Diana will never get that title she desperately wanted, is the comparative public perception and reaction to these two trollops. While the public scorned Camilla, they worshipped Diana. And what they get is a crushed Diana and a Queen Camilla.

    in reply to: Does “Chasidish” refer to both Satmar and Lubavitch? #1405792
    Joseph
    Participant

    I’ve heard left us used for many tzaddikim but never heard a reluctance to use zt’l.

    in reply to: Proper etiquette for bochor speaking to girl’s parents #1405785
    Joseph
    Participant

    Isn’t it proper, anytime not just while dating, to say your brochos loud so that others can say Amein?

    in reply to: Natural-Hair Sheitels Are Assur #1405783
    Joseph
    Participant

    “It’s worthy to note, that both Rav SZ and Rav Elyashiv were from the Yishuv haYashan Perushim of Yerushlayim where all women went covered as per minhag and tekanah. I am sure that was still the overall custom at the times they got married.”

    Why is that reason to write off and dismiss how RYSE and RSZA conducted themselves?

    in reply to: The Queen of England is Married? #1405749
    Joseph
    Participant

    Wolf: We disagree about the likelihood of Camilla officially and publicly using her title of Queen.

    in reply to: Funny Shidduch Stories #1405722
    Joseph
    Participant

    Shopping, change a few slight details and you’ll be fine sharing them.

    in reply to: Shidduchim in the CR! #1405721
    Joseph
    Participant

    You and oyyoyyoy.

    in reply to: The Queen of England is Married? #1405701
    Joseph
    Participant

    iac: Succession is set by law, and the law is jointly set to be the same by the legislatures of all Commonwealth nations. They’d all have to jointly legislate any change to make any adjustments. And the reigning monarch has no say in who succeeds him/her.

    in reply to: Does “Chasidish” refer to both Satmar and Lubavitch? #1405559
    Joseph
    Participant

    The four Chasiduses started by the Talmidei HaMaggid were Lubavitch, Stolin, Berditchiv and Cherenobyl.

    in reply to: The Queen of England is Married? #1405558
    Joseph
    Participant

    It would not surprise me in the the least (in fact I anticipate as such) that King Charles will officially refer to his wife as Queen Camilla once he is King, despite the PR titles that were said will be used for Camilla not long after the untimely but deserved early death of the adulteress Diana occurred and emotions were still raw in the United Kingdom. The wedding announcement was a mere 8 years after Diana met her demise in a crush of metal. By time Charles ascends it’ll be more like 30 years thereafter.

    Indeed, the rumblings from Buckingham Palace over the past five years has made clear that Prince Charles is making known that this will be the case.

    in reply to: The Queen of England is Married? #1405557
    Joseph
    Participant

    CTL, absolutely incorrect.

    Camilla WILL be Queen (unless she or Charles passes away before Queen Elizabeth). As wife of the future King, by law of both the UK and all Commonwealth nations, she is currently the Princess of Wales and will be Queen upon Charles’ ascending to the throne. Period. Whether she tells the newspapers to call her Queen or Princess of Wales or Duchess of Cornwall or HRH The Princess Consort or any of whatever the MANY titles both she and Charles have, is an irrelevant personal preference of either hers or the newspapers.

    But no matter what you or others (even she!) likes or dislikes, Princess Camilla is now Camilla, Princess of Wales and will be Queen Camilla once there is a King Charles.

    As far as the divorce issue, don’t forget that their zeida King Henry specifically broke the Church of England away from Roman Catholicism so that he could remain King and get divorced. So they surely have ample precedent. (And like adulteress Diana, two of his wives were beheaded for adultery, which he – like Charles – was also guilty of.)

    in reply to: The Queen of England is Married? #1405486
    Joseph
    Participant

    Charles, Prince of Wales, will become the next King. At that time, Camilla, currently the Princess of Wales and Prince Charles’ wife, will become Queen Camilla.

    in reply to: Proper etiquette for bochor speaking to girl’s parents #1405467
    Joseph
    Participant

    The consensus is that whether to eat or not is a matter of personal preference and either way is perfectly fine.

    That having been established, the follow-up is thus:

    If the bochor plans to eat or drink something, should he make the Bracha Rishona and Bracha Achrona very loud so that the father and mother can say Amen to both?

    in reply to: Hey New Yorkers! #1405458
    Joseph
    Participant

    Sandels.

    in reply to: The Queen of England is Married? #1405459
    Joseph
    Participant

    The title of King is higher than the title Queen. Thus if the Queen is the sovereign her husband isn’t entitled King (as that would imply he is of a higher position than her), but if the King is the sovereign, his wife is entitled Queen.

    in reply to: The Queen of England is Married? #1405461
    Joseph
    Participant

    Interesting discussion:

    King Charles and Queen Camilla

    in reply to: Does “Chasidish” refer to both Satmar and Lubavitch? #1405320
    Joseph
    Participant

    NCB: The Geszhe Lubavitchers (old timer families originally from the alte heim) speak Yiddish at home and in Yeshiva, wear different levush and eliminate most of the secular curriculum in school.

    in reply to: GOP Passed tax bill to affect Rebbes #1405292
    Joseph
    Participant

    If the school tells the rebbe working in their Yeshiva that the discount for his children is because he’s an employee, then it might be taxable under the new law. If they tell him it is because of his low income they’re discounting the tuition, it is not taxable under the new law just as when they give a low income accountant (working elsewhere) a tuition discount it isn’t taxable.

    It’s all a matter of structuring it correctly to legally avoid taxes.

    in reply to: GOP Passed tax bill to affect Rebbes #1405286
    Joseph
    Participant

    The proposed law doesn’t treat rebbeim who get a tuition discount any differently than poor accountants who get a tuition discount.

    in reply to: GOP Passed tax bill to affect Rebbes #1405277
    Joseph
    Participant

    The yeshiva can give anyone, including rebbeim no less than working parents, a “needs based” charitable discount. It would be no different in taxation-status between a low income accountant parent or a rebbi parent.

    in reply to: GOP Passed tax bill to affect Rebbes #1405267
    Joseph
    Participant

    Most heimishe Yeshivas and Beis Yaakovs don’t have a fixed set amount as tuition. It is whatever tuition was negotiated with the parents. And the one’s that do have an “official” price, most parents pay less, even working parents.

    in reply to: Yeshiva Boys Are Allowed To Wear Colored Shirts! #1405230
    Joseph
    Participant

    Private prep schools require uniforms too. Does anyone know why?

    in reply to: Illegal smuggling #1405189
    Joseph
    Participant

    Illegal aliens smuggle over the border.

    in reply to: Shailos – Psak Halacha Hotlines #1405206
    Joseph
    Participant

    ZD; So why doesn’t the hotline rabbi tell the caller he cannot answer and he must consult his local rabbi.

    in reply to: Yeshiva Boys Are Allowed To Wear Colored Shirts! #1405193
    Joseph
    Participant

    “So, how many yeshivos have a white shirt only policy?”

    From mesivta and up, the vast majority (of Chareidi) yeshivos do. How many don’t?

    in reply to: Yeshiva Boys Are Allowed To Wear Colored Shirts! #1405022
    Joseph
    Participant

    iac, was that the school where you said the bochurim approached the Menahel? Perhaps the Brooklyn branch seeks a higher standard, being the frum capital of America.

    in reply to: Yeshiva Boys Are Allowed To Wear Colored Shirts! #1404927
    Joseph
    Participant

    In much of the Torah world a white shirt is as much the uniform of a Ben Torah and servant/soldier of Hashem as a black hat and jacket is. Just as every branch of the military has a uniform, every branch of Hashem’s army does. In some branches that requires a white shirt.

    in reply to: Natural-Hair Sheitels Are Assur #1404809
    Joseph
    Participant

    Side C: We think every Yankel and Mara should be able to pick and choose whether they want to go with Side A or Side B. To each their own preference which they find personally preferable.

    in reply to: Yeshiva Boys Are Allowed To Wear Colored Shirts! #1404796
    Joseph
    Participant

    Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim allows it.

    in reply to: People Without a Rov #1404758
    Joseph
    Participant

    funnybone, I’m glad to hear that you discuss with your Rov your family issues concerning chinuch, Yeshiva/Beis Yaakov, Shalom Bayis, moving, tzedaka, machlokes’, etc. You say that if you disagree with his advice you tell him so. If after telling him your disagreement, he considers your point and advises you that he still believes you should do his initial advice despite your disagreement with it, what do you do?

    in reply to: Shailos – Psak Halacha Hotlines #1404739
    Joseph
    Participant

    ZD, how do you have “inside information”?

    in reply to: People Without a Rov #1404614
    Joseph
    Participant

    I’m happy your shalom bayis is perfect but but how can a father not have chinuch questions or know all the answers as to what’s best in such an important and complicated area?

    in reply to: People Without a Rov #1404546
    Joseph
    Participant

    You feel chinuch habonim, shalom bayis and machlokes are outside the purview of one’s Rov??

    in reply to: People Without a Rov #1404516
    Joseph
    Participant

    Do you ask your Rov what Yeshiva and Beis Yaakov to send your little (or not so little) children? Whether to take a vacation? How to handle disobedient children. Shalom Bayis questions. Where/whether to move. How much tzedaka to give. Who to give it to. How to resolve a misunderstanding/dispute with your neighbor.

    Do you accept a Rov’s decision or advice as the final word?

    in reply to: Shailos – Psak Halacha Hotlines #1404513
    Joseph
    Participant

    If his Rav holds Chalav Stam is categorically assur and he’s a member of that kehila, then Chalav Stam is categorically assur for him. Full stop.

    in reply to: People Without a Rov #1404467
    Joseph
    Participant

    ubiq: You figure a range of between 4 and 24 times a year, excluding taharas hamishpacha shailos. What would you say are a handful of the typical shailos that are being asked between every two weeks to three months?

    lot112: Mazal Tov and asach nachas! Aside from shidduch related shailos, how often would you guess your family consults your Rov?

    in reply to: How to get along with workmates. #1404410
    Joseph
    Participant

    Some people are able to use humor in expressing profound responses to serious inquiries.

    in reply to: People Without a Rov #1404397
    Joseph
    Participant

    How often does an average frum family consult with their Rov for a shaila or other advice?

    in reply to: The Five Thousand Dollar Dress #1404291
    Joseph
    Participant

    flowers: 1) I was simply courteously doing what golfer requested I do by asking 2) You’re incorrect in any event.

    in reply to: Proper etiquette for bochor speaking to girl’s parents #1404288
    Joseph
    Participant

    Gamanit: Which “community” is that? The community of 16th Avenue doesn’t touch the food whereas the community of 18th Avenue does eat the food? How are you differentiating “communities”? How did you determine what the community practice is? Or are you simply stating your personal preference or what you’ve seen.

    in reply to: Brooklyn vs. Queens #1404065
    Joseph
    Participant

    Does Queens have a community of Brisker types of Yidden or BMG types, Satmar or Lubavitch Yidden?

    in reply to: Shailos – Psak Halacha Hotlines #1403939
    Joseph
    Participant

    ubiq, your 5 and 6 sound like rabbi/psak-shopping.

    in reply to: Proper etiquette for bochor speaking to girl’s parents #1403924
    Joseph
    Participant

    You speak to the parents while sitting at their dining room table with food to eat. Similar to if you were meeting a client for business at a restaurant.

Viewing 50 posts - 4,851 through 4,900 (of 5,517 total)