Joseph

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,301 through 1,350 (of 5,517 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: restaurant on first date??? #1761903
    Joseph
    Participant

    adocs: Because a guy and girl going out together isn’t something others should know (unless for tachlis), let alone see, since even though it is for tachlis of potential marriage and as such permitted, it isn’t for the world to know since it isn’t tznius outside of potential marriage.

    Joseph
    Participant

    YY: You are peddling a falsehood.

    in reply to: restaurant on first date??? #1761551
    Joseph
    Participant

    It is the proper tzniusdik thing to take steps to avoid being seen with your date by acquaintances.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1761469
    Joseph
    Participant

    Now that we’ve concluded that Torah punishments aren’t random and are indicative of or related to the severity of the underlying crime, we can get back onto topic…

    From: Neville ChaimBerlin

    Person:

    OOT seems nicer than NYC.

    Everyone:

    I respect your opinion.

    Joseph:

    I like NYC better. It has more religious resources.

    Everyone:

    You dumb, mean troll! Why are you alive?!

    Joseph
    Participant

    Why should we help the poor in Central America when our own poor in the United States needs that money (and more.)

    Joseph
    Participant

    YY: I think the US shouldn’t send foreign aid to anywhere. Even to Israel. It should instead redirect said money to alleviate poverty in the US.

    TLIK is 100% correct.

    in reply to: restaurant on first date??? #1761473
    Joseph
    Participant

    I’m sorry for the misunderstanding. You looked famished so I switched the GPS from the park to the restaurant. I didn’t realize you’re anorexic until I saw your order at the eatery. Next time we’re going to the lobby and we’ll get soda.

    in reply to: Take Public Transportation or Uber/Drive, in the Summer #1760887
    Joseph
    Participant

    Rav Moshe’s psak was regarding shomer negia (inadvertently making contact with a female [even properly dressed]) and NOT regarding being exposed to pritzus.

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism as Anti-Semitism: Legal Implications under U.S. Law #1760764
    Joseph
    Participant

    Milhouse: What svoros? Is it a svara to say that if a Yid advocates overthrowing their national government (whether in Morocco, America, Iran or Germany) or advocates to lynch a local population or advocates to seize the property of the local goyin that he’s causing sakanas nefoshos?

    Then why would you doubt that if Yidden advocated expelling the goyim in Eretz Yisroel, whether in the Zionist state or whether in the parts of Eretz Yisroel in Jordan and Lebanon, that he isn’t causing sakanas nefoshos in those areas by angering those goyim into attacking Yidden?

    That’s exactly what the Zionists did pre and up through 1948. The Arabs killed and expelled the Yidden in Yerushalayim and in the Arab countries (Syria, Egypt, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, etc.)

    in reply to: How do you go to a sub-forum? #1760766
    Joseph
    Participant

    The CR software is very buggy.

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism as Anti-Semitism: Legal Implications under U.S. Law #1760655
    Joseph
    Participant

    “Says who? And on what basis?”

    Because advocating that will put Yidden into sakanas nefoshos.

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism as Anti-Semitism: Legal Implications under U.S. Law #1760536
    Joseph
    Participant

    Milhouse: Before Moshiach it is forbidden to advocate the expulsion of the nochrim from Eretz Yisroel in addition to it being forbidden for us to establish a state there.

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism as Anti-Semitism: Legal Implications under U.S. Law #1760537
    Joseph
    Participant

    Milhouse: It is factually inaccurate that the Satmar Rebbe ever said or indicated that nochrim may not be anti-Zionist.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1760208
    Joseph
    Participant

    Ubiq: On what basis would you assume gezel of kesef is less severe than attacking a divorcee?

    in reply to: Take Public Transportation or Uber/Drive, in the Summer #1759905
    Joseph
    Participant

    Definitely spend the money and same your neshoma.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1758766
    Joseph
    Participant

    Yeshivishrockstar: What’s your source that being bo’el a goy is considered worse than being bo’el a niddah? I dispute that. I think that’s another example of putting personal feelings over Torah thought.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1758644
    Joseph
    Participant

    KlugerYid is correct.

    Ubiq, KY adequately answered the questions you posed. His point remains and is a strong argument that hasn’t (and can’t) be refuted.

    Syag, lack of witnesses is a separate issue that doesn’t impact this point or discussion. We’re discussing the underlying punishment assuming the criteria for warning and witnesses has been met. That is a sufficient way in determining the severity of the crime. (If there are no witnesses to a murder, the murderer still committed one of the most severe crimes even though he might get away scot-free with murder. The underlying punishment for murder is the death penalty even if the murderer avoided it due to no witnesses.) In your example, had the victim been male it would be a capital offense, the most severe of all crimes.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1758581
    Joseph
    Participant

    “perhaps among the worst things a human can do to another ?”

    If that had been true, the halachic punishment would have been far more severe.

    Joseph
    Participant

    We should be applauding the deportation of Israelis:

    A. Yishuv Haaretz.

    B. Free ticket home.

    Where are all the Zionists (Avi K, takahmamash, etc.)?

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism as Anti-Semitism: Legal Implications under U.S. Law #1758444
    Joseph
    Participant

    Thank you President Donald Trump for strongly condemning antisemitism and having your administration work tirelessly in combating it, more so than any previous administration in United States history.

    Jewish opposition to the State of Israel is pro-Judaism and pro-Torah.

    Joseph
    Participant

    CTL: Your Post # 1758052 proves you are NOT pro-immigrants. Rather you are simply anti-Trump. If Trump would propose allowing more immigrants, you’d find a pretext to opposed that too.

    in reply to: Admission Cards #1757770
    Joseph
    Participant

    1. School consolidation of unaffiliated yeshivos will simply not happen for a bunch of large reasons. It’s a pipe dream. At best you can hope for administrative/back office pooling/consolidation.

    2. The Federation will simply not accept and not fund the hundreds of mainstream Litvish and Chasidish yeshivos in Lakewood, Brooklyn and Monsey.

    in reply to: Does Israel need a 3 State Solution #1757678
    Joseph
    Participant

    The Brisker R”Y said circumstances imposed by the Israeli government upon Bnei Torah living in Eretz Yisroel may compel us to move out to chutz l’aaretz to continue our Torah life.

    in reply to: The Importance of Having Short Hair #1757667
    Joseph
    Participant

    2qwerty: Are you indicating that Rav Chaim cannot pasken? Is there a requirement to have yoreh yoreh or something? How do you explain all the people who come to him and ask what to do — and he tells them what to do?

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1757666
    Joseph
    Participant

    DY: What is the halachic punishment for embarrassing someone?

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1757613
    Joseph
    Participant

    Phil, when I say every Jew is required to give tochacha, that is only referring to a shomer Torah v’Mitzvos.

    Drastically edited 

    in reply to: Collecting with R’ Chaim on the internet? #1757597
    Joseph
    Participant

    WB Meno.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1757549
    Joseph
    Participant

    C’mon, ubiq, you were certain I was insincere. You suspect that of many of my posts. For what reason you suspect that I have no idea. But so much so about women’s suffrage that you actually started a thread soliciting everyone’s opinion after I reassured you that I really am sincere after your expression of disbelief:

    Joseph Poll

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1757543
    Joseph
    Participant

    Phil: Your comment is ripe with incorrect characterizations and factual errors. But the main mistake of yours that needs to be corrected is your not being cognizant that the obligation to give tochacha is upon ever Jew in the world. Even those imperfect in whatever area.

    Please read this thread to correct your knowledge:

    The requirement for everyone to give Tochachah

    in reply to: Women’s Suffrage Must End #1757530
    Joseph
    Participant

    TLIK: Certainly gender does play a large role in one’s qualifications for a job. To deny that is to r”l deny the Torah, which unambiguously defines gender roles. Advocating a position of gender-neutrality is emulating the Mitzrim who forced men to do women’s jobs and forced women to do men’s jobs.

    Furthermore, aside from job qualifications there is the general role of women in society. Normally men are the ones who are to go out in the world to take care of the business of society. Whereas women are meant to take care of the home and family. Indeed we explicitly see as such from the Torah where everyone from Chazal through Shulchan Aruch and before and beyond encoded such as a matter of law, where it is codified that women aren’t to leave the home too often.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1757483
    Joseph
    Participant

    Yeshivishrockstar: You clearly don’t understand what a troll is. You can’t agree with a troll since a troll, by definition, is posting insincere (and that’s the key) positions. Yet you state you agree with my position on women’s suffrage. Ubiq also tried that. He was sure no one, really no one, would agree with me on that “extreme” position. Yet even among the small number of currently active CR posters you aren’t the first or second person to voice agreement with me on just that “extreme” issue alone.

    What you’re really trying to say is that I’m not such a tzaddik in accordance with the lifestyle of tzidkus that you feel I strongly advocate. Okay. I never claimed to be a tzaddik or to be perfect, in accordance with the ideal Torah positions I think and advocate we all should aim for. If I were a real tzaddik you are correct that I shouldn’t be on the internet altogether or at least as much. 100%. Nevertheless that doesn’t mean I should stop advocating the ideal Torah lifestyles just as your rebbeim who you said 100% agree with all my positions, non-ironically. I’m not ironic either, even if you feel I might be hypocritical sometimes. I truly believe it is the ideal Torah life. And I aim for it, even if I’m imperfect in succeeding.

    To take a common example, can someone who is bittul zman not advocate that people not be bitul zman or at least do so less? Can someone who uses unreliable hechsherim not admit he is wrong, even if he has trouble stopping himself, and publicly advocate that people stick to reliable hechsherim? Can someone who embezzled not advocate that people be law abiding and not steal?

    in reply to: Women’s Suffrage Must End #1757442
    Joseph
    Participant

    Ubiq suggested that Yeshivishrockstar post his views on this subject here.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1756831
    Joseph
    Participant

    Ubiq: You’re grasping on straws here. I also once posted that I prefer chicken cooked rather than fried. I’m surprised you haven’t yet used that as another proof that the mainstream view among Rebbeim in Litvish yeshivos isn’t always like me, since there’s no consensus on how to consume a chicken. Or that since I posted in 2016 that I voted for Ted Cruz in the presidential primaries, surely you’ll use that as further proof since that wasn’t necessarily the mainstream view among Rebbeim in Litvish yeshivos on who to vote for.

    What’s this harping of yours about women’s suffrage? That’s my political opinion, not necessarily halachic opinion. In any event nitpicking on this individual view or that individual view that I posted in no way, shape or form disputes what Yeshivishrockstar pointed out. (And note that Yeshivishrockstar admits to himself being more liberal on Jewish/religious issues, yet nevertheless makes this observation.) That there are many mainstream rebbeim, rabbonim and members of the hamon hoam who overall and generally agree with my entire worldview and hashkafos. Even if you can cite a small number of exceptions that don’t have a widespread consensus.

    in reply to: Going off the Derech #1756612
    Joseph
    Participant

    Yeshivishrockstar: Dovid HaMelech describes in Tehillim the records you have in controling the latter situation. And Shulchan Aruch paskens l’Halacha accordingly.

    in reply to: Should we be medicating our kids? #1756611
    Joseph
    Participant

    Yeshivishrockstar: Your suggestion would necessitate seriously reducing the time available for Limudei Kodesh, something very objectionable to many if not most parents.

    Also, please check the thread “A Study in Trolls”; there’s a question there for you.

    in reply to: Should we be medicating our kids? #1756492
    Joseph
    Participant

    As a former infant, I believe it should be infants decisions what time to be put to sleep or permitted to be out of the crib.

    in reply to: Going off the Derech #1756493
    Joseph
    Participant

    That depends whether he’s a minor child or an adult child.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1756435
    Joseph
    Participant

    ubiquitin: Are you denying the truthfulness of Yeshivishrockstar’s personal experience, as he described it, regarding him having had multiple Rebbeim who agree with me — non-ironically — across the board?

    in reply to: The Importance of Having Short Hair #1756344
    Joseph
    Participant

    Au contraire. Rav Chaim was makpid. Which is why he asked him to take the watch off. Even though Rav Chaim couldn’t control his behavior outside his presence he at least insisted he comply with his psak when by him.

    in reply to: Should we be medicating our kids? #1756322
    Joseph
    Participant

    Rational: In this “re-evaluation” that you propose to eliminate formal schooling in the Jewish community, what do you propose it be replaced with?

    Or were you just blowing hot air with nothing really in mind to replace what you propose discarding.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1756205
    Joseph
    Participant

    Yeshivishrockstar: “It doesn’t help when you have Rebbeim in in Litvish yeshivos making snide comments about other groups and insinuating that “their” derech is the only way to serve Hashem. (Joseph may be a top-notch troll, but I have had Rebbeim who would have agreed with him on everything – only nonironically – and would feel that all those who disagree with them are not on the true derech. As an aside, all those Rebbeim who shared that attribute were all graduates of one specific yeshiva.)”

    referenced comment

    If several of your Rebbeim agree with me about everything, what convinces you I’m trolling? (I’m not.)

    2. Perhaps I too am from that “one specific yeshiva”. Or, perhaps, <gasp>, I’m one of your rebbeim.

    This is no way acknowledges any correctness in any aspect of your comment.

    in reply to: The Importance of Having Short Hair #1756041
    Joseph
    Participant

    When I was in Yeshiva, the Menahel would send you home for a haircut if you had a “tchuhpp”.

    in reply to: Slavery in NY School? #1755127
    Joseph
    Participant

    Of course it is mesira. That’s like asking whether chazer is treif.

    And there’s nothing wrong with an employer changing future terms of employment, in any event.

    in reply to: Star-K Article about Electric Shavers #1754507
    Joseph
    Participant

    Perhaps something similar to the rule that only a married person can be shliach tzibbur on the yomim noraim?

    in reply to: Less than 50% of Sephardim don Tefillin. #1754450
    Joseph
    Participant

    Grey matter: Thank you. That particular assertion was only rhetorical in response to N9N’s directly opposite assertion; in order to force him to defend his incorrect position.

    Joseph
    Participant

    Redleg: FYI – there are many many frum online businesses. Some of which are obviously frum owned; and many of which most don’t even know are frum businesses.

    in reply to: Less than 50% of Sephardim don Tefillin. #1754353
    Joseph
    Participant

    N9N: Actually Ashkenazic is closer to the Second Beis HaMikdash practices. Sefardic pronounciation was selected by the anti-religious Ben-Yehuda for Ivrit. Israel is 51%/49% Ashkenazic/Sefardic according to the Israeli Bureau of Statistics and the Ashkenazic secular elite dominate Israeli culture and politics.

    Also see my comment to YO.

    in reply to: The Importance of Having Short Hair #1754326
    Joseph
    Participant

    NP: It was a random bochor who came to him for a quick brocha. You could see the Sar HaTorah’s eyes fixating on his hair before he offered the instructions about the haircut alongside the brocha.

    in reply to: Less than 50% of Sephardim don Tefillin. #1754325
    Joseph
    Participant

    YO: The opposite is happening. Sefardim have been Ashkenazisizing for decades already. In dress, in Yeshiva and in just about everything else.

    in reply to: Less than 50% of Sephardim don Tefillin. #1754152
    Joseph
    Participant

    “What is left of R/C/MO who have not either become Haredi or assimilated is that they will migrate towards Sephardi communities that are not as rigid as the Haredi world.”

    I haven’t noticed any notable migration from the R/C/MO world to the Sefardic world.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,301 through 1,350 (of 5,517 total)