Joseph

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 751 through 800 (of 5,517 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aspergers shidduchim #1832081
    Joseph
    Participant

    Do those with Asperger’s look to marry someone else wish Asperger’s?

    in reply to: What programming language is better to start learning? #1831999
    Joseph
    Participant

    CTL, did you learn that in law school?

    in reply to: dirshu siyum was 80% chassidish, understanding why? #1831911
    Joseph
    Participant

    Toast: The Siyum at MetLife/Barclays was easily 50% Chasidish.

    in reply to: dirshu siyum was 80% chassidish, understanding why? #1831806
    Joseph
    Participant

    Chasidim today represent about three fifths of American Orthodox Jews. Shocked they’re such a majority of Orthodoxy, are you? It’s easy to miss realizing this statistical fact since Chasidim mostly congregate living in Chasidish neighborhoods and towns. Never been to Kiryas Yoel, like the vast majority of Orthodox Jews haven’t been to it? Well, KY is already half as big as Monsey; and Monsey (which is one of the Big Three areas of American Orthodox Jews [the other two being NYC/Brooklyn and Lakewood]) is itself majority Chasidish, as is Brooklyn. And KJ is constituted of just one chasidus of many, and isn’t even a majority of that one chasidus.

    So if you’ve rarely or never visited Williamsburg, Boro Park (which only became vast majority Chasidish over the last 20 or so years; until then it was a mix of Litvish, Chasidish and MO — even Rav Aharon Kotler lived in BP), New Square and Kiryas Yoel, you probably have no idea how demographically huge the Chasidim have become as a majority proportion of Orthodox Jews.

    Even Lakewood is now getting a huge influx of Chasidim.

    Birth rates matter. And there’s a large statistical difference in that rate between the Chasdim and the Litvish.

    in reply to: Wedding Costs….In Law Chutzpah #1831375
    Joseph
    Participant

    CTL, please let me know when your next grandchild is in shidduchim. I have a an excellent candidate.

    in reply to: He who lives in glass houses shouldn’t throw roger stone #1831317
    Joseph
    Participant

    The President of the United States is the head of the Department of Justice as well as of every other departments, agency and branch of the executive government of the United States. As such, the President has the full constitutional and legal right to decide any and all decisions made by any part of the Justice Department or any other executive department.

    As far as pardons, yes, I hope he gives a full, complete and immediate pardon to all victims of the Mueller witch hunt, the morning after election day, whether he wins or loses the election.

    in reply to: Why was trump impeached??? #1831316
    Joseph
    Participant

    The Democrats were very clear even before Donald Trump was sworn into office, after he shockingly won the election and Obama was still the lame duck in office, that they would impeach Trump.

    Everyone knew in 2018 that if the Democrats took the House they would impeach. The only question was what pretext they’d come up with to try to justify it.

    in reply to: Wedding Costs….In Law Chutzpah #1831315
    Joseph
    Participant

    Mazal Tov, CTL and Mrs. CTL!

    Don’t forget to send me the invitation… 😁

    in reply to: shreds of decency #1830639
    Joseph
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer, presumably not since as a leader in Congress she is authorized by law to maintain government documents under her guardianship as Speaker.

    in reply to: Agudah Supports Palestinian Statehood #1830635
    Joseph
    Participant

    They unquestionably do. I’m not the only one even just here that noticed that. It’s sticks out as blatantly obvious. There’s no other reasonable way to read it as anything other than praising the American plan and specifically mentioning the offer for a Palestinian state in a positive light.

    in reply to: Agudah Supports Palestinian Statehood #1830608
    Joseph
    Participant

    Get over it, Phil. Anyone fluent in English can read the Agudah’s own statement and see with their own eyes that the Agudah was praising the American offer for a Palestinian state.

    in reply to: shreds of decency #1830595
    Joseph
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer: It was an official government document and government property. It was not Pelosi’s personal property. She belongs in prison for destroying government property.

    in reply to: shreds of decency #1830464
    Joseph
    Participant

    Huju: Destroying government documents is against the law. She needs to go to jail.

    in reply to: shreds of decency #1830197
    Joseph
    Participant

    My take is Pence would be better than Trump.

    in reply to: shreds of decency #1830174
    Joseph
    Participant

    “Are yo usaddened by that do you wish the Republican party nominated such a candidate”

    Yes, I’m saddened that a modern day Ronald Reagan isn’t President. Though, admittedly, even though Donald Trump has some personal faults compared to Ronald Reagan, on a policy level his administration is in some ways even better than Reagan.

    in reply to: shreds of decency #1830108
    Joseph
    Participant

    Ubiq: If you write in a candidate, you’re voting for him to be an ELECTOR; you’re not voting for him to be President. Furthermore, most states require the electors from that state to be a resident of that state.

    Mike Pence isn’t a resident in most states.

    “why not nominate a republican who will win a general election (and lacks Trump’s “despicable mannerisms.”)”

    Because that candidate you’re describing isn’t on the general election ballot for President, as a viable major party candidate. And either wasn’t a Republican party presidential primary candidate or lost the Republican primary election.

    in reply to: shreds of decency #1830078
    Joseph
    Participant

    Ubiq: I don’t believe there’s the ability for a write-in candidate in presidential elections, since in actuality you’re not voting for President. You’re voting for electors. The 538 electors are the only ones who actually vote for President.

    Anyways, for the nomination I would certainly vote for a Republican who is better than Trump instead of Trump. In fact, I did exactly that in 2016 when I voted for Ted Cruz.

    But at the end of the day I think it is more important to nominate an acceptable Republican who will win the general election rather than a more ideal candidate who will lose the general election.

    in reply to: landscape painting watching Israel? #1830079
    Joseph
    Participant

    In sign language “Jew” is made by a motion of stroking a beard.

    in reply to: Dirshu Siyum explanation #1830042
    Joseph
    Participant

    Yes, they follow the regular Daf Yomi calendar.

    As to your next question, yes, the Siyum is being held a few weeks after they completed Shas.

    in reply to: shreds of decency #1830043
    Joseph
    Participant

    Ubiq: Pence isn’t a candidate for President; so he can’t be voted for President.

    in reply to: Agudah Supports Palestinian Statehood #1829914
    Joseph
    Participant

    I would just like to point out that I don’t necessarily think that the Agudah supporting a Palestinian State is inherently a negative position. 5ish, I think, would disagree with me on this point. But IF the creation of a Palestinian State as part of a peace treaty would have the net effect of saving more Jewish lives, it would be a positive.

    I should also point out that Phil is dead wrong about the Moetzes. This statement came from the Agudah’s political office led by laymen. And I can confirm from first-hand information, something that’s well known to anyone familiar with the Agudah, that the press releases and statements made by the Agudah’s lay office are NOT vetted or approved by the Moetzes. Including this January press release.

    In any event, the primary point here is the Agudah’s language praised the Trump peace plan, including specifically mentioning in a positive manner the offer for Palestinian statehood.

    in reply to: Dirshu Siyum explanation #1829886
    Joseph
    Participant

    Shas.

    in reply to: shreds of decency #1829760
    Joseph
    Participant

    She ought to be tried, convicted and sentenced to be hung, drawn and quartered.

    Joseph
    Participant

    Where do you think Google gets the answers from?

    From folks like me.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1829047
    Joseph
    Participant

    Syag, what is the halachic basis that the unknown “someone familiar with halacha” thinks you’re correct? KlugerYid explained the halachic sources how you’re incorrect. All you’re countering is someone unknown and unforseen claims, based on unstated and unknown claimed halachic basis, that you’re supposedly correct even though you were demonstrated halachic sources to the contrary.

    Please produce your halachic cards. You may even ask that someone for the answer, if any.

    in reply to: Agudah Supports Palestinian Statehood #1829043
    Joseph
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer: The Agudah lauded the American offer for a sovereign Palestinian state as a positive.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828792
    Joseph
    Participant

    zdad, no pritzus is expected of EVERY Jew, not just our Chofetz Chaim’s.

    in reply to: Issuing calls for Tehillim when it’s (almost) too late. #1828791
    Joseph
    Participant

    As long as the person is breathing, it is NEVER too late.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828709
    Joseph
    Participant

    BEFORE what? This forum is over ten years old already with a demonstrated track record of certain commentaters here regularly defending the indefensible; specifically the aveiros that were referenced and much worse.

    The Chofetz Chaim that KlugerYid referenced also generically referred to those the heilige Chofetz Chaim severely criticized BEFORE many of those who fell into the categories he described opened their mouths. Specifically to discourage them from doing so. But here we already have a decade of proven mouth openings defending aveiros.

    in reply to: Agudah Supports Palestinian Statehood #1828524
    Joseph
    Participant

    As you see above, I’m not the only one reading it as such. It is a basic reading of the English as written by the Agudah. Even their emailed clarification clearly says that they’re not against a two-state solution. But even that is a departure from their stated position less than 20 years ago when they were unequivocally opposed to a sovereign Palestinian State.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828502
    Joseph
    Participant

    Find a more appropriate way to say it or leave it deleted

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828373
    Joseph
    Participant

    Syag: Would you say the same if the comment was made about a gathering of Reform thinkers? Not to say the CR is full of Reformers; but there’s certainly an element of reform-minded here, even if they won’t admit as much.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828256
    Joseph
    Participant

    People rationalize all sorts of aveiros; so expect a litany of excuses here why this aveira is okay and why this aveira (pritzus and whole list of worse things) “really” isn’t such an aveira. Or that one day a year is okay to take a break from not doing aveiros.

    in reply to: Agudah Supports Palestinian Statehood #1828167
    Joseph
    Participant

    The Agudah’s emailed response can only be characterized as a partial retraction to their January 28 statement which I quoted in my second post on this thread. The January statement was laudatory and approving of the President’s offer for a sovereign State of Palestine, with the Agudah specifically mentioning a sovereign state in a positive light.

    I would also dispute the notion that they’ve “never taken a position on a two state solution.” Without any ambiguity, in the 90s and 2000s they were outright opposed to Palestinian statehood. Perhaps, as they now wrote, nothing they said in their statement last week reacting to President Trump’s peace proposal was intended to convey such an endorsement, but unintentionally they’ve shown that their position has shifted over the decades — slowly but ever so surely, even if not so perceptibly.

    in reply to: Why is the Wider Frum Public Making a Big Deal Over Bryant’s Death #1827980
    Joseph
    Participant

    GHD: The fatality rates PER MILE TRANSPORTED via helicopter is significantly higher than that via automotive.

    in reply to: Torah hashkafah on having midwinter vacation #1827774
    Joseph
    Participant

    Real Yeshiva ketanas and Mesivtas don’t have any midwinter vacation; under that name or any other name. It’s the ones that modernized a bit that started doing this vacation I’m the last few decades or so.

    in reply to: Returning at Item Purchased Through eBay #1827773
    Joseph
    Participant

    That’s a good point. Refusing a package doesn’t cost the shipper anything more for getting the package back.

    in reply to: Agudah Supports Palestinian Statehood #1827644
    Joseph
    Participant

    Phil, nothing you said negates the facts I clearly presented directly quoting Agudas Yisroel of America specifically mentioning Palestinian statehood.

    Edited

    in reply to: Returning at Item Purchased Through eBay #1827646
    Joseph
    Participant

    jer: In many or most sales it is actually the customer who pays the shipping cost, not the seller.

    Furthermore, how would it be less “geneiva”, as you put it, to accept the package and then immediately ship it right back than just refuse it in the first place?

    in reply to: Bachurim marrying early #1827647
    Joseph
    Participant

    Reb Wolf: With the rabbinical powers vested upon me by my Gedolei superiors I hereby absolve you of any sins that have or may have caused you to be a rasha, purported or actual, and deputize you from this point on as a tzadik gamur.

    You have no right or ability to accept or reject this designation as it is automatically conferred upon you willingly or unwillingly.

    I declare that your Teshuva is now complete whether or not you are aware or acknowledge this fact.

    in reply to: Yiiddeshe Application for Robotics and Artificial Intelligence #1827645
    Joseph
    Participant

    What if all nine guys in the minyan are sleeping, with the shliach tzibbur being the only awake male?

    in reply to: Agudah Supports Palestinian Statehood #1827612
    Joseph
    Participant

    Not true. The Agudah does not support “Palestinian” statehood, and nothing in its statement implies that it does.

    Milhouse: You’re clearly mistaken. Have you even read the actual Agudah letter? In the relevant portion the Agudah (in the second paragraph) states approvingly, verbatim, “The framework offers hope for the fulfillment of their dreams of statehood, sovereignty and economic enrichment.” (The “their” are a reference to the “Palestinians”, as specially referenced by that name earlier in the same Agudah statement.)

    This is NOT, as you characterized it, a “statement merely welcomes Trump’s plan despite this one flaw in it.” The Agudah in its own words specifically and approvingly noted that it offers a sovereign State of Palestine. It does not in any way infer or imply it as being a flaw.

    This is a 180 degree turnaround from many decades of strong and unambiguous opposition to any notion of Palestinian statehood.

    in reply to: returning to amazon #1827613
    Joseph
    Participant

    Is it possible to contact any third-party seller on Amazon prior to making a purchase?

    in reply to: returning to amazon #1827339
    Joseph
    Participant

    GHD: Read all my posts on this thread rather than just the last one that you responded to.

    Ubiq: NO seller allows that (to purchase a product with the advance intention to use it and then return it.)

    Btw, Amazon often closes accounts of customers who return too many items, and bans them from opening a new account, even if all the returns fell within the allowed Amazon return policy.

    in reply to: returning to amazon #1827307
    Joseph
    Participant

    Halachas regarding monetary dealings (as well as just about everything else) are different when interacting with a yehudi versus an aino yehudi (as well as between a Shomer Shabbos versus a non Shomer Shabbos.) What’s difficult to grasp about that general fact?

    in reply to: Toi, you shouldn’t be on social media. #1827258
    Joseph
    Participant

    Is the YWN CR social media?

    in reply to: Returning at Item Purchased Through eBay #1826947
    Joseph
    Participant

    Dr. Pepper, what was the explanation you gave to PayPal to successfully request the refund?

    in reply to: President Donald Trump, Oheiv Yisroel Par Excellence #1826967
    Joseph
    Participant
    in reply to: TZADDIK #1826914
    Joseph
    Participant

    Ruach Hakodesh most certainly does exist today.

    in reply to: President Donald Trump, Oheiv Yisroel Par Excellence #1826912
    Joseph
    Participant

    As expected, the Trump “Deal of the Century” gave Israel virtually everything it dreamt of.

Viewing 50 posts - 751 through 800 (of 5,517 total)