Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
JosephParticipant
That’s not an answer, that’s a dismissal.
You’re criticizing Rav Shteinman, Wolf?
JosephParticipantYou’re disagreeing with Rav Shteinman, Sam?
JosephParticipantstam, I hate to break it to you, but Eretz Yisroel is in galus.
JosephParticipantHaRav Pesach Eliyahu Falk shlit”a has an invaluable sefer that covers all areas you are asking about. Literally A to Z. It is available on Amazon as well as most seforim/Judaica stores.
It’s title is – Modesty: An Adornment for Life
They give them out in most Beis Yaakov schools and learn from it as the complete reference. There is nothing else comparable that is nearly as comprehensive.
JosephParticipantCTL: I said that the Federation, on a national basis, gives far far less per capita to Orthodox students or their educational institutions that it gives to non-Orthodox students or their educational institutions.
I know they give a few shekels to a small number of OOT Orthodox schools. But the reality is that current Jewish growth is occurring, by far, within the Orthodox community. The UJA’s own 2011 Jewish Community Study of New York showed that 61% of Jewish kids in the New York Metropolitan Area are Orthodox. Yet we both know that virtually no Federation funds go to Hareidi Yeshivos, despite that Pew’s 2013 survey of American Jewry shows that 66% of American Orthodox Jews describe themselves as Ultra-Orthodox (including 81% of American Orthodox Jews aged 30 and younger).
It is clear that the Federation does not provide funding to the vast majority of Orthodox Jewish students or educational institutions.
July 15, 2016 7:13 pm at 7:13 pm in reply to: Does anyone know of any good modern or yeshivish high schools in Jersey #1159485JosephParticipantPassaic.
JosephParticipantI think MA is entitled to make a mistake without getting beaten up over it.
JosephParticipantI bet if you were to compare the benefits the Orthodox receive compared to the contributions made by Orthodox people you will see that the Orthodox come out way ahead.
I bet if you were to compare the benefits the poor receive compared to the contributions made by poor people you will see that the poor come out way ahead.
So the poor should stop whining that they receive so little benefits. Let them pay the piper; little contributions, little help.
JosephParticipantCTL, whatever support the Federation gives out of town to a small number of institutions of Orthodox education, it is a tiny minuscule portion of its national budget and incomparably smaller, even per student capita, to its support of non-Orthodoxy.
JosephParticipantYet the KS was originally created to be a group identifier for the folks who switched to it, to set themselves apart.
JosephParticipantThe Islamic State became as big and powerful as it is now because Obama pulled out of Iraq. With thousands of US boots on the ground Iraq the IS never got a foothold. It only did because the Obama cut and ran.
Obama originally was going to pull almost completely out of Afghanistan too, but redfacedly changed plans after he saw how badly the Iraq pullout backfired.
Obama also failed to follow through on his so-called “red lines” in Syria regarding Assad, before the IS became large, thus feeding the Islamic State which saw Obama was puppeteer pulling strings but not following through on his promises.
JosephParticipantWe’ve been hearing about the impending collapse of the frum yeshiva system due to its unsustainable financial structure for… well over 50 years already.
JosephParticipantHow do you know the music really is from the teiva?
JosephParticipantor whatever other language you would want to use
My language for you is tzadik and lamed-vov’nik.
JosephParticipantThe only reason a kipa is perceived by some as being used to identify with a group, is because that’s why the kipa sruga was invented. Prior to it’s introduction not that many decades ago, a yarmulka wasn’t popularly thought of as being a group identifier. As you pointed out, those wearing it today either switched to it or their (grand)father did so from what he was wearing previously.
So the question, as you said was food for thought, was why the switcheroo.
July 14, 2016 4:22 am at 4:22 am in reply to: Within the next 10 years, Israel Will be mostly religious #1160953JosephParticipantYou’re not following the point of contention. An all-volunteer army versus an involuntary draft. The points you are raising don’t point to benefits of an involuntary draft over a volunteer army. America needed one of the largest armies in the universe to protect almost the entire continent of Europe and the entire free world against the threat of a nuclear armed superpower. It needed humongous amounts of armed manpower to accomplish that.
And it did so with an all-volunteer army.
July 14, 2016 3:56 am at 3:56 am in reply to: Within the next 10 years, Israel Will be mostly religious #1160951JosephParticipantIndeed. The nuclear threat to the US, as well as the threat of the Soviet army quickly overrunning Europe, which the US was sworn to protect under its NATO obligations, was far higher and more dangerous than the Arab threat to Israel.
July 14, 2016 3:40 am at 3:40 am in reply to: Within the next 10 years, Israel Will be mostly religious #1160949JosephParticipantIf nuclear war broke out, which was a constant threat, there would hardly be time to institute a draft. America was well prepared with an all-volunteer army to match the mighty USSR on the battlefield in Europe, the high seas and around the world.
July 14, 2016 3:34 am at 3:34 am in reply to: Within the next 10 years, Israel Will be mostly religious #1160947JosephParticipantThe draft was dropped while the Soviet Union still had Atomic bombs on ICBMs pointed at NYC and LA.
July 14, 2016 3:30 am at 3:30 am in reply to: Within the next 10 years, Israel Will be mostly religious #1160945JosephParticipantThe American army has been doing quite well over the last 40 years of it having an all-volunteer army with no draft.
JosephParticipantWhen was the kipot serugot invented and why’d those folks switch over to it from the earlier types of yarmulkas worn?
July 14, 2016 1:32 am at 1:32 am in reply to: Within the next 10 years, Israel Will be mostly religious #1160943JosephParticipantEven if Israel becomes majority Chareidi and chareidim don’t serve in the army, there are enough non-chareidim (even if they’re a minority) to fully staff the army without Chareidi participation.
JosephParticipantI once carried on shabbos, outside the eruv.
Are you a choshuv Rav?
JosephParticipantgavra, and if the family of eight is about to become homeless, do we first give money to the yeshiva or first to insure the family has shelter?
JosephParticipantgavra, does a yeshiva have kadima for tzedaka over a poor Jew whose family is on the verge of starving?
JosephParticipantOn this issue Rav Kook was not in the minority amongst the Orthodox rabbinate during his time, when the issue of women’s suffrage was at the forefront of the political world and actively being debated.
JosephParticipantJosephParticipantubiq, no. The same thing happened as by your chasuna with the Rov who you gave krias hatenaim to. The flower girls rabbonim stormed out as soon as all the flowers were done and looked very upset.
JosephParticipantI know a chasuna where there were so many big rabbonim, way more than any way to slice and dice the kibudim, that even some of the rabbonim were made before the chupa to be the flower girls!
July 12, 2016 12:20 am at 12:20 am in reply to: How to Find an Apartment to Join in Brooklyn? #1184257JosephParticipantI know of at least two cases that people killed their roommates in the frum community.
What years were these? Students?
JosephParticipantIn the same sense people speak of children-at-risk in the frum community.
July 11, 2016 7:29 pm at 7:29 pm in reply to: Within the next 10 years, Israel Will be mostly religious #1160922JosephParticipantMost OTDs eventually come back to frumkeit.
JosephParticipantThe Yeshivish seem to rate Krias HaKesuba second to Sidur Kidushin.
JosephParticipantThat isn’t an accurate summary, gavra. The keywords were the halacha is not like them.
July 11, 2016 5:24 pm at 5:24 pm in reply to: Within the next 10 years, Israel Will be mostly religious #1160917JosephParticipantZD: There are four BTs for every one OTD.
JosephParticipantJosephParticipantThey trespass on MTA property, abandoned stations and on the tracks to commit their offense.
July 11, 2016 4:52 pm at 4:52 pm in reply to: Within the next 10 years, Israel Will be mostly religious #1160914JosephParticipantakuperma suggested the religious Jews could team up with the religious Muslims to outvote the secular Jews.
JosephParticipantbenignuman: As I noted, I was going from memory and as it turns out wasn’t entirely accurate on his position. Here is the relevant communication from Rav Elyashev on the issue. My point remains that Wolf isn’t an apikorus despite his above-mentioned position.
Dear ***,
My short visit to Israel last week was, among other reasons, to ascertain Rav Elyashiv’s reason for the issur on Nosson Slifkin’s books. Contrary to rumors, I did not travel on anyone’s behalf.
Rav Eliashiv felt that the hashkofos of the books regarding Chazal and the age of the universe are forbidden to be taught, and this despite the fact that others, even great people (such as R.Avraham ben HaRambam, Pachad Yitzchok and, in our times, Rav Dessler and R.Shimon Schwab) may have said similar things. “They were permitted to say these things, but we may not,” he said. In other words, the halacha is not like them.
Most important, Rav Eliashiv said that by his signature on the public announcement regarding the books he did not mean to rule that the author is a min or kofer. As far as he is concerned, Rav Eliashiv said, “the author could be one of the lamed vov tzadikim”; the books nevertheless are forbidden to read. He was surprised when he was shown that the announcement described the books as kefira and minus. He then dictated a statement to me,in the presence of his secretary, Rav Yosef Efrati, and one of his grandsons, which read as follows:
?????? ????????? ???? ???? ???? ?? ????? ??????? ?????? ??? ????
or, “My intention when I added my name to the public announcement [regarding the issur] was only regarding that the books should not enter the Jewish community.” The word “only” was meant to specifically exclude the implication that the author is a heretic.
With best wishes,
Aharon Feldman
So, I remain with the position that, secretly, Wolf is still one of the lamed vov tzadikim.
JosephParticipantI related Rav Elyashiv’s position.
JosephParticipantOh, yes, how I wish I was around in the times of the Sanhedrin…
JosephParticipantWolf, specifically regarding that position, Rav Elyashev stated that while that position is apikorsus, the subscriber of that position is not necessarily personally an apikorus. If I recall correctly I think his reason was because the subscriber mistakenly, but sincerely, thinks its a halachicly legitimate position to hold.
JosephParticipant“(they say it by Korbanos, Goel HaDam, and some others)”
So you, I or others shouldn’t add other things from the Torah where the Rishonim don’t say it about. Like kashrus, eved knani, Shatnes, men and women’s roles, taharas hamishpacha, etc. Otherwise ein sof, anyone can add anything the Torah says into the pot and say it’s all the same.
Additionally, are the positions of the Rishonim you speak of even accepted as normative by the corpus of the body of Rishonim and Achronim?
JosephParticipantI can’t think of any positions you hold that are apikorsus.
July 11, 2016 2:52 am at 2:52 am in reply to: How to Find an Apartment to Join in Brooklyn? #1184253JosephParticipantkapusta, what’s the risk regarding luach being on the internet?
JosephParticipant“response: I carefully did not say that. I said I have heard some say that.
I am not at all qualified to offer an opinion on the correct opinion.”
Miamilawyer: That’s why I was happy to correct the record for you.
JosephParticipantmiamilawyer: “This does not explain why when two individuals who are pulled over for the EXACT SAME CRIME–no question, both are guilty, whites get treated one way and blacks the other.”
That’s your presumption which has no factual basis.
JosephParticipantThere’s nothing b’dievedik regarding eved knani in the Torah.
JosephParticipantA far far higher percentage of blacks are criminal than are whites. So when an officer pulls over a black suspected of a crime, there’s a far greater likelihood he’s a criminal than a pulled over white. Are law enforcement officers supposed to ignore this difference in likelihood?
JosephParticipantI’ve been consistent in expressing the view that ideally a wife should be home with the children and the husband be the breadwinner.
That said, their are exceptions to the rule where it may be necessary for the wife to provide an income. They should remain the exceptions. And certainly most preferably when that is unfortunately necessary, she should seek an income from the home or at least as close to the home as possible. Manhattan-type office jobs are surely to be best avoided.
And the great zchus of having a husband/father in full-time Limud Torah HaKedosha is surely one of the exceptions that could justify her working. Another might be when family income necessitates it. (For core family necessities, not luxuries.)
-
AuthorPosts