Joseph

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 3,451 through 3,500 (of 4,305 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pidyon Haben? #1163907
    Joseph
    Participant

    A C/Section would cause no pidyon haben where otherwise there would be one. There is a shitta that after a Cesarian on a first born child if the second child is a boy born naturally (irregardless whether the first child was a boy), you make a pidyon haben on the second child. I don’t think, though, that’s a widely held shitta.

    in reply to: smoking #1164694
    Joseph
    Participant

    Marijuana?

    in reply to: Words from an ex IDF solider for Yom HaZikaron #1163281
    Joseph
    Participant

    yichusdik, your “statistics” is wishful thinking in your longtime anti-Chareidi agenda that has no basis in reality. The number of chareidim leaving is at an all-time low, the number of new BTs is high, the Chareidi birthrate is still k’h very high while the secular rate is low (even though it is slightly higher than the historical lows the seculars reached a few decades ago) and the Chareidi financial state is currently better than it has ever been in the post-WWII era.

    An the Chareidi populace still adheres to the holy words and commandments of their gedolim and manhigim as much as they have in the past.

    in reply to: Pidyon Haben? #1163899
    Joseph
    Participant

    Avada it’s a major simcha irregardless of those factors. But birth order and gender make a difference as to the extent of the simcha, as Syag pointed out proudly. (Even though she’s gonna beat me up for using her as an example.)

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/are-sons-more-desirable-than-daughters

    in reply to: what is your definition of? #1164048
    Joseph
    Participant

    Most Conservative and Reform laymen don’t know the Torah forbids homosexuality? Do most of the average laymen reject that mitzvah? (Irregardless whether they don’t violate it themselves; they reject it’s binding applicability. That makes them an apikorus. And that’s just one example.)

    in reply to: what is your definition of? #1164045
    Joseph
    Participant

    miamilawyer, I was making a larger point with that hypothetical. The Reform and Conservatives outright reject various mitzvos. That makes then apikorsim irregardless of how mitzvos they do keep.

    in reply to: Pidyon Haben? #1163897
    Joseph
    Participant

    Mazal Tov! Many more simchas. It’s always a major simcha to have a male child (or grandchild), but especially when the firstborn is male.

    in reply to: Why people become OTD (with the focus on the "why") #1164860
    Joseph
    Participant

    Most Orthodox OTDs eventually come back on the derech.

    in reply to: "frum" boys who smoke #1178943
    Joseph
    Participant

    I simply wanted to bring the OP to the realization that smoking is not “off the derech” and that a person’s life, in totality, needs to be considered.

    I agree, Wolf. I think this same principle applies to a smoker not only regarding being OTD or not, but whether he/she is a nice person or a worthwhile shidduch prospect. The person’s life, in totality, needs to be considered.

    in reply to: "frum" boys who smoke #1178940
    Joseph
    Participant

    Please point it out.

    in reply to: "frum" boys who smoke #1178937
    Joseph
    Participant

    I think Wolf’s dear mother was a wonderful spouse and parent. Smoking notwithstanding. And I think we can apply the lesson’s from Wolf’s mother to shidduch prospects who smoke.

    in reply to: "frum" boys who smoke #1178935
    Joseph
    Participant

    Nu, kapusta, would you still describe it as an oxymoron to say that Wolf’s mother was both a nice person and a smoker? And, Syag, would you still compare Wolf’s mom, who smoked, to a girl in tight clothes?

    in reply to: "frum" boys who smoke #1178927
    Joseph
    Participant

    (You aren’t really as humorless as you’re pretending to be, right?)

    in reply to: "frum" boys who smoke #1178926
    Joseph
    Participant

    What if the choice is a nice boy in all regards, except that he smokes, or being a spinster?

    in reply to: "frum" boys who smoke #1178922
    Joseph
    Participant

    Okay, Health. Once there are only smokers left to marry in their age category those 25 year old girls will have to choose between a young smoker or a 50+ year old.

    in reply to: "frum" boys who smoke #1178912
    Joseph
    Participant

    Girls have no choice but to marry smoking boys because, as is well known, there is a shortage of available boys for every girl and as it is some girls will be left with no one to marry. So without marrying smoking boys, even more girls will be left at the altar unable to marry anyone.

    in reply to: Why people become OTD (with the focus on the "why") #1164853
    Joseph
    Participant

    Nishma,

    Were the survey participants self-selected (rather than being a true sampling of the demographic)? Was participation strongly solicited among footsteps members (who represented a large percent of the survey responses)? Have the authors of the survey addressed the issue of respondents providing self-serving responses to the questions?

    in reply to: Raw milk #1163022
    Joseph
    Participant

    How did folks drink milk for thousands of years if not raw?

    in reply to: Where you going on vacation?? #1164613
    Joseph
    Participant

    I’ll also fill you in on all the new members from the past five years and my full dossier on them. When’s a good time to visit – could I crash with you during the last two weeks of August?

    in reply to: Why the ashkenazi schools don't accept sefardi children #1164131
    Joseph
    Participant

    I can hear someone not accepting the shechita of a meshictsan. But why reject the shechita of the majority of Lubavitchers who aren’t meshictsan, especially if you know that a particular Lubavitcher shochet isn’t a meshictsan.

    On top of that, the major kashrus organizations, including OU, certify meat that is produced by various kosher meat producers that employ Lubavitcher shochtim. Do you therefore reject meat from the major kashrus organizations and non-Lubavitcher meat producers that employ Lubavitcher shochtim? I guess you’d have to stick to Kiryas Yoel meat or Badatz Eida Chareidus.

    in reply to: Feminism #1162819
    Joseph
    Participant

    Some jobs are specifically meant to be done by men, and some meant for women.

    Let’s not forget one of the ways the Egyptians tortured us was to make men do women’s work and women do men’s work.

    in reply to: Women Driving #1162004
    Joseph
    Participant

    Sam: I cited them because I found them relevant to the discussion. Nowhere did I otherwise comment on them other than to point them out.

    benignuman: But without a car, won’t she walk more places and be out for everyone to see even more than if she is safely ensconced in a car?

    I would think that walking, taking a bus, taking a subway, or taking a cab would all be less tzniyusdik.

    That’s a fair argument. And, indeed, a number of rabbonim permit women to drive. No one is disputing that. And, perhaps, they like you will argue that a woman is less exposed to the public and to the street when she’s ensconced in a vehicle than if she’s walking on the street or taking public transit.

    On the other hand, other rabbonim who pasken women are not permitted to drive might argue the ready access to driving gives her the ability, and inevitably in many cases the reality, of her being out of the home much more frequently than if she were limited to walking and public transit since a license and vehicle makes more places accessible (and thus more opportunities to be out) than otherwise.

    in reply to: The old and the new #1164150
    Joseph
    Participant

    Chasidish garb is simply more or less the same garb Jews wore 200 and more years ago. Non-Chasidim wore those garbs too but over time, often due to force by the non-Jewish governments, stopped dressing as such.

    You can find photos of Yekkes with long curly payos like the Chasidim. Shtreimels were worn by misnagdim. And long rekels were the norm in Lita until the Russian government passed a law against it and starting beating Jews who continued wearing it.

    in reply to: what is your definition of? #1164036
    Joseph
    Participant

    jf02, a person who fully and completely, with every chumra, keeps 612 mitzvos but one mitzvah he rejects, is an apikorus gamur and far worse off than another person who out of laziness or apathy keeps no mitzvos.

    in reply to: Why do women wear expensive sheitels? #1163772
    Joseph
    Participant

    Incidentally, it’s the man’s responsibility not to “gaze at the women”. Not the women’s responsibility to accept extra tznius chumras for the sake of the men’s neshamos.

    It is explicit in the halachas that the reason women need to dress tzniusdik is in order that men not overly look at her.

    in reply to: Why the ashkenazi schools don't accept sefardi children #1164128
    Joseph
    Participant

    Mikvas, Chabad has a rather unique shitta regarding, so it might be understandable if someone held l’chatchila to use another mikva based on his shitta. But regarding shechita, I see no logical reason why anyone wouldn’t use Chabad. Care to explain the halachic reasoning?

    in reply to: Where you going on vacation?? #1164605
    Joseph
    Participant

    To England, to visit the famous noitallmr.

    WB!

    (Can’t believe you remembered your login credentials after being gone for so long from here…)

    in reply to: Feminism #1162813
    Joseph
    Participant

    Everything I stated is 100% factual.

    in reply to: Bahamas Vacation advice #1162828
    Joseph
    Participant

    I was never there. You don’t need to be somewhere to have heard the horrible reputation that precedes it.

    I’ve never been to Las Vegas either but one would need to be pretty sheltered to not know of the terrible pritzus that is the norm there.

    It is wise to know where to avoid so you don’t “innocently” end up in the wrong places.

    in reply to: Bahamas Vacation advice #1162825
    Joseph
    Participant

    ZD, people aren’t going to the Bahamas to go to the Beis Medrash, I assure you. I’m skeptical the Bahamas even has a Beis Medrash.

    in reply to: The role of the woman in yiddishkeit #1162869
    Joseph
    Participant

    RY23, Men are slaves too. Are we not all an Eved Hashem?

    in reply to: The role of the woman in yiddishkeit #1162868
    Joseph
    Participant

    After forswearing taking the bait and participating in the other thread, you’re now an active participant there.

    1 for 2, going down. 😉

    in reply to: Bahamas Vacation advice #1162822
    Joseph
    Participant

    How is it possible to go to the Bahamas and avoid the rampant pritzus?

    in reply to: Women Driving #1161995
    Joseph
    Participant

    Shulchan Aruch and Rambam specify their are frequency limitations, and type of reasons for going out limitations. I’m simply relating the reality of what they pasken.

    in reply to: Feminism #1162809
    Joseph
    Participant

    It isn’t true. Women typically took more time off for family and personal reasons, both child birth and other reasons like raising children etc., so the women in the workforce typically have less experience than men even if both joined the workforce at the same time. This factual reality is not taken into account, and is virtually entirely ignored, when the feminists keep griping that they’re not paid fairly. Even the statistics they keep pumping out to “prove” this misnomer, doesn’t take the above fact into account and simply pretends that those women who spent months or years out of the workforce were actually employed all that time, when they’re comparing pay to experience between men and women.

    in reply to: Women Driving #1161993
    Joseph
    Participant

    That point was addressed. By having a driver’s license and ready availability to a car in the driveway, the reality is the woman will more readily and more frequently be going for a spin around town even if it isn’t an appropriate reason for her to be shpatziring outside according to the Shulchan Aruch, Rambam, etc.

    Think of it like having a TV in the home. Sure National Geographic and PBS might have some kosher programming, but once you have access to everything, we all know the great risks.

    in reply to: The Eruv Rav #1162996
    Joseph
    Participant

    They certainly do try to push people away from frumkeit. You clearly haven’t heard quite a number of their speakers at their meetings. And their current members frequently try to recruit friends of theirs to join.

    in reply to: An Israeli tries to understand life in America #1163823
    Joseph
    Participant

    What do regional Selective Service Review Board’s do (and how much work is it, how does one become a member and what does it pay)?

    in reply to: An Israeli tries to understand life in America #1163821
    Joseph
    Participant

    The New York metro area, Brooklyn, Monsey and Lakewood, is the epicenter of Torah life in chutz l’aaretz.

    By far a majority of frum Americans live in those areas alone.

    in reply to: The role of the woman in yiddishkeit #1162856
    Joseph
    Participant
    in reply to: Women Driving #1161989
    Joseph
    Participant

    What did you make of the Rav Nissim Karelitz shlit”a and Rav Moshe Shternbuch shlit”a that I linked above from Hebrewbooks on this Rambam/SA?

    in reply to: Women Driving #1161984
    Joseph
    Participant
    in reply to: Women Driving #1161983
    Joseph
    Participant

    Sam, you’re regurgitating the same inaccurate point we’ve previously discussed. You’re stressing precisely the opposite of what the Rambam and Mechaber are stressing. And he doesn’t say it is an “Eitzah Tovah”, he explicitly paskens that the husband should prevent and not allow his wife to go out more frequently.

    in reply to: Women Driving #1161981
    Joseph
    Participant

    adocs, have you ever asked a shaila from a posek or Rov whether the Halacha in the Shulchan Aruch we’re discussing, as well as the equivalent Rambam, are utterly meaningless and irrelevant in our modern day, with our era having replaced the anarchistic practices and rulings from the days of the Mechaber? No? I didn’t think so. So I’ll tell you what. Call a posek of note and ask him if a) the Shulchan Aruch and Rambam we’re discussing can be scratched out as irrelevant and to be ignored without any meaning for our times or b) the Shulchanch Aruch and Rambam remain relevant for us today and ought to guide our lives in some manner.

    in reply to: Sitting on Toilet and Bed on Tisha B'Av #1161488
    Joseph
    Participant

    If not critically needed, should ones wait until after chatzos to use the facilities?

    in reply to: Women Driving #1161979
    Joseph
    Participant

    Like Shatnes. It took a Mr. Joseph Rosenberger to fix the problem. Dare I say we need another Joseph today for this laxity? (This will be so worth the flak I’m about to get.)

    in reply to: Women Driving #1161977
    Joseph
    Participant

    I can pretty much assure you that over 90% of frum Americans today do not know this Rambam and Shulchan Aruch. 2010s, not just 1950s.

    And the principal that women should avoid unnecessary public exposure and being on the streets unnecessarily can be found in many sh”ut seforim of fairly recent vintage.

    in reply to: The Eruv Rav #1162978
    Joseph
    Participant

    They certainly do encourage people to leave yiddishkeit.

    in reply to: im a girl alone in medical office #1165273
    Joseph
    Participant

    Yes, it is a problem. Speak to a Rov immediately.

    in reply to: A Cohen Remarrying #1161455
    Joseph
    Participant

    Are older never-married girls amenable to marrying a divorced guy? How common?

Viewing 50 posts - 3,451 through 3,500 (of 4,305 total)