Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
The irony of the situation is hard to miss. If Israel is a Jewish State — and is seen as responsible for promoting halacha and sponsoring Yeshivas etc –shouldn’t all its citizens act with Zrezus to contribute to the survival of this state? Of course, Israel is seen as only a medina, and one that is not 100% (or even 50%, or 25%) kosher by many charedim. So why contribute to such an enterprise? One really can’t have it both ways: (1) Expecting the state to promote and sponsor Yiddishkeit; (2) Refusing to participate in the defense and economic health of the state because it is not Heilig. Having said that, there are better ways for the state to proceed than it has been doing. One can’t change a situation that was built on political deals overnight. Nor is it right to attack all Charedim for proceeding on a path that was agreed upon for years. Finally, the business of Tzava is in many respects symbolic and designed with less than up and up intentions — do they really think a Golani or Shaldag or 669 or any sayeret unit is screaming for a Yeshiva guy? Probably not.
The analogy to doctorates in the humanities is interesting but off the mark, in my opinion.
Most individuals who earn PhD’s — especially in the humanities — will not find gainful employment
as tenure track assistant professors. Those who do find such job will overwhelmingly find jobs at teaching oriented colleges (where research is not a main criteria for advancement and tenure). Their role is essentially as a me’chanech. They teach many classes, grade hundreds of exams and (pporly written) papers and do a little bit of research. The few who are hired at research universities have the expectation to both teach and do scholarship. Of these, a very small percentage will rise and become professors whose main “job” is to think and write. These are the super scholars and they are under great pressure to keep turning out books (with first rate presses) to demonstrate their worth and to justify why they have limited teaching loads. Perhaps this could be a model for the Kollel system. It preserves the special privileges to the truly outstanding and hard working scholars, and (as long as some accountability is built into the system) allows others who are talented but not brilliant to move to teaching positions in respectable yeshivas (each according to his ability). Finally, those who are not cut out for it can move along to other pursuits.