Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
yitayningwutParticipant
Younger than age 20 is not considered a bar onshin…
That is completely not true. Once a female turns twelve and a male thirteen they are considered by Halacha to be one hundred percent adults for all practical matters.
yitayningwutParticipantAs far as protecting innocents, absolutely. But it cannot done in a manner that penalizes the person in a manner unauthorized by the Torah.
Incorrect. The Halacha is explicit not like you. The Shulchan Aruch, Rema, Sma, and Shach all say in the second siman of Choshen Mishpat that if there is a real problem in a community with a certain issue, the ones in charge are authorized to take measures not sanctioned by normative rules of Choshen Mishpat – even if that means killing the person, or any other of penalty (as long as we are authorized by the government to do so of course).
A deterrent is needed. There’s no better way to say it – it’s simply tough luck on this kid.
yitayningwutParticipantI don’t know why you would say he is chayav misah. He is a criminal, and the courts are obligated to take action to prevent the crime from occurring again. But a technical chiyuv misah? ???? ????? ?? ????.
yitayningwutParticipantThis is not a question of punishment. I don’t believe in punishment. Who are we to judge? In this sense I agree with popa that we have no idea why the kid is like this.
But I don’t think locking up a murderer or executing him is about punishment either. It is about protecting society from him, and it’s about making other potential criminals think twice.
Does this kid deserve to be maligned? It isn’t relevant. The community is more important than him. If he hadn’t done anything then it might not be morally right to make such a judgement call of individual versus community, but he jumped on the scale by committing his crime.
Can he do teshuva? Of course! Is it possible that he isn’t even at fault for his actions, due to some deeply rooted issue in his brain caused by someone else? Certainly. But that makes no difference to us, as a functioning society. If someone’s bad upbringing were causing him to come at me with a gun, I’d still run him over with my car. His personal motivations are between him and God.
Once you jump into the ring, my life comes first. Otherwise society goes down the tubes.
yitayningwutParticipantIt’s not that bad down there. In the hick towns, possibly, but not in the major cities. Many southerners, especially more progressive but religious Christians (which is a large chunk of the more urban areas) are very friendly towards Jews.
yitayningwutParticipantSimply put each set of strings into small sandwich bags and close them tightly with twist ties, and then chuck it in the washing machine. Use a few bags, one over the other, if you want to ensure that no water gets in.
yitayningwutParticipantWhy don’t you just ask the person in charge? Maybe they have a good reason. Who says they’re wasting money for no good reason?
yitayningwutParticipantHaLeiVi – Your first point is interesting, though it doesn’t really have much bearing on the question at hand. Your second point is a nice explanation, and works well with the vort that is being taynehed here. Thanks. 🙂
August 28, 2012 1:05 pm at 1:05 pm in reply to: blessings for animals (in particular, pets!) #895941yitayningwutParticipantaurora77 –
Bless you. It is highly commendable that you are looking for ways to show appreciation for something; gratitude is one of the most basic tenets of Judaism. We do have standardized prayers, but we also believe that one can add whatever they feel like in their own words.
The first of the standard morning blessings goes as follows:
Blessed are you LORD, our God, king of the world, who gives the rooster understanding to distinguish between day and night.
If you wish to say a prayer of thanks for your pets, that might be an apt place to insert some of your own thoughts.
yitayningwutParticipantToi – I have no problem with sharfkeit, but I have no idea what your problem with what I’m saying is. There there’s a shvachkeit in the asei, here there’s a shvachkeit in the lav. Why are you maching avek such a pashute chiluk? I’m maskim to the vort that we’re not stam being practical and rather we’re danning on the etzem shavyus (so to speak) of each mitzva. I just think that once we start doing that, this is a pashute vort to say. I’m building on the vort you were saying.
yitayningwutParticipantI hear what the oilam is taynehing but now that I hear it I think you can tayneh even better. There’s a pashute chiluk, which I didn’t think of originally, between the case of Nazir and the other cases. In the other cases the asei is shvach, not the lav. You can push aside yibum by doing chalitza, or ??? ???? ???? by refusing. It makes sense that a weak asei won’t break a regular lav. By Nazir the asei is a regular strong asei, it’s the lav which is weak! The lav of Nazir is ???? ?????, so maybe that’s why it gets knocked over by the asei, but you can’t learn from there that a asei will knock over a regular lav!
yitayningwutParticipantDaasYochid – I understand the chiluk that ???? ????? works ?????, I just don’t see how it is mechalek. Lechora the pashtus is the vort of the other two Gemaras is stam that the Torah is not going to allow you to break a rule if it’s possible not to. That applies by Nazir too, regardless of the mechanism that is used to make that happen.
yitayningwutParticipantDefinitely possible.
yitayningwutParticipanthello99 –
Thanks!! I hope to have good answers within a few weeks.
As for your points:
1) My chavrusa was trying to convince me of the same thing. I guess I’m just not mystically inclined that way.
4) I hear, but im kein it’s the same as #2 and #3; it doesn’t fit within Tosafos.
yitayningwutParticipanthello99 –
I’m thinking about what you wrote, and this is what’s coming out.
1) The Pri Chadash and the Ri MiKinon: I already figured this from the end of Tosafos in Zevachim 73b ?”? ???. This was my whole question, how are they nikkar, and the only good answer I could think of was bris, which would exclude women. Hence my klerr.
2) The Minchas Yaakov and the Pleisi are arguing on Tosafos. I am wondering how to deal with Tosafos. Besides, how do they address how every chad betrei is not a problem of kavua?
3) Suggesting like the Pleisi, the Maadanei Yom Tov, and R’ Moshe, that human knowledge somehow automatically makes it nikkar, is lehedya not like Tosafos, because Tosafos in Nazir is coming to say that mid’oraisa all the women in the world are not considered kavua because the issur one is not nikkar. Refer to #2.
4) The Bach and Yad Yehuda: Nice lomdus, but not really addressing the question at hand.
In simple terms: Tosafos is clear that a ‘mixture’ of human beings is shayach to kavua when the issur is nikkar, and not shayach when it is not nikkar. Accepting these premises as Tosafos does, I want to know if a mixture of Jews and non-Jews will have a nafka mina in din if the Jews are men or women, and if not, explain how Jews are nikkar from non-Jews even while in other mitures of humans we can say the issur is not nikkar.
yitayningwutParticipanthello99 – Lots of very interesting shitos! I am just getting into the sugya, so thanks.
Toi – Thanks for the mareh makom.
yitayningwutParticipantoh no…
snort
heh heh 🙂
(exact order of my reactions)
yitayningwutParticipantlebidik yankel –
I hear, but how does one easily discern between Jews and non-Jews? Are you going to tell me there is going to be a nafka mina between what community of Jews we are talking about?
yitayningwutParticipanthe must be dead then.
yitayningwutParticipantnow that was from left field
yitayningwutParticipantHuman beings are inherently differentiable from one another.
It’s ee efsher to say this in Tosafos, because in Nazir we’re gufa talking about human beings. The svara why you are mistaken, I believe, is because while the human being is distinguishable, the factor that makes one ‘issur’ and another ‘heter’ is not.
yitayningwutParticipantThere is a legend about R’ Moshe that he was officiating a wedding and in middle of the chuppa the mother cried out that her son was a mamzer. As the story goes, without a moment’s hesitation R’ Moshe said, “ignore her; her testimony is inadmissible.”
yitayningwutParticipantwell played
yitayningwutParticipantI go with the Mechaber
I don’t.
It is not a stretch to say that without cleaning ones teeth it is a vadai, that meat is be stuck inside.
For six hours, every single time? It is a stretch.
you have Rashi, who holds that the shuman stays in the mouth and gives flavor for 6 hours
It’s still not always/vadai. Besides, following Rashi and the Rambam lechumra is not the ikkar hadin either. The Tur’s lashon is ??? ????? ?????? ??? ?????.
the general population (re:not everyone) accepted the halacha of the Rambam and the Rashi
You have no basis for that, and I believe it is incorrect. The minhag is in accordance with what the Rambam held lehalacha, but it is a minhag, not the ikkar hadin as the Rambam himself held; as I explained the Rema.
yitayningwutParticipantThe Rema writes in Darkei Moshe that one hour has no makor. The ikkar halacha according to him is that no waiting is necessary. That’s why he is maskim to the 1 hour minhag, because it doesn’t really matter. And my point about the Rambam is that there is no vadai meat between your teeth. You can’t tell me a shtickel torah based on the assumption that the Rambam holds there is always vadai meat between your teeth for 6 hours after every time you eat meat, because such an assumption makes no sense and is a pchisus in the kavod of the Rambam. And Sam, it’s possible, but you can’t be oker a davar pashut with somewhat of a mashmaus.
yitayningwutParticipantuneeq – According to the Rema the Halacha follows Tosafos, and that which we keep six hours is a minhag. Moreover, even the Rambam/Mechaber obviously only holds it’s a chashash that there’s meat, not that there’s vadai meat. Everyone underdstands that lekulei alma waiting six hours is less chamur than actually eating them together. That’s a davar pashut.
yitayningwutParticipantUneeq – without getting into whether or not the Tzemach Tzedek is right, this case is more lenient, because you are never actually going to mix it with meat (I was bavorning this in my final parentheses).
yitayningwutParticipantPopa – the top tosafos in Chullin 6b is mevuar not like you, vdoik.
yitayningwutParticipantrabbiofberlin – The Gemara in Shabbos (10a) is talking about putting on special garments for davening.
August 20, 2012 4:25 pm at 4:25 pm in reply to: Would Rabbi Akiva Eiger z"l wear a "kippa sruga"?so why do you?? #892076yitayningwutParticipantKozov – I haven’t commented on this thread (well I did make a joke in the beginning but the mods didn’t put it through…) but I’ll take the ochel from the psoless; thanks for the compliment. 🙂
yitayningwutParticipantSam –
I’m not going to debate that. But if there is one parent in the world with one kid who is frum and one who isn’t, then more is upgeshlugged, even if R’ Moshe is right.
yitayningwutParticipantI suppose every ba’al teshuva’s parents accidentally kept taharas hamishpacha, yes?
yitayningwutParticipantHappy birthday Goq
yitayningwutParticipantThere is a letter from the Rambam in which tells his student to wish his wife well for him. He goes on to explain that greeting normally is not included in that which Chazal said that it is a lack of tznius to inquire about a woman’s welfare.
Furthermore, see the Aruch HaShulchan on that siman who cites a Ritva and says that these Halachos change with the times, and where people are used to it there is no issur.
oomis – +1
yitayningwutParticipantWolf – I probably will do that, I just want to go in knowing what the accepted norm is, if there is one.
akuperma – Interesting angle.
yitayningwutParticipantMaybe they post here.
yitayningwutParticipantLol OneOfMany exactly
yitayningwutParticipantStart with Rolos.
yitayningwutParticipantAs I said, others may disagree, but this is my opinion.
yitayningwutParticipantI dunno, but I’m in Lakewood right now holding a smart phone and not getting any stares.
yitayningwutParticipantRofl
yitayningwutParticipantI hear.
yitayningwutParticipantStart with Rolos.
yitayningwutParticipantAccepted by whom exactly?
yitayningwutParticipantAnd the lack of ac is bothering you?
yitayningwutParticipantIf you’re going with a pen, the thinnest you can get is definitely the best, so I’ll second that.
yitayningwutParticipantDash – It isn’t, even assuming what you quoted to be true, because of what I wrote after that. The fact that something is there solely for flavor still does not preclude it from being ta’am kalush.
yitayningwutParticipantLol popa
yitayningwutParticipantSam – the milk isn’t nikkar, the creamer is.
yitayningwutParticipantChacham – No, it doesn’t fit the criteria. Most ingredients are meant for flavor, avida leta’ama has to be something strong and very distinctively discernible in the final product. (I don’t have access to seforim right now but see the Taz on the se’if of avida leta’ama.)
-
AuthorPosts