Chortkov

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 1,909 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Six Days of Creation – Refreshing #1380836
    Chortkov
    Participant

    The parts that are not in Shabbat are being recreated while those that are are not.

    Avi K – Sorry, I didn’t understand that. Care to elaborate?

    in reply to: Six Days of Creation – Refreshing #1380838
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Joseph – I’d love to answer that question. But first, can you explain the relevance to my question? It doesn’t matter if their isn’t one.

    in reply to: Changing your mind #1380644
    Chortkov
    Participant

    I was wondering the same thing.

    Bump.

    in reply to: Is decorating the succah the mans job or women’s? #1380388
    Chortkov
    Participant

    A kosher succah is a kosher succah…..

    According to the Rishonim’s understanding of the Rabbeinu Tam (many Achronim try to differentiate between the R”T’s cases and Sukkah), it would not be a Kosher Sukkah.

    is their an inyan of going back to through the construction process to determine who held the hammer and nailed which board, who might have steadied the ladder for the one holding the hammer and who threw the schach on to the roof over the boards which were hammered by someone for whom someone else held the ladder?

    You didn’t have to ‘concur’ with the post, but if you did, how could it not be imperative to ensure the Kashrus of your Sukkah?

    Not to be too technical

    Torah is very technical. Halachah is very technical. Those who refuse to be technical cannot keep Hilchos Shabbos. Avoidas Hashem is full of details and intricacies.

    but if there are ways to squeeze the joy out of hidur mitzvah, some will recognize no extremes to find that opportunity….

    Do you really think that depriving a woman the option of building a Sukkah is “squeezing the joy out of Hiddur mitzvah”? And – if that is what you meant – do you honestly think that the reason why a woman would feel deprived is because she doesn’t have the opportunity to perform a hechsher mitzvah, or because it highlights the distinction between Man and Woman in Torah?

    in reply to: Is decorating the succah the mans job or women’s? #1380387
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Joseph: GHD: Which part of it did you not “concur” with? The Rabbeinu Tam, the Rishonim, the Gemorah, the Mordechai, the Beis Yosef, the Yaavetz or the Chasam Sofer?

    When I saw your post I realized that I forgot to write – I don’t think this is an accepted Halachah. I haven’t been into the sugya properly, but the Rishonim reject the Rabbeinu Tam’s view – largely on account of the Gemara in Sukkah 8 which is mefurash that סוכת גנב”ך is Kosher. The Mordechai’s mehalech (that it is only lechatchila) isn’t consistent with the Rabbeinu Tam’s view elsewhere that even בדיעבד, tzitzis made by women are פסול. The Yaavetz’ mehalech is also very shver from Gemara’s which are משמע that סוכת גנב”ך refers to a Sukkah built by a woman, not for a women.

    Yekke: It was minimally a partial refutation of the quote of his you bolded “Women can build a sucah…”

    You’ll have to learn the difference one day between refuting a view and nitpicking on an example. Gadolhadorah’s view saying that women are as manly as men, and there is no reason to stereotype. I wasn’t getting involved in debating gender roles, stereotypes and feminism in Mitzvos. It just reminded me of the tzad that a woman cannot built a Sukkah, which I posted. Gadolhadorah was justified in sardonically point out the relevance [and lack thereof] to this thread.

    in reply to: Is decorating the succah the mans job or women’s? #1380273
    Chortkov
    Participant

    but it can always be counted upon for comic relief

    I’m glad somebody else finds it funny. It never ceases to amaze me how annoyed some people get at the more obscure (and dare I say it, predictable) views Joseph expresses. (Not sure why monolithic is a bad thing)

    (I’d be interested to hear why it’s only a ‘mostly concur’, by the way.)

    in reply to: WHY IS IT HARD TO stop smoking? #1380266
    Chortkov
    Participant

    SUPPOSE THE rabbonim would discover that the tobacco used in cigareettes are froma n indian temple and it is avoda zara.

    Well, that’s easy. How many women do you know who have given up their Sheitels after the recent uproar? It’s easier to find a Posek who hasn’t gone into the sugya or who is meikal.

    in reply to: Is decorating the succah the mans job or women’s? #1380264
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Joseph – I wasn’t refuting his views.

    in reply to: "TALMUD STUDY NOW MANDATORY IN KOREA #1380228
    Chortkov
    Participant

    This is interesting.

    Why on earth would they have such a custom?

    It is an extremely strange choice of study.

    in reply to: Is decorating the succah the mans job or women’s? #1380213
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Gadolhadorah: Perhaps you should ask why decorating the sucah or ANY other task not specifically mandated under Halacha is defined by gender? … Women can build a sucah…

    Actually, it’s not so simple.

    According to Rabbeinu Tam in Tosfos Gittin 45, a women cannot create a חפצא דמצוה which she is not commanded to perform. He talks specifically about Tzitzis, Sefer Torah, Mezuzah, Tefillin and Iggud of Lulav. The Rishonim extrapolate that according to the Rabbeinu Tam, she also cannot make a Sukkah. The Beis Yosef (OC”H 14) brings from the Mordechai הל’ קטנות אות תתקמ”ט that although the Sukkah she makes is כשר בדיעבד, she is not allowed to make a Sukkah (which is his position regarding Tefillin and Mezuzah etc.).

    There is a Gemara (Sukka 8) which is mefurash that a woman’s Sukkah is Kosher; the Rishonim ask on the Rabbeinu Tam from this Gemara. There are various mehalchim to answer that Gemara – the Beis Yosef learns that it is only בדיעבד, but it is actually אסור. The Yaavetz (Mor UKetzia 14) learns that this is referring to a Sukkah built for women, not a Sukkah built by woman. See also Chasam Sofer Yo”d 271.

    in reply to: WHY IS IT HARD TO stop smoking? #1379846
    Chortkov
    Participant

    How many smokers actually acknowledge that it is assur?

    You quote David Lichtenstein, talking on a radio show designed to be controversial, liberal and provocative. That isn’t going to convince anyone at the best of time – especially smokers, who have negius that it should be muttar.

    Look at it from the point of view of a smoker.

    – Stage 1: There is the famous teshuva in Igros Moshe where R’ Moshe is basically mattir for those who are not בעלי נפש*. There is a large amount of discussion in earlier Poskim about smoking on Yim Tov, but very clear documented proof that at one point, it was Muttar. Of course there are discussions as to whether or not the hetter still applies; various testimonies which are disputed – nothing concrete.

    – Stage 2: Everybody smokes. Walk around Eretz Yisroel. Stand outside any Beis Hamedrash. Dozens of Gedoilim – Yerei Shamayim and Talmidei Chachamim of immense proportions – smoke or smoked themselves.

    – Take this a stage further. Not only do such a large proportion of frum, heimishe Yidden smoke, but very few accepted Gedoilim have ever come out publicly against smoking. Imagine if Klal Yisroel were eating certified pork on the streets – wouldn’t you expect pashkevilin, Smoking Asifas, public speeches – some sort of awareness campaign? When something is so blatantly widespread, you expect a strong reaction if it would be assur . But what do we see? Snippets of private conversations busybodies have with gedoilim, where they agree that it is assur to start smoking.

    – Even if the facts are there, on some level, most smokers don’t believe it is truly dangerous. Just like most of us drink Coke, and eat fatty foods – although we are aware that these things are nutritional disaster – it’s because we don’t actually believe it will cause any lasting damage. Consider to yourself the number of smokers you personally know, and how many people you know who have ever died from smoking. On some subconcious level, we consider it like driving a car; accidents happen, and it is dangerous – but hey, nothing’s going to happen when you get into a car. Nobody has ever walked around the corner because of the health risk in driving.

    In summary: An activity which is (1) considered muttar by רוב of Klal Yisroel – specifically something that (2) was once unanimously accepted – (3) which is still practiced by רבים וטובים, is not going to be fought with ambiguity.

    in reply to: When to Propose #1379679
    Chortkov
    Participant

    No I wasn’t.

    Joseph – I think NeutiquamErro was responding to Takes22tango, not to me.

    in reply to: When to Propose #1379589
    Chortkov
    Participant

    It wasn’t introduced by the Goyim.

    Jewish women proposing to their husbands has been part of the Jewish marriage ever since Rus proposed to Boaz.

    in reply to: Being a rabbi (in a business or political relationship) #1379487
    Chortkov
    Participant

    So why can’t a woman be a Rabbi?

    in reply to: When to Propose #1379466
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Not up to scratch, Joseph.

    The normal you would be positing about how it’s assur to propose, and how the whole concept of proposing comes from the Goyim.

    in reply to: “When in DOUBT, Leave it OUT.” #1379055
    Chortkov
    Participant

    GAON: What is deOreisa of Lo Sisah, please?

    It is the source for the prohibition to say G-d’s Name in vain.

    in reply to: “When in DOUBT, Leave it OUT.” #1379054
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Lightbrite – It’s not a competition between Hashem and the Rabbonim. Hashem gave us certain mitzvos, and gave the Chaza”l (the Rabbanim) the ability to create additional commandments and restrictions.

    In general, our rule is ספק דאורייתא לחומרא וספק דרבנן לקולא. When faced with a doubt in Torah Law, we must be stringent. When faced with a doubt in Rabbinic law, you don’t have to take the more stringent side. (Why this is so, when according to many, every Rabbinic ediction is also Biblically mandated, is subject to debate. There numerous answers.)

    When faced with a ספק ברכה, you have two doubts: (A) A ספק rabbinic commandment to make a blessing, and (B) a ספק prohibition to say G-d’s name in vain. There is a מחלוקת whether this would be Biblically prohibited or only Rabbinically prohibited, seeing as it is said in the context of blessing, and not entirely in vain. Therefore, we say that ספק דרבנן לקולא allows you to be lenient and not make the blessing, and because of ספק ברכה לבטלה you are not allowed to make the blessing*.

    So you don’t make a brocho. It is a מחלוקת whether you are now allowed to eat. There is a prohibition [although almost certainly rabbinic] to eat without a prior blessing. Although you do not make a ברכה when in doubt, you are left with a possibility of איסור**.
    _________________
    * I’m not sure why you are not allowed to make the blessing according to the authorities that a ברכה לבטלה is only rabbinically forbidden – we should apply the same dictum and say ספק רדבנן לקולא.

    ** Here you don’t necessarily say ספק דרבנן לקולא. It’s complicated why, but it doesn’t fit the parameters. There is a חזקת איסור – it was once definitely forbidden. It may be דבר שיש לו מתירין.

    in reply to: The likelihood of raising a half black child as yeshivish #1378853
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Welcome!!

    The other option would be to try to raise him as modern Orthodox, but that is not our first choice because they do not have the matchmaking system in place for marriage purposes that ultra-orthodox people do.

    The choice of how you want your son to grow – Modern orthodox or ultra-orthodox – should not be based on a matchmaking system. Conveniences and practicalities pale in the bigger picture when discussing something as large as the Yiddishkeit of your children – and their generations to come. You should sit and think – seriously think – about your level of commitment to Avoidas Hashem, and whether you are able to commit to ultra orthodox. If you can, אשריך וטוב לך.

    It is also been my experience that of the people that I know who are divorced something like 90% of them are modern Orthodox even though they are no more than 30% of our community.

    Just to echo my previous point – this shouldn’t be the reason to become Ultra Orthodox over Modern Orthodox. It is more likely to be an indication of other issues, however, which should be weighed into your decision.

    in reply to: The likelihood of raising a half black child as yeshivish #1378854
    Chortkov
    Participant

    What have other people heard of the experience of half black children who have tried to be raised as Yeshivish?

    There was a child in a similar situation – but not half black, he was black – who applied to a Chareidi school in London. The school accepted him immediately. When a parent of another child in the school complained that he didn’t want this child in the school, the school threatened to kick out their child, not the black kid.

    To the best of my knowledge, he is very happy in the school.

    Chortkov
    Participant

    To Yekke2 People daven three times a day every day so you should daven the same time you would daven when in Yeshiva.

    You haven’t explained why you feel the time one davens during Bein Hazmanim should be the same time it is in Yeshiva.

    Chortkov
    Participant

    I was brought up with the principle that you set your life around your avoidas Hashem, not the other way around. In other words, we don’t daven when we wake up, we wake up to daven. The idea of deciding which minyan to join was totally foreign to my father; you decided what time you were davening and set your alarm accordingly. If I planned on davening at 7.45 and ended up davening 8.15, in his eyes, that was oversleeping. Not getting up at the time planned was considered a חיסרון in Avoidas Hashem.

    Chortkov
    Participant

    For those who don’t take the admonition of “V’hagesa bo yomam valaylah” literally, it means the reality that there are yom tovim, which require preparation time everyone from the Rosh Yeshiva, the many rabbonim who may be magid shiiur down to the workers in the chadar ochel to the janitors who sweep the floors in the beis medrash. These same people have families and require time off for rest and vacation The reality is that even the most dedicated masmid needs a break. You cannot shteig 24x7x365.

    The Yeshiva system was not set up with holidays simply so that the staff could prepare for Yomim Tovim. The real reason, as you acknowledge at the end of your post – The reality is that even the most dedicated masmid needs a break. You cannot shteig 24x7x365. – Or, to phrase it slightly differently, to ensure optimal shteiging 24x7x365, humans need breaks. For some amazing bochurim – and they are not so rare, b”H – bein hazmanim means learning in a different Beis Hamedrash, perhaps browsing through some Achronim they wouldn’t during zman. I have a chavrusa who learns 12 hours a day during Bein Hazmanim. Most of us need time to recharge our batteries. This is a situation of ביטולו זהו קיומו. So, in summary, B”H is not holiday from Avoidas Hashem, but Avoidas Hashem is to holiday.

    Chortkov
    Participant

    Eli51: A Bochur should daven Schacharis whatever time he davens when he is in Yeshiva during the Zeman. If he davens any later than that he is showing Hashem now that he is off from Yeshiva He is taking a rest from Hashem

    Do you think a bochur should learn during bein hazmanim the same amount that he learns during zman?
    Explain, in your own words, what you feel the function of bein hazmanim is?

    (As far as standards in Halacha/Avoidas Hashem (such as missing zman krias shema, or watching movies), I agree with you, that there is no difference between zman and bein hazmanim, and lowering standards when out of yeshiva indicates a general lack of sincerity or devotion.)

    in reply to: Vegas Massacre: 59 Good Reasons to Outlaw Automatic Weapons #1378682
    Chortkov
    Participant

    But your point is not valid bc it extends to all dangerous items, including trucks, knives etc. Yet for some (emotional?) reason you don’t seem to take the point to it’s obvious conclusion

    You’ll notice I didn’t make a point. I responded to your point, which mixed in Hashem’s control. If you are using HKB”H as an answer, your point makes no sense, as you agreed. I did not get involved as far as balancing public danger and issues of freedom and liberty.

    in reply to: Vegas Massacre: 59 Good Reasons to Outlaw Automatic Weapons #1378590
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Mentsch1: yekke and others
    There are obviously inyanim of hishtadlus here

    Which therefore renders your point moot. The minute you acknowledge that leaving dangerous things in the hands of dangerous people based on trust in Hashem doesn’t work, you acknowledge that leaving guns in the hands of people likely to shoot humans with them is impossible.

    Chortkov
    Participant

    I think it is לכתחילה to daven in any minyan that will catch Krias Shema uBirchoseho with Sof Zman Krias Shema, although I don’t think there is anything wrong with davening until Sof Zman Tefillah, provided you say Krias Shema bizmano.

    My mother was once saying that she thinks it is a Chillul Hashem when she says Bnei Torah (aka Bochurim) going to daven at 10.
    I tried to defend Bochurim International; I asked her that if Hashem asks us to daven between 6 and 11 (Sof zman tefillah today in London is 10.54), why does she think it is necessary to change the time from 6 to 9?
    When my father heard me saying that there is no mekor to daven before sof zman tefillah, he gave me The Look, and said: אישתמיתיה שו”ע או”ח סי’ א’ סע’ א – I forgot the first halachah in Shulchan Aruch. יתגבר כארי לעמוד בבוקר עבודת בוראו שיהא הוא מעורר השחר

    in reply to: What qualifies as chesed #1378577
    Chortkov
    Participant

    The chiyuv of Tzedakah is די מחסרו – what he is lacking. Even if you disagree with the necessity of somebodies standard of living, you are still mechuyav to provide the standard of living he is used to. I’m not saying that this story is something he needs, but I am saying that we have no right to decide what someone is entitled to or what he isn’t.

    The family who lives next door us (in my dirah in Eretz Yisroel) are penniless. Our Dirah has taken it upon ourselves – with the initiative of one particularly generous roommate of mine – to give them [anonymously] some of the basic necessities for Shabbos – we pool the money and leave a box outside their front door every Thursday. Ten minutes later, it disappears. They have no idea where it comes from.

    Once, two of the kids knocked on our door and asked us for candy. When we said we didn’t have, they asked for a shekel to buy some candy. I commented to a friend that this isn’t even tzedakah. He got very upset with me, and said that just because I don’t consider candy a necessity, for a child, this is די מחסרו. If they cannot afford candy, then we are equally obligated to provide candy for the kids as we are to provide vegetables for the adults.

    Chortkov
    Participant

    Randomex – for that price you should have asked what makes Bein Hazmanim different to any other time.

    The difference is that bochurim tend to have little or no structure to Bein Hazmanim, and are therefore free to get up at whatever time they fancy. And the question is – until what time is it considered proper and respectful for a bochur to daven.

    in reply to: So much toirah that I want to learn #1378477
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Set aside specific times and stick to them. Do you prefer to cover ground to learn in depth? If you enjoy covering ground, set yourself a goal – an omud a day? Half an omud a day? Work out a realistic plan for how long this will take, and dedicate that time for learning. If you enjoy learning in depth, don’t set a goal in distance, this will only disturb your goal. But dedicate that hour for learning this particular limmud, and stick to it. If you have a specific time set aside daily for one activity, it is much more likely to be accomplished.

    When it comes to Halachah – especially Hilchos Shabbos – it is very easy to give up. Again, keep a specific time for Halocho, and try keep to schedule as much as you can. If you can commit to a page of Mishna Berura daily, you will cover ground. The key is to be as diligent as possible, because when it comes to Halachah, if you miss your seder once or twice, you will find you are getting nowhere and give up. It’s got to be persistent, determined and diligent.

    The key is in the decision. How much importance you give the limmud will be reflected in your decision to simply learn. Keeping a seder is easier than learning when you have time. Make sure you have a structure.

    in reply to: So much toirah that I want to learn #1378473
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Yekke obviously is not a chassid.

    I think I can safely agree with you on that.

    One of the innovations of Chassidus was the telling of inspirational stories by the Rebbe. This was looked down upon by the others

    You will notice that I deliberately pointed out that I was not “looking down” on storytelling and other such methods of inspiration. Inspiration – however it comes – is an essential tool when it comes to Avoidas Hashem, specifically in our generation when מוסר has been replaced by חיזוק. It just isn’t Torah.

    The Nefesh HaChaim proves from Chaza”l that “Yirah” is the אוצר – storehouse, and תורה is the goods which you fill the storehouse with. Of course, תורה cannot be מתקיים without Yirah. But just amassing Yirah doesn’t help; that’s like fortifying a storehouse which you never fill up.

    Of course you must listen to shiurim which inspire you to elevate yourself. You also must learn Torah. Don’t let one overtake the other.

    in reply to: Vegas Massacre: 59 Good Reasons to Outlaw Automatic Weapons #1378480
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Mentch:
    Do you think we should do away with prisons, and let all the murderers and abusers roam the streets with impunity? After all, no one can do anything against the Will of Hashem; what have we to lose?

    in reply to: Pre-Yom Kippur Request from the helige Coffee Room Posters #1378323
    Chortkov
    Participant

    וכבר היה האדם יכול להיות יושב ובטל והגזירה היתה מתקיימת, אם לא שקדם הקנס לכל אדם, (בראשית ג’) “בזעת אפיך תאכל לחם”, אשר על כן חייב אדם להשתדל איזה השתדלות לצורך פרנסתו, שכן גזר המלך העליון, והרי זה כמס שפורע כל המין האנושי אשר אין להמלט ממנו. על כן אמר בספרי, יכול אפילו יושב ובטל, תלמוד לומר “בכל משלח ידך אשר תעשה”.
    אבל לא שההשתדלות מועילה, אלא שההשתדלות מוכרחת וכיון שהשתדל הרי יצא ידי חובתו, וכבר יש מקום לברכת שמים שתחול עליו, ואינו צריך לבלות ימיו בחריצות ובהשתדלות, הוא מה שאמר דוד המלך ע”ה (תהלים פ”ה) “כי לא ממוצא וממערב וגו’ כי אלקים שופט”. ושלמה המלך אמר (משלי כ”ג) “אל תיגע להעשיר מבינתך חדל”… (מסילת ישרים פרק כא)

    in reply to: So much toirah that I want to learn #1378322
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Listening to a Shiur on Torah Anytime is just as valid as any other learning

    A shiur on TorahAnytime is not as valid as any other learning. I say this for two reasons:

    A) Many modern shiurim – in particularly the style on TorahAnytime – contain plenty of content which isn’t Torah and isn’t learning. I am not discrediting the speakers; for purpose of inspiration, you need to be interesting, you need to be original, and you often need to be funny. Cute anecdotes, powerful stories and emotional flavour is certainly conducive to getting across a message, to keeping the attention of non-attentive people, and to keeping a sometimes heavy shiur light. However, if an hour “Torah shiur” is spent with thirty minutes of Torah and thirty minutes of fluff, you haven’t learnt for an hour.
    Furthermore – listening to something inspiring doesn’t necessarily constitute Limud Torah – even besides for the jokes and stories, even the toichen isn’t necessarily Torah. Of course it is essential to Avoidas Hashem, but Yirah does not equal Torah. See what the Nefesh HaChaim writes in Shaar Daled about people who spend all their time on Yirah and don’t actually learn the Torah.

    B) There is something called ביטול תורה באיכות – qualitative bittul Torah. An hour spent investing all your intellectual capacity and energy into what you are doing is worth infinitely more than an hour spent lying on your bed, staring at your ceiling with earphones plugged in.

    in reply to: Yeshivas Kodshim- Rav Tzvi Kaplan’s Yeshiva #1378319
    Chortkov
    Participant

    I think the Motze Shabbos shiur is the classic Brisker “Chumash Shiur”. Based on the weekly Parshah, he presents a blend of both relevant lomdus, diyukim, and hashkafic lessons that can be drawn from the parsha.

    in reply to: Yeshivas Kodshim- Rav Tzvi Kaplan’s Yeshiva #1377777
    Chortkov
    Participant

    From what I hear, every bochur in the yeshiva can have a great shuychus with the Rosh Yeshiva.

    Just so that you know – there is a lot of pressure. The standards of hasmadah are higher than most similar Yeshivas, and it is expected that you shtell Tzu to that. The shiur room gets locked during shiur; if you need the bathroom, you have to ask the Rosh Yeshiva for the key to get out. On Motze Shabbos, the Rosh Yeshiva gives schmooze for up to three hours at a time. Last zman, he even gave an “emergency schmooze” for all the bochurim and yungerliet, bemoaning the terrible yeridah that bochurim now use the bathroom in the middle of seder, and forbidding it except for emergency cases.

    Many people thrive under the pressure – I have friends who learnt in R’ Tzvi’s, whose attitude to learning totally changed – currently some of the biggest masmidim I know. For those who can cope, the demanding and exacting standards force you to rise to heights you didn’t know you had or never had the zitzfleish to reach. For others, however, it can be a little too stifling. (There are not many avenues of outlet there)

    in reply to: So much toirah that I want to learn #1377795
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Are you in full time learning? Are you discussing during zman or during bein hazmanim?
    Are you working? Are you talking about finding time during your busy schedule?

    If you make your situation clearer, maybe we can help you more.

    in reply to: Will the sun disappear when Moshiach comes? #1376954
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Thank you, Geordie613. I hope you had a meaningful Elul!

    in reply to: Vegas Massacre: 59 Good Reasons to Outlaw Automatic Weapons #1376687
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Outlawing weapons because of a massacre?

    That’s outrageous.

    That’s like outlawing the use of kitchen knives because of stabbing attacks.
    That’s like banning matches because of arsonists.
    That’s like banning unfiltered internet because some people can’t control themselves.

    #CRDSYAG

    in reply to: Will the sun disappear when Moshiach comes? #1376666
    Chortkov
    Participant

    No. The wealth of pesukim, midrashim and gemaras we have that discuss the coming of Moshiach/World to Come are full of references to the sun – e.g. it’s healing powers for tsaddikim, or the fact that the moon will be restored to be as powerful as the sun.

    Maybe you are confusing it with this?
    אמר להם [הקב”ה לאומות העולם]: מצוה קלה אני נותן לכם, אם אתם משמרין אותה אתן לכם שכר כישראל. אמר להם: לכו ועשו סוכה. מיד כל אחד ואחד הולך ועשה לו סוכה. והקב”ה מוציא חמה מנרתיקה וכל אחד מבעט בסוכתו ויוצא, שנאמר: “ננתקה את מוסרותמו”. והקב”ה משחק עליהם, שנאמר: “יושב בשמים ישחק ה’ ילעג למו”.

    HKB”H will offer the goyim the chance to do one mitzvah and get reward – and he will choose the Mitzvah of Sukkah. The Nations of the World will build sukkas. At this point, Hashem will remove the sun from it’s sheath, and each of them will kick their sukkah and leave.

    “Removing the sun from it’s sheath” – at least in the simplest understanding – refers to the strengthening of the sun, not the sun disappearing. (See also Nedarim 8b.)

    in reply to: Yetzer Harah “Defense” Under Halacha #1374198
    Chortkov
    Participant

    There are certain situations which fall below the Bechira level, which – according to R’ Dessler – renders the perpetrator unaccountable for his transgressions. Nevertheless, putting oneself in a situation where one will fall below his level of control is enough to hold him accountable for transgressing.

    Regardless of this, however, no-one has ever got himself off the hook in Beis Din for claiming that the sin he did was below his level of Bechira. בית דין של מעלה may accept that, but in our Beis Din, if you do the forbidden act after accepting the warning from two valid witnesses, we punish you.

    There is one place where we find the Yetzer Hara defence in practical Halacha, although the parameters of this defence are subject to large scale debate in the achronim. The Gemara in Kesuvos 51b mentions a concept of יצרה אלבשה, which is enough that we consider – even in this world – certain situations as אונס, not רצון.

    See also Kiddushin 40a, although not entirely relevant.

    (Of course, this does not apply to disgusting people who have taivos and have no self control.)

    in reply to: What would you say? – Hilchos Brochos #1345867
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Maybe it’s because you specifically had in mind that the original bracha should not cover the cos shel bracha. You can ask the same question by the arba kosos by the Seder. Perhaps it’s the same answer there.

    I’m still here, just haven’t had time to respond to your posts yet.

    That would be a brocho sheina tzricha.

    Arba Kosos is different. The Poskim talk about why each cup has its own bracha, and there are various answers. I don’t think it will help here.

    in reply to: What would you say? – Hilchos Brochos #1345360
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Question – According to the Piskei Teshuvos [that I may continue eating without a new bracha if I had such intention while making the bracha achrona], why when I bentch al hakois do I make a borei pri hagafen on the wine [if I already drank during the seudah]? Surely I plan on drinking it, and the birchas hamazon will not stop that?

    (I don’t like answering that the Borei Peri Hagafen is part of Bentching al HaKois, like Kiddish or Sheva Brochos – it definitely won’t answer why others at the table apart from the mevorech who want to partake of Kois shel Beracha have to make a new bracha.)

    Perhaps there is a difference between regular ברכה אחרונה and birchas hamazon?
    Perhaps here, it is wine which is specifically for after the meal; inasmuch as you are continuing the meal, it is not wine of birchas hamazon?

    in reply to: What would you say? – Hilchos Brochos #1345357
    Chortkov
    Participant

    My position so far (can’t remember if this is in accordance with what I have written previously):

    1. Does a brocho achrona close off a brocho rishona :- Not inherently, unless it would constitute a siluk for some reason.

    2. Is brocho achrona automatically a siluk, in a situation where there is no hesech hada’as: This seems to be the machlokes the Biur Halachah brings down.

    3. Even if it does constitute a siluk, logic dictates that only on something which requires this bracha achronah. It is pretty clear that if you made mezonos on cake and shehakol on water, you may make al hamichya and continue drinking. I would posit that it would not be a siluk on the rice. [I don’t know what to say about a food which requires the same bracha achrona, but you haven’t eaten it yet (eg. al haperos on grapes with intention to continue eating pomegranate) – would that be a siluk? This case causes me a lot of confusion]

    4. If it doesn’t cause a siluk, one would not need to make a new beracha after making a bracha achrona with intention to continue eating (although it would be assur to make the first bracha achrona because you are causing ברכה שאינה צריכה). This is the position of the פסקי תשובות, supposedly quoting a Ra’avad.

    5. Even if it is not a siluk inherently, the act of birchas hamazon without intention to continue eating would be a siluk; it signals the end of the meal.

    in reply to: What would you say? – Hilchos Brochos #1345347
    Chortkov
    Participant

    LU: I appreciate you taking time to respond.

    I hope to have time to read through your posts and respond before I go back – but I don’t know if I’ll manage.

    in reply to: Eclipse Photography #1345296
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Would you ask a painter why he’s painting a pastoral scene, since there are thousands of pastoral paintings already?

    At simchas where I had a camera, I felt less emotionally attached, less involved, less simcha. Yes, I got some fantastic shots of Uncle Barry balancing the bottle on his head while Cousin Yanky did a cartwheel, but I wasn’t part of the Chasuna.

    People are too busy documenting the event for eternity that they forget to experience it themselves.

    And herein lies the distinction – there is definitely an enjoyment in successfully capturing something on film; similar to the painter in Avram MDs example. It is a way of enscribing something through your own personal lens, if you like. So it depends what you are aiming to do – a pastoral scene is always there; you can come back another time to view it. Now I’m here to paint. A once in a lifetime experience – here it depends what you find more exhilirating – the thrill of experience, or the thrill of trying to capture it.

    in reply to: Prove that I am not invisible #1345074
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Or it could be that what you write is frequently true to the point that nobody can argue.

    Truth hasn’t stopped anyone arguing in the past.

    in reply to: Mazel Tov! #1343768
    Chortkov
    Participant

    So last night I was at the same Chasuna as Geordie613.

    Tomorrow night I will be at the same chasunah as NetiquamErro, iy”H.

    Anybody else at any of these weddings? We can only guess…

    Oif Simchas!!

    in reply to: Mazel Tov! #1343775
    Chortkov
    Participant

    Mazal Tov!

    in reply to: What would you say? – Hilchos Brochos #1343282
    Chortkov
    Participant

    The (פסקי תשובות (סי קע”ט writes that if one makes a Brachah Rishonah, eats, and then makes a borei nefashos with intention to continue eating other food, he may continue eating without a new brachah. He must not do this because he is גורם ברכה שאינו צריכה (by requiring himself to make another brachah achrona when one would suffice). [There are cases when it would be muttar or even required – if you are worried that you will pass the שיעור עיכול after drinking, but plan to continue eating (acc. to those that eating doesn’t extend the bentching period of the drinking, and acc. to those that you can continue eating after the זמן עיכול), you must bentch for the first drink, but must have in mind to continue eating, so that you will not have to make a new brocho].

    He doesn’t cite a quote for this psak; he redirects you to where he quotes a ראב”ד in a different siman, which I could not find.

    in reply to: Here we go again with alleged theft of public funds #1343276
    Chortkov
    Participant

    I find it interesting that a yeshiva can steal millions of dollars and it doesn’t bother you.

    Of course it bothers me, as much as any Yid who sins does (with bonus points for a public aveirah).

    I don’t think it is because of misunderstanding of the halachos; it is simply a lack of Yiras Shamayim.

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 1,909 total)