yankel berel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 1,429 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetsky and the modern State of Israel #2452146
    yankel berel
    Participant

    yankel > you have not internalized the calamity of OTD

    aaq> so, I made several posts discussing how to deal with the danger. You did not seem to care about that, and it is me who does not care?

    you are not responding to the point I made [which is common in your rejoinders]

    I said – you have not internalized OTD as a “calamity” .

    I said – you consider OTD as an “inconvenience”
    .
    .

    your suggestions how to deal with OTD, are more of an indication that you consider OTD a mere inconvenience.
    .

    you would support sending all 10 of your kids to the army knowing full well 3 return OTD chvsh

    but you could not , even after repeated prodding , support sending all 10 , knowing they return as cripples chvsh
    .

    because …. returning as cripples – is a clear calamity ….

    whereas returning OTD … in your opinion …. is obviously not .

    .

    in reply to: Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetsky and the modern State of Israel #2452155
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @AAQ

    yankel> don’t see any connection to ‘no true scotsman’ in any of my writings …

    aaq > I meant that – in this case – you seem to only consider chachamim those who agree with your opinion.

    Incorrect.

    I treat both SR and r YB soloveitchik with reverence.

    Both were chachamim .

    Both were outliers and clearly a minority amongst the chachamim in their views.


    What I am saying , and you did not address , is the current draft .

    All chachamim seeing the current draft problem with all its current realities and all its repercussions , agree not to enlist ..

    aaq disagrees ….
    ..
    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2452115
    yankel berel
    Participant

    First of all, Palestine was under grave threat from the Nazi general Rommel, and Hashem supernaturally interceded to save all the Jews there from the evil Nazis ….
    [katan]

    Not ‘supernatural’ .

    that was not a nes .

    just like Israeli military victories are not a nes

    same with the military victory of the british at el alamein – it was not a nes .

    both were clear hashgacha pratit.
    .
    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2452113
    yankel berel
    Participant

    …. and for example, if the United States of America were to take over and annex that as an overseas territory, do you really think that President Trump or a similar leader would allow some savage to ruin that? No, he obviously would not.
    [katan]

    Oh … after so much prodding …

    finally did katan agree to let the cat out of the bag ….

    the secret is out : the US is the mysterious esav who is going to administer EY .

    the same US who withdrew from Afghanistan , Iraq and Lebanon after

    many years ,
    many dead ,
    many wounded
    many trillions of debt,

    that very same US will have the appetite to tolerate another round of their middle eastern adventures ?

    and successive administrations will keep the course ?

    new and changing majorities in congress and senate will keep up their support ?

    ..
    the most important question – what will the situation be when the inevitable withdrawal will happen ?

    what is the situation going to be for the mothers and the children in EY ?

    what is the situation going to be for the elderly in EY ?

    what is the situation going to be for the fathers, the breadwinners and protectors of the family, in EY ?

    what is katan suggesting ?

    to have bitachon ?
    .

    kdushat levi and r yisrael salanter both famously said that
    there is no place for bitachon when someone else’s gashmiyut is at risk …

    am betting that katan would not risk his own house – where he should have bitachon- in such a scenario …

    whoever follows katan in this reasoning , is totally off the torah derech ….
    .

    in reply to: Mochel Loch… time to forgive and be forgiven! #2451592
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @Square Root

    Over the past 2 or 3 weeks, Zionist fanatics
    here in the YWN Coffee Room have repeatedly stated
    that “Chareidim are simply not interested in participating in over 20 endeavors needed by the public”.

    When will the person who made those false
    Motzi Shem Ra attacks do teshuvah?

    Probably never, because lunatics do not do real teshuvah.
    And brainwashed fanatics also do not do real teshuvah.

    When will the people who failed to protest
    those false Motzi Shem Ra attacks do teshuvah?

    They retracted only one of the twenty – the one about hospitals ,
    and let all other motsi shem ra stand …..

    It is erev rosh hashana ….
    .
    .

    in reply to: Moshe Rabbeinu criticizes 2 tribes for not wanting to fight for the Land #2451503
    yankel berel
    Participant

    telling a person he is naive

    and that his naivete may be dangerous

    is not meant as an insult

    and should not be taken that way either

    you cannot keep on talking in the name of ‘the law’ to force people into the army

    when ‘the law’ is being trampled on in the most brazen way by the very same people who

    are supposed to be the most exemplary upholders of that very same ‘law’

    and are the ones fabricating on their own new laws , non existent

    and never passed formal procedures in the knesset

    and clearly contradicting actual laws , passed by all legal necessary procedures

    if this sounds orwellian , it is because this is plain reality obvious to all besides the willfully blind ….
    .
    .

    .
    .
    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2451502
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @katan

    As mentioned before, the point remains: “…as the Satmar Rav wrote decades ago, that non-Zionist rule by a responsible Esav ruler would be far better for Jews there and around the world than would be any Zionist regime. …The details aren’t relevant here…”

    You can look up the Satmar Rav’s holy words and see what he wrote. You can then take that to your LOR and ask him for details and see if he can provide to you those details if you’re really that curious. Please do not claim anything I write to be attributed to anyone’s Rebbi or Rebbe
    [katan]

    in other words – katan hereby admits that he does not have a solution …

    he refers ‘curious’ people to a non defined address

    to explain a non defined idea …

    and on top of all that, still expects the ‘non curious’ people to take him seriously ….
    .
    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2451501
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @somejew

    @katan

    the real full fledged Zionists – shomer shabbos or not – are no longer part of klal yisroel as per Torah guidelines.
    [somejew]

    somejew clearly contradicts karyane de’igrata vol 1 …..

    and contradicts worldwide accepted halachik practise in all batei hora’a

    and all rabanim and dayanim

    all because of some supposed obligation to fit with wrongly preconceived ideological shitah ….
    .
    .

    in reply to: Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetsky and the modern State of Israel #2451500
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @AAQ

    don’t see any connection to ‘no true scotsman’ in any of my writings ….
    .
    .

    in reply to: Should Chareidi demonstrators be drafted. #2451498
    yankel berel
    Participant

    He wasn’t simply “a prime minister 80 years ago”. He founded that idol “State”. But, regardless, yes, he certainly could obligate future governments.
    [katan]

    According to katan – the first PM of the medina could obligate the medina 80 years later….

    that shows the tenuous grasp on reality katan possesses ….

    Not only is katan deficient in the torah and its analysis …

    even to plain reality staring in to your face , to which the torah is meant to be applied, he is deficient …

    how can his maskana count at all ?
    .
    .

    in reply to: Alan Dershowitz and Others Speak Truth #2451496
    yankel berel
    Participant

    Would katan would use the services of any atheist/zionist/reform top surgeons …. ?

    yes or no ?

    . waiting for an honest answer
    .

    katan seems afraid to answer ……

    wonder why ….

    .

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2451495
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @Avi k

    Besides your shitot which are wrong

    your facts are also wrong

    R E Wasserman zatsal clearly refers to the term dati le’umi in his writings

    at the end of kovets he’arot on yevamot

    REW was murdered al kidush hashem in 1941 …
    .
    .
    .

    in reply to: Should Chareidi demonstrators be drafted. #2450863
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @avi k

    because the torah mandates this hishtadlut.

    simple .

    which protects , because they are listening to the torah

    as does – not enlisting

    that’s also listening to the torah

    because he torah mandates listening to the sages who instructed not to enlist

    the q is on you –

    why do you think you are exempt from listening to the sages ?
    .

    in reply to: Moshe Rabbeinu criticizes 2 tribes for not wanting to fight for the Land #2450328
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @AAQ

    You seem to be ignorant of the facts .

    And you are not addressing my point at all.
    .
    .

    politicians DID create a way to stop them.

    the MAJORITY of the Knesset passed many laws to stop them ,

    which were immediately vetoed by the same SC effectively blocking any voter based authority on this subject

    this , while they themselves are the subject of the legislation ….
    .
    .

    your problem is that you are so naive that

    in your wildest dreams they could not do such a thing

    that’s why you discount plain reality right in front of your eyes

    easy to check , read about it , george orwell in action , ….. right here , right now ….

    unbelievable … but true …..

    .
    .

    in reply to: Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetsky and the modern State of Israel #2450327
    yankel berel
    Participant

    AAQ

    your approach stems from your lax attitude towards yahadut

    you have not internalized the calamity of OTD , nor the calamity of OTD lemechtsa , lishlish ulerevi’a

    in your eyes its not more than an inconvenience.

    rav zilberstain is on record permitting hilul shabat !! mamash to avoid the draft, if the draft risks the yahadut of the draftee

    thats only because halacha considers the calamity of OTD for what it really is …
    .

    you have not yet responded to the q about the three sons returning as a cripple as result internal army policy

    whether you would send all 10 of your sons
    .
    .

    learning horayot reminds us how pervasive mistakes are

    so – why do you consider AAQ as more immune to mistakes than the collective of our chachamim ??

    without getting personal – isn’t that a sign of hubris ??
    .
    .

    in reply to: Moshe Rabbeinu criticizes 2 tribes for not wanting to fight for the Land #2449692
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @AAQ

    Reread : Previous post was not clear enough
    .

    The SC canceled every law which they saw as touching their own authority . And that without any legal basis .

    If that’s not illegal , then what is ?
    .

    you seem to be [sorry] ok with

    forming opinions without knowing fact and figures first

    I rather hold of the following approach – First one gathers the facts and the figures , then one forms an opinion , accordingly.
    .
    .

    .
    .

    in reply to: Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetsky and the modern State of Israel #2449691
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @AAQ

    They will not transform the army .

    The army will transform them .
    .

    And that’s exactly their objective !

    thousands of our forefathers lived with mesirut nefesh mamash in order to transmit the mesorah to us

    its much too precious to squander it on some irresponsible ‘temporary feel and look good’ venture ….
    .
    .

    sechor sechor amrinan lenezirah lekarma lo tikrav …

    al tevi’enu lyedie nisayon

    Besides , once they go , the dam has burst and all will go ….

    its time you should be mitchazek a bit more in your emunat chachamim ….

    .
    .

    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2449690
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @katan

    The only ones who would have those details would be those in political power, not ordinary commenters on this forum.
    [katan]


    Katan agrees here that he himself does not have those details …

    Meaning he himself does not know which esav country would be willing to assume control of EY ….

    And which esav country will be accepted by the Arabs in EY …

    And still assumes that he is able to convince his readers of the practicality of his suggestion in 2025

    without him self even knowing what he is suggesting ….

    am wondering whether his readers should be insulted …

    insulted by the apparent lack of basic intelligence katan is imputing to them ….

    .
    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2449688
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @katan

    Those details aren’t needed because the point addressing the OP was sufficiently made without those details …
    [katan]


    There are questions remaining even after your post . Seems that your point was not sufficiently made …..
    .

    in reply to: Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetsky and the modern State of Israel #2449218
    yankel berel
    Participant

    AAQ is insinuating in his latest post that he would send all ten even when having clear foreknowledge that three will come back OTD …

    I don’t have a problem at all with his strategy of minimizing risk

    but sometimes reality is such that losses will for sure occur

    and AAQ has let us know that even in a case of a certain loss of three of his children’s religion , he would still send all ten
    .

    here is the crux of the issue , here is THE point where AAQ deviates from the unanimous haredi sages’ position.

    AAQ is willing to sacrifice three of his sons’ religion

    on the altar of ‘sharing burdens’ and on the altar

    of the false hope of finding favor in eyes of those who disdain us

    while the haredi consensus is

    that our children’s religion is one of the most precious things one can have, not to be bartered for anything in the universe

    By the way , AAQ has not insinuated at all , about what he would do if he had foreknowledge that 3 of his sons would come back as cripples chv’sh , not as result of combat , but as result of internal army policy ?

    From his lack of answer we could safely assume that he would not send any of his ten sons ….

    .

    and here comes the million dollar question –

    MA NISHTANA between 3 sons without religion and 3 sons without their health [both chv’sh] ???

    I suspect that AAQ considers – like all other critics on this page , and all around the world for that matter …-

    loss of religion, a relatively minor problem , while a lack of health a major one ….

    .
    .
    The difference between the Sages and their critics is this following point :
    how tragic and how major is the issue of decline in yirat shamayim or the issue of OTD ?

    Is it a calamity ?

    or an inconvenience ?
    .

    if you support forced haredi draft, it is an inconvenience .

    if you resist haredi draft, it is a calamity.
    .
    .

    quite simple…..
    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2449217
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @katan

    katan :
    The point remains: “…as the Satmar Rav wrote decades ago, that non-Zionist rule by a responsible Esav ruler would be far better for Jews there and around the world than would be any Zionist regime. …The details aren’t relevant here, nor is anyone obligated to provide them to the idolaters here.”

    Why are the details not relevant ?

    Why are we not obligated to provide them ?

    Do we have those details at all ?

    .

    in reply to: Should Chareidi demonstrators be drafted. #2449216
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @avi k

    @zsk

    @are roster

    They obviously believe that the Torah protects. Thats why they are learning whenever not protesting.
    The reason why they protest is because they listen to the Sages who advised to protest.
    Because the torah commanded them to listen to the Sages.
    So , listening to Sages is another form of listening to the Torah , which protects.
    So yes, protesting protects from the gezerat shmad which is imposed on them by your friends.
    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2448992
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @katan

    katan :
    Any objective observer would conclude, as the Satmar Rav wrote decades ago, that non-Zionist rule by a responsible Esav ruler would be far better for Jews there and around the world than would be any Zionist regime. This blows the mind of the Zionist idolaters, but that’s the reality. The details aren’t relevant here, nor is anyone obligated to provide them to the idolaters here.

    Utter folly.

    SR wrote that in the fifties or in the forties when huge nations were ruled by colonial empires.

    This era is long gone.

    There no Arab populations being governed by esav anywhere on the globe for a long time.

    There is a valid reason for that , just in case you don’t know …

    They think that they can do a much better job.

    Right or wrong , but that’s what they think .

    So once mr katan will agree to this reality , which even a ten year old can grasp ,

    then we are in business …. Arabs will not agree to be governed by outsiders , esav or not , SR or not .

    Katan claims that he has some big secret in his bag , which for some mysterious reason we are not allowed to know about ….

    the details of the future governing power in EY ….

    he has let on that it is esav , but the rest we still have to guess …. why ???

    Aha , because we are “idolaters” …..

    Thats seems a fitting punishment for zionists like us !

    We are sentenced to mandatory guessing games ….

    When will katan and somejew be honest enough to agree that they do not have a solution for the pikuach nefesh needs of the jews in EY ?

    When will that happen ?

    Because , without honesty , it is exceedingly difficult to have real debate ….

    .
    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2448881
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @ujm

    Come on ….

    Inter – Arab violence and clear mass pikuach nefesh in all 12 instances I mentioned which happened over the last 20 years are because of the Zionists ????

    Hamas throwing Arabs off high rises is because of zionists ??

    They have no regard whatsoever for human life , not their own and for sure not about their perceived enemies.

    This is not written as a passing of moral judgement .

    This is merely an observation of reality.

    A reality which cannot be wished away .

    A reality which has to be dealt with .

    Same with all other 12 examples of totally depraved barbarities

    depicted in real life right in front of our very eyes over the last 20 years all around the Middle East .

    katan and somejew remind me of the proverbial ostriches

    instead of burying their heads in the sand

    they turn the clock back to the 1880’s – voila , no problems at all ….. all solved …..

    its all the z ‘s fault ….

    as if that changes reality by a millimeter …..
    .

    .

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2448857
    yankel berel
    Participant

    Re R Steinman

    I think the answer is simple.

    Did he support the draft ?

    Absolutely not.

    But he recognized that we do not live in an ideal world , and that necessitates pragmatism

    he recognized that haredim are a minority living in galut.

    the binary choice would -in his view- be

    between all out war with the majority as it unfortunately became the case now, and

    a tacit approval for the weaker non yir’at shamayim element , or better said the hefker OTD crowd who still wear haredi levush

    to enlist and have a rigid framework , while all other haredim , including the working element legally deferring or being exempted.

    So , barring a clear cut case of haredi levush but already OTD , he would advise not to enlist

    that’s my understanding of his approach , and may be wrong …
    .

    in reply to: Moshe Rabbeinu criticizes 2 tribes for not wanting to fight for the Land #2448856
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @AAQ
    If you think they are violating some rules, then other parts of the system, like Knesset, should be able to override them …

    Fully agreed.

    They should be able to override …

    You are not updated, seems like – they did override them , multiple times …

    They canceled every law which they saw as touching their own authority . And that without any legal basis .

    If that’s not illegal , then what is ?

    you seem to be [sorry] ok with something called the ‘ostrich approach’

    I rather hold of the following approach – First one gathers the facts and the figures , then one forms an opinion , accordingly.
    .
    .

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2447910
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @AAQ

    thanks for the correction about the mareh makom of the turei zahav

    my memory is not exact enough

    there is no difference between a ben torah and talmid chacham , however ,

    the principle of turei zahav stands regardless
    .

    in reply to: Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetsky and the modern State of Israel #2447909
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @non political

    you are 100 % right in your observation
    .
    .

    the question I am repeatedly posing to AAQ , and did not merit to receive a straight answer to — yet , is

    a hypothetical one

    AAQ obviously does not have 10 sons eligible for the Israeli draft , and

    obviously he has no foreknowledge what is going to happen to them
    .

    but AAQ [in addition to countless others] is very quick to pass judgement on the leaders of haredi judaism

    for their advice discouraging the draft.

    AAQ himself , even after numerous direct and targeted prodding , declined to answer 2 simple questions
    .

    It is safe to assume that the reason of his repeated non answer is

    because he knows that any honest answer will include a negative – no , he will not send any of his sons
    .

    in the case of three of them returning as a cripple, for sure not

    and in the case of three of them returning OTD , also not.
    .

    so AAQ himself in regard to his own children would advise them not to enlist …
    .

    why is he critical of gdolei yisrael who advise the exact same to

    their students who alpi torah are considered like their own children ?
    .
    .

    it is becoming clearer and clearer that criticism of non enlistment

    is rooted in either a lack of care for the individual to be enlisted, or

    a lack of care about the overwhelming calamity of this individual going OTD

    .
    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2447417
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @katan

    … it’s not very relevant what to expect from Arab rule in the holy land …, because nobody suggested that Arabs should rule there …
    [katan]

    plain incorrect .

    somejew is clearly on record , claiming repeatedly that Arabs are respected and should be trusted with government in EY.

    I asked 12 realistic questions – no answer whatsoever has been forthcoming ,yet ….

    katan, however , claims some ‘unnamed esav’ should be trusted to take over government

    katan consistently declines to name that country , however.

    it seems it’s meant to be some sort of surprise …. in the ruach of purim maybe ….

    when katan will deign to specify which country is going to be trusted to shield EY’s jews from a wild and hating Arab populace

    we should ask him too whether the same wild Arab populace of EY , has agreed to be governed by this ‘esav country’ ??

    very important question …

    maybe katan knows what we do not know ….

    maybe katan knows of other Arab populations which are governed by ‘esav vountries’ ??

    he should share their names with us

    just in the very unlikely case that we will be met with deafening silence as an answer [or with sidestepping]

    which will cause us to take this an admission that there are not any esav countries governing Arab populations on the globe

    the next question will come up – why not ??

    why are no Arab populations governed by any esav countries ??
    .
    .

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2447382
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @ujm

    the only plausible reason I can see on

    why people take the issue of OTD lightly – is that they only pay lip service to this whole scare of OTD

    they do not really care about it ….

    so they belittle it …

    no study , no this , no that …..
    .
    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2447381
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @katan

    As it happens, though, there is a different example, Morocco, where even now the Jewish community still exists, with active support of their Muslim king who has restored synagogues and promoted Jewish heritage.
    [katan]

    I hear your answer here.

    But mr katan , what is your honest opinion ,

    will EY under Arab control resemble Morrocco , a stable country for as long as we can remember, or

    one of the other 12 examples of recent and present mass pikuach nefesh areas in the ME ?

    considering the exagerated grievances the Arab locals are being fed with their mother’s milk for many generations

    and considering the wide support hamas and islamic jihad receive in Arab society

    and considering hamas’ stated policy of “the suitcase or the coffin” [H yishmor]

    or their promise to duplicate October 7 again again , until there are no more jews left in palestine [H yishmor]

    an honest answer mr katan – would you wager your own house on this ????

    .
    honesty – honesty , goes a long way ……
    .
    .

    in reply to: Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetsky and the modern State of Israel #2447379
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @AAQ

    the q is still very simple – in a case when it cannot be helped !

    if it is impossible to rectify it, when you know for sure that this is a fixed result , no matter what advice you give the kids,
    .

    A] 3 kids are coming back crippled l’o

    would you send all ten – yes or no ?
    .

    B] 3 kids are coming back without their religion l’o

    would you send all ten – yes or no ?

    no reason to fear an honest answer …

    .

    in reply to: Moshe Rabbeinu criticizes 2 tribes for not wanting to fight for the Land #2447375
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @AAQ

    saying something is illegal when it is illegal is not “vile” at at all

    it is merely stating a legal fact

    Hafets Hayim would never object to that
    .

    in reply to: Moshe Rabbeinu criticizes 2 tribes for not wanting to fight for the Land #2447376
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @aaq

    Never said their position was not a legitimate position as a private opinion within the Israeli State.

    According to Israeli law they can advocate for this position , run for election , and attempt that their position should garner a majority and then pass it into law.

    Totally within their rights acc to Israeli Law .

    But to falsely label full time torah students as criminals , dodgers or fugitives etc , when SC’s cancellation of the Tal Law was done in an unauthorized and therefore illegal way , is beyond acceptable .

    The people acting as enforcers of this illegal decision, are legally nothing more than kidnappers .

    This is a plain legal issue , not a call to violence at all.

    The SC cancelling Knesset’s law regulating the SC’s own authority is nothing more than one big farce. Even a ten year old sees through it.

    This not “vile” ,

    this is accurate.
    .

    in reply to: Moshe Rabbeinu criticizes 2 tribes for not wanting to fight for the Land #2447374
    yankel berel
    Participant

    My imperfect understanding that politically the law was damaged by lack of results – while it proposed a path for charedim to integrate, that did not happen. That was a chance for some compromise, but I guess both sides decided to risk and press their advantage.
    [aaq]

    Yes, I do agree that yours is an imperfect understanding , sorry about that.

    The ONLY reason Tal law is not officially in force now – is the SC .

    Nothing else.

    They used non-existing authority to cancel it.

    So it legally follows – that if cancellation is illegal – the law is legally still in force.
    .
    Simple.
    .

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2447315
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @AAQ

    its a mitsva for a ben torah to be asleep at 3 am

    he needs to concentrate the next day

    cf. turei zahav EH 23.

    .

    yankel berel
    Participant

    @AAQ

    Got news for you .

    Majority of Knesset is of the same opinion as me .

    They acted already .

    They passed laws curtailing the SC’s illegal activities .

    Which were illegally overturned by that very same SC.

    Those illegal rulings by the SC were illegally enforced by thugs, paid by leftists , who virtually stopped everything.

    And threatened to destroy the whole country if SC’s power is diminished in any way.

    They were aided and abetted by the MSM and the corrupt judicial system .

    So without any recourse , the Knesset was rendered practically powerless …..

    Unbelievable – right ?

    I couldn’t make it up …

    These are the plain facts….

    Follow the Israeli news , and its all there …..
    .

    in reply to: Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetsky and the modern State of Israel #2447308
    yankel berel
    Participant

    I am still [patiently…] waiting for AAQ’s wisdom ….
    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2447307
    yankel berel
    Participant

    Katan is too scared to answer questions

    He knows that honesty will not serve him too well ….
    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2446492
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @katan

    A few questions for katan – which the Brisker Rav did not address …
    .

    katan will have to use his own head ….

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for yazidi’s in the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for alawites in the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for kurds in the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for xtians in the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for druze in the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for arabs from each other in Sudan within the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for arabs from each other in Libya within the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for arabs from each other in Yemen within the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for arabs in Gaza from hamas within the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for arabs from each other in Lebanon within the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for arabs from each other in Iraq within the Middle East in the last 20 years ?


    Assuming katan and somejew are honest enough to give accurate responses to the above questions

    the question follows –

    why do they assume that the hated and demonized jews will fare any better that the above mentioned fellow arabs and fellow muslims ?

    hope the lalaland somejew and katan commenters will not, like a one trick pony , broken record like, start us about the supposedly idyllic situation of the jews in moslem lands before the advent of zionism some 120 years ago.

    This is totally irrelevant .

    What is relevant — is what we can logically expect from the Arabs in 2025 …

    the question is dramatic and immediate – MA NISHTANA IN 2025 ,

    why are all those fellow arabs and fellow muslims in sakana over the last 20 years ,

    and the jews will suddenly be safe ???

    .
    .

    .

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2446489
    yankel berel
    Participant

    notice to katan –

    All ‘real non-Zionist posekim’ paskin halacha lema’aseh, that

    the subsequent children of a grusha, divorced with a get signed by fully frum athalta digeuola believers , to be ksherim lavo bakahal .

    this is pashut and also easily verifiable .

    this is fully in line with steipler who unequivocally states

    its assur to speak lashon hara about dati le’umi as they are not yatsa michlal amitecha …
    .
    .
    .

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2446482
    yankel berel
    Participant

    Brisker Rav published a KK signed by the Gerrer Rebbe and many others that “Dati Leumi” education is a “sea of heresy mixed in with a drop of Torah”.”

    KK was referring to dati le’umi hinuch in their era and their locale.

    Nothing more.

    And , again, the KK was lesheim hitrachkut , not to entrust your children to them.

    Not lehalacha.

    .

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2446485
    yankel berel
    Participant

    Notice to katan .

    sfarim hakdoshim write that ka’as is heresy .

    Wine of a ko’es is not yayin nesech ….
    .

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2446479
    yankel berel
    Participant

    Rav Elchonon states b&w in kovetz maamarim that “Dati leumi” is literal idolatry.

    REW z’l did not issue any halacha psak that “Dati leumi” is literal idolatry.

    Far from it.

    This was a ma’amar hashkafa , and meant as mussar vehit’orerut.

    Not lehalacha.

    Pashut to any beginner ….
    .

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2446476
    yankel berel
    Participant

    Chazon Ish NEVER stated that dati le’umi wine is yayin nesech.

    None of chazon ish devotees ever considered dati leumi touched wine as yayin nesech.

    This a verifiable fact .

    There are hundreds of chazon ish devotees in BB , serious talmidei hahamim .

    Utter baloney.
    .

    in reply to: Moshe Rabbeinu criticizes 2 tribes for not wanting to fight for the Land #2446452
    yankel berel
    Participant

    AAQ

    the reason I employ the term ‘legally considered kidnappers’ is merely a reaction

    a reaction to the tsunami of moralizing and smearing adjectives thrown in the direction of innocents

    adjectives like ‘lawbreakers’ or ‘criminals’ or ‘dodgers’, which are misplaced.

    full time learners , and haredim more generally, are a minority treated with disdain and derision

    in a sea of powerful well-oiled secularism

    not only haredim are treated with said disdain and derision –

    settlers of the dati le’umi variety have the doubtful privilege to receive the same type of treatment in Israel ,

    they are also a despised minority there , although the latest turn of the political wheels

    made them temporarily forget their ‘special status’

    the wheels in Israel turn very fast …
    .

    in reply to: Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetsky and the modern State of Israel #2446243
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @aaq

    ??
    .

    in reply to: Moshe Rabbeinu criticizes 2 tribes for not wanting to fight for the Land #2445989
    yankel berel
    Participant

    AAQ

    but that was not what my post was about .

    my post was about the legality of the kidnappers who enforce the illegal draft

    speaking in a strictly legal sense

    which you did not address at all

    .

    in reply to: Moshe Rabbeinu criticizes 2 tribes for not wanting to fight for the Land #2445987
    yankel berel
    Participant

    AAQ

    Israel is not America .

    To use American tactics in Israel is naive and therefore dangerous .

    You will be taken for a ride .

    As experience has amply shown.
    .

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2445986
    yankel berel
    Participant

    Katan is continuing to live in lala land …

    A few questions for him – which the Brisker Rav did not address …

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for yazidi’s in the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for alawites in the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for kurds in the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for xtians in the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for druze in the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for arabs from each other in Sudan within the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for arabs from each other in Libya within the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for arabs from each other in Yemen within the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for arabs in Gaza from hamas within the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for arabs from each other in Lebanon within the Middle East in the last 20 years ?

    Is / was there pikuach nefesh for arabs from each other in Iraq within the Middle East in the last 20 years ?


    Assuming katan and somejew are honest enough to give accurate responses to the above questions

    the question follows –

    why do they assume that the hated and demonized jews will fare any better that the above mentioned fellow arabs and fellow muslims ?

    hope the lalaland somejew and katan commenters will not, like a one trick pony , broken record like, start us about the supposedly idyllic situation of the jews in moslem lands before the advent of zionism some 120 years ago.

    the question is dramatic and immediate – MA NISHTANA IN 2025 ,

    why are all those fellow arabs and fellow muslims in sakana over the last 20 years ,

    and the hated [no difference why] jews will suddenly be safe ???
    .
    .

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 1,429 total)