Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
WolfishMusingsParticipant
“Why do you stay in prison when the door is wide open? “
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantArsenic.
The Wolf
December 31, 2011 11:37 pm at 11:37 pm in reply to: Was there really a spitter in Beit Shemesh? #840366WolfishMusingsParticipantThat group numbers less than 30 men, from a city of 100,000 people.
I did not dispute that.
Secondly, if that’s the issue, I’ve addressed the legalities of the protesters here: http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/the-best-response-to-the-rbs-terror (Read all my comments there.)
I’ll read it when I have the chance.
Thirdly, you should be more bothered by what is being protested than by the protesters, considering that from a secular law perspective both dressing immodestly and protesting that is both legal, yet from a halachic perspective both aren’t legal.
There are ways to properly protest and there are ways to not properly protest. Yelling “slut” and “whore” at little girls is not the proper way.
But you know what? I guess it doesn’t matter what I say. After all, if you want to question whether or not there was a spitter, why not go all the way and question whether there is even a school there and whether there are people yelling? After all, what can I say? I didn’t personally see them from seven thousand miles away, so perhaps I don’t know what I’m talking about since I’m just a dumb apikorsish non-Chreidi American idiot who doesn’t know “bein y’mino l’smolo” and doesn’t deserve to even share the same universe with normal human beings, let alone those who are staunchly defending the honor of the Torah.
The Wolf
December 31, 2011 11:34 pm at 11:34 pm in reply to: Was there really a spitter in Beit Shemesh? #840365WolfishMusingsParticipantI will judge Mr. Wolf lkaf zchus
There is absolutely no reason to be dan l’kav z’chus when it comes to me. Just like Bilaam, you are allowed to assume the worst about me.
That being said, so I assume that somehow the non-Chareidim in the area somehow instigated the yelling of “prutzah” and “zonah” at little girls?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI wear a black yarmulke.
However, since it’s knit, that probably doesn’t count according to some shittos. So I guess, ultimately, you could say that I walk around and daven bareheaded.
Just another sign of the wickedness and evil that is me.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantIf you have peyos covering your ears during prayer, then the “Heavenly Ear” will not hear your tefillos. This is what i read in the cr on another thread. I could be wrong, though.
I sometimes cover my ears (with my hands) during davening.
I guess that’s just another sign that I’m an apikorus.
The Wolf
December 30, 2011 8:44 pm at 8:44 pm in reply to: Was there really a spitter in Beit Shemesh? #840361WolfishMusingsParticipantThe truth of the matter is that the spitter is the least of the problems.
The problem is whole groups of grown men who go down to a school of young girls to yell at them, calling them “prutzah” and “zonah.”
The problem is a group of grown men who believe that it’s proper to hang around a school inspecting the legs of little girls for stockings rather than to remain in the beis midrash where they belong.
The problem is a group of grown men who feel that somehow yelling “prutzah” and “zonah” at people (and little children!!) is the best way to get people to dress in the style they want, rather than trying the approach of Aharon who was an Oheiv Shalom v’Rodef Shalom.
The problem is a group of men who seem to think that they can move into a mixed neighborhood with a history of harmonious living and try to force everyone to things *thier* way.
Those are the real issues. The spitter is just the straw that broke the camel’s back. And if, for the sake of argument, he never existed, that doesn’t change the real problems here, which are very real.
The Wolf
December 30, 2011 7:13 pm at 7:13 pm in reply to: Was there really a spitter in Beit Shemesh? #840356WolfishMusingsParticipantThat’s it, WolfishMusings, mock the point.
I’m not mocking. I’m just showing you that if you’re willing to begin engaging in conspiracy theories (i.e. “there is no spitter, this is all manufactured to make chareidim look bad”), then we can carry that all the way.
The Wolf
December 30, 2011 6:47 pm at 6:47 pm in reply to: Was there really a spitter in Beit Shemesh? #840353WolfishMusingsParticipantKnowing well the chareidi-hatred permeating the Israeli media, we know from very many past experiences that the media can manafacture lies against chareidim from cloth.
Next up: How do we know there was a girl? “She’s” really a 35 year old man with dwarfism in a disguise paid by the media to make chareidim look bad.
After that: Who says there are really people protesting at the school? It’s really a bunch of actors hired by the chareidi-hating media to make chareidim look bad.
After that: How do we know that there is even a non-chareidi school there? I think that the media set up the whole operation (including bussing in chiloni kids day after day for months, hiring actors to play teachers, parents, etc.) to make chareidim look bad.
The next step: Who says that there are even non-chareidim living in Beit Shemesh at all? The “chareidi-hating media” rented all those houses, brought in a bunch of leftist troublemakers to make it look to the world like there is a thriving non-chareidi community, and set up the conflict years ago by starting to build a school, knowing that the chareidim were going to eventually move into the area.
The next step: How do we know that there are any non-chareidim at all in Israel? Maybe all these chilonim, dati-leumi and others are brought in from neighboring countries just to cause trouble and make the peaceful chareidim of Israel look bad?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantthe other side of the coin is saying to put things in perspective.
That’s exactly what I tried to do above *without* bringing other people’s tragedies into the picture.
The Wolf
December 30, 2011 5:52 pm at 5:52 pm in reply to: Point to Ponder: Would you prefer a physical virus, or computer virus? #840234WolfishMusingsParticipantIt would depend on which physical virus and which computer virus.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantYou know, if you think about it, it’s a good thing that when Pope Gregory skipped 10 days in 1582* to correct deficiencies in the Julian calendar, that he only skipped the calendar dates and not the actual days of the week. Otherwise, we’d be celebrating Shabbos in the middle of the work week. 🙂
The Wolf
* Thursday, Oct 4, 1582 was followed by Friday, October 15, 1582.
WolfishMusingsParticipantThank you, Sam2. That’s pretty much the sentiment I was trying to express, but you did it with much more eloquence.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantAre they going to be accused of being Mechalel Shabbos?
Not if they keep Shabbos seven days after the previous Shabbos, regardless of what the day is called.
The Wolf
December 30, 2011 4:40 am at 4:40 am in reply to: To All Insulters/Name-Callers, Myself Included #839926WolfishMusingsParticipantKol Haposel Chaveiro B’mumo Posel.
I guess that means that I, truly, am a doodyhead.
The (doodyhead) Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantThey are using the individual who screamed prutza to the eight year old girl as their rallying cry to break all boundaries of tznius.
Nonsense.
First of all, it’s not one individual — have you seen the vidoes where the men shout at the girls as they come and go to and from school?
Secondly, you’re implying that the whole incident was manufactured to “break all boundaries of tznius,” therefore requiring a zealous response. That’s clearly not the case as the parents at OROT would have rather none or this would have happened in the first place.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantwhether it’s uncovering her hair in her husband’s presence, or singing for him, or dancing with him, or anything else…hakol mutar. No tznius police in the private domain of married couples.
Ah, I seem to remember that there was once one poster on these boards who made it a point to say it wasn’t “hakol mutar.” The specific example he used was mixed swimming (even in private) was forbidden.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantHis point was that the reasoning behind posters’ condemnation of zealotry would, if followed through consistently
So, in other words, he’s comparing fighting back against an armed force that is preventing people from learning and performing Mitzvos to people who scream “prutzah” and “zonah” to six, seven and eight year old girls?
Or is it possible, just possible, that some zealotry is good and others are bad?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI won’t respond to you until you ask EEES (your wife) her opinion about Frum women belly-dancing! Then we will discuss it.
OK, I’ve asked Eees. She has no problems with women learning belly-dancing to be used in the privacy of their homes with their husbands (if taught in an all-female class).
Now, please answer my question as you agreed. Is this a problem for you?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantThey just resort to insults, name-calling, judging, accusing, and embarrassing
If it offended you, I apologize for my “doodyhead” comment.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantThis is getting very childish, and sillier by the hour. I am waiting for someone to call someone a doodyhead and stick out their tongue.
Oh, don’t be such a doodyhead. :p 🙂
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI won’t respond to you until you ask EEES (your wife) her opinion about Frum women belly-dancing! Then we will discuss it.
In private and for their husbands? I’m sure she’d be for it if that was what they wanted.
Nonetheless, I’ll ask her if it will make you feel better – and then we’ll discuss.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantStraw man.
No one suggested abolishing channukah.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI saw a dot. Therefore, ipso facto, it is not blank.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI was at a wedding once where the father of the Kalla collpased at the Mitzvah Tantz and died of a heart attack on the spot!
Felling better Cinderella???;)))
I’m confused. Did this really happen or are you just making a point?
And if it really happened, then why the smiley face at the end? That’s horrible — and I can’t imagine that someone else’s greater tragedy should make her (relatively minor) misfortune seem any better.
The Wolf
December 29, 2011 6:36 pm at 6:36 pm in reply to: sub-titles and privacy !SAY NO TO SUB-TITLES #839653WolfishMusingsParticipantSAY NO TO SUB-TITLES
Me: Subtitle?
Subtitle: Yes?
Me: NO!
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWhy do they read all these old cases and then have to write papers about what happened in the past?
Google the term “legal precedent.”
In short, people learn what is relevant to them. How dentists drilled teeth 200 years ago is probably not relevant to them today*, so they don’t learn it (except, perhaps as history).
Previous court cases, however, *are* relevant today, and so they are studied.
The Wolf
* I’m assuming so, anyway. IANAD.
WolfishMusingsParticipantso you wouldn’t have a problem if women learn and do belly-dancing in class, right?
Why not? And she can dance for her husband in the privacy of their own home. Or is that a problem for you as well?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipant:: grabbing the popcorn and sits back, waiting for the show to begin ::
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipant70 faces to the Torah
Some people’s idea of shivim panim laTorah is the same as Henry Ford’s idea of consumer choice regarding the color of the Model T:
“Any customer can have a car painted any colour that he wants so long as it is black.”
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantAt the risk of asking a silly question…
Did you ask your Rav (or whomever you turn to for guidance)?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantmy 2 worst nightmares
While I agree that both of the events are unpleasant experiences, are they really the *worst* things you can imagine happening at a wedding?
May those unpleasant experiences be the worst you ever suffer.
The Wolf
(Yes, I meant that bracha sincerely)
WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf, denial is not a place in Egypt, and there should not be many wolves there anyway. The truth hurts.
There is no truth. You made an assertion (that MO rabbis decide halacha at random) and provided no evidence to that assertion. When you provide some evidence to your baseless accusation, we’ll begin to talk about whether or not I’m in denial.
In any event, apparently your mother never taught you proper manners. You see, when it’s been pointed out that something you said is hurtful, the proper response is “I’m sorry” not “denial’s not just a place in Egypt.” Heck, I’m not even MO and I was really bothered by what you said. I can only imagine what the MO people on this board must be feeling about your callous remark.
But what the heck, let’s take this all the way then. I have a hat full of piskei halacha here and I think I’ll determine what I’m going to do by just picking them at random. After all, that’s how you think the MO determine halacha anyway, right?
Well, here’s one that says that I can cook on Shabbos. Oh, well, it’s not Shabbos today, so I guess I can toss that one.
Here’s one that says that I can eat treif today. Oh, goody. It just so happens that I have a coupon for McDonalds that I can use.
Here’s another one that says that I have to shuckle precisely 73 times while davening Shmoneh Esrei this afternoon. I guess I’ll have to follow that one since I pulled it out of the hat today.
Now for the last one…
… ok, this one says I have to kill myself today as a kapparah for violating an aveirah with a chiyuv of the death penalty. Well, I guess I’m off to do that too. I have to follow it, since I pulled it out of the “random piskei halacha hat.”
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantnot every shitta, randomly pulled out of the hat(as is the minhag by the MO), one is allowed to rely on.
Not every chumra, randomly pulled out of the hat (as is the minhag by chareidim), one is allowed to rely on.
Didn’t like that, did you?
Personally, I am disgusted that you seem to think that it’s perfectly all right to accuse the entire MO movement of deciding halacha by something as capricious and arbitrary as “randomly pull[ing]” rulings “out of a hat.”
I think you owe every one of them an apology.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI will not copy music illegally — whether some Rav tells me that it’s permitted or not. Period.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWhen posters feel the need to sign each and every post.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf- Yes, now you’re mamesh a menuval and a mechalel shabbos: )
I fail to see what chillul Shabbos has to do with this topic.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantYou mean most amaratzim are repelled by the idea. They would feel the same with an uncle marrying a niece.
And a 90 year old man with a 13 year old girl… also perfectly fine l’halacha and yet would rate high on the “ick” factor of most people.
Just because a marriage is perfectly valid halachically doesn’t mean that it can’t “ick” one out. And just because it does, that doesn’t mean that s/he is an am haaretz.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantNo, nor do I think people will consider you a kofer if you don’t bow at Modim when you’re in the middle of S”E. You’re still not supposed to do things that give off a bad appearance, though.
Your example (“faking it” by Modim) is part of normative halacha. Therefore, that is an occasion where the “deceit” is explicitly sanctioned by halacha. I don’t think my case has the same explicit permission to deceive.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantAnd I was told that the tooth fairy will put a dollar under my pillow.
A dollar? I only got a quarter.
Seriously, however, I heard mine as a p’sak halacha. You did not.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantMy kids (all teens) will be a Channukah party with their cousins of the opposite genders as well. Yes, I know that I’m a perfect example of a menuval.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantThe same might be said to apply here. *NOT* lip synching when the tzibur is singing Hashem’s praises might be worse than lip synching.
You really think that people will think that I’m a kofer if I don’t sing? I think that’s *very* unlikely.
There are plenty of legitimate grounds to consider me a kofer, but I don’t think the lack of singing during hakafos on Simchas Torah quite rises to that level.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI was told that I am not allowed to eat my own cooking as a mechallel Shabbos.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantdoes anyone in your shule really care whether you were singing or not?
Probably not. Nonetheless, I still have my concerns.
If it bothers you to lip-sync, then don’t do it.
That’s all fine and well for the future. However, since I lack a functioning flux-capacitor, 88 gigawatts of power and a DeLorean, I cannot change any misconceptions that have already happened.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWhat do you think about giving three names??
As I mentioned above, one of my children has three names.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantThis reminds of the famous shaila about how do you take ma’aser on salt and straw.
Yeah, a regular Eisav HaRasha. That’s me.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantwhy do you need to sing (or lip synch) why can’t you dance with your mouth closed or even take a break from singing and dancing to save your voice?
Good question. Perhaps because I feel like I’m not really participating otherwise.
Yes, I grant you that that’s a silly feeling… but it’s what I have to work with.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantSo what are Walter, George, and Wilma’s full names?
Mitty, of the Jungle and Flintstone.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWell, I am a mechallel Shabbos (as discussed elsewhere), but I have not been posting on Shabbos. So, it’s not me.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipant1. Do you tend to give them one name or two (i.e., Reuven ben…, or Ruven Shimon ben…)?
Two of my kids have two names. The other has three.
2. Do you tend to name after relatives or great Torah scholars?
We named after relatives who were very special to us or others in the family.
3. Would you name a boy after a female relative? I won’t ask the other way around, since it’s clear this is not a good idea (kedusha should go upwards).
No.
4. Would you name a child after a non-choshuv relative (some will do this, but will have a different more choshuv person in mind when actually doing the naming. It matters not what you tell your relatives in terms of who the baby is named after – you know the truth)
Depends on your definition of “choshuv.” None of the people we named our kids after were rabbanim. Some weren’t even frum. Yet, they were all “choshuv” and special to us.
5. And do you give you children English names? If you only give them one Hebrew name, would you give them an English middle name?
Our children’s legal names are their Hebrew ones. Those are the ones on their birth certificates.
The Wolf
-
AuthorPosts