Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
WolfishMusingsParticipant
Somehow, your definition of a “hero” seems to be far different from mine.
Needless to say, very few, in any people in the audience were “heroes.” That’s not to say that they weren’t engaged in something beneficial and positive, but doing so does not make one a “hero.”
And if that opinion makes me a spiritual heir of the eruv rav, then fine. I never claimed to be better than the eruv rav. Heck, at least the eruv rav managed to keep Yom Tov, unlike me who, according to a prominent rav in my neighborhood, has not kept Yom Tov for quite a while.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipanti sat on the ambulance for most of the night which some consider to be a waste of time.
I don’t think that anyone would say that working saving lives is a waste of time.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI spent most of the chag studying Neuropsych…I’m really going to hell. See ya wolfie!
Not learning at night on Shavuous will not land you in hell. Heck, everyone staying up all night learning is a (relatively) recent phenomenon.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantAnd how would you know the milked animal was a treifah until AFTER it was shechted? By that time, the milk was probably already drunk.
At least some of the signs of a tereifah are external and visible while the animal is still alive.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantMay I suggest that you attend and thus obtain firsthand knowledge of what is being said?
Considering the fact that I don’t even keep Yom Tov, I’m pretty sure that I will not be welcome there.
If someone doesn’t even keep Yom Tov, worrying about whether or not he has a filter on his internet connection is really secondary.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantSince last week there is a prominent sign posted in Rav Lieff shlita’s shul (the Agudah where the Flatbush Asifa will take place) with the above Psak Halacha (with those two words in big bold letters) of, and signed by, Hagaon Haadir Posek Hador Ba’al Shevet Halevi HaRav Shmuel Wosner shlit”a.
So, you’re saying that they’re NOT going to say anything along the lines of “if you must have it at home, make sure it’s filtered…?” And they’re going to make sure that yeshivos no longer accept (or throw out) kids from homes with internet connections that are filtered?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantwell then, i guess i didn’t ‘keep’ yomtov either.
Be careful. I don’t think you want to be in the same company as I.
I’m sure that some of the kanoim here will say that my kids don’t deserve to be in yeshiva (what yeshiva accepts a kid whose father doesn’t keep Yom Tov), be a member of the community or even walk into the shul.
And they may well be right.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantAll the Gedolim and Rabbonim shlit”a sitting on the dais were officially supporting the Kinus, its message and the psak halacha read out loud by Hagaon Haadir Posek Hador Ba’al Shevet Halevi HaRav Shmuel Wosner shlit”a.
So, if they all support the p’sak given at the asifa by R. Wosner that the internet is forbidden in the home with or without a filter, will that be the message delivered at the second Flatbush asifa in less than two weeks? Will it be reiterated at this meeting that R. Wosner paskened that children who have parents with an Internet connection (filtered or not) in their home should not be accepted into yeshivos?
Or will the message be different now that (to borrow a baseball term) we’re in front of the home crowd? And, if so, how can you say that the gedolim support R. Wosner’s p’sak?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantCome on. You weren’t happy once over yomtov?
The way the question was framed was “is a person who is sad on Yom Tov in violation of an issur?” It was not framed as “is one required to be happy at least once over Yom Tov?”
The answer to my question is that someone who is sad over Yom Tov is in violation of the positive commandment of “v’samachatah” and is no different than someone who fails to eat matzah, sit in a sukkah, hear shofar and so on.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantwhy don’t we have cheesecake then?
Who is stopping you? Have all the cheesecake you want.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI side with the gedolim that forbid it.
Then, by all means, don’t wear a sheitel. But don’t presume to make that choice for everyone else.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWhen Moshiach comes all the cholim will be healed from their sicknesses IY”H.
Perhaps because by then the advance of medical knowledge will have made such a thing possible.
The Wolf
May 23, 2012 3:48 pm at 3:48 pm in reply to: Calling Everyone You Disagree With a "Troll" or Someone Else #1165832WolfishMusingsParticipantTroll or Something else 🙂
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWhy shouldn’t we?
I’m sure that as metal working technology improved, better knives and implements were used in the BHMK. I don’t think there was any requirement to go back to pre-Davidic metalsmithing to produce implements for the 2nd BHMK.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWas attendance at the retreat mandatory? If so, then you have your answer.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI believe (although I could be wrong) that charitable organizations (and political candidates) are exempt from the DNC restrictions.
However, I wonder if you might have a case if you specifically told them to stop calling you and kept careful records of whom you told it to and when you told them.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantmay someone pregnant with a mamzer take her life?
Of course not. There is no requirement to kill a mamzer. Furthermore, there are mamzerim who come into the world through perfectly 100% legal unions (a mamzer and a mamzeres come to mind).
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantThe ratzon of Hashem isn’t that he die. The ratzon of Hashem is that a yehudi should kill him
Based on that logic, I suppose that if a peson sees an Amaleki drowning, he should rescue him so that he can kill him personally??
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf was this rebellion of yours the first step in your journey towards being a sinner?
No. I’ve been the worst human being in the history of the planet since the day I was born. Since then I have not redeemed myself in any manner at all.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI’m reminded of the time (and yes, I know that I’m dating myself here) when I used to play Strat-O-Matic Baseball in yeshiva during lunch/recess. One time a bully threatened to tell the Rosh Yeshiva that we had baseball cards which, ostensibly, were forbidden in the school. I was about to object that they aren’t baseball cards, but then I stopped myself. I figured “what does the Rosh Yeshiva know about baseball cards? He’ll see cards, they’re about baseball, ergo, they’re baseball cards.”
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantActually, it wasn’t Chalav Stam. We’re not makpid on CY, but, on the other hand, if it’s available, we get it.
But I know that that doesn’t really change the depravity of my acts at all. I’m still a horrendous human being who sins and for whom there is no hope of salvation whatsoever.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipanta good number of rabbanim say txting is assur
I had no idea that my sending a text to Eeees asking her to pick up extra milk was a sin*.
I guess that’s what I get for being a dispecable, horrible, rotten person — I sin and sin and sin even when I didn’t intend to.
The Wolf
* I texted her (as opposed to calling her) because she was probably seeing clients at the time and I didn’t want to interrupt her by actually calling.
WolfishMusingsParticipantNot only do I play cards, I also play games that use cards (standard playing cards as well as custom cards for that particular game).
I guess that makes me a rasha multiple times over.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf, at home do you have a filter that operates when you use the computer?
Yes
What about on your internet-enabled cellphone?
No. But we already agree that I’m a horrible person who is detested by any and all who come into contact with me and who has absolutely no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantAndy Kaufman, may he continue to live and be well.
The Wolf
May 18, 2012 2:04 am at 2:04 am in reply to: co-ed first aid course with male and female instuctor #875265WolfishMusingsParticipant100% treif
Sigh. I remember when I took the EMT course at Brooklyn College years ago. Yes, it was mixed. Yet another reason, I suppose, that I’m doomed to eternal damnation.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI have unfiltered internet at work. My justification is that that’s the policy that the IT department has implemented and I am in position to be making demands regarding the IT policy of a large multinational corporation.
Yes, I know that that makes me a worse rasha than Hitler, Bilaam, Pharoah and Haman combined.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI had a friend whom that happened to and, in fact, recently mentioned him in a blog post on the shidduch system.
The relevant quote:
When he was dating, he had a list of traits (both physical and non-physical) that his future wife had to have. She had to be in a specific age range, with specific hair color, a weight range and on and on. He dated for a while, unsuccessfully. And then, something happened.
He moved out of town and met, apparently on his own, a divorced mother fifteen years his senior. She was overweight and had the “wrong” hair color. And, yet, he was deliriously happy with her. He found his match. She certainly wasn’t was he was looking for on the physical side, but he was so happy with her emotionally, mentally and spiritually that he simply put all that aside and decided that he loved her for who she was inside, despite the fact that she had all these qualities (older, overweight, divorced, mother) that would have caused her to be kept out of the “shidduch market.” In other words, once he found someone he was happy with, the physical side of his “wish list” became less important and, perhaps, irrelevant. They’re still married, fifteen years later.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantYou callin’ 42 a liar?
Not at all. Merely possibly mistaken. It’s also possible that I’m mistaken.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantIt was reported on VIN
Well, if it was, it’s not there now. Nor is it on any of the other major Jewish news sites.
In addition, googling “arthur ashe” and internet and limiting the result to the last 24 hours yields only one hit — this thread.
In other words, I’ll believe it when I see it somewhere else besides here.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantNot that I’m saying you’re wrong, but I find it odd that this hasn’t been reported on the main YWN page (or any of the other Jewish news sites) yet.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI was directed, by a known posek, to call the morgue and ask if there were corpses of Jewish people stored there.
You called the wrong person. A better person to call would have been the hospital chaplain. Even if non-Jewish, he would certainly understand the need for an answer on this type of question (and his ne’emanus shouldn’t be any different than a random person answering the phone in the morgue).
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWhat are Rabbis today, mishnah berurah’s for the visually impaired ?
Perhaps the problem isn’t with the Rav’s knowledge of halacha, but rather with his ignorance regarding the layouts and procedures that go on in modern-day hospitals?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantIs it muttar to serve booze at simchas?
Is it muttar? Obviously it is.
Is it a good idea? And, if it is done, what responsibilities do the guests and the ba’al simcha have?
Those are other questions that should be debated. But the answer to your question in the OP is very simple — yes, it’s muttar.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf, are you eating lunch in your office/cubicle by yourself or in the boardroom with the CEO/CFO and other bigwigs?
Even if I’m in my cubicle alone, I’m still in public. Shouldn’t my dignity count then too?
And, in addition, is the person wearing the jacket over his shoulders by himself, or is he with CEOs and CFOs too? The point being that eating with plasticware “alone” and in public shouldn’t be any different than wearing a jacket over your shoulders while “alone” and in public.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantThe key here is appropriate per situation. Plasticware at home makes sense. Period.
Ah, so if the idea is that one should look dignified in public, then I assume that if I bring lunch to work (certainly a public situation) then one should not use plasticware. Do I need to bring a real plate/silverware to work for my lunch in order to be properly dignified?
And what about the other things I asked about? If I were sitting in front of the king, I wouldn’t be reading a book, but yet I read on the subway all the time. Is that a problem? What about humming a tune to myself? I certainly wouldn’t do it front of a king…
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWhy? Why is wearing a jacket on my shoulders any different from eating with plasticware in that one is unacceptable because you wouldn’t do it in front of a king, but the other is acceptable even though you wouldn’t do it in front of a king? What’s the difference?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantLt. Berenbaum was drafted and had no choice but to join.
Well, isn’t that the premise of the question at hand?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantRaise my cholesterol level too high, to get a medical exemption.
1. I don’t think the army tested for cholesterol levels in 1941.
2. You probably had to do a lot worse than that to be exempted during World War II.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantYou are not presenting yourself to the world when you are showering. When you present yourself to the world, you should project yourself the way you you would look before a king.
When you shower, you also do so as if your in His presence – that just has different ramifications in that circumstance.
And the other stuff I mentioned? Is it sinful to eat with plasticware on a Wednesday evening at home in front of Him because I wouldn’t do so if the President were present?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantYes, I realize my mistake — R. Yehuda lived well after the churban. My apologies. Nonetheless, my main point still applies.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWould you go in front of a King wearing your jacket over your shoulders?
I guess I need to stop showering, eating with plastic plates/cups, humming to myself and reading while riding on the subway, since I would never do any of those in front of a king either.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantNot all Chazal were Anti-Roman especially Rebbe Yehuda HaNasi and Likely Rebbi Yochanan Zakai as well
Let’s keep in mind that the period of “Chazal” covers several hundred years and several thousand miles.
Saying that Chazal were anti-Roman (or not anti-Roman) with any consistency is like trying to say that Americans are anti-British because of all the anti-British rhetoric that existed in America between 1763 and 1820 (or that they weren’t anti-British based on their alliance in World War II).
In other words, one could easily expect that they weren’t so anti-Roman before the churban (in R. Yehuda’s time) and vehemently anti-Roman after the churban. Statements of Chazal about surrounding cultures, powers and people have to be viewed through the lens of what was actually happening in those times. You can’t take statements made across the centuries by different people in vastly different places and make general statements.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantEpis,
If you’re wondering how to make it so that your friend does not have mixed dancing at his wedding, here is what you should do:
1. Ask your friend for the guest list. Call everyone on the list and warn them that there will be mixed dancing and that if they participate, they will be in violation of a severe issur.
2. Get to the wedding hall early, erect a mechitzah and put up signs indicating which side is the mens’ side and which is the womens’.
3. When people arrive and begin to disregard your efforts, make a scene. Physically stand in the way when men and women begin to dance. Shout and scream over the music. Perhaps even try to physically separate the couples.
When all this is done, you will no longer have the problem of having a friend with mixed dancing by his wedding. Instead, you will have an ex-friend with mixed dancing by his wedding.
The Wolf
May 13, 2012 11:06 pm at 11:06 pm in reply to: Woman Should Always Wear Her Wedding Ring in Public? #873618WolfishMusingsParticipantNonetheless, as far the OP’s question goes, the answer is clearly no — no one says she *must* wear her wedding ring in public or in private. Whether she should is debatable, but there is clearly no issur involved with not wearing one.
The Wolf
May 13, 2012 11:01 pm at 11:01 pm in reply to: Woman Should Always Wear Her Wedding Ring in Public? #873617WolfishMusingsParticipantSo you disagree with the Sefer HaChinuch?
I didn’t agree or disagree with anyone. I made an observation.
Yes, I know that in some circles, having the ability to make an independent observation is the sign of the worst sort of spiritual corruption. That’s fine… I never claimed to be anything other than utterly spiritually corrupt.
(And, yes, I’m also fully aware of the fact that I didn’t rush to affirm what the Sefer HaChinuch said [i.e. the fact that I said that I didn’t agree or disagree in my previous post] also makes me an apikorus as well.)
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantIt’s a converse relationship. Because you are an apikorus you are wearing jeans.
Simple logic.
My heretical apologies.
The Wolf
May 13, 2012 8:31 pm at 8:31 pm in reply to: Woman Should Always Wear Her Wedding Ring in Public? #873611WolfishMusingsParticipantIf anyone truly needs a “constant reminder” that they are married, then they have far worse issues than the question of whether or not they should wear a ring.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI’m wearing jeans right now. Yes, I know that makes me an rasha apikores who deserves nothing but the worst damnation, but so be it.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantSo, go to sleep early. Who’s stopping you?
Or do you propose to organize a “bedtime posse” to round up those who flout your authority as bedtime monitor?
The Wolf
-
AuthorPosts