WolfishMusings

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 2,451 through 2,500 (of 7,787 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Recall Election #885497
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I understood ICOT to mean that he thinks public opinion would be the determining factor. I disputed that. If I misunderstood ICOT, then I apologize.

    Nope, I misunderstood you. I was mistaken as to whom you were responding to.

    That’s why I generally either include a quote in my response, or I address the poster by name.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Bnos Yaakov newsletter #879957
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    as to the second I have to say again that there is punishment in this world and the next for avairos. How dare you call it drivel?!

    But how do you know that *that’s* the punishment? Or is making up horrific punishments okay since you know (a) there is a punishment and (b) it’s for a “good cause” anyway?

    If I say that the punishment for wearing sha’atnez is having a vulture eternally peck at your liver in the afternoon, is it drivel? Or am I covered by saying “well, since there *is* s’char v’onesh, I’m okay?

    The Wolf

    in reply to: NY Integrated Algebra Regent #879765
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Wolf: I hadn’t seen you in a while. I thought you were burning already.

    No doubt I will for the sin of helping my niece with her regents.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Recall Election #885495
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    That’s not correct, it will be decided by law not opinion. The public will have an opinion (actually many divergent opinions), but we are a nation of laws and ultimately the law determines the result.

    The law may well specify that the opinions of key people be the deciding factor, as it is with the case of the President.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: When the Fat Lady Sings #879774
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Where did the expression come from and what does it mean?

    Google is your friend.

    http://bit.ly/KFaXOp

    The Wolf

    (MODS: I know you normally don’t allow links, but I feel this deserves an exception.)

    in reply to: Recall Election #885494
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Sure it would. The criteria could be the opinions of several people, as is the case with the President (as spelled out in the Amendment).

    The Wolf

    in reply to: NY Integrated Algebra Regent #879763
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    My niece took it today. I’ve been tutoring her for it.

    (Yes, I know that by talking or otherwise interacting to my niece I am a horrible person who purposely disregards the boundaries of tznius and taharas hamachaneh.)

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Recall Election #885491
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    There also needs to be some way of determining diminished mental capacity and removing someone who is no longer capable of serving.

    Such a mechanism exists at the Federal Level for the office of President.

    From the 25th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States:

    Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

    Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

    The New York Consitution provides a similar provision regarding the Governor (Article IV, Section 5)

    In case the governor is impeached, is absent from the state or is otherwise unable to discharge the powers and duties of the office of governor, the lieutenant-governor shall act as governor until the inability shall cease or until the term of the governor shall expire.

    I would imagine (but I can’t say that I am sure) that the method of making such determination is governed by law.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: monticello walmart #879533
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    why not?

    Why should I?

    “Why not” is not enough of a reason to do it. I don’t do everything by default and then weed out what I shouldn’t do. I start with I won’t do and then add things I should and/or want to do.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: monticello walmart #879530
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    No.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Kids at Kiddush #934707
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I allow everyone (kids and adults) to sit before I do at a kiddush, se’uda shlishis, etc. I sit only once I’ve determined that there is a seat for anyone and everyone else who wants one, regardless of age, level of learning, communal position, etc.

    and

    “before Moshiach comes……. Zekeinim (old people) will stand Mipnei(Because of) Kitanim (Children under 13)

    I’m glad that I’m doing my part to bring Moshiach.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: CREAM OF THE CROP!?! WHERE R THEY??? #879663
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Perhaps you need a redefinition of “cream of the crop.”

    The Wolf

    in reply to: OU kashrus is not reliable? #1214300
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I dont want to box you into a corner, but again, your statement that, “it’s a matter of practicality” is a bit shallow.

    So, I’m shallow. That’s probably the nicest thing you* can say about me.

    The Wolf

    * I don’t mean “you” personally — I mean “anyone.”

    in reply to: Kids at Kiddush #934693
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I allow everyone (kids and adults) to sit before I do at a kiddush, se’uda shlishis, etc. I sit only once I’ve determined that there is a seat for anyone and everyone else who wants one, regardless of age, level of learning, communal position, etc.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Be gentle to your kids. They'll be your parents one day. #879540
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I believe a far bigger determinant of how a child will treat his elders when he grows up is how he sees his parents treat *their* parents and elders.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Matisyahu – what are you doing with his cds? #886188
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I will not be destroying or discarding any Mattisyahu CDs, no matter what he does.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: OU kashrus is not reliable? #1214262
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    What kind of statement is that in that if you are not going to eat OU, you will not have a lot to eat?

    It’s a statement of practicality.

    I expect that if the OP feels that the OU is unreliable, he should not only not eat OU products, but not eat anything/anywhere that relies on OU ingredients. This includes just about every restaurant and other kosher eating establishment in the US, as well as many food manufacturers whose mashgichim provide them with a list of approved products to use (most of which are probably OU certified).

    If the OP truly feels this way, I expect him to do due diligence into every product before he buys it to determine if it contains any OU-supervised products. I also expect him to ensure before he goes anywhere to eat that they do not allow any OU products in their kitchens.

    Good luck.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: OU kashrus is not reliable? #1214238
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    If that were true, that would be a much bigger problem than the occasional oversight. They should have a contract with their supervised companies forcing a recall when a serious kashrus concern arises.

    I don’t know whether it’s true or not. As I said, it was simply my guess. I don’t know enough about the OU’s policies and contracts or the economics behind whether or not the threat a mass recall would cause a company to reconsider whether or not to obtain a hechsher at all.

    Also, aside from bb”c, many are machmir not to eat milk products which rely on the heter of chalav stam, so mislabeling a product is problematic anyhow.

    I’m willing to bet that anyone who is machmir WRT cholov Yisroel AND looks at the ingredients (the first thing *I* would do if I saw something such as this) would know better than eat this.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: OU kashrus is not reliable? #1214228
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    How about a recall?

    My guess would be that the OU does not have the power to demand a recall.

    In any event, if you’re going to avoid the OU, then you’ll have very few options to eat. The OU not only supervises OU foods and establishments (obviously), but is used by many, many other hechsheirim (both in manufacturing of foods and eateries) for ingredients and such.

    just with basar b’chalav?

    Oh, please. This is not a case of basar b’chalav — it’s not as if the chips themselves were cooked with meat — they’re still 100% kosher. In addition, very few, if any people, are going to cook their potato chips with meat.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: hat for shabbos #879165
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Wear it on your head. 🙂

    Wear it in good health.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: PRENUPTUALS in FRUM circles??! #879270
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    She can’t decide that when they are getting divorced. She would have had to state that when they were first married.

    Actually, she can decide that at any point in her marriage. However, it does not work retroactively, so deciding on it at the divorce is pointless.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: PRENUPTUALS in FRUM circles??! #879267
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Any money earned during marriage (by either parties) belongs to the husband.

    Unless, of course, she decides that she wants to keep her money and pay for her own support. In a situation where the wife works and the husband does not, it makes financial sense for her to do exactly that.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: PRENUPTUALS in FRUM circles??! #879239
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    If you Mesader Kidushin insists on it, move onto another Mesader Kiddushin.

    Mine insisted on one. It’s called a Kesubah.

    Yeah, I know… I’m a miserable filthy kofer so what does it matter what I do?

    The Wolf

    in reply to: My Shavuous Roundup #877896
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I don’t comprehend how this was your 1st time in 4 years rather than in 14 years? that you were up overnite, since last time that Shovu’os came out with Yaknehaz, was 14 years ago.

    I explained above. In the last few years, I’ve taken naps in the early evening before going to learn, so I did not stay up. Before about four years ago, I did not need to take a nap to stay up during the night.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: My Shavuous Roundup #877894
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    What I really mean is give yourself some slack and please try to find some way to be kind to yourself.

    Why should I? I certainly don’t deserve it.

    If you view yourself with such negativity, how do you expect others to treat you?

    I expect others to treat me as I deserve, as I treat myself. No better and no worse.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Someone Who Is Considering Murder… #879828
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Perhaps you think we should ostracize the family members of someone suffering mental illness?

    No, I don’t. Just because one puts forth a hypothetical argument does not mean that that is the position one actually supports in real life.

    That would be typically hypocritical of you.

    Just out of curiosity, if it were my position, why would it be hypocritical of me to say that?

    Suicide isn’t intrinsically worse than murder. Its just that a suicide leaves no opportunity for teshuva, while a murderer can do teshuva.

    There are opportunities that a suicide can do teshuva (not all methods of suicide produce instantaneous death) and yet we still say that they have no chelek in olam habah.

    Another flaw in your argument is that the reason why people distance themselves in all your examples is because of how they or their children may be affected by the actions of the “evildoer” which clearly does not apply here. (don’t throw in emotions here that is not a valid reason).

    Friends and family of people who commit or attempt suicide are certainly affected by the person’s actions. How you can say otherwise is quite puzzling.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: PRENUPTUALS in FRUM circles??! #879232
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    What do you think of a prenup in frum marriages?

    Considering the fact that the Kesubah itself is a prenuptial agreement and, in previous times, it could be altered as either party saw fit with conditions (provided the minimum amount was provided for), I’d say there’s pretty solid grounds to say that they’re okay (provided, of course, they conform to Halacha in general).

    The Wolf

    in reply to: My Shavuous Roundup #877892
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I don’t think so. As you said, you had no requirement to learn, so what you did is neither here nor there.

    On the other hand, I wasted my time by “learning” Halacha, as opposed to true learning (Gemara, etc.). As a result, that makes me a sinner and, should I influence anyone else to follow my example, I’d also be a “machati as haRabim.” For such a person, there is no teshuva.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Someone Who Is Considering Murder… #879824
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I would hope that not not only would such a person be ostracized, he would be, more importantly, watched very carefully.

    Thank you, for finally giving a straight answer. At least someone can actually give one.

    Your answer now leads me to this follow-up question:

    We all know that suicide is worse than murder (for example, a murderer does not necessarily lose his portion in Olam HaBah, a suicide does). If a person who is considering murder should be ostracized, shouldn’t it also follow that someone considering something far worse (i.e. suicide) should also be ostracized and shunned from the community?

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Someone Who Is Considering Murder… #879823
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    The idea that a home with a TV or unfiltered internet will always be strictly off-limits to the children (young adults or small children) is highly unlikely. A Yeshiva cannot risk an entire class of tinokos shel beis rabban being negatively influenced by one child in the class who lives in a home with TV or unfiltered internet. That child can literally bring multiple innocent children in his class off the derech with his negative influences from his contamination to television or unfiltered internet rachmana l’tzlon.

    Which, whether it’s true or not, is beside the point, because this thread isn’t really about TV or unfiltered internet. It’s about murder.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Someone Who Is Considering Murder… #879818
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    In your hypothetical case, is the child likely to have a negative influence on his/her schoolmates based on the father’s wickedness?

    I couldn’t answer that. Let’s say no, he wouldn’t. But that would also apply to the case of a TV where the child wasn’t allowed to watch it and could not access it.

    However, as I said, if it’s any easier, forget the yeshivos/children part of the question. Should such a person be refused honors in shul (such as aliyos or even attendance at all) and should he be allowed to remain as a respected member of the community?

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Someone Who Is Considering Murder… #879817
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Syag,

    Fair enough. My apologies if I misinterpreted your comments. And thank you for clarifying your remark.

    Nonetheless, feel free to pick any community anywhere — would someone who is considering murder be welcome in your shul, wherever in the world you happen to be? Would he be eligible for the services that the local Jewish community offers? It’s really a pretty straightforward question.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Someone Who Is Considering Murder… #879814
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Syag,

    I’m not sure what it is that I wrote that ticked you off so. My question was fairly straightforward and, I thought, applied to just about every community. I didn’t view this as a “New York” issue or an “out of town” issue. It’s really very simple — should someone who is a potential murderer not be allowed to be a member of the community — whether it be Boro Park, Flatbush, Baltimore or some small two-horse town.

    Can you please either articulate why you think my question is New York-centric or else just answer the question I posed at the top of this thread.

    Thanks,

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Someone Who Is Considering Murder… #879808
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    S’yag,

    Would a potential murderer be welcome in the LA community?

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Psak Halacha on Internet Access #878773
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Wolf -you just fell into this guy’s Farfrumta Kruma trap.

    WADR, I disagree. I just took the opposite approach.

    His approach is “one (wrong) look at the internet and you’re damaged for life.”

    My rejoined to that is “maybe, but if so, then that applies for every aveirah. So don’t get so worked up over the internet since we *all* sin and therefore are *all* “damaged.”

    It’s simply a variation of the “if everyone’s special then no one is” line of thought.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: SHABBOS TEXTING! #877652
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    The most likely answer is that some probably do and some probably don’t.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Someone Who Is Considering Murder… #879805
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Is it the child’s fault though? If the parent is contemplating murder, it probably has zero to do with the child.

    and

    his kids are not responsible for his thought or actions, therefore you can not penalize his kids by not allowing them into yeshiva

    I agree with you in principle, but this doesn’t seem to be the general practice. Yeshivos will throw a child out of school if the parents have a TV or an unfiltered internet connection even if the child is unable to watch/access it.

    But hey, let’s forget the kids/yeshivos angle. I simply used it because it’s the most common form of societal pressure used today. How about simply being allowed to belong to a shul, have an aliya, etc.? Should he be ostracized from the community?

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Coat over Kittel #877687
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Why by weddings does the Chasson wear a raincoat over his Kittel?

    I don’t know. I didn’t wear a raincoat over my kittel.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Nusach sefard #1190183
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Probably your biggest sin is disregarding the fifth chelek of shulchan oruch.

    I wouldn’t say that that’s the biggest sin I’ve done. However, I’ll admit to occasionally having a lack of common sense — just like everyone else.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Are you ????? not to eat fish and meat together? #877691
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Yes, I am makpid not to eat fish/meat together.

    I don’t own a barbeque and the thought of eating marshmallows together with meat makes me a bit queasy.

    I do eat fish/dairy together. I realize that that makes me a horrible person according to some people because I disregard their particular chumra/minhag. Deal with it.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Someone Who Is Considering Murder… #879799
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Wolf, How would anyone know what someone else is planning?

    Suppose he told someone. Or suppose he already attempted it once and failed.

    For the sake of argument, just take it as a given that you know.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Someone Who Is Considering Murder… #879797
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Murder is an extremely rare, almost unheard of, issue in the frum community.

    And the relevance of that to my question is…?

    It doesn’t matter how rare or prevelant it is — Giving one’s children over to Molech is pretty rare today too, but we can all agree that a person who does so should not be in our community. I’m asking for your opinion on how a potential murderer should be handled vis-a-vis his position in the community. How rare it is is really irrelevant, IMHO.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Someone Who Is Considering Murder… #879795
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    The only Halachic ramifications as far as an accidental killing

    I’m not talking about someone who actually killed anyone (accidentally or otherwise). I’m talking about a *potential* murderer.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Nusach sefard #1190177
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    The ARIZAL held it 100% muttar, and even PERFERABLE, to daven with this Nusach.

    I guess that means that I’m a sinner for disregarding the Arizal and davening Nusach Ashkenaz.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Psak Halacha on Internet Access #878767
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    But the stain on his neshamah remains.

    And guess what? That applies to *every* sin.

    I’ve done things that I regret my life. Things I regret very deeply. In those cases, I have long since apologized and the people involved have forgiven me many, many years ago. I have long done teshuva for those sins. And you know what? It still affects me to this day. I *still* think about the things I’ve done to them and feel guilty about it whenever it comes to mind. In other words, while the slate may (or may not) be clean in Heaven, *I* still feel it — because it means something to me all these years later.

    If you commit any sin — it doesn’t matter which one — eat treif, commit murder, wear sha’atenz, insult a fellow human being, steal, not hear the megillah on Purim — take your pick — if that mitzvah truly means enough to you, you may never truly get over it. Your soul may always be burdened with the guilt of what you’ve done — even if God Himself has wiped it clean off of His books.

    So, unless you’re a perfect human being who never sins, or unless sins mean so little to you that you can simply forget them, you’re argument regarding the internet is pointless — it applies to any and all sins.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Someone Who Is Considering Murder… #879794
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Come on, folks!! This isn’t a difficult question.

    Many of you won’t allow a kid in a school is his parent has a TV in his home (whether or not the kid is allowed to watch it), but attempted murder is okay?

    Many of you would turn your back to a needy couple asking for charity to get married if the wedding was going to have mixed seating, but you have no problem with giving charity to someone considering murder?

    Many of you would find it perfectly alright to refuse admittance to shul of a man who is wrongly withholding a get from his wife, but have no problem allowing a potential murderer to daven there?

    Why hasn’t anyone here simply said “No, it’s not okay?”

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Why Don't We Have Cheesecake on Chanukah? #877457
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I have never heard of any minhag to NOT have cheesecake on Channukah. Can you please state the source of this minhag?

    The Wolf

    in reply to: My Shavuous Roundup #877890
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    You’d be surprised with some of the stuff I’ve been told over the years.

    Considering the fact that I was just told by a prominent rav that I’m no better than one who doesn’t eat matzah, etc., I doubt it. However, you’re welcome to try me.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Psak Halacha on Internet Access #878752
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Since last week there is a prominent sign posted in Rav Lieff shlita’s shul (the Agudah where the Flatbush Asifa will take place) with the above Psak Halacha (with those two words in big bold letters) of, and signed by, Hagaon Haadir Posek Hador Ba’al Shevet Halevi HaRav Shmuel Wosner shlit”a.

    I was just there and saw no such sign. Perhaps it’s because I am a disgusting, miserable excuse for a human being and therefore items of kedusha (such as that sign) are invisible to me. But in any event, I saw no such sign — and I checked all the bulletin boards and walls.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: any advice on purchasing a GOOD Canon camera? #877239
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    My piece of advice:

    *If* you’re going to buy an SLR (and I’m not necessarily saying you should), and you have to make a choice between spending money on a better camera or a better lens, by all means, spend the extra money to get better lenses.

    The Wolf

Viewing 50 posts - 2,451 through 2,500 (of 7,787 total)