Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
there are many places mashma beis hamikdash will be rebuilt before moshiach. see ??????? ???? ??? ?”? ?”? and yerushalmi in berachos explains the reason the bracha of yerushalayim is before malchus bais david (es tzemach) is because first the beis hamikdash will be rebuilt and only afterwards will malchus bais david (moshiach) come
Only the family sells it but sometimes Tuvias has them.
Rav Moshe supposedly also tucked his in as well as all of the Lithuanian Roshei Yeshiva. I remember seeing once in Mishneh Halachos bsheim Rav gustman Bshaim Reb Chaim Ozer a whole new pshat in the Mishna berura but lmaaseh it doesn’t shtim so good inside. Also I once found on otzar hachochma a kuntress devoted to this topic and explains all the achonim and the mb (although I am not sure I am maskim). Check it out @ http://www.otzar.org/wotzar/Book.aspx?162549&
the malbim himself in the back of the new artzos hachaim has a sefer called alei terufah where he is mepalpel to show that all the rambam’s in hilchos deos perek 4 are coming from sugyos.
rav elyashiv in hearos on brachos 9b ask many more kashyos on it
IT is not just the crc it includes yad avraham YD 84,17 teshuvas ksav sofer 111 Igros Moshe oc2 92 Minchas shlomo2 65.
The Chacham tzvi 119 says bfeirush what The “scientists” say. except he adds that according to miktzas chachamim you are yotzeh with horseradish ayin shum http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=829&st=&pgnum=104
MAHARSHAM CHELEK 1 197
I once heard that when REb Elchonon was in America someone told him he works on shabbos but lmaaseh he doesn’t trust anybody in americas shchita so he wanted to shecht his own meat. HE asked if the psul of the shechita of a mechalel shabbos is a psul in neemanus or a psul in the chalois shechita.
First of all the chumra of two kzaysim is only on the baal haseder. The reason is the bracha of hamotzi and the achilas matza each require their own kzayis. The biur halacha 475 dh kezayis is mefakfeik in this chumra and the chazon ish himself was not makpid on his shiur for these two kezeisim, rather he was somech on the shitos that our kzeisim is enough.
About taking matzaa from the box- it should be noted there is a big machlokes if you need a kzayis davka from the middle matza or if you can take a piece of the middle matza and eaat a kzayis of another matza. Reb Shlomo Zalman in HAlichos shlomo says you can be metzareif from other matzos. However, the brisker rov held since one of the definitions of lechem oni ?????? ???? ????? ???? which is the hagada the matzos should be on the table during maggid.
About the chumra of kdei achilas pras, while pashtus you are right that the two shitos don’t make sense the steipler in shiuron shel torah says to be makpid on 2 minutes lchatchilah. Probably, the reasoning is kdei achilas pras is a set time based on eating pas lechem not on matza. ( however lfi this it must be six times quicker to eat lechem)
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/typing-on-chol-hamoed
We did this a few times already. Normally, the thread starts on chol hamoed and everyone comments how it is muttar, or there rav was mattir etc. But the people who don’t dtype on chol hamoed never write their opinion since it is chol hamoed
old man- the size of the kzayis sets the time not the time sets the kzayis.
sam2- the steipler in a letter in back of hilchos chag bchag writes that a choleh can be somech on the avvnei nezer.
old man- The Chazon ish at the end of kuntreis hashiurim is very clear that the shiur kdei achilas pras is a set time and is not dependent on the food you are eating. His main raya is from eiruvin 4a ?? ????? ???? ????? ??? ?? ????? ??? ?? ??????. However the minchas chinuch in hilchos erev yom kippur brings up a tzad that it goes by each food.
In the star k book it says
“Rabbi Bess contacts the company and asks numerous questions. Information is
updated every year and is accepted only when submitted in writing. Rav Moshe
a company (Igros Moshe YD I:55). A medicine can also be added to the list if it only
contains ingredients that are de? nitively chometz free.”
IN Even Yisrael (chelek 1 perek 6 of hilchos chametz umatza) Dayan Fisher calls on people to be MACHMIR to use machine matzos.
Reb Chaim said it by mi’un. The rov says it by hafara of a Nasir. Reb Shimon says it practically everywhere else. Lmaaseh the ran in the beginning of narah hameorasa seems to say it by hataras chacham .
sam2- in kuntress divrei sofrim ois 15 reb elchonon discusses why losid lvo halach is like beis shamai.
gaw- I am not Joe if you were talking to me. And i do not think my style is similar.
My understanding is, that getting the scientific knowledge from torah comes through learning Torah lishma. Their is many different madreigos of Torah Lishma. The Nefesh Hachaim in Shaar daled (should be around perek9) writes how you are ableto reach the level of Istakel boiraysa Ubara alma- In other words the torah serves as a blue print of the world so the metzious will be pashut. Now this is just taloi in Torah lishmah, something in which all the tannoim and ammoraim did and even if you were to say the mesorah of torah was not so strong the understanding of science could still be perfect
Interestingly the rambam does not pasken (lchatchila) like Reb Eliezer who saw the Tzitz in rome. See succah 5a and 9,1 in rambam klei hamikdash.
simcha– you are saying the noda beyehuda and every singel acharon since his time argued very strongly. se the above chasam sofer I linked. I suggest you learn through the inyan before you speak
the tur says some don’t eat in the succah on shmini ateres veino minhag
bal tosef? I would not feel nervous when the gemara is mefurash to eat in a succah. And I heard Reb Moshe told people who did not have such a minhag that they are mechuyav to eat in the succah, because you can’t have a minhag against a mefurishe gemara
hello99–
I do not understadnd why the fact it constantly refreshes itself it should not be a mechika. Misvara, I would say the way we should dan everything is the way we see it. Ain hachi nami this is what really is occurring, however, the way we see it is a mechika.
Besides, in hilchos gerama if something is setup to do a specific action, it would not be considered a gerama. An example is the malacha of zoreh which the entire melacha is a gerama. So if I have a button that says on it “Backspace” it is meyuchad to erase so it should not be considered a gerama.
old-man
is that based on the Chasam Sofer I linked to?
Mukaf chomah .?
sam- can you direct me to this aruch hashulchan?
???? ???? ???? ?
[ ?
also see the orchas chaim in 531 who brings down from the pachad yitzchak bsheim magidei haemes that the Noda biyehuda was chozer
see- http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=8760&st=&pgnum=194
sam- teshuvas Oc 154– http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14663&pgnum=118
Also in igros rav moshe is only matir someone who has a huge tzoirach…..
hello99- I think I saw in Ashrei ha’ish ????? ??”? ??? on shabbos nogea kosev, that rav Elyashiv said even though the ksav itself has no kiyum and is being refreshed etc. it is still kosev mdoiraysa since it is nechshav derech ksiva.
In Yabia Omer 8 OC 48 says
?????? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ????? ?? ????: ?????? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ???? ?? ??? ??? ?????, ???? ???? ??????? ??????? ?? ??? ???????, ??? ?????? ?? ??? ????? ????. ??? ?????? ???? ??? ???? ????? ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ????? ???? ??, ??? ????, ??”?.
IN Nishmas Avraham he brings down from Rav Shlomo Zalman ??? ?? ????”? ???????? ??”?: ??? ?? ????????? ??? ?? ???? ?? ????? ????, ?? ?????? ??????? ???? ?????? (??”? ????????? ???? ???) ???? ??? ????? ?????? ???????? ?? ???? ?? ??? ???? ??? ???.
Shmiras Shabbos Khilchosa brings down from rav shlomo zalman and rav moshe nogea a typewriter, that it is not a maaseh uman so it will be muttar only ltzoirach hamoed.
However, yesh lchalek by a computer Like the yabia omer
hello99-
If i remember correctly Rav Y. Feinhandler in Ginzei hakodesh presents the metzious that it is constantly refreshing itself.
INteresting shevet haleivi –
sam2- are you forgetting what the chasam sofer wrote about that noda beyihuda?
vochindik- yes rav yehuda hachassid is indeed arguing with a gemara. For this very reason the Noda beyehuda (shut Noda B’Yehuda tinyana EH 79) writes that he must have seen something in ruach hakodesh that it is not good for his descendants. THerefore the Noda byehuda conludes it was only written for his descendants.
vochindik- I see almost every post on here or on zionism is a staight out copy past from the frumteens site. Not only is it a copy paste but you posted the same paragraph twice.
Chazon ish on nails- Is against the rishonim and pri megadim if you understand it simply.
Now explain why it is more pashut to do all of the above over techeiles. if you are going to come from gedolim and talk all about how Rav Elyashiv Zt”l nodded his head and all that other hype, I already told you that the full case was not presented to him.
(Besides i saw that this mr frumteens dude says it is a straight out chiyuv to keep 72. Lshitaso how come the chazon ish Rav shlomo zalman and Rav Elyashiv And Rav Moshe etc. all held that you do not need to in chutz laaretz. So if you are coming from what the gedolim do than his list is against that idea. so why is techeiles less)
And if you are coming halachikaly why is techeiles less than the above on the list?
vochindik- I am glad to see the Copy/paste on your computer is working fine.
But how come when this guy whos is so into the Satmar rebbe’s understanding of the Arizal he fails to point out that in Divrei Yoel 44,3 the Rebbe says that according to the arizal it could come back before the binyan habayis?
It should be noted that if a navi were to tell you that a mitzva is not nogea bizman hazeh it is assur to listen to him, kal vchomer the arizal (if chas vshalom that is what he meant) Reb Yaakov Hillel explains the derech of the Arizal in Vayeshev hayam siman 20
???”? ???? ??? ????”? ??? ????”? (??’ ?) ??? ??? ??? ?????”? ???? ???? ?????? ?”? ???? “??? ?? ???? ????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ????? ?????”
As for the case being presented to Rav Elyashiv zt”l in that teshuvah he writes “???? ?? ????? ?? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ????? ?????? ?? ?? ???? ?? ????? ??”?” which means that the fullcase was not presented before him.
As you can see from his teshuva the only thing asked “????? ?????? ??????? ???? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ????” Rav Elyashiv responded that being that this is the 3rd proposal ???? we don’t have to believe the ??????. (which is really not the case)
It’s important to point out Rav Elyashiv was addressing Rav Feivel Cohen’s question about ?????? ???????, not the specific proofs for the murex trunculus (Rav Feivel Cohen said that at the time he didn’t even know the arguments and it certainly not part of his question).
As for his list of chumras I was literally laughing out loud as I read them.
Feif un, Firstly, I do not like being called Joseph. He is not me and I am not him.
The Chazon Ish is in ois 4 DH umnum http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14334&st=&pgnum=118
zdad- I never knew Chalav Aku”m is one of the Mitzvos hateluos Baaretz.
However, there is a reason why i wrote not to respond unless you saw it . I was shocked to see that he says almost exactly like Rav Moshe. ???? ??
How come when it comes to Chalav Aku”m nobody remembers the Chazon Ish YD 41,4 ? (don’t respond unless you see it)
How come when it comes to Chalav Aku”m nobody remembers the Chazon Ish YD 41,4 ? (don’t respond unless you see it)
sam2- after looking it up again The machatzis hashekel DOES sound like you but the Pri megadim not. And see also the Pri megadim pesicha koleles (back of chelek 1 page ???? in the bahir) chelek 4 ois 13 (kdai to see inside)
“???? is more of a normal word to describe green.”
That still does not prove that it necessarily means green and does not mean blue.
That is exactly what Rav herzog said. see ?’ ???”? ?????? ?”? ??’ ?? and rav Tuccashinsky accepted that. IT does sound like that it was hard for Rav Hezog to get his hands on.
”According to this logic every sea creature is ???? ???.”
No. Not every creature picks up the growth around it. It depends on other factors ????? ????? ( ??’ 295) ????
???? ?? ????? “? ????????? ,” ?? ???? ??????? ???? ???? ??? . (???? ??? ??? ???? ???”? ?? ?????? ????? ??? ???, ?? ?????
???????? ??? ???? ???). ??”? ?? ?? ??? ????, ?????? ???? ????????
?????.
sbepth- if you are still around.
Regarding my raya from the case of rosh hashana to which you wrote “This as I understand it has nothing to with Reb Chaim. If i have ??? if there is a Esrog in a certain place I need to go find out since I might fulfill my mitzvah 100 percent.”
It could be I am a little late but I saw the magen avraham in ???? says that even if the safek shofar is in a place that they only know seder echad (ie they don’t know how to do a teruah) we still say safek deoraysa lchumra. In this case you do not know if you were vadai yotzei. I know it is not as strong as I originally wrote because it is only from a magen avraham and not a gemara. And yes patur, I know that your chiluk still applies here.
what makes you a zionist?
For a full huge overdone maaracha on the color and the shitah of rashi and why rashi does not write ???? see Kuntreis Chosem Shel zahav ‘??? ??. He also brings over 15 rishonim who hold clearly it is blue (many of them who always will quote shitas rashi if they argue yet none of them do). the kuntreis can easily be found with a quick search.
it is not Avida ltaama?
patur- yes yam is obviously being used for green as in yam domeh lasavim. So why does the braisa say domeh lyam? maybe for the aggadita like rashi says ???? ???. ????? ?? ???? ??????: However, the rambam and meseches tzitzis are gores ???? ?????? ????? ??? ???? ??? ???? ????? ????? ??????. ??? ??? ???? ?????
Keep in mind that Lshitascha that the color of the shell is blue than what do you do with the
???? ????? (??????) ?’ ?
“??? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ??????? ??????? ?????..”
And being that we have a mesora techeiles is blue ( you need mareh mekomos for that? I think CHosem shel zahav has 5 pages with hundreds of mareh mekomos )
So how can the shell be blue and green?
Well we can simply say that when covered in fowl then they assume the color around them. Therefore you have some blue and some green.
And stam in the inyan of domeh it is useful to know
??’ ???”? ??? ??? ???? “???? ?? ??? ????? ???? “????” ??? ??? ?? ??? ??? ?? ??
and after this he gives domeh lyam as an example
“The Rambam also has ” vedamo shachor” (citation eludes me), though in treifos, Rashi and Tos make “ukma” “k’kuchla” to differentiate form kediuta (ink black).”
Ok. Pliny the elder when describing the Murex Trunculus writes ” ….when it has exactly the colour of clotted blood, and is of a blackish hue to the sight”
If this is not enough for you than there is pictures in back of a kuntress called ???? ?? ??? which is available by a quick search.
“As posted by Y.T. in the old techeles thread, techeles is referenced (citation in old thread) as nignaz. So the great palette (npi) of sources on techeles is not a “how to find it” manual.”
Who says Nignaz means you cannot find it? Rashi psachim 62b (and the eitz yosef on the Medrash of nignaz quotes rashi) that nignaz means forgotten. BUt the rosh and rif bring down the halachos of techeiles. And the MAharil and chemdas shlomo and Malbim clearly write how it can be found bizman hazeh…..I think we were already maarich on this topic in another thread see : http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/techeiles-1
“No one, other than the replacement experts at the Temple Institute, has gone looking for the Aron, the hatzosros, the ketores, or the nechash hanechoshet”
Well is there a mitzvah to wear an aron on your tzitzis?
Patur- about needing strong rayos I think the ksav yad of the Rambam is the best raya you can get.
Yarok= ??’ ????’ ???? ??: ?”? ????? ?????, ??’ ????? ???? ?? ??? ????, ??”? ???”? (??”? ??? ?), ??? ??’ ?????? ???? (?? ????”? ??”?, ??”? ?????; ???’ ??? ????? ??’ ? ??? ? ????? ????? ?? ????? ??? “??? ???? ???? ????? ??? ????? ????? [????] ??? ?????”, ???”? ?”? ??, ???? ??”? ????? ??? (?? ??”? ??) “??? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ???
Patur-
Generally when someone changes a girsa it means that there was a mistake and people had the wrong girsa. It does not matter who they are as it is not a chisaron in them. Unless it is just a ???? ??, but when you are coming from kisvei yad that are neeman (such as this case) then it means we change the girsa. Besides the Adnei yad hachazaka on hebrewbooks and others there also change the girsa.